Recommended Posts

Source

Opera and Firefox users are quite vocal on the subject, but none of them can actually show any research to back up their statements, ususally just saying "X takes way longer than Y to start" or "my friend uses X and it is much slower on his computer than Y is on mine". Those that did try more than one usually say "X just felt faster than Y when I tried them" (although this may refer to familiarity with the individual user interface - something that I do not cover here). I have even heard people comparing Firefox and Opera, then realised they were referring to Opera 6 (even though historically, Opera 6 is about equivalent to Netscape 4), something that was replaced with a completely new engine long before Firefox even existed.

Well, I've had enough of these unfounded arguments. I present my research. This is an honest, unbiased view (or as unbiased as I can be). Unlike most people, I not only test all the browsers, I test them all on the same computer as each other - grouped into Linux, Mac and Windows (using the same or equivalent hardware for each). This, I hope, gives an accurate comparison, not only of the browsers compared with each other, but for those that work on multiple platforms, it also gives a fairly accurate comparison of the different optimisations for each platform.

So overall, Opera seems to be the fastest browser for windows. Firefox is not faster than Internet Explorer, except for scripting, but for standards support, security and features, it is a better choice. However, it is still not as fast as Opera, and Opera also offers a high level of standards support, security and features.

On Linux, Konqueror is the fastest for starting and viewing basic pages on KDE, but as soon as script or images are involved, or you want to use the back or forward buttons, or if you use Gnome, Opera is a faster choice, even though on KDE it will take a few seconds longer to start. Mozilla and Firefox give an overall good performance, but their script, cache handling and image-based page speed still cannot compare with Opera.

On Mac OS X, Opera and Safari are both very fast, with Safari 2 being faster at starting and rendering CSS, but with Opera still being distinguishably faster for rendering tables, scripting and history (especially compared with the much slower Safari 1.2). Camino is fast to start, but then it joins its sisters Mozilla and Firefox further down the list. Neither Mozilla, Firefox nor IE perform very well on Mac, being generally slower than on other operating systems.

On Mac OS 9, no single browser stands out as the fastest. In fact, my condolences to anyone who has to use one of them, they all perform badly.

View the article for the graphs and results. I like this article, it is ubiased and it's tests are widespread.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/283635-browser-speed-comparisons/
Share on other sites

I thought it was a pretty good test.....

for each platform, I use just one computer to ensure that the tests compare just the browsers, and not the hardware or software they run on

Anyone else see a problem with this?

The numbers were interesting though.

I liked the part where the moox optimized build actually scored lower than the normal firefox build.

:angry: On his own experience(s), I guess, which hardly matter to others.

585450682[/snapback]

Maybe you didnt read his post

hmmm quote " no way i have tried opera,maxthon,firefox and I.E " unquote

he hasnt tried A,B,C,D, but thinks E (firefox) is faster just because. doesnt make any sense.

i know about 23 million would say thats bunk you can take any test you want and just because you say you took a unbiased test dont mean nothing out em in a lab control enviorment with all the machines exact same and the testers being normal everyday users. then I might say ok, but in my view just uninstalling opera 8 today firefox is faster then any ive found and ive used everyine out there today.

opera has came out top on all tests, just different versions of it lol,

opera 8 has come out top on 4 out of the 7 tests and lets not forget its still in beta, so these times can only be improved and may take the top seed of the other 3...

I use opera at the moment though but may go back to opera when 8 final is out, i just have a few extensions in firefox such as foxytunes which are soo handy for my use

Maybe you didnt read his post

hmmm quote " no way i have tried opera,maxthon,firefox and I.E " unquote

he hasnt tried A,B,C,D, but thinks E (firefox) is faster just because. doesnt make any sense.

585450692[/snapback]

It doesn't make sense because you didn't read what he wrote. Translated into proper English it reads: "Those tests are wrong, by golly! I have tried Opera, Maxthon, Firefox and Internet Explorer and Firefox was the fastest!"

And to these tests...

Interesting. Hrm. *ponder

It doesn't make sense because you didn't read what he wrote. Translated into proper English it reads: "Those tests are wrong, by golly! I have tried Opera, Maxthon, Firefox and Internet Explorer and Firefox was the fastest!"

And to these tests...

Interesting. Hrm. *ponder

585451451[/snapback]

And now what Techno_Funky said makes even less sense.

Overall, Opera is faster, and there is little denying that. The 7.x series started to slow down, but with 7.5 and now 8.0, its taking its speed back.

But there are other factors that end up affecting the speed. Many people are victims to these factors that make one browser look bad, and then they end up thinking it's all the browsers fault, when sometimes it is not.

In terms of raw speed, Opera's latest version vs. Firefox's latest version is generally faster. You can say "firefox feels faster" all you want, and maybe it does for you, but that doesn't change anything really.

Also, when people talk about Opera being the fastest browser on earth, it's more than just the rendering engine. It's the whole internet experience and the power Opera gives you to browse faster and more efficiently.

I remember reading an article about this in the past, but there are so many browsers and stuff that i can't remember it all.

Basically the article was about the different ways that browsers render pages. It was written by one of the guys who worked on Safari, and it talked about how a browser can appear to load a page faster, even though it isn't, by doing something like loading the text before the images, or something like that.

I remember that Firetruck does its loading differently from Safari, but i don't remember how they compare to Opera. But either way, maybe that difference is the reason that some people think Firefox is faster than Opera even though it technically isn't? :shrug:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • MusicBee 3.6.9668 by Razvan Serea MusicBee is an application geared toward managing extensive music collections, easy to use and with a comprehensive feature set. It makes it easy to organize, find, and play music files on your computer, on portable devices, and on the Web. It provides playback of a wide range of audio formats, smart playlists with the ability to discover and play new music from the web, advanced tag editing with automated artwork and tag look up, folder monitoring, automated file re-organization, portable device synchronization, and secure CD ripping with AccurateRip verification. MusicBee features: Supported formats: MP3, AAC, M4A, MPC, OGG, FLAC, APE, TAK, WV, WMA and WAV. Audio CDs: Audio CD playback and ripping (with CD-Text capabilities) is supported. CD tracks can be ripped (in fast or secure mode) as individual files or as a single album with embedded cuesheet. Conversion: Conversion from and to all supported formats as metadata are preserved. Synchronization of tags only (in case that the output file already exists) instead of reencoding is possible. ReplayGain support: both playback and calculation. File Organization: Organization and renaming of music files into folders and files based on tag values such as artist, album, name, track number, etc. that can be specified. MusicBee can do this automatically for all files in a music library or the user can choose the files or folders themselves. Web Browsing: Browsing of the web using Mozilla's XULRunner environment. Scrobbling: Tracks played from MusicBee can optionally be scrobbled to Last.fm. Customizable user interface layout. Customizable keyboard shortcuts. MiniLyrics support Download: MusicBee 3.6.9668 | MusicBee Portable | ~9.0 MB (Freeware) Download: Windows Store Edition View: MusicBee Home page | Release Notes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • On xiaomi hyperos there's also an option to disable google assistant. I've got everything disabled. Only thing I do have installed is a web wrapped for duck.ai which claims to let you use various AIs anonymously
    • I need to understand the rationale of not shipping all of these K2 improvements in a single update/release. It's giving "we will fix Windows 11 but no commitments". It seems to me that they just announce these improvements just to appease the community.
    • The term "RTM" is long gone starting with Windows 10. Every current release is a GA build. This is the result of MS making Windows as a Service (WaaS).
    • Looks like no official TBW rating, which should be a required listing in my opinion for sites like Amazon (hell, put it on the box too.)
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      186
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!