• 0

Bluetooth Programming [C]


Question

#include <stdlib.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <Winsock2.h>
#include <Ws2bth.h>
#include <BluetoothAPIs.h>
#include <windows.h>

void ErrorExit(LPTSTR lpszFunction);

int main(void)
{
	BLUETOOTH_FIND_RADIO_PARAMS FirstRadio;
	HANDLE RadioHandle;
	HANDLE NextRadio;
	BOOL FoundNextRadioHandle;
	BLUETOOTH_RADIO_INFO RadioDeviceInfo;
	DWORD dw;

	BluetoothFindFirstRadio((BLUETOOTH_FIND_RADIO_PARAMS*)&FirstRadio,(HANDLE*)&RadioHandle);
	if(RadioHandle == NULL)
	{
  printf("Problems Creating Radio Handle");
	}

	FoundNextRadioHandle = BluetoothFindNextRadio((HANDLE*)&RadioHandle,(HANDLE*)&NextRadio);

	if(FoundNextRadioHandle == TRUE)
	{
  printf("Found Another Bluetooth Radio");
	}
	else
	{
  printf("Only One Bluetooth Radio Handle Present\n");
  
	}
  
	BluetoothGetRadioInfo(RadioHandle,(BLUETOOTH_RADIO_INFO*)&RadioDeviceInfo);
	dw = GetLastError();
	ErrorExit((LPTSTR)&dw);

	HBLUETOOTH_DEVICE_FIND DeviceHandle;
	BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_INFO DeviceInfo;
	BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_SEARCH_PARAMS SearchParams;

	BOOL FoundDevice; /*Return Value of FindNextDevice*/
	BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_INFO FoundDeviceInfo; /*Structure Containing Info of next Device*/

	SearchParams.dwSize = sizeof(BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_SEARCH_PARAMS);
	SearchParams.fReturnAuthenticated = TRUE;
	SearchParams.fReturnRemembered = TRUE;
	SearchParams.fReturnUnknown = TRUE;
	SearchParams.fReturnConnected = TRUE;
	SearchParams.fIssueInquiry = TRUE;
	SearchParams.cTimeoutMultiplier = 10;
	SearchParams.hRadio = RadioHandle;

	BluetoothFindFirstDevice((BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_SEARCH_PARAMS*)&SearchParams,(BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_INFO*)&DeviceInfo);
	dw = GetLastError();
	ErrorExit((LPTSTR)&dw);

	FoundDevice = BluetoothFindNextDevice((HBLUETOOTH_DEVICE_FIND*)&DeviceHandle,(BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_INFO*) &FoundDeviceInfo);
	dw = GetLastError();
	ErrorExit((LPTSTR)&dw);

	return 0;
}

void ErrorExit(LPTSTR lpszFunction) 
{ 
    TCHAR szBuf[80]; 
    LPVOID lpMsgBuf;
    DWORD dw = GetLastError(); 

    FormatMessage(
        FORMAT_MESSAGE_ALLOCATE_BUFFER | 
        FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM,
        NULL,
        dw,
        MAKELANGID(LANG_NEUTRAL, SUBLANG_DEFAULT),
        (LPTSTR) &lpMsgBuf,
        0, NULL );

    wsprintf(szBuf, 
        "%s failed with error %d: %s", 
        lpszFunction, dw, lpMsgBuf); 

    MessageBox(NULL, szBuf, "Error", MB_OK); 

    LocalFree(lpMsgBuf);
    ExitProcess(dw); 
}

Hi, Please could someone tell me why this program isnt working. It keeps comming up with the error :

  Quote
Error 126 : The specified module could not be found.

It needs the platform SDK installed for the bluetooth headers and such. It also doesnt find the local bluetooth dongle or my phone which is what it is intended to do.

Thanks in Advance.

Sawyer12 :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/275426-bluetooth-programming-c/
Share on other sites

13 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

If a function succeeds, it is not required to set the last error to 0. You have to check what success means for each function. For example, BluetoothFindFirstDevice is supposed to return a valid handle and fails on NULL - you should check this first. If you have a NULL handle, then call GetLastError.

  • 0
  Sawyer12 said:
Can anyone tell me the difference between the functions :

BluetoothFindFirstDevice and  BluetoothFindFirstRadio ?

Which should I call first, Im basically trying to get my program to find my bluetooth phone. Any ideas?

585348297[/snapback]

I tried the code on 2 dev machines:

Machine 1: Mitsumi Bluetooth Adapter - Got an Error 126

Machine 2: Microsoft Bluetooth Keyboard/Mouse Adapter - Worked no problem

I guess it could be a driver issue.

BluetoothFindfirstDevice, this would find a device like phone, pda, keyboard etc.

BluetoothFindFirstRadio, this would find the actual bluetooth adapter.

  • 0

If you only have the 1 bluetooth adapter installed then you can have the line

 SearchParams.hRadio = NULL;

Then you can delete all the code that deals with BluetoothFindFirstRadio().

But like I said, 1 adapter worked for me, the other didn't... If you are still getting the same error it might be the adapter/api conflict.

  • 0

Here is the code that worked for me

#include "bthdef.h"
#include "BluetoothAPIs.h"
#pragma comment(lib, "irprops.lib")

	BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_SEARCH_PARAMS bdsp;
	BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_INFO bdi;
	HBLUETOOTH_DEVICE_FIND hbf;

	ZeroMemory(&bdsp, sizeof(BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_SEARCH_PARAMS));

	bdsp.dwSize = sizeof(BLUETOOTH_DEVICE_SEARCH_PARAMS);
	bdsp.fReturnAuthenticated = TRUE;
	bdsp.fReturnRemembered = TRUE;
	bdsp.fReturnUnknown = TRUE;
	bdsp.fReturnConnected = TRUE;
	bdsp.fIssueInquiry = TRUE;
	bdsp.cTimeoutMultiplier = 10;
	bdsp.hRadio = NULL;

	bdi.dwSize = sizeof(bdi);

	hbf = BluetoothFindFirstDevice(&bdsp, &bdi);
	DWORD dwErr = GetLastError();

	if (hbf != NULL)
	{
  TCHAR szDevName[MAX_PATH];

  while(1)
  {
  	memset(szDevName, 0x00, sizeof(szDevName));
  	sprintf(szDevName, _T("Name:%S"), bdi.szName);
  	MessageBox(szDevName, _T("Bluetooth Info"));

  	if (BluetoothFindNextDevice(hbf, &bdi) == FALSE)
    break;
  }

  BluetoothFindDeviceClose(hbf);
	}
	else
	{
  //No Devices Found...
	}

  • 0

I think that the Microsoft Bluetoothxxx() API functions are only to enumerate, bond, select & get info of bluetooth devices in the area. You may have to use the Winsock functions to actually communicate to the bluetooth device.

I only do WindowsCE programming, and the MS Bluetooth API functions are very different, eg. once you have bonded/selected a device it usually appears as a COM Port, then it is a simple matter of opening/closing/read/write to that port. On WIn32, I don't know.

Some devices like PDA's use OBEX to transfer files, maybe that could be used, maybe not !!!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • This site is just old men ranting at clouds. Neowin knows its audience.
    • That's nice and all. but I generally just stick with Lutris paired with 'ge-proton' (which gets updated fairly often (June 1st was last update) as the 'ge-proton' entry in Lutris uses stuff here... https://github.com/GloriousEggroll/proton-ge-custom/releases ) and the like to play my games. p.s. if a person wants to stick with a specific version from that link you can download a specific version and extract it to "~/.local/share/lutris/runners/proton/". then select it in Lutris options on game shortcut is the basic idea. because by default the standard 'ge-proton' entry will automatically get updated which can occasionally cause issues even though it's usually fine. but manually setting it on a specific version will prevent the standard updates on 'ge-proton' from messing with it on a particular game you may have issues with if that gets updated etc. one good example of the 'ge-proton' updates messing with a game in particular is the offline version of RDR2 1491.50 as I setup a specific version there and after removing the 'vulkan-1 (native)' entry in 'Wine configuration' on 'RDR2.exe' entry (if you don't remove this the game won't start up) is when the 'ge-proton' updates, it will restore that 'vulkan-1 (native)' entry and prevent the game from working. you can always remove the entry on the RDR2.exe in Wine configuration specifically after updates, but doing that everytime that updates will get old quickly. hence, keeping it on a specific GE Proton version stops me from having to mess with it as then you just adjust it once and you are done with it. also, when using 'bat' files to start a game (like Hitman: WoA for example using Peacock etc) I had some issues with GE Proton after '9-27', so I got the game locked to '9-27' (April 1st) instead of the newer ones (10-1 etc).
    • Sam Altman says AI could soon help with discovering new knowledge by Hamid Ganji OpenAI is currently at the forefront of developing powerful AI models, while its ChatGPT product is rewriting our traditional way of looking for new information. The company's CEO, Sam Altman, now says AI could even help humans discover new knowledge. He also described AI agents as junior employees. Speaking at the Snowflake Summit 2025, Altman boasted that AI agents can act like junior employees, saying, "You hear people that talk about their job now is to assign work to a bunch of agents, look at the quality, figure out how it fits together, give feedback, and it sounds a lot like how they work with a team of still relatively junior employees." OpenAI CEO also added AI agents could help humans discover new knowledge in "limited cases" or "figure out solutions to business problems that are kind of very non-trivial." While the use of AI for scientific discovery is still viewed with skepticism, the technology has proven its capabilities for new discoveries in several cases. For example, the Microsoft Discovery platform, designed for accelerating scientific research and development by AI agents, was recently able to discover a new chemical for cooling data centers in just 200 hours, a process that normally takes years to research and complete by humans. AI firms are also shifting their focus toward developing AI agents capable of performing various tasks. OpenAI recently unveiled Codex, which contains AI agents for helping programmers write and debug code. According to Altman, OpenAI engineers are already using Codex. As AI agents become more intelligent, more employees should be concerned about losing their jobs. Companies have already started replacing some specific roles with AI. For example, Duolingo has replaced its contract workers with AI, while Shopify managers need to provide reasons why AI cannot handle a job before seeking approval for new hires. Via: Business Insider
    • I personally don't think there will be many survivors past the ESU date, but I can be wrong🙂 >Firefox still supports Windows 7 (until the end of August), which will be just over 16 years since release. Well, yes, but it's an ESR version, which kind of doesn't count as fresh for me. So the last mainline version of Firefox with W7 support was 115, which was released in 2023, exactly around the W7 ESU expiration.
    • Hey, sounds like it’s definitely time for an upgrade. The R7000 had an excellent run! If you want lots of wired ports and future-proofing, the Asus RT-BE88U is a killer choice. It’s got 2x 10GbE, 4x 2.5GbE, and handles WiFi 7 like a champ. Super fast, stable, and the ASUS firmware is solid with loads of features. The TP-Link BE900 is also great, sleek design, strong performance, and a combo 10G port (RJ45/SFP+), but it has fewer wired ports than the Asus. Netgear RS700S is powerful too, but the firmware isn’t as flexible and only has one 10G port. It might feel familiar from your R7000. If wired ports are a big deal, maybe adding a 2.5G or 10G switch later gives you more options. My vote is RT-BE88U all the way.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      nothin earned a badge
      First Post
    • Enthusiast
      Epaminombas went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Posting Machine
      Fiza Ali earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Year In
      WaynesWorld earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      chriskinney317 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      186
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      130
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      129
    4. 4
      Xenon
      119
    5. 5
      +FloatingFatMan
      97
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!