Recommended Posts

Even with the new evidence, they plan to keep looking, said Nicastro. That's because intergalactic baryons not only fill a gap in scientists' understanding of the universe, but they may also lead to a better understanding of "dark matter," a mysterious and unseen form of matter that has so far only been detected by the gravitational pull it exerts on other bodies in the universe.

They just found Baryons, the building blocks of life. Oxygen Ions + Carbon + Nitrogen etc... They have yet to find dark matter. But that's some pretty good info. (Y)

Wow, thats amazing.  So, what's dark matter?

585410657[/snapback]

Dark Matter

n : (cosmology) a hypothetical form of matter that is believed to make up 90 percent of the matter in the universe; it is invisible (does not absorb or emit light) and does not collide with atomic particles but exerts gravitational force

Dark Matter

n : (cosmology) a hypothetical form of matter that is believed to make up 90 percent of the matter in the universe; it is invisible (does not absorb or emit light) and does not collide with atomic particles but exerts gravitational force

585410682[/snapback]

90%?

why is it so hard to find?

"Whereas baryons account for 4 percent of the total matter and energy in the universe, dark matter is thought to make up 23 percent."

So yeah, they maybe found some dark matter, if that was actually part of the dark matter, but even then, there's undiscovered dark matter? :huh:

As for dark energy, I'd say it's a name given for a force we don't understand. It could be that there isn't any dark energy at all, but our theories are wrong. Same with dark matter btw. We haven't observed it for sure yet, we just assume dark matter is going to be there. With other theories, I guess you could find workaround without the necessity of dark matter to exist? It could be that we simply don't understand gravitational forces and therefore assume there must be tons of strange "dark matter" around us when it's in reality us who're wrong. :)

In layman's terms: Dark matter, which makes up a huge chunk of the universe (up to 90%), is the theoretical "filler" to make everything else we have discovered about the universe fit. We can measure gravitational effects, and we understand the gravitational effects of the matter that we CAN see but there's a whole lot of gravitational forces from something that we CAN'T see. The best example is the expansion of the universe. It was recently discovered that not only is the universe expanding, but it is accelerating. The amount of matter required to exert the necessary gravitational forces that would cause the universe to accelerate outward is about 10 times what we can see and detect. Thus, dark matter.

I've always wondered if anyone took into account simple light and emitted electromagnetic radiation.

You figure, everything in the universe has been 'glowing' since the beginning of time. I imagine a good amount of that energy is lost, 99.9% (completely made up figure) of it never hitting any matter (and recycling the energy).

Sorta like evaporation. If matter and energy are two states, and they can't find most of the matter, its probably because its become energy and escaped quantification.

:shrug:

Pretty cool, was a big subject when I did physics at Uni up till last year.

When it really starts messing with your head is when they tell you that for every positive there is a negative i.e. Anti-matter!

I won't try and elaborate, break out Google if you want to know more.

Dougal.

then how they know it is there

585415535[/snapback]

its like OXYGEN... its INVISIABLE! but we KNOW it is there... but there is a evidence of what oxytgen is made up of... now, say "dark matter" is oxygen for the universe... thats what they have NOW just discovered!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers like me was eager to get. And that main feature that developers will love it`s the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
    • Wow, Microsoft IS cooking lately... This only shows that they COULD improve, they just chose not to for whatever reasons. That obsession with AI was destroying them from the inside out.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      511
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      80
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!