Recommended Posts

Catalyst A.I.

Ive searched and not seen anything, Unless its hidden deep inside a thread.

There is Standard And Advanced.

I've read they improve performance.

But by doing so, do they descrease visual quality or is it the same or better quality??

585612510[/snapback]

Google for a sweet program called "ATI Tray Tools". I use it and I don't even need to use the Classic Control Panel anymore :happy: You can access the A.I. settings through it as well (as well as Temporal Antialiasing).

My 9800 Pro loathes these drivers. After installing them I went through 3 VPU recovers on the desktop, my monitor would turn off I hit APPLY under the SMARTGART settings, and Far Cry is corrupting beyond belief! (Both 1.0 and 1.3). All of these issues (except the Far Cry one) resolved themselves within 3 reboots.

Looks like I'll be going back to the 5.2's

And yes...Chode (once NVIDIA fan #13524327B) has converted to ATI. Lack of decent drivers from NVIDIA have turned me off them for awhile.

My 9800 Pro loathes these drivers. After installing them I went through 3 VPU recovers on the desktop, my monitor would turn off I hit APPLY under the SMARTGART settings, and Far Cry is corrupting beyond belief! (Both 1.0 and 1.3). All of these issues (except the Far Cry one) resolved themselves within 3 reboots.

585616717[/snapback]

One rollback to 5.2's, and corruption gone.

For 9800 Pro users, I recommend steering clear of these.

I downloaded the Catalyst driver from your link. I use Norton Internet Security 2005 and it scanned the downloaded driver and said it had adware included. The file Adware.BarginBuddy was detected by the Norton Antivirus 2005. I went to the site and received the same adware notice when I downloaded the file directly from ATI. :angry: I can't believe they would include adware in a driver update. There was no way to contact their support to ask if this was indeed true. Their support function really is lousy when it comes to product support. :no:

I downloaded the Catalyst driver from your link. I use Norton Internet Security 2005 and it scanned the downloaded driver and said it had adware included. The file Adware.BarginBuddy was detected by the Norton Antivirus 2005. I went to the site and received the same adware notice when I downloaded the file directly from ATI.  :angry:  I can't believe they would include adware in a driver update. There was no way to contact their support to ask if this was indeed true. Their support function really is lousy when it comes to product support.  :no:

585619821[/snapback]

there is no adware in catalyst

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I think the car analogy is more this: Left hand drive, basic commands on the left side of the infotainment screen. Right hand drive, basic commands on the right side of the infotainment screen. Granted, you're not swapping between the two often so it's doesn't really work. But it's to do with the proximity of you (your mouse, or the driver) to the controls.
    • I mean, the old one was broken and so stupidly complex for many users, so I don't see that as a feasible option. A context menu needs to be simple to use, and for me the Windows 11 style actually worked really well for me, and many others. I used to have to scroll the damn context menu just to get to "file properties" in Windows 10. That was not a good experience, and I'm sure you'd agree. What they're trying to do is make it the best of both worlds, as clearly you'd prefer the Win10 style. I'm curious how they're going to do this.
    • The "Show more options" has its place, as does the simpler context menu, but it should perhaps be a separate fly-out rather than relaunching the entire, old context menu. The old context menu was getting absurd in Windows 10. Often I'd have to make the context menu scroll just to get to "File properties" on my old laptop. Even without much installed, the amount of items was just too much. It's a context menu, not a "do all" menu. Making it configurable is fraught with challenges too, so I'm interested to see how Microsoft tackles this one.
    • I don't hate the new menus, I am not a fan of the lack of features and how they went live when they clearly are not complete. The menu itself presents much better than the previous - but what's lacking (IMO) is: 1) Any kind of automated manipulation such as: "this goes on the new menu because you use this feature more often on this filetype" "this is rarely used and will fall back to the old menu" 2) Any kind of user manipulation such as: "a UI to add/remove/order items to the new menu"
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      I2D earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Dr Jared Dental Studio earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      RG INVESTMENT GROUP earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Very Popular
      The Norwegian Drone Pilot earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Very Popular
      s0nic69 earned a badge
      Very Popular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      484
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      262
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      86
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      64
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      63
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!