Recommended Posts

If you can avoid getting viruses in the first place, you have every right to apply the patch.

585569237[/snapback]

Some guy, a human very probably, programmed the OS and applications you are using. In our lifetimes, I guess that will always continue to be true. Let's multiply that guy by a couple hundred to create an OS.

Being humans, we make errors. Even if there's 12 levels of quality check after the actual guy's work, some of which are done by humans too, errors can still find their way into the finished product.

I don't think anyone will actually argue with me that OS and other applications have bugs, shortcomings, failures, etc.

Since I'm sure you'll agree to that, I really don't see how you can say 'if you can avoid getting viruses'... There is no such thing. You'll never be able to be 100% sure your computer will always be virus-free. Even with the best security anyone can devise, there will always be a way around it.

That being the reality of today (and of probably the couple of decades to come), why help the potential virus you'd get ? Why not just wait at the red light like everyone else ?

Exactly.

A better metaphore would be a "security guard" for your house that doesn't do anything while your house is being robbed and ransacked but is paid to just keep stepping in the way of the the crooks as they move onto other homes, making them take longer to get their but not apprehending thim. To make things worse the guard does this for everyone leaving your house, all the time.

Now who would think this is "good" security or even security at all?

585569705[/snapback]

Can any security guard stop all robbers from going in my house ?

If not, I'll get the best I can get.

That's what we could call an AV... Or anything that would achieve the same goal. Get the best you can. That's not the point. The point is, there is no available security guard that can gives me 100% results (= no robbers in my house).

If the security guard company gives me a free security guard (to use in complement of my security guard against robbers) whose only job will be to shoot at robbers who would come *out* of my house, I really don't see why I wouldn't agree...

Why remove a security measure that helps your neighbours and cost you very little (or nothing) ?

Exactly.

A better metaphore would be a "security guard" for your house that doesn't do anything while your house is being robbed and ransacked but is paid to just keep stepping in the way of the the crooks as they move onto other homes, making them take longer to get their but not apprehending thim. To make things worse the guard does this for everyone leaving your house, all the time.

Now who would think this is "good" security or even security at all?

585569705[/snapback]

That would be a worse metaphore, it only describes a firewall that doesn't work correctly.

The TCP/IP security has got not much to do with virusses. It's there to make sure a computer isn't swept away by a wave of data (DDOS).

It's more like a "guard" that is stopping 200 crooks from entering a house through 1 door at the same time. If you want to stop the crooks you need another type of guard, being a firewall. If you want to get rid of sick crooks (worm virusses) you need antivirus software.

The guard in question doesn't guard your own house, it guards everyone elses house by making sure you're not the one that is trying to flood someone elses home.

So it guards everyone elses home at your doorstep.

It's a bit hard to explain it correctly.

Edited by dyn
Some guy, a human very probably, programmed the OS and applications you are using. In our lifetimes, I guess that will always continue to be true. Let's multiply that guy by a couple hundred to create an OS.

Being humans, we make errors. Even if there's 12 levels of quality check after the actual guy's work, some of which are done by humans too, errors can still find their way into the finished product.

I don't think anyone will actually argue with me that OS and other applications have bugs, shortcomings, failures, etc.

Since I'm sure you'll agree to that, I really don't see how you can say 'if you can avoid getting viruses'... There is no such thing. You'll never be able to be 100% sure your computer will always be virus-free. Even with the best security anyone can devise, there will always be a way around it.

That being the reality of today (and of probably the couple of decades to come), why help the potential virus you'd get ? Why not just wait at the red light like everyone else ?

585570132[/snapback]

OK, name me a viruses that exploited a security vulnerability that was not patched when the virus started spreading...

Of course I can't be 100% sure that I'll never get a virus, but then again I can't be 100% sure that I'll never hit someone with my car, even when following all traffic laws. Are you suggesting I should just never drive?

speed is a lot more important to me, common if i get attacked by a virus because of this patch or i get hacked, wtv, i can simply use a backup and get everything back, but the fact that I can download x times faster, will make all the difference for me, it's not like I have credit card numbers on my computer so I don't really care if a hacker hacks this computer, what are the chances one would want to? I'm not using a firewall for that exact reason, speed is much more important, and I've actually seen the speed difference, those that are using their computer knowledge to prove that it doesn't work are probably not considering an important factor, i can't tell you what it is, i'm no expert, but if the speeds are faster, the speeds are faster.

speed is a lot more important to me, common if i get attacked by a virus because of this patch or i get hacked, wtv, i can simply use a backup and get everything back, but the fact that I can download x times faster, will make all the difference for me, it's not like I have credit card numbers on my computer so I don't really care if a hacker hacks this computer, what are the chances one would want to? I'm not using a firewall for that exact reason, speed is much more important, and I've actually seen the speed difference, those that are using their computer knowledge to prove that it doesn't work are probably not considering an important factor, i can't tell you what it is, i'm no expert, but if the speeds are faster, the speeds are faster.

585577415[/snapback]

That's why I get 3 megs / sec through a software and a hardware firewall :rolleyes:

Are you suggesting I should just never drive?

585573459[/snapback]

Nope, I am suggesting you should have car insurance.

This patch works for me, it sped up my downloads big time and I always got that error prior to the patch.  I always saw it in the Event Viewer in Admin Tools ;)

585585329[/snapback]

Did you ever look to see what was causing your error? What exactly were you downloading?

Here's how I see this whole shabang.

It's your system. You are the user. You should be aware of the consequences that you might be facing. If you get a virus or something malicious, then you deserve it no matter how you got it. You're responsible for your machine all the time so don't run around crying when your system is lagging cause of excess # of foreign established connections or worms spreading throughout your network.

You cannot not to be a computer savvy and still be safe from the online threats by relying on what others will do to you or your software.

Frankly I find these "solutions" ridiculious. You might think it has good intentions to limit connections but this should be something the user can tweak by himself. User could be a "geek" who knows what he/she's doing or a noob. Why should everyone be faced to use the same solution when clearly the amount of security and awareness varies from one to another? Well I guess that goes to show you what the average windows user is? Or am I wrong?

For example my ISP NewsGroups Admin is a dumb the guy configure a upload limit for a file at 5k and i have a 200k and he don?t put a limit to the connection the same user can do (or maybe the ISA Server on my WS2003 somehow transfrom the packet ACK "give me this to someone"), so to use all my band i have to make around 40 simultaneous connections, this also aply to the Download Maneger in some http and ftp servers, and no need to talk about the Scanners and some Games, and if you disable the Windows Firewall most programs just crash or don?t work at all____Patch the .sys file

Now to se the Connections just use the Old Friend DOS Prompt

netstat /? <--- Info about the Command

netstat /aobn <--- This should do the Job

Note:

My home system uptime is 1day and some hours and already make 9560 connections and have 421 erros and now i have 60 active connections,

Tip:

You can see this info on a MMC console with a ActiveX - System Monitor

Edited by alex3299

There sure are a lot of opinions about this patch. I use it.

The main thing I want is speed and I am aware of 'perceived' speed vs 'real' speed.

I mainly use Limewire and my real speed over time was about 28K on a 3M connection. P*** Poor. I also used Bittorrent which was even worse in REAL speed. At times Bittorrent wouldn't even work. I applied this patch and tried several settings and now my Limewire consistantly d/l's @220K+ with the u/l usually above 60K. Before I tried this patch I never once saw my combined up/down break 70K. I have been using it for 3 months now with NO problems.

I understand everyone is allowed an opinion which is why I may have mine. I also realize that not everyone will experience the same results so I won't call any one stupid. All I can say is on my machine the patch works. And the results are real (graphed out, sorry I didn't save them or I would have posted them), not perceived. Reading a lot of the posts apparantly this shouldn't be, but it is and I'm happy with it.

When I can get what I'm looking for through 'legit' channels like my 64 bit XP directly from M$ I do so. But to get my copies of Longhorn I had to use other means. And the same goes for my copies of linux which are legit but their downloads were totally enhanced with this 'patch' or maybe it's an 'unpatch'. Don't really care as it works and as long as I am vigilant and pro-active on the virus-trojan-worm front this really shouldn't be anyone elses concern.

No disrespect is intended. Opinions may be like ***holes, everyone has one, but having one doesn't make anyone an ***hole. OK.

There is no Microsoft "Fix" for this since Microsoft is the one who changed the way Windows XP handles UNANSWERED (this is the key work) connections. This is not a bug in the Windows XP OS. What program are you running when you get the error? Do you notice a speed difference in any of your programs?

First thing I would do is scan for Spyware and Viruses.

Download Spybot S&D, Adaware and Microsoft Anti-Spyware and update the patterns on all of these programs and run a full scan. A lot of people say "I already have them installed, and they don't find anything", well if this is the case make sure your pattern files are up to date AND you have the most recent version of both of these programs.

Also go to http://housecall.antivirus.com and run a scan EVEN IF you have a virus scan program installed.

I don't know what programme is causing the error. How do you find out?

I have scanned for a virus with different scanners a few times.

It just happens while I am surfing the net. I don't have much installed. AVG antivirus, windows firewall, and MSN Messenger, mailwasher and that is about it that is open.

Have you ran a scan for spyware? Eventhough you have ran a scan with a few different virus scanning utilities I would still run a scan with Trend's free scanner @ http://housecall.antivirus.com.

What programs are you using when you get the error?

I just this minute edited my post with the programmes that are open lol.

It just happens while I am surfing the net. I don't have much installed. AVG antivirus, windows firewall, and MSN Messenger, mailwasher and that is about it that is open.

I have used housecall and it found nothing.

I just this minute edited my post with the programmes that are open lol.

It just happens while I am surfing the net. I don't have much installed. AVG antivirus, windows firewall, and MSN Messenger, mailwasher and that is about it that is open.

I have used housecall and it found nothing.

585648282[/snapback]

I don't see anything here that would cause the error. If you ran the scans like you claim and have no viruses, and this is all you have installed then I am baffled to what is causing your error.

Edited by bangbang023
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
    • Given the hefty price tag this thing will likely have I doubt many everyday home users will be in the market for one especially given the current climate.
    • ESET 19.1.14 by Razvan Serea NOD32 for Windows is the best choice for protection of your personal computer. Almost 20 years of technological development enabled ESET to create state-of-the-art antivirus system able to protect you from all sorts of Internet threats. ESET Internet Security boasts a large array of security features, usability enhancements and scanning technology improvements in defense of your your online life. ESET Internet Security ESET Internet Security keeps your computer or laptop safe with intelligent multi-layered protection combining proven antivirus, antispyware, firewall, anti-rootkit and antispam capabilities. Based on ESET NOD32 Antivirus, it protects you from viruses, worms, spyware, and all Internet threats. It conserves resources and improves computer speed. You are protected at the highest level while you work, social network, play online games or plug in removable media. ESET NOD32 Antivirus Your best defense against viruses, trojans and other forms of malware—and the top choice for IT professionals. Powered by the ThreatSense® engine with advanced heuristics, which blocks far more unknown threats than the competition. The latest generation of the legendary ESET NOD32 Antivirus takes your security to a whole new level. Built for a low footprint, fast scanning, it packs security features and customization options for consistent and personalized security online or off. ESET Smart Security Ultimate protection for everyday web users, thanks to ESET’s trademark best balance of detection, speed and usability. Stay safe from viruses and spyware. Stay protected from ransomware - Blocks malware that tries to lock you out of your own data. Receive free support by email or telephone in your local language, wherever you are. Bank and shop online more safely - automatically secures transactions on internet banking sites, and helps to protect you on online payment gateways. Stop hackers from accessing your PC - Personal Firewall prevents hackers from gaining access to your computer and keeps you invisible when you use public Wi-Fi. Keep your kids safe online - block unwanted internet content by categories or individual websites and keep your kids safe online with Parental Control. Safer webcam and home router - Get an alert when anyone tries to access your webcam, and check your home router for vulnerabilities. Safely store passwords, and encrypt your data. Safely store, generate and prefill your passwords, and encrypt your files and removable media (USB keys). Includes protection for smartphones and tablets. Protect all of your devices - mix and match security protection for up to 3 or 5 devices. ESET Security Ultimate ESET Security Ultimate offers all-in-one protection with antivirus, anti-malware, and anti-phishing features. It includes a personal firewall, secure online banking, and a password manager for enhanced security. Parental controls and data encryption keep family and sensitive information safe. It also provides regular updates to ensure you're always protected against the latest threats. It's user-friendly and ensures comprehensive digital security, perfect for those seeking reliable protection without complexity. ESET 19.1.14.0 changelog: Fixed: GUI crahes Fixed: IPM issues Download: ESET NOD32 Antivirus 64-bit | NOD32 Antivirus 32-bit | ARM 64 | ~ 80.0 MB (Free Trial) Download: ESET Internet Security 64-bit | ESET Internet Security 32-bit Download: Eset Smart Security Premium 64-bit | Eset Smart Security Premium 32-bit Download: ESET Security Ultimate 64-bit | ESET Security Ultimate 32-bit ARM64: Antivirus | Internet Security | Smart Security | ESET Security Ultimate Link: ESET Home Page Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      494
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      229
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      65
    4. 4
      Nick H.
      56
    5. 5
      monterxz
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!