Logitech MX518 Spy Shots


Recommended Posts

impossible.. you should be slapped?;))

lol its not even worth spending money on.in the end you want the best anyways>.. and of course thats this beast im using the MX1000

585471112[/snapback]

I'll quote a fellow Neowinian:

For those who think cordless mice have no lag, and are as good at corded mice... obviously suck at FPS games:))

Ask any ranked player in the CPL what mouse they use... you won't find cordless there -- there's a reason for that.

585326845[/snapback]

So yeah the MX1000 isnot> the best:pp

impossible.. you should be slapped  ;)

lol its not even worth spending money on. in the end you want the best anyways.. and of course thats this beast im using the MX1000

585471112[/snapback]

Yeah, but the MX1000 is not a gaming mouse, as there's a delay if you pick up the mouse and put it back down again. Not a good thing when you're playing a big multiplayer shooter...

now a corded MX1000 would be the ultimate solution.

why would you want to turn down the sensitivity?!  surely you'd want it at the highest setting all the time.

585471406[/snapback]

I guess just so you don't have to go into the mouse options for each game you play. Or maybe you use different sens. for desktop? I'm not sure myself. :unsure:

LOL why do people prefer corded versions of mice?

Do we still need to say that THERE IS A STAND TO COMPLETELY RECHARGE THE BATTERY OF THE MX1000 WITHIN TWO HOURS and that FIFTEEN MINUTES ON THE CHARGE IS EQUAL TO ONE DAY OF USE and that A BREAK LASTS ABOUT FIFTEEN MINUTES?

I think their concept is not well understood by people, or maybe people don't know about new technology... but yeah, Logitech includes a stand to recharge the batteries nowadays! WOW!

Edit : Oh sorry... I just read the topic and realized it is because of the huge 2 milliseconds lag cordless mice have. :pinch:

Yeah, but the MX1000 is not a gaming mouse, as there's a delay if you pick up the mouse and put it back down again.  Not a good thing when you're playing a big multiplayer shooter...

now a corded MX1000 would be the ultimate solution.

585471403[/snapback]

i never noticed any lag doing that...
i never noticed any lag doing that...

585471731[/snapback]

I've never noticed the lag either. I play FPS games like CS:Source, HL2, Doom3.

The MX1000 is by far the best mouse I have ever owned! I do have some friends who don't like it cuz they got small hands and the mouse is a little bigger. To each his own.

I'll quote a fellow Neowinian:

So yeah the MX1000 is not the best :p

585471389[/snapback]

OK I have the MX700 and i have NEVER i repeat NEVER i trepeat NEVER noticed any lag from my mouse playing a FPS. I just moved it accross the screen fast and i didnt lag. This is the best (optical) wireless mouse ever.

The pics are just ripped of this article here:

ComputerBase.de

He cut out the watermark of the pics and put it on here.  :x

Shame on you.  :angry:

585472165[/snapback]

uh no. sorry :blush: I got it off a very "cheeky" website. I'll add it to the first post anyway.

OK I have the MX700 and i have NEVER i repeat NEVER i trepeat NEVER noticed any lag from my mouse playing a FPS. I just moved it accross the screen fast and i didnt lag. This is the best (optical) wireless mouse ever.

585472196[/snapback]

Got the same mouse the 1st one broke but logitech shipped me a new on hte same day called at 9am and it was here by 5pm thats good service and i have noticed NO lag whatso ever, maby a milisec when it wakes up from its true sleep mode but the semi sleep respose is compeltley instant

OK I have the MX700 and i have NEVER i repeat NEVER i trepeat NEVER noticed any lag from my mouse playing a FPS. I just moved it accross the screen fast and i didnt lag. This is the best (optical) wireless mouse ever.

585472196[/snapback]

I have used MX700 and I found almost zero lag. I still prefer a corded mouse though.

LOL why do people prefer corded versions of mice?

Do we still need to say that THERE IS A STAND TO COMPLETELY RECHARGE THE BATTERY OF THE MX1000 WITHIN TWO HOURS and that FIFTEEN MINUTES ON THE CHARGE IS EQUAL TO ONE DAY OF USE and that A BREAK LASTS ABOUT FIFTEEN MINUTES?

I think their concept is not well understood by people, or maybe people don't know about new technology... but yeah, Logitech includes a stand to recharge the batteries nowadays! WOW!

Edit : Oh sorry... I just read the topic and realized it is because of the huge 2 milliseconds lag cordless mice have. :pinch:

585471607[/snapback]

It's not that, it's the weight dude. You always have more weight with coreless ones becaus of the battery.

I have a just plain cordless ball wheel mouse from logitech, never seen any sort of lag...it looses it's signals occasionally and I need to leave it a few days then try to reconnect it...it's buggy...but lag no.

I'd take a cordless over corded because the cord gets in the way and restricts movement more than anything...lag on a mouse is not an issue

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are you going to do performance benchmarks comparing all states? I'd be interested in seeing that in the next "part".
    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!