• 0

Cherry OS Trial Available!


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

One thing?s for sure, when this baby is more mature it?s going to be good... However, it?s a bit pointless (speaking in terms of productivity) running an emulated OSX on top of Windows XP if you think for a bit. But it?s good, clean f:). :)

I have access to an OSX disc, but I?ll skip this for a few months until it?s faster and better.

  • 0
its not pointless at all. like i said in my previous post, my cd's are still "coming in" but if in fact it does have 80% cpu ussage, then my 2800xp w/512mb ram can outperform a mac mini 1.25ghz and 256mb ram.

585589145[/snapback]

it doesn't have anywhere near 80% performance.

  • 0
its not pointless at all. like i said in my previous post, my cd's are still "coming in" but if in fact it does have 80% cpu ussage, then my 2800xp w/512mb ram can outperform a mac mini 1.25ghz and 256mb ram.

585589145[/snapback]

And is it worth getting all the software you have in Windows in their corresponding Mac versions? To run them slower? No if you want to get a job done in a practical way, that was what I was saying.

  • 0

lol, mines still installing.... 24 hours to go.. and it keeps rising... o_o; thank god i have my roommates comp to use to pass the time..

so tell me... how did y'all install it so quickly.... im using physical cd's.. the images failed to install on several tries so i thought it was the images fault.

  • 0
lol, mines still installing.... 24 hours to go.. and it keeps rising... o_o; thank god i have my roommates comp to use to pass the time..

so tell me... how did y'all install it so quickly.... im using physical cd's.. the images failed to install on several tries so i thought it was the images fault.

585589177[/snapback]

You have to remove some options! mines took 45min to install (maximum indicated was 50 min and went down to 30 min in no time and then every min were displayed more slowly)

  • 0
Okay I have the file ASTROAMATRO now. It is created right after you create a profile and start it (doesn't require OS X to be installed), and here are it's content:

pci_ide0_master_installed = 1
pci_ide0_master_image = "c:\CherryOS_HD\toxicfume\hdimage.img"
pci_ide0_master_type = "hd"
pci_3c90x_installed = 0
pci_3c90x_mac = "DE:AD:CA:FE:12:34" 
pci_usb_installed = 1
nvram_file = "nvram" 
pci_ide0_slave_installed = 1
pci_ide0_slave_image = ""
 pci_ide0_slave_type = "cdrom"
prom_bootmethod = "auto" 
redraw_interval_msec = 10
 cos_start_resolution = "1280x1024x32"
prom_driver_graphic ="C:\DOCUME~1\xxxxxxx\LOCALS~1\Temp\ifrs_gkl.tmp"
memory_size = 0x20000000
pci_rtl8139_installed = 0
pci_rtl8139_mac = "DE:AD:CA:FE:12:35" 
key_toggle_mouse_grab = "F6" 
cpu_pvr = 0x000c0000

Familiar? ;) busted.

585588193[/snapback]

There you go! The ONLY reason many people get the illusion of this being faster or smoother is:

redraw_interval_msec = 10

that's a VERY important setting, and will determine the whole speed of the emulation. I thought pearpc was too slow to use when I had it at like 250 or something. Now that it's at 10 on my PC, it's actually very useable with smooth animations.

for those saying this is faster, set that setting in your PearPC, and then tell me.

  • 0
Well, it comes free with a Mac if that?s what you mean... but not free to CherryOS users, I believe.

585589240[/snapback]

you missed my point:laugh::

anyway, since its illegal to install OSX on any computer not made by apple, and this IS a G4 and it IS legal, and apple includes a copy of OSX with every G4 system, technically> this should come with osx for free untill a court decides that it is illegal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      189
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!