Recommended Posts

Source

Opera and Firefox users are quite vocal on the subject, but none of them can actually show any research to back up their statements, ususally just saying "X takes way longer than Y to start" or "my friend uses X and it is much slower on his computer than Y is on mine". Those that did try more than one usually say "X just felt faster than Y when I tried them" (although this may refer to familiarity with the individual user interface - something that I do not cover here). I have even heard people comparing Firefox and Opera, then realised they were referring to Opera 6 (even though historically, Opera 6 is about equivalent to Netscape 4), something that was replaced with a completely new engine long before Firefox even existed.

Well, I've had enough of these unfounded arguments. I present my research. This is an honest, unbiased view (or as unbiased as I can be). Unlike most people, I not only test all the browsers, I test them all on the same computer as each other - grouped into Linux, Mac and Windows (using the same or equivalent hardware for each). This, I hope, gives an accurate comparison, not only of the browsers compared with each other, but for those that work on multiple platforms, it also gives a fairly accurate comparison of the different optimisations for each platform.

So overall, Opera seems to be the fastest browser for windows. Firefox is not faster than Internet Explorer, except for scripting, but for standards support, security and features, it is a better choice. However, it is still not as fast as Opera, and Opera also offers a high level of standards support, security and features.

On Linux, Konqueror is the fastest for starting and viewing basic pages on KDE, but as soon as script or images are involved, or you want to use the back or forward buttons, or if you use Gnome, Opera is a faster choice, even though on KDE it will take a few seconds longer to start. Mozilla and Firefox give an overall good performance, but their script, cache handling and image-based page speed still cannot compare with Opera.

On Mac OS X, Opera and Safari are both very fast, with Safari 2 being faster at starting and rendering CSS, but with Opera still being distinguishably faster for rendering tables, scripting and history (especially compared with the much slower Safari 1.2). Camino is fast to start, but then it joins its sisters Mozilla and Firefox further down the list. Neither Mozilla, Firefox nor IE perform very well on Mac, being generally slower than on other operating systems.

On Mac OS 9, no single browser stands out as the fastest. In fact, my condolences to anyone who has to use one of them, they all perform badly.

View the article for the graphs and results. I like this article, it is ubiased and it's tests are widespread.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/283635-browser-speed-comparisons/
Share on other sites

I thought it was a pretty good test.....

for each platform, I use just one computer to ensure that the tests compare just the browsers, and not the hardware or software they run on

Anyone else see a problem with this?

The numbers were interesting though.

I liked the part where the moox optimized build actually scored lower than the normal firefox build.

:angry: On his own experience(s), I guess, which hardly matter to others.

585450682[/snapback]

Maybe you didnt read his post

hmmm quote " no way i have tried opera,maxthon,firefox and I.E " unquote

he hasnt tried A,B,C,D, but thinks E (firefox) is faster just because. doesnt make any sense.

i know about 23 million would say thats bunk you can take any test you want and just because you say you took a unbiased test dont mean nothing out em in a lab control enviorment with all the machines exact same and the testers being normal everyday users. then I might say ok, but in my view just uninstalling opera 8 today firefox is faster then any ive found and ive used everyine out there today.

opera has came out top on all tests, just different versions of it lol,

opera 8 has come out top on 4 out of the 7 tests and lets not forget its still in beta, so these times can only be improved and may take the top seed of the other 3...

I use opera at the moment though but may go back to opera when 8 final is out, i just have a few extensions in firefox such as foxytunes which are soo handy for my use

Maybe you didnt read his post

hmmm quote " no way i have tried opera,maxthon,firefox and I.E " unquote

he hasnt tried A,B,C,D, but thinks E (firefox) is faster just because. doesnt make any sense.

585450692[/snapback]

It doesn't make sense because you didn't read what he wrote. Translated into proper English it reads: "Those tests are wrong, by golly! I have tried Opera, Maxthon, Firefox and Internet Explorer and Firefox was the fastest!"

And to these tests...

Interesting. Hrm. *ponder

It doesn't make sense because you didn't read what he wrote. Translated into proper English it reads: "Those tests are wrong, by golly! I have tried Opera, Maxthon, Firefox and Internet Explorer and Firefox was the fastest!"

And to these tests...

Interesting. Hrm. *ponder

585451451[/snapback]

And now what Techno_Funky said makes even less sense.

Overall, Opera is faster, and there is little denying that. The 7.x series started to slow down, but with 7.5 and now 8.0, its taking its speed back.

But there are other factors that end up affecting the speed. Many people are victims to these factors that make one browser look bad, and then they end up thinking it's all the browsers fault, when sometimes it is not.

In terms of raw speed, Opera's latest version vs. Firefox's latest version is generally faster. You can say "firefox feels faster" all you want, and maybe it does for you, but that doesn't change anything really.

Also, when people talk about Opera being the fastest browser on earth, it's more than just the rendering engine. It's the whole internet experience and the power Opera gives you to browse faster and more efficiently.

I remember reading an article about this in the past, but there are so many browsers and stuff that i can't remember it all.

Basically the article was about the different ways that browsers render pages. It was written by one of the guys who worked on Safari, and it talked about how a browser can appear to load a page faster, even though it isn't, by doing something like loading the text before the images, or something like that.

I remember that Firetruck does its loading differently from Safari, but i don't remember how they compare to Opera. But either way, maybe that difference is the reason that some people think Firefox is faster than Opera even though it technically isn't? :shrug:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Zed 1.7.2 has landed with updated OpenCode models, bug fixes and other improvements by David Uzondu Zed 1.7.2 recently landed on the stable release channel, bringing a host of AI-related features including automatic context compaction and settings-based skill management, along with other things like better Markdown preview rendering and custom git commands in the graph view. Starting with the AI stuff, the developers introduced "/compact", a command that basically summarizes your conversation history on demand. This tool prevents your active chat window from hitting token limits by compressing older parts of the dialogue into a brief overview. In addition to that, the team relocated skill management to the settings UI, improving how the application communicates errors regarding those skills, and updated the OpenCode model roster to support DeepSeek V4 Flash, MiniMax M3, Qwen 3.7 Plus, and Nemotron 3 Ultra Free. External agent users can also monitor context window cost metrics and delete individual sessions directly from their history. Right-clicking ref labels in the git graph now opens a context menu that runs different actions against selected targets, kind of how VS Code does it. Here are some of the bug fixes this new release brings: The active agent fails to auto-select when creating a new git worktree. A scrollbar unexpectedly appears on wrapped code blocks in the agent chat. Collapse indicators for project headers appear when performing sidebar searches. Bracketed ellipsis title prefixes fail to show the ellipsis icon properly. Project icons render incorrectly in the recent projects picker. Diff hunk controls appear inside non-editable commit view multibuffers. The software update button hangs indefinitely on the downloading stage. Restoring an agent terminal in a remote project triggers a sudden crash. Splitting a pane that contains an active commit view causes a crash. Linux Wayland freezes when trying to read the clipboard from laggy external apps. Zed is a "newish" code editor trying to break the massive stronghold VS Code has on the developer community. Funny enough, the editor was created by former GitHub employees who worked on the Atom text editor (which Microsoft killed in 2022, several years after it bought GitHub). The project officially hit version 1.0 back in April, introducing platform parity for Windows and Linux alongside deep support for DeepSeek-V4-Pro.
    • 26H2 absolutely will support ARM Windows just not on devices that came with 26H1. This is evident by the fact I am running 26H2, which on my MacBook Neo and Surface Pro 12 (inch), within a VM.
    • Mp3tag 3.35 by Razvan Serea Mp3tag is a powerful and yet easy-to-use tool to edit metadata (ID3, Vorbis Comments and APE) of common audio formats. It can rename files based on the tag information, replace characters or words from tags and filenames, import/export tag information, create playlists and more. The program supports online freedb database lookups for selected files, allowing you to automatically gather proper tag information for select files or CDs. Mp3tag supports the following audio formats: Advanced Audio Coding (aac) Free Lossless Audio Codec (flac) Monkeys Audio (ape) Mpeg Layer 3 (mp3) MPEG-4 (mp4 / m4a / m4b / iTunes compatible) Musepack (mpc) Ogg Vorbis (ogg) OptimFROG (ofr) OptimFROG DualStream (ofs) Speex (spx) Toms Audio Kompressor (tak) True Audio (tta) Windows Media Audio (wma) WavPack (wv) Mp3tag 3.35 changelog: This version introduces a new Files options page, enhanced toolbar customization, support for RF64 WAV files, improved Discogs and MusicBrainz tag sources, and many other improvements and fixes. See the Release Notes for more details. Download: Mp3tag 64-bit | 5.7 MB (Freeware) Download: Mp3tag 32-bit | 5.2 MB Link: Mp3tag Homepage | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The FIFA World Cup is not US centric.
    • It’s amusing how Microsoft is pushing IT admins as if this was a major, game-changing update. In reality, it’s just an enablement package that bumps the build number, which is disappointing compared to the more substantial 22H2 and 24H2 releases. Technically, 25H2, 26H1, and the upcoming 26H2 are essentially the same, differing only in support schedules. They could have included the Windows K2 improvements here, but chose not to. The era of Windows being in the backburner continues, and this 26H2 release feels like an afterthought. Shame, Nadella, shame.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      523
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      78
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!