• 0

Cherry OS Trial Available!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
No, if Apple sues, it's because CherryOS is in breach of OSX's EULA, which specifically states that OSX can only legally be run on Apple hardware (or at least that's what I've been told...sue me if I'm wrong).  CherryOS is like the Napster of the emulation world.

585587866[/snapback]

actually no... cherryos is like an zsnes or something lol, it doesnt distribute osx .. or anything.

  • 0
No, if Apple sues, it's because CherryOS is in breach of OSX's EULA, which specifically states that OSX can only legally be run on Apple hardware (or at least that's what I've been told...sue me if I'm wrong).  CherryOS is like the Napster of the emulation world.

585587866[/snapback]

By like Napster you mean like with Napster the functionality was already being done, better, and all it does is make it possible for N00Bs to do it?

  • 0

umm, sorry to clutter the thread with a question.. but how should this install.. i've installed cherryOS.. and a command prompt window popped up which says

"Updating drivers for cosdrv from c:\windows\system32\cheryOSNT.inf ."

... am i supposed to just sit here (its been 10 minutes)

  • 0
if apple is smart, they'll buy up cherryos just like Microsoft bought up Connectix.

585587888[/snapback]

I agree. Apple could sell this product for whatever they wanted to and developers would buy it to develop or test software. I mean, other then that, what other purpose does this really provide? It is faster then what I thought it would be, but honestly, it isn't fast enough to use full time, just like other emulators (VMware Workstation, Virtual PC, etc.). It might even get more people to buy Apple Computers, who knows?

  • 0
umm, sorry to clutter the thread with a question.. but how should this install.. i've installed cherryOS.. and a command prompt window popped up which says

"Updating drivers for cosdrv from c:\windows\system32\cheryOSNT.inf ."

... am i supposed to just sit here (its been 10 minutes)

585587908[/snapback]

Just click X ;)

  • 0

apple wanting ipods to run on PCs is a lot different than them wanting OSX to run on PCs. If you could run osx on a PC, there would be no need to buy apple hardware... now there are 2 trains of thought here... if they did release a PC version of OSX, you would have people who are devoted to buying macs, continue to buy macs and PC users who would never buy a mac really thinking about the software and PC/people on the fence buying it outright. The only downside i see to this is that a lot of mac people might becoming... hmm whats the word- disillusioned. remember ive heard apple being referred to as a cult- and for a lot of people its an exclusive club that low budget minded PC people just are not allowed to come near! ;) hehehehehe

  • 0
No, if Apple sues, it's because CherryOS is in breach of OSX's EULA, which specifically states that OSX can only legally be run on Apple hardware (or at least that's what I've been told...sue me if I'm wrong).  CherryOS is like the Napster of the emulation world.

585587866[/snapback]

Apple don't have a leg to stand on since CherryOS emulates the G4 processor and not MacOSX you could install Linux or any operating system that can run on x84 hardware which is not limited to Apple since Sparc are also creating G4 processors which you can buy and use in your Macs.

  • 0
I know that some people claim rip, or whatever. Who cares?

585587598[/snapback]

If you'd like to know if it's going to be much faster than PearPC (as the developer claims it to be), you should care.

If it's a rip, it will have comparable performance, if it's what they claim it to be, it'll be almost godly.

If you're at all interested in running this software, why should you not care about that?

In pearPC even in the cursors you could see that is was lagging or in the status bars as well .. it took several hours to install OSX with it .. with this one I was already into the install rather quickly and the cursor animations were very smooth, although when I would click on the title bar you could see it was slightly laggy, and also if you move your mouse really really quickly you can see it lags slightly .. A hell of a lot better than my experience than PearPC so far.

Now that's interesting. :)

It would be great if this one wasn't a modified rip, and actually something real good. It would add a very nice and useful competition (for us) in the software PPC emulation area. :)

Edited by Jugalator
  • 0
yea, im gettin an error when i try to run it.  :( 

what kind of computer are you running it on ?  im thinking it's b/c mines a centrino.  the documentation says nothing about centrino

585587929[/snapback]

windows xp

  • 0
ATTENTION ALL CHERRYOS BELIEVERS, PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING. OPEN C:\CHERRYOS\ASTROAMATRO. THIS IS A PEARPC CONFIG FILE. IF YOU CHANGE THE LINE prom_bootmethod = "auto" to prom_bootmethod = "select" YOU WILL SEE PEARPC.

Taken from PearPC.net. I'm at school right now, so anyone wanna confirm? :blink:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!