Recommended Posts

The Mozilla Foundation has published its Mozilla Application Suite transition plan, ending days of speculation about the future of the SeaMonkey project. The announcement confirms that there will be no official Mozilla 1.8 release and offers an apology to all those who believed that there would be. The 1.7.x line will be the last set of Mozilla Application Suite products released and maintained by the Mozilla Foundation and all future suite versions from the Foundation will be minor updates only.

However, the Mozilla Foundation will offer infrastructure support to a community effort to continue development of the Mozilla Application Suite, probably under a different name. The exact details still have to be worked out but will broadly follow the plan outlined by Boris Zbarsky. We expect that more details will be posted on the home page of the nascent SeaMonkey community effort over the next few days. Mozilla Foundation President Mitchell Baker has posted background details on the SeaMonkey community transition plan on her weblog.

Source: http://www.mozillazine.org/talkback.html?article=6206

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/295331-mozilla-18-dropped/
Share on other sites

I guess that now they will start to integrate Firefox+Thunderbird+Sunbird into a new Application suite... Maybe Mozilla 2.0??

Fantastic news to me that they are doing this anyway, I really dislike the Mozilla Suite, I've always thaught that it was poorly made. Would be better news if my speculation is true.

eh... that kinda sucks, but the only good thing was the composer

585599324[/snapback]

well if you use linux, htere is nvu which is an improved composer. im not sure if its available for windows though.

this is bad news however. i dont like where mozilla is going. while i never used mozilla, i still think it should always remain their flagship product.

the focus is going from web designers to end users. that is very bad IMO.

well if you use linux, htere is nvu which is an improved composer. im not sure if its available for windows though.

this is bad news however. i dont like where mozilla is going. while i never used mozilla, i still think it should always remain their flagship product.

the focus is going from web designers to end users. that is very bad IMO.

585599361[/snapback]

Well, as a web designer, I much prefer Firefox. It's not like they're not improving the Gecko rendering engine to keep up with standards. They're just making the front-end more user-friendly.

Well, as a web designer, I much prefer Firefox. It's not like they're not improving the Gecko rendering engine to keep up with standards. They're just making the front-end more user-friendly.

585599402[/snapback]

i dont know, its hard to explain. i just dont like the decision. its like theyre whoring themselves out.

Don't forget that the Mozilla Suite is Open Source which means that it will never die because anyone around the world can continue to improve it.

585599471[/snapback]

Actually no. It means it may never die, because anyone can continue to work on it if this person wants, but if noone wants to continue the work on it, it will die.

I just think this is a smart move for the Mozilla Foundation, after all, Firefox is their main product now, they already said before that their attention would go more to Firefox, and this is only they being more clear with their intentions. Work on Gecko will never stop, but it will be more focused on Firefox. Just think about the trouble they had to merge the newest Gecko code base to Firefox after the 1.0 release, and that they wouldnt need if the Gecko work was being made directly to Firefox.

And this is the beauty of open-source, the original developer might not give a damn anymore for its program, but it can continue its path with anyone interested on it.

they should modularize it so that firefox runs on top of gecko. that way you can have a large variety of different browers, each meant for a different use, all running on top of one engine. not only will this make a better browser on hte outside, it will also lead to more people working on the engine as well.

oh well, I am still using Mozilla 1.8a4 lol

585599419[/snapback]

moz 1.8 b2 here . its a bad decision , cause mozilla is /was a flagship of the oss , it was a well designed suite and had much more options than their ?quivalents have . something very important is dieing here ....:((

If it wasn't for the quick launch crap that's been in the Mozilla Suite from the very beginning that's what I would use.

I think it's a bit ridiculous to have a browser run at startup just to have acceptable performance, while I know it's a holdover from early netscape versions, it's still ridiculous.

Maybe now, if they're going to create a new suite using Firefox and Thunderbird and they can get rid of the Quick Launch crap I might jump on that bandwagon.

In the suite, there is only one instance of the gecko engine for everything, web browser, wmail, html editor. but with separate Firefox and Thunderbird the gecko engine gets loaded twice ..a bit of a hit on your ram, but all in all this is a small price to pay in the name of progress and I'm looking forward to Firefox 1.1 and 2.0

I do hope they do a new suite thom that would be niiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiice

i really hope they don't bundle firefox, thunderbird and sunbird all together. firefox is so great because it's not a suite. not everybody wants a browser or email client, just one or the other. the three are great as they are...separate. they should never put them together cos that will just put people off.

but then again ..

I know a lot of people that absolutely love the suite

and if you want to use FireFox and Thunderbird separate then you can

but I'd be interested in it from the performace aspect I mentioned about the gecko engine loaded in memory only once for all applications

but really tho ...why would creating a new suite put anyone off?

A new suite built around FireFox Thunderbird and Sunbird would more then likely be better performing anyway

I see this as a good thing. I never really liked the whole suite, but now that Firefox has been released to mass apeal, and they are working on Thunderbird and the calendar integration, they have enough time on their hands to make a very much improved Mozilla "suite". Seems like a worthwhile advantage to take.

I think Firefox is in Danger.

Seems like there's some troubles internally. I dunno why am I having this feeling but that's taht.

Mukund

http://www.itfresh.com -> The ultimate InfoTech Portal.

585600792[/snapback]

according to that article the reason the suite is being dropped is due to the amount of product they would have to support .. as time goes on the "supportable product" is only going to increase..they had to draw the line somewhere.

and besides the suite is based off older versions of Netscape, something needs to be done to modernize the entire Mozilla line. The more you focus on the older stuff the harder it is to make serious improvments on newer product

It's just like Microsoft dropping support for older 9.X OS's

I think doing this is gonna keep Firefox alive for quite some time into the future

just my 0.2

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
    • Given the hefty price tag this thing will likely have I doubt many everyday home users will be in the market for one especially given the current climate.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      65
    4. 4
      monterxz
      56
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!