Recommended Posts

Opera's faster cause it has years of development

Firefox is only Version 1

585497474[/snapback]

Sir, Firefox's version number might just be 1, but you should take note of the fact that firefox is just a stripped down version of Mozilla that has been in development like ages.

That's no reason to steal the credit from Opera.

VCV, please read the ENTIRE article before you talk about it. Reading SELECT CLIPS does not count as reading the whole article. You would see that he says

Here is what my data says

This means that IF HIS DATA applies to the entire world (which he never said that it did), these would be the stats.

Also, knowing WHERE the data is collected from is NOT the same as knowing HOW the data is collected.

Please keep your bullshlt replies to yourself in the future.

He said "My data says that Firefox has 20% of the market". The data is collected from his mini-network of 10 websites.

The quotes are not taken wrongly out of context.

Let me make it simple for you.

By December 2005 or before, as I have previously anticipated, Internet Explorer will not be anymore the browser of choice for the majority of Internet users.

IE and Outlook free fall

Today, according to my own traffic statistics based on a sample of over 600,000 visitors from over 180 countries, Internet Explorer controls slightly more than 70% of the browser market, where, just twelve months ago it had over 91% of it.

The rapid loss of IE users is now a clear and definite trend that appears to be unstoppable: Internet Explorer is showing many bad wrinkles and a slippery short term memory. For a fast-growing number of experienced Internet users IE is already NOT anymore a browser option to consider.

Here some specific data:

The data I am referencing is from my own mini-network of English-written Web sites, who doesn't target specifically a US-based audience but provide news and information to readers from all parts of the world. The Good mini-publishing network is in fact comprised of 10 Web sites that collectively reach nearly 200,000 unique visitors per month and serve over 500,000 page views (Dec. 2004).

Being the sites and the authors in my publishing network not US-based and actively targeting international readers from all parts of the world, my own statistics offer a humble alternative peek at the browser market with a likely less US-centric slant on what are the actual trends taking place on the Internet.

The data is collected both through traditional server logs complemented by log analysis software, as well as through a live tracking and traffic monitoring system powered by WebSideStory HitBox Professional.

Here is what my data says:

Mozilla FireFox now controls by itself over 20% of the world browser market share, with Opera (2%), Netscape (8%) and Safari (1.2%) being the other browsers with some significant market share.

FireFox growth has been as steady as IE rapid demise, with the new browser from the Mozilla foundation gaining most of those 20 percentage points just in the last 3 months. Pretty impressive.

Internet Explorer version 6 alone has now less than 60% of the world browser market share and it keeps loosing percentage points at a phenomenal rate.

In comparison IE 5.5 and other older IE versions are more entrenched and less subject to market erosion that the latest browser version from Microsoft.

Competition is also increasing for IE from the many IE-clones and IE-based browsers that have been appearing on the market in the last few years (AvantBrowser, Maxthon, MYIE2, etc.). Many of these enhanced versions of IE have a lot more to offer than the original Microsoft IE browser and increasing number of users swear by them while dropping IE without afterthoughts.

Opera (2.x%) and Safari (1.x%) keep also increasing the quality of their browsers and their adoption rate with final users. Opera in particular has been very proactive in the last year by greatly enhancing its browser while integrating cutting-edge functions like RSS newsreading. You can expect both of these browsers to further improve their offering while maintaining a strong loyal following of users (as Opera and Mac users typically are).

Netscape has also a very, very loyal following which, though decimated by IE advance over the years, has not ever shrunk to less than 1%. Presently Netscape 7.2 enjoys over 1.2% of the browser market share, reaching nearly 2% if we count in all of the older versions of Netscape still in use. Netscape overall market share seems to be holding to this level though the latest versions (7.1 and 7.2) have seen a recent steady increase in adoption rates.

Overall adoption of alternative operating systems for Internet users is also on the rise, though Microsoft Windows maintains still a very predominant position with over 90% of the world end user market. The Mac OSX and Linux operating system have taken opposite directions, according to my own one-year data and while Linux users browsing the Internet have significantly increased in number by moving from a 0.78 to 2.45 of my monthly visitors share, the Mac has instead lost over a full percentage point in these last 12 months (from 6.37 to 5.05), remaining though the undisputed second operating system of choice.

You can bet serious money that Microsoft will release a new much improved version of Internet Explorer before Mozilla FireFox takes the majority share of this world browser market.

At the pace things are going this has got to happen likely in the first 3-4 months of 2005 or it may just be too late for IE to save itself from drowning.

With this week release of the final official version 1 of the Mozilla Thunderbird email client, typical users of the Microsoft Outlook/Internet Explorer combo have one more reason to migrate happily to this new and increasingly popular Internet application-duo from the Mozilla Foundation (FireFox + Thunderbird) without ever fearing of being left among a small minority of adopters.

They in fact, the new Mozilla users, will actually be soon representing, by the numbers, the new Internet browsing and email exchange applications standards.

The fact is, he is very misleading in what he says. He also suggests his data is a somewhat accurate measurement of the world market, if you actually read what he says. Then he goes on to say Firefox has 20% in the world market, and does not state afterwords that this data is not a real portrayal of the web, and simply of his network.

The article leads the reader to believe that Firefox does in fact have 20% of the market-share, when according to every other study, it does not.

I like how you quote the entire article but still refuse to read it.

my own statistics offer a humble alternative peek at the browser market with a likely less US-centric slant on what are the actual trends taking place on the Internet.

Cmon man, really. Can't you read?

I gathered that from a site that handles 200 000 users and 500 000 sites based on those numbers this is what the data shows. btw he used a professionsal corporations analzying software. I think it's accurate. but of course your not going to convince I.E, users of that so I gave up.

I like how you quote the entire article but still refuse to read it.
my own statistics offer a humble alternative peek at the browser market with a likely less US-centric slant on what are the actual trends taking place on the Internet.

Cmon man, really. Can't you read?

585500811[/snapback]

Got bias?

(the study of statistics is fun)

Yes, I have bias.  Anybody who doesn't is a ######.

The way he wrote the article is not very clear, and could be interpreted different ways.

Yes, statistics is interesting.  Sort of.  I took two classes.

585501856[/snapback]

I meant the article, ducky, not you. ;)

Yes I read the article. He leads the reader to believe it's a close portroyal of the world browser market. By him saying "alternative peek", that in no way implies "oh this isnt a completely accurate portayal of the world market, just of my network."

Take mircleman. He read the article and believes it. He thinks 20% is accurate of the world market.

But the ability to add extensions is.

His claim was:

"opera's missing lots of features from firefox"

You can extend Opera in many ways, too.

Actually you're wrong.

I know for a fact that Opera had it before any other browser. I remember when the first version with inline find was released. It was a beta, and it blew everyone away.

Other applications may have had inline find, but they were really obscure. Emacs? Who uses that? No one but hardcore geeks. Opera innovated by bringing this hardcore geek thing into a mainstream web browser. A first. An innvation.

Seems like you have no clue what you're talking about.

I love it how this is the best way Firefox zealots can respond. I know that I am right, and anyone who has a tiny bit of knowledge about browser history knows that I am right, too.

Being able to drag toolbar items whever I want them, for example being able to put my bookmarks toobar next to my menu items.

You can drag and drop toolbar items in Opera, too.

Please, before you say something, make sure that you know what you are talking about.  Your fanaticism makes every opera user look like an ######.

You are just calling me a fanatic because I point out certain facts that are hard to face for Firefox zealots and fanboys. Someone claimed that "opera's missing lots of features from firefox". I pointed out that Opera actually has more features than Firefox built in, and that most of the features Firefox users are bragging about were invented by Opera, or were available in Opera long before it was available in Mozilla/Firefox.

Obviously, Firefox fanboys will attack me for exposing lies about Opera, and thereby showing that Firefox is overhyped. Truth hurts.

Browser Statistics Month by Month

2005 IE 6 IE 5 O 7/8 Ffox Moz NN 4 NN 7

February 64.9% 4.3% 2.0% 20.0% 4.0% 0.2% 1.1%

January 65.3% 4.4% 2.1% 19.3% 4.0% 0.3% 1.1%

now for those folks who thought the very well known news/security site was somehow biased and fake lets try these shall we. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp. thats pretty good stats because thats what kids are using everyday in the real world. we know kids start and follow the trends of society dont we. oh look another that says 20% hmmmmm

next.......Firefox continues gains against IE, Firefox drawing fans away from Microsoft IE

I could sit here and quote sites all day that state between 14-20% of market as of this month but it be a lost cause , because like all microsoft people they will not admit there's a problem till it's too late . this is no different. when the browser is down to 2% they will still be claiming victory. below im posting a link to a site that is non profit and has no biased either way. the watched 42 million users, thats right 42 million and I think you'll fine the numbers very very intresting. also read all the stats on this page you'll see microsoft come sout ahead in most other cases..cept browser use. take a peek .. thats all im gonna say on this matter. if you can sit and read all these numbers and still deny to yourself and others that this isnt true its all a lie then you my friends need more help then im trained to provide. have a wonder day :)

http://www.boingboing.net/stats/awstats.boingboing.net.html

how do you use gmail?

as for the clutter,

i have the main menu on top, then i have the ads, then the tab bar and then teh nav bar. in firefox, i only had one bar the size of the nav bar and a tab bar that was about 3/4 the size of operas.

but dont get me wrong, there are many things i like about it, but...

im not sure, on the fence  :p

585496991[/snapback]

let me try to make yourself sure.

1. Main Menu -> do you need it? I don't, so I remove it (Ctrl+F11), then add a menu dropdown in the nav bar, just in case I need it again. Get the menu dropdown from http://nontroppo.org/wiki/CustomButtons

2. Ads -> Nothing I can do if you don't have the registration code.

3. Tab Bar -> You can right click, customize, check "Show only when needed". That case you don't even see the tab bar when you only have one page open.

4. Nav Bar -> mine, from left to right.

Menu drop down, back, forward, reload, wand, address bar, Go button, google search, View toggle, "Block unwanted popups" toggle, "In IE" and "In FF" button, in case the page I am viewing refuses to work well with Opera, I'll just hit the "In IE" button, and voila, the page opens in IE. You can get all these from the Wiki site.

As for the size, when you already remove the menu, you already have the maximum browsing space compared to IE or Firefox.

5. Gmail -> it just works. Click on "Sign in anyways"

*Post*

Read your own link.

Statistics Are Often Misleading

You cannot - as a web developer - rely only on statistics. Statistics can often be misleading.

Global averages may not always be relevant to your web site. Different sites attract different audiences. Some web sites attract professional developers using professional hardware, other sites attract hobbyists using older low spec computers.

Also be aware that  many stats may have an incomplete or faulty browser detection. It is quite common by many web stats report programs, not to detect new browsers like Opera and Netscape 6 or 7 from the web log.

w3schools.com is a geek-oriented site. It is for web designers. It does NOT represent the entire internet at all.

However, I think 20% is a fair estimate of the geek population.

I will wait for statistics from places like Juniper who specialize in this kind of thing and have better global statistics.

let me try to make yourself sure.

1. Main Menu -> do you need it? I don't, so I remove it (Ctrl+F11), then add a menu dropdown in the nav bar, just in case I need it again. Get the menu dropdown from http://nontroppo.org/wiki/CustomButtons

2. Ads -> Nothing I can do if you don't have the registration code.

3. Tab Bar -> You can right click, customize, check "Show only when needed". That case you don't even see the tab bar when you only have one page open.

4. Nav Bar -> mine, from left to right.

Menu drop down, back, forward, reload, wand, address bar, Go button, google search, View toggle, "Block unwanted popups" toggle, "In IE" and "In FF" button, in case the page I am viewing refuses to work well with Opera, I'll just hit the "In IE" button, and voila, the page opens in IE. You can get all these from the Wiki site.

As for the size, when you already remove the menu, you already have the maximum browsing space compared to IE or Firefox.

5. Gmail -> it just works. Click on "Sign in anyways"

585508960[/snapback]

ya, i figured it out. i wasnt using opera 8, i was using 7. :p and i customized it the way i like it. im switched now.

i used to ge a HUGE ffox advocate, but a properly configured opera does have an advantage. anything but IE is great. :yes:

I know for a fact that Opera had it before any other browser.

Well, you are wrong. Lynx had it first. Chump.
Other applications may have had inline find, but they were really obscure. Emacs? Who uses that?
Millions of people use emacs.
Opera innovated by bringing this hardcore geek thing into a mainstream web browser. A first. An innvation.
As far as I know, innovate means to introduce something new, not to copy. People have been copying features for years, yet when opera starts copying features, you call it innovating. Funny.
I love it how this is the best way Firefox zealots can respond.
Actually I use opera more than firefox. I just like to expose the lies of fanatics.
I know that I am right, and anyone who has a tiny bit of knowledge about browser history knows that I am right, too.
Actually, you're wrong.
You can drag and drop toolbar items in Opera, too.
But you can't put the bookmarks next to the menu items, LIKE I SAID.
You are just calling me a fanatic because I point out certain facts that are hard to face for Firefox zealots and fanboys.
Wrong again. I'm calling you a fanatic because you make unsupported claims and lie to make your browser seem better.
Someone claimed that "opera's missing lots of features from firefox". I pointed out that Opera actually has more features than Firefox built in, and that most of the features Firefox users are bragging about were invented by Opera, or were available in Opera long before it was available in Mozilla/Firefox.
I can read what you wrote, you don't need to explain it to me. And you still look like an ######.
Obviously, Firefox fanboys will attack me for exposing lies about Opera, and thereby showing that Firefox is overhyped. Truth hurts.
You haven't exposed lies, only made them. And no one is attacking you. You are attacking the truth.
ya, i figured it out. i wasnt using opera 8, i was using 7. :p and i customized it the way i like it. im switched now.

7? or 7.5? or 7.6 TP4? or just the latest stable build 7.54 ?

I remember 7 has quite a slow loading time (CMIIW), but 8 simply blow me away. it loads almost instantly in my laptop. (instantly: less than 2 secs)

i used to ge a HUGE ffox advocate, but a properly configured opera does have an advantage. anything but IE is great.  :yes:

585510551[/snapback]

to be fair, either Opera or Firefox is great, I see most people complain about either browser doesn't have what the other browser has, usually didn't bother much to do some research, and try to configure properly each browser, or find some extensions/scripts to fulfill such purpose.

I can share my personal experience, if you like, why I moved from IE to Opera, from Opera to Firefox, and now from Firefox back to Opera.

Well, you are wrong.  Lynx had it first.  Chump.

Lynx has inline find? Where? If you press / it does a normal search.

Millions of people use emacs.

I doubt that. Only hardcore geeks use Emacs.

As far as I know, innovate means to introduce something new, not to copy.  People have been copying features for years, yet when opera starts copying features, you call it innovating.  Funny.

Actually, it was an innovation because no one else had thought about using it in a browser before.

But you can't put the bookmarks next to the menu items, LIKE I SAID.

That's not really relevant here, Firefox fanboy.

Wrong again.  I'm calling you a fanatic because you make unsupported claims and lie to make your browser seem better.

No, you just find it hard to face the truth :)

I can read what you wrote, you don't need to explain it to me.  And you still look like an ######.

Using big words like that sure makes you look clever!

You haven't exposed lies, only made them.  And no one is attacking you.  You are attacking the truth.

Actually, you are attacking me right now for exposing your lies :D :rofl:

Defensive, are we! :woot:

I'm running Firefox and Opera... And by my testings, by my own eyes and mind... I conclude that Firefox is faster to load pages (on my computer anyways) than Opera (most of the time) Sometimes Opera prevails, but then again that can also be a server fault.

I'm sick of this stupid argument since vcv, gnt, wordb and every other fanatic just chants the same phrases over and over.  I feel stupider every time I read their posts.  Anyway, Opera is adware, bottom line.

585519284[/snapback]

:rolleyes: And you think your opinion is superior to theirs becauseeeee......??

I'm running Firefox and Opera... And by my testings, by my own eyes and mind... I conclude that Firefox is faster to load pages (on my computer anyways) than Opera (most of the time) Sometimes Opera prevails, but then again that can also be a server fault.

People have done some research, and it seems that quite a few sites (including Google's!) send uncompressed data to Opera, while other browsers get it gzipped. This obviously means that Opera will have to download more, and so it takes longer.

Just another case of browser discrimination...

I'm sick of this stupid argument since vcv, gnt, wordb and every other fanatic just chants the same phrases over and over.? I feel stupider every time I read their posts.

You are sick of it because everyone keeps killing your arguments.

Anyway, Opera is adware, bottom line.

When all your other arguments have been destroyed, resort to the adware argument. How predictable:sleep::

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!