Recommended Posts

hi ...

I didn't see this patch & instead d/l this "AutoPatcher_XP_Jan2005_Full" , do I have to d/l this feb. patch ? :( is there no update available. btw I'm new to this site and this soft. and I really like it .. no need to go to the GREAT windows site again :D

^ OK, first, welcome! You seem to have posted this in the AutoPatcher 2003 thread - Your post however is about AutoPatcher XP, and has thus moved here :D

Not sure I understood correctly, but if you're looking for the Fubruary upgrade to AutoPatcher XP Jan2005, you will find it in the first post of this thread.

Hey Raptor/Flish - trying to reach you guys for a radio interview on the Computer America talk show (broadcast nationwide - www.computeramerica.com).

If you're interesed in doing a 60 minute LIVE interview to talk about AutoPatcher and AutoStreamer, please email me.

Thanks!

[email protected]

Carey934: I don't think I could make it (my timezone is well off!). I guess that leaves Jason, although it looks like he's in the wrong planet, rather than the wrong timezone :p

585585365[/snapback]

Well, you and I could use Skype to talk for free and I could record it for edit and playback later in the show... what do you think?

Well done! Many thanks to many people!!!!

Now, it's time to see if it is possible to make it complete in Dutch and keep it up-to-date!

I made some modules available in Dutch, wanted to add them and it turned in to RED :angry: that's not what I hope for.

Got a clue why?

Let me know!

Because they are unofficial! Their functionality isn't affected though.

585619030[/snapback]

The files downloaded are original. So, every change it will be red?

Will anybody use it then?? :rolleyes:

I tried the Dutch Version that has bin made, id doesn't work like it should be :( that's why I thought to waiste my time to make one that will work. :cool:

1. The Dutch version was done by me, with no real testing. Would you be interested in helping?

2. When an official module is edited, or one of its files is altered, it becomes unofficial. The same goes for new modules. Modules not tested and approved by the AutoPatcher team will be listed as unofficial. This is a security measure we had to take to ensure end-users don't install malware and then blame us for it.

3. Right now three people can make official modules; me, Flishfun and TheBlazingAngel.

/Raptor

1. The Dutch version was done by me, with no real testing. Would you be interested in helping?

2. When an official module is edited, or one of its files is altered, it becomes unofficial. The same goes for new modules. Modules not tested and approved by the AutoPatcher team will be listed as unofficial. This is a security measure we had to take to ensure end-users don't install malware and then blame us for it.

3. Right now three people can make official modules; me, Flishfun and TheBlazingAngel.

/Raptor

585619141[/snapback]

Ooohhhh yeahhh, I am interested in helping! :)

Thanks for the explanation about editing official modules. I have to tell you that it's possible to use some "tricks". Besides that, it would be a pleasure to help!

There was a security issue reported, which affected all releases prior to AutoPatcher 2003 (yes, AutoPatcher XP Dutch too). Maybe you have found something new? In either case, I'd be glad to check out your 'tricks' over MSN or the like.

/Raptor

There was a security issue reported, which affected all releases prior to AutoPatcher 2003 (yes, AutoPatcher XP Dutch too). Maybe you have found something new? In either case, I'd be glad to check out your 'tricks' over MSN or the like.

/Raptor

585619329[/snapback]

The Dutch version will not run on Windows XP with SP2 installed. The error is...shown here....this error is based on the latest release 2005 of AutoPatch

The Englisch version has no problems!! I didn't discover any.....yet... :D

post-101056-1110900459_thumb.jpg

Will contact you later, can it be by email????????

Or you can contact me!

Edited by DaFlapDrol
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!