Recommended Posts

This is NOT an attempt to troll by any means, it is meant as a warning.

I ran a memory profiler on Firefox 1.0 just now, and the results were astonishing. The tool used detects any memory that a program does not free when it is done with that memory. These leaks are leaks found after the program was done.

2 tabs were loaded, and each page reloaded twice. Firefox was only running for about 60-90 seconds.

Just to make sure I was reading it right, I ran the profiler on 4 other applications, 2 other web browsers, an a chat program and an email client. All other programs reported fewer than 10 memory leaks.

GlowCode Leaks -- C:\Program Files\Mozilla Firefox\firefox.exe, Tue Feb 22 07:55:22 2005

Leaks found, 6416 blocks, 242150 bytes

Click here for the full results.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/288645-firefox-10-has-major-memory-leaks/
Share on other sites

That's nothing new about firefox. If you do a search on neowin, I bet you will find other posts about the memory leak. This is just the first version of this browser. Give it some time before you complain about the memory leak.

well, if you didnt close the program, and that stayed there, then it's not a leak

it's a leak if the memory isnt freed, so if you close that other tab, the memory usage doesnt go down.

But yeah, there is a slight problem with firefox's memory, you can change a option to make it use a max of 16MB a tab, it's in about:config, called cache something.

That's nothing new about firefox.? If you do a search on neowin, I bet you will find other posts about the memory leak.? This is just the first version of this browser.? Give it some time before you complain about the memory leak.

585515088[/snapback]

What a joke. This is na/b> leak, this is thousands of leaks.

First version of the browser, so thousands of memory leaks are ok? Please spare me the BS. Memory leaks are NEVER okay. There is an acceptable range, but 6,000 is NOT an acceptable range, nor is 14,000.

Making sure memory is properly managed should be a TOP PRIORITY for any software.

well, if you didnt close the program, and that stayed there, then it's not a leak

it's a leak if the memory isnt freed, so if you close that other tab, the memory usage doesnt go down.

But yeah, there is a slight problem with firefox's memory, you can change a option to make it use a max of 16MB a tab, it's in about:config, called cache something.[/quoPLEASE READ WHAT I ALREADY SAID./b>

1. This was the report fafter the application had been closed/i>

2. This is memory thwas not freed when it should have been/i>

3. I only loaded 2 tabs, and refreshed each page twice. This should not cause such harsh memory problems.

most of those apparent leaks are from mostly from the same place....anywho I submited your info so that people that better understand all that mumbojumbo and decipher it.

woah just seen you said this was after you closed the program!? something is wrong with your profile then becuase Firefox does not keep memory after it's closed

24mb is not too bad for firefox sometimes it will go up to 90mb or so - at which point it is usually about to crash.

I do use tonnes of extensions though and 4 or so tabs open.

There are definite memory leak problems though - and it would be nice if they fixed them.

What a joke.  This is not a leak, this is thousands of leaks.

First version of the browser, so thousands of memory leaks are ok?  Please spare me the BS.  Memory leaks are NEVER okay.  There is an acceptable range, but 6,000 is NOT an acceptable range, nor is 14,000.

Making sure memory is properly managed should be a TOP PRIORITY for any software.

well, if you didnt close the program, and that stayed there, then it's not a leak

it's a leak if the memory isnt freed, so if you close that other tab, the memory usage doesnt go down.

But yeah, there is a slight problem with firefox's memory, you can change a option to make it use a max of 16MB a tab, it's in about:config, called cache something.

PLEASE READ WHAT I ALREADY SAID.

1. This was the report for after the application had been closed

2. This is memory that was not freed when it should have been

3. I only loaded 2 tabs, and refreshed each page twice. This should not cause such harsh memory problems.

585515096[/snapback]

Gotta agree with you there.

To me, just isnt good enough either. Saw this in the beta stages and then in final release. I dont see how they couldve released FF how it is.

I totally agree, poor

most of those apparent leaks are from mostly from the same place....anywho I submited your info so that people that better understand all that mumbojumbo and decipher it.

woah just seen you said this was after you closed the program!? something is wrong with your profile then becuase Firefox does not keep memory after it's closed

585515104[/snapback]

You don't understand how the profiler works then. It keeps track of memory allocated and deallocated. When the program closes, it sees which memory was freed and which was not.

24mb is not too bad for firefox sometimes it will go up to 90mb or so - at which point it is usually about to crash.

I do use tonnes of extensions though and 4 or so tabs open.

585515108[/snapback]

This has nothing to do with the memory usage during the application run.
what are the links to the pages you loaded? and also what extensions/themes are you using? and please try again when todays nightly is built

585515124[/snapback]

http://google.picasa.com/

http://www.news.com/

Extensions:

I have about 20 installed. I will run again on a clean install. However, extensions are not responsible for the memory management, FF is. So this is still a problem regardless of whether or not its the extensions.

I will also try a nightly build.

Jeesh this guy again I swear I think this guy is on microsofts payroll. go back read this guys posts and you'll see what i mean. Ok it has memory leaks so what. its still a good browser.
Please stay out of this thread if you're going to troll like this.

Guess what? I don't use IE, I hate it. So there goes your theory.

This is just the first version of this browser.  Give it some time before you complain about the memory leak.

585515088[/snapback]

Firefox has had many preview versions before this final 1.0 release.

It's had enough time to fix it, and apparently it's not.

:sleep:

585515119[/snapback]

:rolleyes:

What are you, a sleepy troll?

I can confirm Firefox 1.0 has memory leaks, I've had problems with it before. I was looking through wallpapers on Deviantart before, and I don't think Firefox properly freed the wallpapers after I closed the tab, so it would easily use over 100mb after a few minutes.

Edit: Downloaded the latest nightly build of Firefox, tested on a fresh profile, the leak is still there :pinch: I'll be submitting the bug now.

Edited by xinok

guy im too old to play silly games and troll. I stated a view in my mind and why I said such is all everytime I turn around you are in a ff forum downgrading and trying to argue why it sucks and doesnt have this or that. Thats all. then I come on here this am and what do I see you again talking about ff. if thats trolling then so be it.

Wow, that's alot of leaks.... Have you tested other browsers too?

How long did you wait until running the test after you closed it? It may be freed later on...

585515150[/snapback]

I tested Opera and IE. Both had under 10 leaks (2 and 9).

I only ran firefox for 60-90 seconds and closed it. Once the process was gone from my list, I looked at the memory leaks. Firefox can not free memory once it is closed.

guy im too old to play silly games and troll. I  stated a view in my mind and why I said such is all everytime I turn  around you are in a ff forum downgrading and trying to argue why it sucks and doesnt have this or that. Thats all. then I come on here this am and what do I see  you again  talking about ff. if thats trolling then so be it.

585515154[/snapback]

Guess what? I use Firefox daily and have recommended it to many people. Try again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Apple are scared of their customers! They have built a brand over the years of "it just works out of the box", but that slows innovation. Samsung's master stroke was the Galaxy Ultra: "Let's cram everything into one handset, make it so stupid only real nerds will love it, some of the features will work, some won't, but the audience will have such a high tolerance they won't care". Apple has no such device and so they are constantly worrying these days about the fallout of creating a new experience that customers might not like. I know it is often cited the reason they don't build a touchscreen Mac Book is they don't want to cannibalise the the iPad market, but I think it's equally cold feet after the criticism Microsoft receive trying to make a touch compatible desktop OS
    • HandBrake 1.11.2 by Razvan Serea HandBrake is an open-source, GPL-licensed, multiplatform, multithreaded video transcoder, available for MacOS X, Linux and Windows. Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or BluRay sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Here is a detailed breakdown of HandBrake’s features: Built-in Device Presets—Get started with HandBrake in seconds by choosing a profile optimized for your device, or choose a universal profile for standard or high quality conversions. Simple, easy, fast. For those that want more choice, tweak many basic and advanced options to improve your encodes. Supported Input Sources—Handbrake can process most common multimedia files and any DVD or Blu-ray sources that do not contain any kind of copy protection. Outputs: File Containers: .MP4(.M4V) and .MKV Video Encoders: H.265 (x265 and QuickSync), H.264(x264 and QuickSync), H.265 MPEG-4 and MPEG-2, VP8 and Theora Audio Encoders: AAC / HE-AAC, MP3, Flac, AC3, or Vorbis Audio Pass-thru: AC-3, E-AC3, DTS, DTS-HD, TrueHD, AAC and MP3 tracks Additional features: Title/ Chapter Selection Queue up Multiple Encodes Chapter Markers Subtitles (VobSub, Closed Captions CEA-608, SSA, SRT) Constant Quality or Average BitRate Video Encoding Support for VFR, CFR and VFR Video Filters—Deinterlacing, Decomb, Detelecine, Deblock, Grayscale, Cropping and Scaling Live Video Preview HandBrake 1.11.2 changelog: All platforms Video Fixed a crash that happened when doing a 2-pass lossless x265 encode Fixed a memory leak that happened when doing a 2-pass MPEG-4/MPEG-2/VP9/FFV1 encode Audio Updated the list of supported dithers and encoders combinations Fixed the Core Audio AAC encoder 7.1 channel layout Subtitles Fixed the VobSub palette creation in the MP4 container Build system Improved build system compatibility with older build tools Third-party libraries FFmpeg 8.0.2 (decoding and filters) SVT-AV1 4.1.0 (AV1 video encoding) Linux Added WebM MIME type to the list of the supported formats Mac Improved handling of unsupported presets Updated Sparkle automatic update library Windows Improved handling of unsupported presets Improved queue low space pause behaviour Fixed the automatic audio track name generation Fixed the summary description of HDR video Download: HandBrake 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~30.0 (Open Source) Download: HandBrake ARM64 | Portable Links: HandBrake Website | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • So, an article that has nothing to do with Windows 11, still gets Windows 11 in the title and a build number as the picture? Dell have a buggy build of Support Assist HP have UEFI settings that need unlocking for the secureboot cert upgrade to take place.
    • What I can't seem to understand is that Google are paying SpaceX? Surely it would be the other way round, with SpaceX needing Google's datacenters etc.? Oh well, this level of money and power is way outside of my comprehension at the best of times.
    • "77ee94b helium/windows: winsparkle updater (built-in auto-update support on Windows" If that's what I think it is, that is about the only thing that's been missing from this excellent browser. I guess I'll find out the next time I'm on a Windows machine.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      244
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      68
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!