Mac Mini vs. Comparable Spec PC


Recommended Posts

The Mac is document-centric, not application-centric.  You cannot open more than one instance of an application, but you can open multiple documents within an application.  If you have multiple documents open, you can click and hold (or right click if you have a two button mouse) on the icon in the dock to get a pop-up window with a list of the documents you have open (along with a few other options, such as quitting the program, hiding it, or showing it in the Finder) .  This is a design element that Microsoft sort of "borrowed" to create the new organization scheme for XP.  The Dock will dynamically re-scale itself to allow for the number of icons being displayed.

As for why I was gone for a while earlier:  I am online at work during the day(when I made some of my earlier posts), and often late in the evening (right now), but have things to do in the afternoon after work.

585622585[/snapback]

if this is true then what about Cmd + Tab...if mac is document centric then why does doing Cmd+Tab brings u to Application switching instead of document switching (like Alt+tab on PC)

I really don?t care that you get along just fine with one mouse button Steve. I couldn?t be more happy for you that OS X is optimised for people like you. Unfortunately though, because OS X it tailored to people that can?t handle more than one mouse button at a time it extends across the whole hardwareright down to the laptopsps which are similarly crippled. I do not find any of the workarounds available to be suitable just to cater for the dexterity and functionally challenged.

585622176[/snapback]

The idea is that you have two hands. Count them, one, two ... ok. Now one hand is on the keyboard (not down you pants) while the other is on the mouse. Press and hold the Option button and viola! a "right click" menu appears (I know that isn't what it really is). It annoyed me at first because I am so "use to" a two button mouse. That's where the problem lies. You are use to a two button mouse and therefore it's harder to do things a different way. Gee what do you know, you can use almost any USB mouse with OS X? Compatibility, isn't it a great thing!

I'm being sarcastic because there is nothing wrong with a two button mouse. It does work. It may not work as well as a two button mouse or a mouse with a scrollwheel but it does work. And for people new to computing it's easier than having more than one button. Also I understand where you are coming from as I like two button mice with scrollwheels which is why I think Apple should give you an option when you buy a computer from them.

Nor do I understand Apple?s stubborn obstinance in introducing new hardware features such as scroll wheels or scroll areas on trackpads. It?s like 2005 guys! I can?t believe they still think transparent plastic in hardware is more important than a friggin scroll wheel!

585622176[/snapback]

Apple introduced a way to two finger scroll and navigate web pages and pictures in the updated Powerbook line. It's actually easier for me to use than the scroll areas in PC notebooks.

But I completely understand where you are coming from as far as the scrollwheel goes. I mean, that is just an extremely useful idea, no way around it.

Edited by Jstphish
if this is true then what about Cmd + Tab...if mac is document centric then why does doing Cmd+Tab? brings u to Application switching instead of document switching (like Alt+tab on PC)

585622784[/snapback]

Uh, no. Both Command+Tab (on OS X) and Alt+Tab (on Windows) are application switchers. Since Windows does things based on instances of applications, Alt+Tab becomes a sort of "window switcher". Then again, Windows has applications which break this multiple-application-instances trend. Those applications are called MDI, or Multiple Document Interface applications. Opera and most Adobe apps are shining examples of MDI. I believe Alt+Tab doesn't switch between the windows inside one instance of Photoshop.

Document switching on OS X is done by Expos?, by the dock, or by Command+~.

The Mac is document-centric, not application-centric. You cannot open more than one instance of an application, but you can open multiple documents within an application. If you have multiple documents open, you can click and hold (or right click if you have a two button mouse) on the icon in the dock to get a pop-up window with a list of the documents you have open (along with a few other options, such as quitting the program, hiding it, or showing it in the Finder) . This is a design element that Microsoft sort of "borrowed" to create the new organization scheme for XP. The Dock will dynamically re-scale itself to allow for the number of icons being displayed.

As for why I was gone for a while earlier:  I am online at work during the day(when I made some of my earlier posts), and often late in the evening (right now), but have things to do in the afternoon after work.

585622585[/snapback]

Thanks for answering my question. To say Microsoft borried this idea from OS X is pushing things a bit don't you think? We are talking of two new OS's literally released months apart. Both would have been feature complete and in testing for months. I'm sure said feature was either a) obvious to both interface developers or b) your latter explanation of them both borrowing it from an existing source is true.

For the record, as far as I know Windows 2000 does not support task stacking. I have it right in front of me as we speak running SP4.

I almost missed this part.  The reason Mac users keep bringing up the Quick Launch bar is that it is the element most like the Dock. The Dock is just a convenient way of launching frequently used programs.  Yes, it also serves as a task manager as well, but it seems that "most people" don't find this confusing at all (or else there would be a massive amount of talk about it on message boards).

585622724[/snapback]

Here's me thinking you guys keep bringing it up because you need some fuel for your "the Windows Taskbar is cluttered" argument.... :p

Oh, and "most people" do not run OS X period. Perhaps that would explain the silence on message boards...

I'm being sarcastic because there is nothing wrong with a two button mouse.  It does work.  It may not work as well as a two button mouse or a mouse with a scrollwheel but it does work.  And for people new to computing it's easier than having more than one button.  Also I understand where you are coming from as I like two button mice with scrollwheels which is why I think Apple should give you an option when you buy a computer from them.

Apple introduced a way to two finger scroll and navigate web pages and pictures in the updated Powerbook line.  It's actually easier for me to use than the scroll areas in PC notebooks.

I can follow the argument that one mouse button may be easier for people new to computing to some degree, but then that factors in all sorts of variabilities like how much easier does it make it, and is it really worth screwing everyone else over to support these dunces?

Personally, I think not.

Apple will never, ever, ever ship a two button mouse btw. They can't. Soon as they do they know it's basically GAME OVER for the one button mouse.

I can follow the argument that one mouse button may be easier for people new to computing to some degree, but then that factors in all sorts of variabilities like how much easier does it make it, and is it really worth screwing everyone else over to support these dunces?

Personally, I think not.

Apple will never, ever, ever ship a two button mouse btw. They can't. Soon as they do they know it's basically GAME OVER for the one button mouse.

585623171[/snapback]

I'm a recent ( 1 month) convert from Windows to Mac and am having no problems at all with the one button mouse. It is pretty easy to use, I just needed to get away from a windows mindset and realize things just work in OSX without much in the way of tinkering on my end.

Getting used to a mouse after using early home computers like the TRS-80 and others as a kid was more difficult.

For the record, as far as I know Windows 2000 does not support task stacking. I have it right in front of me as we speak running SP4.

585623115[/snapback]

I didn't think it did, but didn't have a copy nearby to check when I was posting, so I couldn't be sure. Thanks for the confirmation.

Again, I am not using Windows as a reference. I am trying to speak in generic terms of how *I* would like an interface to work, not in terms of what I am using.

Fair enough, that's the very reason I bought a Mac. I never maximize windows, I rarely use the taskbar if I am using Windows, so OSX makes a lot more sense to me. I've also been a fan of blackbox, where you keep running programs in a right click menu.

BTW. You guys you need to get off Quick Launch. I've already mentioned it's been deprecated in newer versions of Windows to be an optional element. They have done a few other things like clean the desktop up to nothing but the Recycle Bin and put in mechanism to prevent users from wandering in to the "My Programs" folder to try launch things. In Windows your primary and immeidiate mechanism for launching programs is the "Start" menu. That is it. Yes, older programs still want to spray their icons around like a mad women's sh|t (which I find immensley annoying) but it is something MS realise needs to be cleaned up and are working on and have put mechanisms in place to restrict this sort of behaviour.

I'd say about half of the programs I installed in Windows asked if I wanted to add a Quick Launch icon. AFAIK, none ask to add themselves to your dock in OSX. The first time you boot our Win2k boxes at work there are about 10 icons in the Quicklaunch bar.

It personal preference. The Start menu (Win) and Apps folder (OSX) are identical in use. Some people like loading up their quicklaunch bar in Windows, some people like adding icons to the dock in OSX.

Ok so when I saw my Dock growing that may have actually been because open documents were being added to it. My assumption has been that it may have been caused by me running programs that were not in it initially.

How does the Dock prevent the "clutter" that you guys were complaining about with the Windows Taskbar btw? i.e. What organisation mechanism does it use when too many icons are on it, or was this just handballed off by the Dock designers for Expose to handle?

PS I had a bit of a chuckle about Expose in the tutorial. You know I had to tell my friend that bought a Mini and subsequently tried to get me to buy a Mini that the feature existed. How he could have missed it in the tutorial... LOL

585622481[/snapback]

The dock does not equal the taskbar. Nothing gets added to the right side of the dock unless you minimize it there. In general use, the only thing on the right side of my dock is iTunes and the trash can. Every open document is handled on the desktop. Expose certainly helps, but the real usage of OSX comes from the fact that most programs either open partial windows, or you use the + button which maximizes to fit, not to fill. So you never really run out of screen space like in Windows.

As for learning Expose, I'm almost certain I saw something on it when I started up my mini, but if not, I read about it on apple.com. There's quicktime videos there that describe all the major features of OSX, including Expose ;)

just my 2 cents... Someone in the thread said that longhorn will have a significantly different GUI- ALL signs point to it having pretty much the same GUI with a stupid bar ont he said taking up more room. Dont get me wrong- Im a windows user and I like the bar idea, but something "different" definently not,

I have 2 questions for MAC users... when you are using an application, what happens to the dock? does it dissapear and when you hover the mouse near the bottom it pops up again? doesnt it get in the way of your work?

Also, how do you live with no right click? and if u got a usb mouse with a right click and hooked it upto a mac would u get right click function back- or would is be a useless mouse button that doesnt do anything!?

I have 2 questions for MAC users...  when you are using an application, what happens to the dock? does it dissapear and when you hover the mouse near the bottom it pops up again? doesnt it get in the way of your work?

Also, how do you live with no right click? and if u got a usb mouse  with a right click and hooked it upto a mac would u get right click function back- or would is be a useless mouse button that doesnt do anything!?

585625154[/snapback]

You can have the dock auto-hide (have it pop up whenever your mouse goes to the bottom of the screen) or fixed, and all your programs expand only to the edge of the dock, so it never gets in the way. The only time it could be an issue is if you're working on something that requires horizontal scrolling, but since you can always expand to fit, and a lot of macs are widescreen, it's hardly an issue.

Yes, you can use right click. I have an MX duo, I can use every button on the mouse, including the scroll wheel. Unlike Windows though, there's nothing that needs to be done with the right click, everything is icon or menu driven.

I have 2 questions for MAC users...? when you are using an application, what happens to the dock? does it dissapear and when you hover the mouse near the bottom it pops up again? doesnt it get in the way of your work?

Also, how do you live with no right click? and if u got a usb mouse? with a right click and hooked it upto a mac would u get right click function back- or would is be a useless mouse button that doesnt do anything!?

585625154[/snapback]

You can set the Dock to autohide if you like, but by default, applications know not to put their windows behind the dock.

The Mac interface is designed to use only a single button, but it can take advantage of multi-button mice if you hook one up.

edit: I see threetonsun beat me to it, I had started my reply and had to answer the phone before I got finished typing it.

so if i were to get a mac with an mx duo and i highlighted some text and i right clicked on it... a small menu wouldnt open up with a copy/paste option?

585625730[/snapback]

Yup. And spell check in most apps, speech recognition, a few other things.

But honestly, cut/paste/copy should be done by keyboard. If you have an MX Duo, the commands are even printed on the corresponding keys!

Apple will never, ever, ever ship a two button mouse btw. They can't. Soon as they do they know it's basically GAME OVER for the one button mouse.

585623171[/snapback]

They are working on a 2 button mouse right now.

http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=951

They are working on a 2 button mouse right now.

http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=951

585625959[/snapback]

LOL... even as a non-Apple user (although I tried) I know that I would trust "news" from AppleInsider about as much as I'd trust a used car salesperson.

Apple sites are notorious for hyping complete rediculous rumours that eventuate in absolutely nothing. :whistle:

I'd say about half of the programs I installed in Windows asked if I wanted to add a Quick Launch icon. AFAIK, none ask to add themselves to your dock in OSX. The first time you boot our Win2k boxes at work there are about 10 icons in the Quicklaunch bar.

585624418[/snapback]

If you are lucky enough for them to ask you that is... That is one of my absolute pet hates about Windows. Many application installers spray crap all over the interface, or the OEMs fill up the Start Menu with crap that they want you to see for marketing purposes. If they were able to address this in Longhorn I'd be over the moon, but I very much doubt it because the root of the cause is that the Windows interface is polluted by it's success- all sorts of political and financial forces shape it. A company spraying its' icons about everywhere to get you to try out XYZ product or ZXY service is a symptom of that.

A point of interest... the QL bar was probably put in there because it had an icon so you could easily minimise all your open windows and show your desktop. Since the desktop has been deprecated in new versions of XP it is no longer required, hence why QL is now just an option. <- This is just my opinion, not absolute fact.

...but the real usage of OSX comes from the fact that most programs either open partial windows, or you use the + button which maximizes to fit, not to fill. So you never really run out of screen space like in Windows.

585624418[/snapback]

Yeah I saw that behaviour. It was part of my frustration with using OS X. I want to be able to maximise windows. I like having a full screen open for my word processor or other work. In Windows this is a personal choice. If you are focussed on a particular piece of work then you can maximise it and use the full display available. Otherwise you can fit the window to whatever size you like. I can't stand how I could not seem to easily achieve this in OS X with the interface presented.

I know this is another thing that comes down to "well that is the Mac way of doing things", but I don't want to do things the way the Mac wants me to, I want to do things *my* way. Windows comes out tops here.

I know this is another thing that comes down to "well that is the Mac way of doing things", but I don't want to do things the way the Mac wants me to, I want to do things *my* way. Windows comes out tops here.

585627805[/snapback]

Well, again I don't get your point, in this particular case you need to do the same workaround to have things in "your" way. Let's suppose in Os X you want the window to be maximzed to fix the entire desktop (note that some apps that require the full space, lke imovie, iphoto or garageband always maximixe to fill the desktop with the + button, while apps like safari or word only maximize to have all the inside shown) you have to manually drag the window to enalarge it untill it fill the desktop.

Otherwise in windows, if you want a window to enlarge just to fit the contents, you have to manually do it, while you can have it maximized in full screen with a click.

Once again it depends of how "your" way is, to me for example, after years of using Windows, I found the OS X way more productive than the Windows one, but it's just a personal opinion.

I know this is another thing that comes down to "well that is the Mac way of doing things", but I don't want to do things the way the Mac wants me to, I want to do things *my* way. Windows comes out tops here.

585627805[/snapback]

And what if in Windows you actually WANTED to resize your window to fit its contents? Is there an easy way to do that except by manually resizing the window, just as you would have to do on the Mac if you wanted your window to take up the full screen?

I know. I just thought it was kind of like asking members of a cult if they have any issues with their leader...    ;)

585627713[/snapback]

Are you trying to tell me that Mac users love every element of the Mac, its hardware, and interface? If you truly believe that then you are incredibly naive. Mac message boards are generally full of people that have one problem or another. My personal pet peeve with OS X is that you cannot copy one folder over the top of another with the same name and simply add the contents of one to the other (as would happen on Windows). The new folder simply takes the place of the old one, and your old files are gone. Very, VERY annoying (and I've seen others here who share this view).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Microsoft releases PowerToys v0.100.1, fixes a bug that made remapped keys misbehave by Ivan Jenic Microsoft just released PowerToys v0.100.1, a patch update that addresses several stability and behavior issues found in v0.100.0. The v0.100.0 patch was a significant update for PowerToys, as it introduced all sorts of new features and additions, such as a rebuilt Shortcut Guide, a Command Palette Extension Gallery, webcam overlay support in ZoomIt, and more. However, the v0.100.0 version also introduced some bugs and stability issues. And now, Microsoft is addressing these issues in the new patch. The most impactful fix in this release perhaps is in Keyboard Manager, where remapped modifier keys were being delivered as system-key events, causing unexpected behavior in apps. The clearest example of this was Alt-to-Backspace remaps, deleting whole words instead of a single character. So, if you thought there was an issue with your keyboard, Microsoft just confirmed that it was PowerToys. Beyond the Keyboard Manager fix, v0.100.1 also addresses several other issues. It fixes a bug with Power Display that was preventing monitors from waking from standby correctly. Additionally, the new update patches Quick Access crashes on launch, and resolves a Shortcut Guide crash that occurred when switching between sidebar sections. Here’s the full changelog: Color Picker Fixed a bug where the main Color Picker window could appear inside the zoomed-in picker view Command Palette Fixed Run history initialization in AOT builds Fixed a bug where the Performance Monitor dock item could show ??? after restart Fixed the Hibernate command using the Sleep icon Limited the "pin to dock" dialog to displays where the dock is enabled Keyboard Manager Fixed modifier keys remapped to non-modifier keys being delivered as system-key events, which caused unexpected behavior in apps such as Alt-to-Backspace deleting whole words Power Display Fixed a bug where selecting On in the monitor power-state control did not wake a monitor from standby Fixed built-in display detection and brightness control on dual-GPU laptops where the internal panel is driven by the discrete GPU PowerToys Run Fixed VS Code Workspaces discovery after VS Code moved recently opened workspace data to shared storage Quick Access Fixed Quick Access flyout crashes caused by unhandled XAML exceptions during launch or page navigation Shortcut Guide Fixed a crash when navigating between Shortcut Guide sidebar sections Fixed number-key rendering in shortcut manifests and added a Postman shortcut manifest Updated bundled shortcut manifests to use the literal number-key token so number keys render correctly across apps ZoomIt Fixed a race condition in audio initialization for ZoomIt video recording You can download PowerToys v0.100.1 from the official GitHub releases page.
    • OBS Studio 32.2.0 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea OBS Studio is software designed for capturing, compositing, encoding, recording, and streaming video content, efficiently. It is the re-write of the widely used Open Broadcaster Software, to allow even more features and multi-platform support. OBS Studio supports multiple sources, including media files, games, web pages, application windows, webcams, your desktop, microphone and more. OBS Studio Features: High performance real time video/audio capturing and mixing, with unlimited scenes you can switch between seamlessly via custom transitions. Live streaming to Twitch, YouTube, Periscope, Mixer, GoodGame, DailyMotion, Hitbox, VK and any other RTMP server Filters for video sources such as image masking, color correction, chroma/color keying, and more. x264, H.264 and AAC for your live streams and video recordings Intel Quick Sync Video (QSV) and NVIDIA NVENC support Intuitive audio mixer with per-source filters such as noise gate, noise suppression, and gain. Take full control with VST plugin support. GPU-based game capture for high performance game streaming Unlimited number of scenes and sources Number of different and customizable transitions for when you switch between scenes Hotkeys for almost any action such as start or stop your stream or recording, push-to-talk, fast mute of any audio source, show or hide any video source, switch between scenes,and much more Live preview of any changes on your scenes and sources using Studio Mode before pushing them to your stream where your viewers will see those changes DirectShow capture device support (webcams, capture cards, etc) Powerful and easy to use configuration options. Add new Sources, duplicate existing ones, and adjust their properties effortlessly. Streamlined Settings panel for quickly configuring your broadcasts and recordings. Switch between different profiles with ease. Light and dark themes available to fit your environment. …and many other features. For free. At all. OBS Studio 32.2.0 Beta 2 changelog: Beta 2 Changes Fixed a CI deployment issue. There are no application changes since Beta 1. 32.2 New Features Replaced add source dropdown with new dialog [Warchamp7] Improved FPS selector UX [jcm93] Added missing file support for filters [exeldro] Added ability for plugins to set custom icons for new source types [cg2121] Included .webp files when adding a directory to Image Slide Show source [TarunCore] Added copy paste functions to frontend API [exeldro] Added filter to compose SDR into HDR [jpark37] Added delete as a hotkey to delete sources on macOS [PatTheMav] Added dynamic bitrate support to multitrack video [lexano-ivs] 32.2 Changes Forced Intel-based installations to update to Apple Silicon version on macOS [PatTheMav] This change means that OBS Studio versions built for Intel-based Macs but running on Apple Silicon Macs will automatically update to OBS Studio built for Apple Silicon Macs. If an installation was using third-party plugins, those plugins will no longer load until replaced with Apple Silicon versions. Fixed audio mixer state getting out of sync when changing settings via websockets or plugins [Warchamp7] Added theming for checked QToolButtons [glikely] Improved OpenGL performance slightly on low-end machines [kkartaltepe] Set minimum size for color source to 1 pixel [exeldro] Added minimum width to spinboxes [Warchamp7] Disallowed overwriting the crash handler [sebastian-s-beckmann] Applied process mitigation policies for Windows [notr1ch] Adjusted description of multitrack video [jhnbwrs] Changed new capture devices to use fallback frame rate by default [PatTheMav] Improved DLL loading behavior on Windows [notr1ch] Limited multitrack video config to Custom service [PatTheMav] 32.2 Bug Fixes Fixed OAuth and dock state save corruption [PatTheMav] Fixed group bounds not resizing when removing items [howellrl] Fixed canvas mixes not being restored after video reset [dsaedtler] Fixed some erroneous crashes during shutdown [Warchamp7] Fixed display capture sometimes capturing black after a duplicator failure [ThrowTop] Fixed color of controls dock output buttons in System theme [shiina424] Fixed virtual camera reset failures [stephematician] Fixed potential crash when user discards changes in the settings window [suogesi] Fixed incorrect return value in virtualcam filter [xtfo] Fixed source toolbar buttons not working after dragging a source into a group [Warchamp7] Fixed properties hint icon spacing [Warchamp7] Fixed potential crash when a video device reconnects on macOS [jcm93] Fixed an issue where PipeWire could fail on NVIDIA GPUs [hoshinolina] Fixed obs_canvas_get_video_info returning incorrect framerate [dsaedtler] 32.2 Deprecations Deprecated obs_properties_add_button [sebastian-s-beckmann] Download: OBS Studio 32.2.0 Beta 2 | Portable | ARM64 | ~200.0 MB (Open Source) View: OBS Studio Homepage | Other Operating Systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Is a fast food restaurant a good metric to compare against?
    • Grand Theft Auto VI pricing revealed alongside Ultimate Edition and pre-loading details by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Last week, Rockstar revealed Grand Theft Auto VI pre-orders will be starting soon, and just a day ahead of that, now the studio has announced the official pricing for the highly anticipated game. This has been a hotly debated topic among fans and industry veterans for a long time, considering the game is expected to be the biggest entertainment product launch ever. The confirmed pricing for the Grand Theft Auto VI standard edition is $79.99, which Rockstar says gives access to the "single-player experience set in the biggest, most immersive evolution of the series yet." This follows what most of our readers thought would happen with the pricing too. At the same time, a $99.99 Grand Theft Auto VI: Ultimate Edition has been confirmed as well, which lands with "an exclusive collection of premium vehicles, weapons, apparel, and action threaded across all aspects of Jason and Lucia’s story." Pre-ordering will also give fans extra bonuses, including a Vintage Vice City Pack of cosmetic items as well as a free month of GTA+. Head to the official website of the game here to check out all the cosmetic rewards the Ultimate Edition and pre-orders bring. Interestingly, the studio does not mention Grand Theft Auto VI multiplayer at all in today's announcement. Perhaps this will arrive later, following the campaign launch, or the studio is keeping that reveal for a later date. Digital pre-orders for Grand Theft Auto VI will begin on June 25, 2026, at midnight local time across regions for Xbox Series X|S and PlayStation 5. The title is slated to launch on November 19 on those same platforms. Pre-loading for Grand Theft Auto VI will kick off on November 12, giving players a week to get the game ready on their consoles. As for the physical edition, Take-Two has confirmed that this will be available without a disc, with the box only containing a download code inside. This will be purchasable starting November 12, giving players who take this route time to pre-load the title as well.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      OHI Accounting earned a badge
      One Year In
    • First Post
      Almohandis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      122
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Xenon
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!