• 0

MSN Messenger 7 at high Memory Usage?


Question

Goodafternoon everyone,

I have got MSN Messenger 7 BETA version 0425 inwhich i have used the Unniversal Messenger 7 Patch to remove all ads and buttons and things that i dont need, and Speedy MSN 2 beta 3 to make it more compact and less images to load and yet still my msn messenger 7 BETA is 23mb's in Memory Usage on idle (no messenger windows or chats). Is this normal? What is everyone elses memory usage for MSN 7?

There is also another query when i am using a webcam, it increases my CPU to about 50% usage.. even up to 90% when i have two Webcam users. Is this normal too? I have an Athlon XP 1600+ (1.4Ghz)

I am using Windows XP Professional with 1GB SD RAM and ATI Radeon 9600 Pro

Can anyone help me out and let me know if this is normal for Messenger or is it some kind of issue with my pc that i need to resolve? I would be very greatful for all your help and time :).

Please dont advise me to use any 3rd Party Software

Alex :cool:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/273565-msn-messenger-7-at-high-memory-usage/
Share on other sites

17 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

i go up to like 20meg and maybe 15 -25 % cpu when I have my webcam active and view my girlfriend's cam at the same time...

but these ad remover add-ins you speak of sound interesting ... :)

try uninstalling and reinstalling.

if no joy, relax, ITS BETA :)

  • 0

What's your current memory usage on your 1 gigabyte system? :huh: I bet it's not that full, so what's the big deal about 20 some megs? MSN Messenger obviously has some use for that memory, even though you may not know what it is.

  • 0
Maybe the patches that removes ads and tabs are adding a memory leak.

585321776[/snapback]

Hex-editing a file is stupid, because you really have no idea what you're changing. You could be changing an instruction code that tells the CPU to corrupt your partition table, or you could have the app call some function on invalid data, resulting in a blue screen, or you could indeed modify a class destructor so that objects are not completely destroyed, resulting in memory leaks. The fact is, hex-editing is not a good idea, and no number of advertisements or other annoyances would get me to do that. Switch software if you don't like it.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.