Mac Mini vs. Comparable Spec PC


Recommended Posts

The Mac is document-centric, not application-centric.  You cannot open more than one instance of an application, but you can open multiple documents within an application.  If you have multiple documents open, you can click and hold (or right click if you have a two button mouse) on the icon in the dock to get a pop-up window with a list of the documents you have open (along with a few other options, such as quitting the program, hiding it, or showing it in the Finder) .  This is a design element that Microsoft sort of "borrowed" to create the new organization scheme for XP.  The Dock will dynamically re-scale itself to allow for the number of icons being displayed.

As for why I was gone for a while earlier:  I am online at work during the day(when I made some of my earlier posts), and often late in the evening (right now), but have things to do in the afternoon after work.

585622585[/snapback]

if this is true then what about Cmd + Tab...if mac is document centric then why does doing Cmd+Tab brings u to Application switching instead of document switching (like Alt+tab on PC)

I really don?t care that you get along just fine with one mouse button Steve. I couldn?t be more happy for you that OS X is optimised for people like you. Unfortunately though, because OS X it tailored to people that can?t handle more than one mouse button at a time it extends across the whole hardwareright down to the laptopsps which are similarly crippled. I do not find any of the workarounds available to be suitable just to cater for the dexterity and functionally challenged.

585622176[/snapback]

The idea is that you have two hands. Count them, one, two ... ok. Now one hand is on the keyboard (not down you pants) while the other is on the mouse. Press and hold the Option button and viola! a "right click" menu appears (I know that isn't what it really is). It annoyed me at first because I am so "use to" a two button mouse. That's where the problem lies. You are use to a two button mouse and therefore it's harder to do things a different way. Gee what do you know, you can use almost any USB mouse with OS X? Compatibility, isn't it a great thing!

I'm being sarcastic because there is nothing wrong with a two button mouse. It does work. It may not work as well as a two button mouse or a mouse with a scrollwheel but it does work. And for people new to computing it's easier than having more than one button. Also I understand where you are coming from as I like two button mice with scrollwheels which is why I think Apple should give you an option when you buy a computer from them.

Nor do I understand Apple?s stubborn obstinance in introducing new hardware features such as scroll wheels or scroll areas on trackpads. It?s like 2005 guys! I can?t believe they still think transparent plastic in hardware is more important than a friggin scroll wheel!

585622176[/snapback]

Apple introduced a way to two finger scroll and navigate web pages and pictures in the updated Powerbook line. It's actually easier for me to use than the scroll areas in PC notebooks.

But I completely understand where you are coming from as far as the scrollwheel goes. I mean, that is just an extremely useful idea, no way around it.

Edited by Jstphish
if this is true then what about Cmd + Tab...if mac is document centric then why does doing Cmd+Tab? brings u to Application switching instead of document switching (like Alt+tab on PC)

585622784[/snapback]

Uh, no. Both Command+Tab (on OS X) and Alt+Tab (on Windows) are application switchers. Since Windows does things based on instances of applications, Alt+Tab becomes a sort of "window switcher". Then again, Windows has applications which break this multiple-application-instances trend. Those applications are called MDI, or Multiple Document Interface applications. Opera and most Adobe apps are shining examples of MDI. I believe Alt+Tab doesn't switch between the windows inside one instance of Photoshop.

Document switching on OS X is done by Expos?, by the dock, or by Command+~.

The Mac is document-centric, not application-centric. You cannot open more than one instance of an application, but you can open multiple documents within an application. If you have multiple documents open, you can click and hold (or right click if you have a two button mouse) on the icon in the dock to get a pop-up window with a list of the documents you have open (along with a few other options, such as quitting the program, hiding it, or showing it in the Finder) . This is a design element that Microsoft sort of "borrowed" to create the new organization scheme for XP. The Dock will dynamically re-scale itself to allow for the number of icons being displayed.

As for why I was gone for a while earlier:  I am online at work during the day(when I made some of my earlier posts), and often late in the evening (right now), but have things to do in the afternoon after work.

585622585[/snapback]

Thanks for answering my question. To say Microsoft borried this idea from OS X is pushing things a bit don't you think? We are talking of two new OS's literally released months apart. Both would have been feature complete and in testing for months. I'm sure said feature was either a) obvious to both interface developers or b) your latter explanation of them both borrowing it from an existing source is true.

For the record, as far as I know Windows 2000 does not support task stacking. I have it right in front of me as we speak running SP4.

I almost missed this part.  The reason Mac users keep bringing up the Quick Launch bar is that it is the element most like the Dock. The Dock is just a convenient way of launching frequently used programs.  Yes, it also serves as a task manager as well, but it seems that "most people" don't find this confusing at all (or else there would be a massive amount of talk about it on message boards).

585622724[/snapback]

Here's me thinking you guys keep bringing it up because you need some fuel for your "the Windows Taskbar is cluttered" argument.... :p

Oh, and "most people" do not run OS X period. Perhaps that would explain the silence on message boards...

I'm being sarcastic because there is nothing wrong with a two button mouse.  It does work.  It may not work as well as a two button mouse or a mouse with a scrollwheel but it does work.  And for people new to computing it's easier than having more than one button.  Also I understand where you are coming from as I like two button mice with scrollwheels which is why I think Apple should give you an option when you buy a computer from them.

Apple introduced a way to two finger scroll and navigate web pages and pictures in the updated Powerbook line.  It's actually easier for me to use than the scroll areas in PC notebooks.

I can follow the argument that one mouse button may be easier for people new to computing to some degree, but then that factors in all sorts of variabilities like how much easier does it make it, and is it really worth screwing everyone else over to support these dunces?

Personally, I think not.

Apple will never, ever, ever ship a two button mouse btw. They can't. Soon as they do they know it's basically GAME OVER for the one button mouse.

I can follow the argument that one mouse button may be easier for people new to computing to some degree, but then that factors in all sorts of variabilities like how much easier does it make it, and is it really worth screwing everyone else over to support these dunces?

Personally, I think not.

Apple will never, ever, ever ship a two button mouse btw. They can't. Soon as they do they know it's basically GAME OVER for the one button mouse.

585623171[/snapback]

I'm a recent ( 1 month) convert from Windows to Mac and am having no problems at all with the one button mouse. It is pretty easy to use, I just needed to get away from a windows mindset and realize things just work in OSX without much in the way of tinkering on my end.

Getting used to a mouse after using early home computers like the TRS-80 and others as a kid was more difficult.

For the record, as far as I know Windows 2000 does not support task stacking. I have it right in front of me as we speak running SP4.

585623115[/snapback]

I didn't think it did, but didn't have a copy nearby to check when I was posting, so I couldn't be sure. Thanks for the confirmation.

Again, I am not using Windows as a reference. I am trying to speak in generic terms of how *I* would like an interface to work, not in terms of what I am using.

Fair enough, that's the very reason I bought a Mac. I never maximize windows, I rarely use the taskbar if I am using Windows, so OSX makes a lot more sense to me. I've also been a fan of blackbox, where you keep running programs in a right click menu.

BTW. You guys you need to get off Quick Launch. I've already mentioned it's been deprecated in newer versions of Windows to be an optional element. They have done a few other things like clean the desktop up to nothing but the Recycle Bin and put in mechanism to prevent users from wandering in to the "My Programs" folder to try launch things. In Windows your primary and immeidiate mechanism for launching programs is the "Start" menu. That is it. Yes, older programs still want to spray their icons around like a mad women's sh|t (which I find immensley annoying) but it is something MS realise needs to be cleaned up and are working on and have put mechanisms in place to restrict this sort of behaviour.

I'd say about half of the programs I installed in Windows asked if I wanted to add a Quick Launch icon. AFAIK, none ask to add themselves to your dock in OSX. The first time you boot our Win2k boxes at work there are about 10 icons in the Quicklaunch bar.

It personal preference. The Start menu (Win) and Apps folder (OSX) are identical in use. Some people like loading up their quicklaunch bar in Windows, some people like adding icons to the dock in OSX.

Ok so when I saw my Dock growing that may have actually been because open documents were being added to it. My assumption has been that it may have been caused by me running programs that were not in it initially.

How does the Dock prevent the "clutter" that you guys were complaining about with the Windows Taskbar btw? i.e. What organisation mechanism does it use when too many icons are on it, or was this just handballed off by the Dock designers for Expose to handle?

PS I had a bit of a chuckle about Expose in the tutorial. You know I had to tell my friend that bought a Mini and subsequently tried to get me to buy a Mini that the feature existed. How he could have missed it in the tutorial... LOL

585622481[/snapback]

The dock does not equal the taskbar. Nothing gets added to the right side of the dock unless you minimize it there. In general use, the only thing on the right side of my dock is iTunes and the trash can. Every open document is handled on the desktop. Expose certainly helps, but the real usage of OSX comes from the fact that most programs either open partial windows, or you use the + button which maximizes to fit, not to fill. So you never really run out of screen space like in Windows.

As for learning Expose, I'm almost certain I saw something on it when I started up my mini, but if not, I read about it on apple.com. There's quicktime videos there that describe all the major features of OSX, including Expose ;)

just my 2 cents... Someone in the thread said that longhorn will have a significantly different GUI- ALL signs point to it having pretty much the same GUI with a stupid bar ont he said taking up more room. Dont get me wrong- Im a windows user and I like the bar idea, but something "different" definently not,

I have 2 questions for MAC users... when you are using an application, what happens to the dock? does it dissapear and when you hover the mouse near the bottom it pops up again? doesnt it get in the way of your work?

Also, how do you live with no right click? and if u got a usb mouse with a right click and hooked it upto a mac would u get right click function back- or would is be a useless mouse button that doesnt do anything!?

I have 2 questions for MAC users...  when you are using an application, what happens to the dock? does it dissapear and when you hover the mouse near the bottom it pops up again? doesnt it get in the way of your work?

Also, how do you live with no right click? and if u got a usb mouse  with a right click and hooked it upto a mac would u get right click function back- or would is be a useless mouse button that doesnt do anything!?

585625154[/snapback]

You can have the dock auto-hide (have it pop up whenever your mouse goes to the bottom of the screen) or fixed, and all your programs expand only to the edge of the dock, so it never gets in the way. The only time it could be an issue is if you're working on something that requires horizontal scrolling, but since you can always expand to fit, and a lot of macs are widescreen, it's hardly an issue.

Yes, you can use right click. I have an MX duo, I can use every button on the mouse, including the scroll wheel. Unlike Windows though, there's nothing that needs to be done with the right click, everything is icon or menu driven.

I have 2 questions for MAC users...? when you are using an application, what happens to the dock? does it dissapear and when you hover the mouse near the bottom it pops up again? doesnt it get in the way of your work?

Also, how do you live with no right click? and if u got a usb mouse? with a right click and hooked it upto a mac would u get right click function back- or would is be a useless mouse button that doesnt do anything!?

585625154[/snapback]

You can set the Dock to autohide if you like, but by default, applications know not to put their windows behind the dock.

The Mac interface is designed to use only a single button, but it can take advantage of multi-button mice if you hook one up.

edit: I see threetonsun beat me to it, I had started my reply and had to answer the phone before I got finished typing it.

so if i were to get a mac with an mx duo and i highlighted some text and i right clicked on it... a small menu wouldnt open up with a copy/paste option?

585625730[/snapback]

Yup. And spell check in most apps, speech recognition, a few other things.

But honestly, cut/paste/copy should be done by keyboard. If you have an MX Duo, the commands are even printed on the corresponding keys!

Apple will never, ever, ever ship a two button mouse btw. They can't. Soon as they do they know it's basically GAME OVER for the one button mouse.

585623171[/snapback]

They are working on a 2 button mouse right now.

http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=951

They are working on a 2 button mouse right now.

http://www.appleinsider.com/article.php?id=951

585625959[/snapback]

LOL... even as a non-Apple user (although I tried) I know that I would trust "news" from AppleInsider about as much as I'd trust a used car salesperson.

Apple sites are notorious for hyping complete rediculous rumours that eventuate in absolutely nothing. :whistle:

I'd say about half of the programs I installed in Windows asked if I wanted to add a Quick Launch icon. AFAIK, none ask to add themselves to your dock in OSX. The first time you boot our Win2k boxes at work there are about 10 icons in the Quicklaunch bar.

585624418[/snapback]

If you are lucky enough for them to ask you that is... That is one of my absolute pet hates about Windows. Many application installers spray crap all over the interface, or the OEMs fill up the Start Menu with crap that they want you to see for marketing purposes. If they were able to address this in Longhorn I'd be over the moon, but I very much doubt it because the root of the cause is that the Windows interface is polluted by it's success- all sorts of political and financial forces shape it. A company spraying its' icons about everywhere to get you to try out XYZ product or ZXY service is a symptom of that.

A point of interest... the QL bar was probably put in there because it had an icon so you could easily minimise all your open windows and show your desktop. Since the desktop has been deprecated in new versions of XP it is no longer required, hence why QL is now just an option. <- This is just my opinion, not absolute fact.

...but the real usage of OSX comes from the fact that most programs either open partial windows, or you use the + button which maximizes to fit, not to fill. So you never really run out of screen space like in Windows.

585624418[/snapback]

Yeah I saw that behaviour. It was part of my frustration with using OS X. I want to be able to maximise windows. I like having a full screen open for my word processor or other work. In Windows this is a personal choice. If you are focussed on a particular piece of work then you can maximise it and use the full display available. Otherwise you can fit the window to whatever size you like. I can't stand how I could not seem to easily achieve this in OS X with the interface presented.

I know this is another thing that comes down to "well that is the Mac way of doing things", but I don't want to do things the way the Mac wants me to, I want to do things *my* way. Windows comes out tops here.

I know this is another thing that comes down to "well that is the Mac way of doing things", but I don't want to do things the way the Mac wants me to, I want to do things *my* way. Windows comes out tops here.

585627805[/snapback]

Well, again I don't get your point, in this particular case you need to do the same workaround to have things in "your" way. Let's suppose in Os X you want the window to be maximzed to fix the entire desktop (note that some apps that require the full space, lke imovie, iphoto or garageband always maximixe to fill the desktop with the + button, while apps like safari or word only maximize to have all the inside shown) you have to manually drag the window to enalarge it untill it fill the desktop.

Otherwise in windows, if you want a window to enlarge just to fit the contents, you have to manually do it, while you can have it maximized in full screen with a click.

Once again it depends of how "your" way is, to me for example, after years of using Windows, I found the OS X way more productive than the Windows one, but it's just a personal opinion.

I know this is another thing that comes down to "well that is the Mac way of doing things", but I don't want to do things the way the Mac wants me to, I want to do things *my* way. Windows comes out tops here.

585627805[/snapback]

And what if in Windows you actually WANTED to resize your window to fit its contents? Is there an easy way to do that except by manually resizing the window, just as you would have to do on the Mac if you wanted your window to take up the full screen?

I know. I just thought it was kind of like asking members of a cult if they have any issues with their leader...    ;)

585627713[/snapback]

Are you trying to tell me that Mac users love every element of the Mac, its hardware, and interface? If you truly believe that then you are incredibly naive. Mac message boards are generally full of people that have one problem or another. My personal pet peeve with OS X is that you cannot copy one folder over the top of another with the same name and simply add the contents of one to the other (as would happen on Windows). The new folder simply takes the place of the old one, and your old files are gone. Very, VERY annoying (and I've seen others here who share this view).

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • TerraMaster F4-425 Pro review: an octa-core Intel NAS that ships with AI (OpenClaw) by Steven Parker It has been a while since I reviewed a TerraMaster NAS, but the company reached out to me asking if I was willing to test the F4-425 Pro, which goes on sale today. It is an upgrade on the F4-425 Plus, which I reviewed back in October 2025 What you need to know is that it basically follows the design principles of the four-bay F4-425 series, with its all-metal exterior. Here are the most important specifications: TerraMaster F4-425 Pro CPU Intel Core N350 (8x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.9 GHz) Intel Core N305 (4x E Cores/Threads, Max burst up to 3.8 GHz) TDP: 7W / 9W (Base) Graphics Intel UHD Graphics 32 EUs (1.35 GHz) Intel UHD Graphics 24 EUs (1.25 GHz) Memory 1x slot 16 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (Max 32 GB) 1x slot 8 GB DDR5 4800MT/s non ECC SODIMM (Max 32 GB) Disk Capacity 120 TB (30 TB x 4) Supported RAID Types TRAID, TRAID +, RAID0, RAID1, RAID5, RAID 6, RAID 10 Network 2x RJ-45 5 GbE Internal storage 3x M.2 2280 NVMe Slot (PCIe 3.0 x1) Bootloader 2Gbit 256 GB NAND Flash card (MX30LF2G28AD) USB port (internal) USB Ports 1x Type-C 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) 3x Type-A 3.2 Gen 2 (10Gbps) HDMI 1x (HDMI) Hardware Transcoding Engine H.264, H.265, MPEG-4, VC-1 Maximum resolution: 4K (4096 x 2160); Maximum FPS: 60 Size (H/W/D) 219 x 181 x 150 mm Weight 2.9 kg System Fan 150 x181 x 219 mm Power 90W, 100V - 240V AC, 50/60 Hz, Single frequency Power consumption (HDDs) 45W (4x 4TB ST4000VN008 in read/write state) 14W (4x 4TB ST4000VN008 in hibernation) Noise Level: 20.9 dB(A) Using 4 SATA HDDs/SSDs in standby mode; Test environment noise: 17.3dB(A); Test distance: 1m Warranty 2 Years OS TOS 7.0.0706 (Beta) MSRP £639.99, $699.99, €739.99 / £739.99, $799.99, €839.99 As you can see above, there are two variants of the F4-425 Pro releasing today. The lesser variant has the slightly weaker N305 CPU and iGP, and 8 GB less RAM, although it also costs $100 less than the top variant we are testing today. In addition, these new F4-425 Pros are shipped with the as-yet-unreleased TOS 7 beta. So what is TOS 7 exactly? During the device initialization, you are warned not to use it in a production environment, which we'll get into later. My contact told me that TOS 7 exits beta today, June 23 with version 7.0.0746. The clear difference with the F4-425 Plus is that it contains the more powerful N350 Intel CPU released in the first quarter of 2025, with support for DisplayPort 1.4, HDMI 2.1, LPDDR5 (4800), DDR5 and DDR4, and a max TDP of just 7W. It also supports AV1 decoding, as well as H.264, VP8, VP9, H.265 (8 bit), and H.265 (10 bit). The different capabilities in the Alder Lake-N (and Twin Lake) series are listed below. Processor E-cores L3-cache Turbo clock GPU GPU-clock TDP Intel N355 8 6 MB 3.9 GHz 32 EUs 1.35 GHz 9 W Intel Core 3 N350 3.9 GHz 1.35 GHz 7 W Intel Core i3-N305 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 9 W Intel Core i3-N300 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz Intel N250 4 3.8 GHz 1.25 GHz 6 W Intel Processor N200 3.7 GHz 0.75 GHz Intel N150 3.6 GHz 24 EUs 1 GHz Intel N97 1.2 GHz 12 W Intel Processor N100 3.4 GHz 0.75 GHz 6 W The CPU is part of the Alder Lake-N series that sits just below the top N355 offering, albeit with an impressive TDP (less than the N355 and N305) for the features it offers. It is designed for low- powered systems and entry-level laptops. As before, we are seeing another NAS with an acceptable, if not great, amount of RAM. It should be noted that the F4-425 Pro only has one SODIMM slot, so if you are planning to upgrade the already 16GB included in this NAS, it will have to be on one module of Single Rank DDR5. As a reminder, up until a couple of years ago, it was commonplace to only get 2 or 4GB max on a flagship Synology or QNAP home NAS. Ever since the likes of TerraMaster and more have entered the market with ample RAM sizes included in their NAS offerings, it has gone a long way in forcing the hands of the traditional makers to up their game a bit. Before we dive in, you can view the different SKUs released so far since the 2025 series launched for Home and SMB users, with the most important specifications listed along with the MSRP listed below: SKU CPU Cores Memory Link Price F2-425 Intel N5095 4 4 GB DDR4 2.5 GbE x1 $249.99 F4-425 Intel N5095 4 4 GB DDR4 2.5 GbE x1 $369.99 F2-425 Plus Intel Core N150 4 8 GB DDR5 5 GbE x 2 $399.99 F4-425 Plus Intel Core N150 4 16 GB DDR5 5 GbE x 2 $569.99 F4-425 Pro Intel Core N305 8 8 GB DDR5 5 GbE x 2 $699.99 F4-425 Pro Intel Core N350 8 16 GB DDR5 5 GbE x 2 $799.99 The F2 in the product name means two 3.5-inch HDD bays, where F4 is four 2.5-inch bays. First impressions Like with the F8 SSD Plus packaging, the F4-425 Pro is using the upgraded box materials, which certainly look better than a plain cream colored box with TERRAMASTER stamped on the sides. The box gives off a premium feel and certainly adds a positive vibe to first impressions. In the box F4-425 Pro TNAS device Power adapter LAN cable (CAT 6) Quick guide [full online guide] Limited warranty notice Screws (for HDD bays) Stickers 2x rubber feet (spares) Design As has become kind of common with TerraMaster, certainly in the last three years, the 2025 F2- and F4-series have received a makeover that really adds to the premium feel of the NAS. Gone are the plastic shells, now replaced with an aluminum outer shell, with the front and back retaining the textured black plastic we saw on the 2024 models. Some key differences from the 2024 series include placing the power button back on the front, along with the addition of a Type A USB port. It's not much bigger or heavier either; in fact, it weighs 500 grams less than the F4-424 Pro. It's slightly shorter in height and depth (length), but only by a few millimeters. The front and back do retain a similar style to the 2024 series. On the front, you just have your four bays along with LED indicators for the HDDs and power. The welcomed change is having a USB port on the front for quick access, should you need to back up a USB drive, for example. Around the back, from top to bottom, you have a reset pin hole, an HDMI port, two 5 GbE Ethernet ports, two USB 3.2 Gen 2 (10 Gbps) Type A ports with a Type-C port below them, and a connector for the barrel port power source. Again, there's no Kensington Security Slot present, which is a bit of a shame considering it's a data storage device. Left side Right side On the left and right of the F4-425 Plus, it is completely smooth aluminum with a TERRAMASTER logo printed on both sides. On the bottom, there are some holes to assist ventilation. Unlike with the F4-425 Plus, the rubber feet did come unstuck during the teardown, which was also an issue on the 2023 series. It seems like other customers have lodged complaints about them, as TerraMaster now includes two spare rubber feet in the box, in case any of the preinstalled ones are lost; however, this seems more like a papering over the cracks solution rather than actually fixing the issue with better quality rubber stand-offs. There are also four screws that must be removed in order to access the internals. Teardown Upon removing the four screws, you can slide the device out of its shell to reveal the three NVMe M.2 slots (PCIe 3.0 X1) and single SODIMM slot connector, which is populated with a single 16GB DDR5 4800MT/s module. I added a couple of MP44Q M.2 PCIe 4.0 SSDs (2 x 4TB) that can be availed on Amazon for $492.99 that TEAMGROUP supplied us with, along with a 250GB 970 Evo Plus that my colleague Chris White sent me by accident and let me keep a few years ago. As I have said in previous reviews, TerraMaster support staff actually encourage installing whatever you want on their devices, and happily, the USB port for the bootloader is now easily accessible should you want to use it for your own flavor of NAS OS, such as TrueNAS, Unraid, or maybe Xpenology. Yes, because TerraMaster has now switched to a 256 GB NAND Flash card (3rd photo above) for the TOS bootloader. This is also replaceable, but you can also simply add a USB bootloader, access the BIOS, and tell the F4-425 Pro to boot from that instead of the Flash card. Unlike earlier iterations of TerraMaster NAS, you don't have to tear this down any further than the four screws on the outer shell in order to be able to access and manage the memory, NVMe slots, and USB bootloader. However, if you need to access the NAND Flash card or CMOS battery, then eight more screws (four on each side) need to be removed in order to take off the rear panel with the 120mm fan, and then the motherboard can be lifted off and removed from the SATA connector PCB. There's also no risk of threading the screw holes, because the four that hold the shell in place are metal on metal, while the screws that hold the rear panel on do screw into plastic. Either way, like last time when I reviewed the F4-425 plus, I was just happier to see larger screws being used. Overall, it follows some great improvements in build quality from the 2024 series and earlier. Setup BIOS The F4-425 Pro includes an Aptio BIOS from American Megatrends [1, 2], and you can setup pretty much everything here including the boot order, which is locked to the UEFI OS, however above that choice you can enable or disable booting to the USB bootloader so this would still allow you to switch to a USB stick with an alternative bootloader and boot from it, or disable it to instead always start from the first disk with an OS installed on it. Initial Setup Setup is roughly the same as the F4-425 Plus, along with the new TOS 7 setup dialogs, so there will be no surprises here. Upon connecting to the LAN and booting up, the F4-425 Pro can be reached by navigating to http://tnas.local. If that doesn't work, you can use the local address assigned via DHCP, which you can find using the TNAS PC desktop application, which is essentially a TerraMaster NAS finder. The setup process is pretty straightforward, through a wizard, and in full below: TOS 7 Initialization As you can see, TOS 7 received a new coat of paint, and the initialization requires fewer interactions. Happily, TOS no longer decides to throw all disks into the same Storage Pool; 2.5-inch HDDs are allocated into Storage Pool 1. This is because two of the HDDs are allocated to hold system files. Previously (with TOS 5 and 6), if you pre-installed HDDs and SSDs, they were all placed into Storage Pool 1, even if you did not select the SSDs for inclusion during the onboarding. TOS 7 Setup On first boot, there is a tutorial and some steps to take to harden the TNAS (or not), which includes an immediate update from TOS 7.0.0616 to 7.0.0706, of which the changelog screenshot is also included in the above gallery. It must be noted that the Security Advisor still contains (in my opinion) a pretty major bug in that if you enable SPC and then do the required rebooting, the Security Advisor still says that SPC is disabled. TerraMaster provided the following statement about it: It is disappointing that TOS 7 has been in beta since December, and this OOBE issue is still there. Shutdown option has moved Instead of a Taskbar option to manage the NAS, all of these options have been moved to a "Start panel", initially I didn't see it and my contact had to show me how to power off the F4-425 Pro. To logout, reboot or power off you can find those controls at the top right of the Panel. It is also possible to power off through the TNAS mobile app beta. Storage setup Above, you can see the steps I took to create the Storage Pools and Volumes. I made a second Storage Pool using TRAID on two 4TB MP44Q SSDs (which, in this instance, is similar to RAID 5), and finally, I added the 250GB 970 Evo Plus drive as Hyper Cache on Storage Pool 1 in Balanced mode. Registering If you decide not to lock down the F4-425 Pro in Security Isolation Mode (blocking all external connections), then you could set up a TNAS device ID through the Remote Access setting in the Control Panel (which must be unique). This works in combination with an online TerraMaster account. TOS 7 TNAS Online Creating a TerraMaster account and linking the device online activates the warranty when you provide proof of purchase and the serial number, but it also gives you access through the TNAS mobile app, which allows you to complete certain operationsб including powering off and restarting the NAS remotely. A TNAS mobile update is required to gain access through TOS 7, and this is provided on the TerraMaster website, as it is not yet on Google Play. The app is evolving all the time and has made leaps and bounds since I first started reviewing TerraMaster devices almost three years ago. It is not quite there yet if you are comparing the likes of Synology, which, sadly, a lot of users online do all the time. OpenClaw setup One of the main selling points of the new F4-425 Pro is the inclusion of OpenClaw, with TerraMaster claiming that it is "powered by the world's first AI-native TOS 7 OS, supporting local-first smart workflows and independent data control." However, I immediately ran into problems trying to enable OpenClaw. After waiting 20 minutes at the "Enabling" message of the OpenClaw app following installation, I decided to do some searching online and discovered that it couldn't complete the installation process due to SPC being enabled, which is something TOS 7 immediately recommends to be enabled on first boot. SPC for NAS (TOS 7) is basically the same principle as UAC in Windows; it blocks executables from being launched by non-Super Users. After reaching out to my contact about these issues, I received the following response: Anyway, this only became clear when I closed the OpenClaw app screen and clicked on the OpenClaw icon in the taskbar; that is when I saw the message about disabling SPC. I think, due to the fact that this is a requirement, this should be a prompt during the installation process, not when closing the App Market and then trying to launch OpenClaw. There's also no 'Getting started' guide for people like me who have never used OpenClaw. I tried to add an LLM and discovered the tutorial led nowhere. That's when I started looking around the official TerraMaster forums, and I found a guide that helpfully explains that you won't get anywhere with OpenClaw unless you have a paid plan, which is disappointing because I imagined there would be an option to use a local LLM as I do in SubtitleEdit with Whisper-XXL. In addition, with the marketing imagery on the official site, it says that the OpenClaw feature is "all processed 100% locally for absolute privacy." which led me to believe that I could install a local LLM, not one that required paid tokens. In any case, TerraMaster does not provide guidance for this new feature, which was also a selling point of the F4-425 Pro! My contact also provided clarification about the above points I raised with TerraMaster Since it is not in the scope of the review to add paid services, I'll leave that to the people who are more qualified with OpenClaw. F4-425 Pro Surveillance App TOS also comes with a Surveillance app, which is not installed by default; it can be found in the App Market recommended section. In addition, after installing, it doesn't drop a shortcut on the Desktop or top taskbar, but you can "Send to Desktop" from the App Market listing for the app for a quick way to open it. Adding my Reolink POE doorbell camera was painless. TerraMaster doesn't appear to have a repository of preconfigured cameras; instead, the camera must be added using ONVIF or RTSP. No mobile Surveillance app TerraMaster still doesn't have a dedicated Surveillance app, although from searching online, Surveillance can be used and managed through the TNAS mobile app. I tried this with the updated TNAS mobile app beta in combination with TOS 7 and got a message that Surveillance was "Only accessible through web browser," so I reckon this must be limited to the stable versions of TOS 6 and the mobile app. More quirks In addition, whenever I minimized the Live View window in the browser Surveillance app, the feed appeared to switch to the Low-bandwidth stream, and there was no way to get the High-quality stream back. To get the High-quality stream back, I had to close Live View and then reopen it. Benchmarking A pretty cool feature of the TOS 7 is that it allows you to install directly to the NVMe M.2 SSD. In order to do that, you would have to leave out any HDDs during initialization, and even then, the system partitions are always written to two HDDs when they are eventually added. With three NVMe slots, this also gives an interesting scenario where you could build a TRAID storage Pool for installing all your apps and Docker on, and keep the third for SSD cache on the HDD pool. Limitless options! SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 A CrystalDiskMark test on a mapped network drive from within a Windows 11 25H2 PC (image above) connected over a 5 GbE hub was well within acceptable ranges. Although the read result on SATA was a little less than with the F4-425 Plus, for some reason, while writes were generally better. SATA PCIe 3.0 X1 I also ran the NAS Performance tester, which tests the link speed performance. As you can see, it pretty much maxes out the 5GbE connection. Of course, you can also opt to bond the two 5 GbE connections for a bit more umph, but I didn't do that. TOS 7, which, as of testing, is still in Beta, comes with an App Center that has a bunch of handy programs you can install right off the bat, such as Emby, Plex, Docker, as well as in-house Backup and Surveillance solutions. As you can imagine, any media streaming services you would want to host off the F4-425 Pro will work great, thanks to the Intel Core N350 CPU and its 16 GB of DDR5 memory. Accessing from mobile is only possible if Security Isolation Mode is disabled, which can put your NAS at risk from external sources, so there was no way to access it from the TNAS Mobile app. It's also quiet. I had this sat next to my computer on my work desk for the past week, and I did wonder if the noise I was accustomed to with NAS devices would annoy me, but all I could hear was a soft whirring of the rear fan (which was a little annoying) when the disks were not actively copying or reading data. Conclusion So what have I learned? Unfortunately, this release raises a few important questions and concerns that I feel haven't been adequately addressed. What I didn't like Our variant shipped with TOS 7 beta, and it's advised not to use it in a production environment. I feel that's a bit limiting on an $800 device. The mobile app is also still in beta and does not support some of the first-party apps, like Surveillance, and it still has quite a few bugs. I am a bit confused about the OpenClaw marketing along with the F4-425 Pro. I feel like that if it's going to be a main selling point, then offer official guidance on how to get started with it. TerraMaster recommends enabling SPC, but then markets the NAS for use with OpenClaw, which requires disabling SPC to be able to use it, opening up genuine security concerns for the NAS; and that's before you get into the security concerns of OpenClaw itself. Of course, the above issues won't be a problem if you decide to install something else on it, or even go back to the stable TOS 6. I wish TerraMaster had just given TOS 7 as opt-in rather than shipping with it. TOS 7 has been available as a preview since December 2025 (so well before my last TerraMaster review), and according to a thread on Reddit where a user shared a screenshot from the TerraMaster Facebook page, it is scheduled to launch today, June 23, but there's nothing about that in the TerraMaster news blog. My contact confirmed over email that TOS 7 exits beta today. The rubber feet also deserve a mention as they continue to be a problem, with them coming unstuck the moment you shift the F4-425 Pro anywhere on your desk. What I liked What it comes down to, though, aside from what I already mentioned, you are still getting a quality, affordable device here, so recommending it will depend on the individual's use case. If you're just looking for a relatively small NAS device to manage virtual machines on, backup your files, and take care of your home theater streaming, then it is a great device that will certainly futureproof you for some time. It provides good performance, takes up little space, and is, on the whole, very quiet. Four bays afford proper redundancy using TRAID or RAID 5, and you can even expand on storage capacity by adding the 2-bay D5, or 4-bay D8 Hybrid DAS over a USB 3.2 (10Gbps) link. Considering the 2024 releases were more about power, with the likes of an Intel Core i5-1235U high-end laptop CPU under the hood, I asked my contact last time if we could expect more of the same in higher-end models and was told: It makes a lot of sense to use Intel's N350 chip inside a NAS; it is more than capable of doing what the F4-425 Pro is intended for, media streaming and backup. The only downside is still the clear lack of community and even staff support on the official forums. In the past, I have had topics go unanswered for days, or there would be generic-type "we've noted this and passed it onto our developer team" type responses. Along with the other things I mentioned, it all ends up costing it a couple of points. If you are comfortable with the command line, Docker, and setting up TrueNAS or Unraid, you'll be fine. You can do great things with this hardware. In TOS, the apps are a bit lacking, and things don't always work as expected.\ AI NAS?! What has become clear to me this year is that we are going to start seeing all kinds of "AI NAS" come to market, and while that might be good for us consumers, be diligent and research these claims. Although the F4-425 Pro technically comes with AI, it is really using a cloud service that is externally sourced off-device through the third party OpenClaw app. My colleague did review a newcomer to the NAS space earlier this year, and it includes a local AI assistant inside the Zettlab D4 NAS, and they do not even use AI in the product name, check out Chris' review here. Where to buy and a discount coupon However, it does not change the fact that this is truly a great entry-level home media-class NAS that you can buy right now. TerraMaster is having a 20% off launch discount, plus you can also still apply our unique 10% off coupon on checkout, which only works on the official website. So here is a breakdown of the pricing that is only valid on the official TerraMaster website. TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N350) + 20% discount + 10% coupon = $575.99 TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N305) + 20% discount + 10% coupon = $503.99 TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N350) + 20% discount + 10% coupon = £525.59 TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N305) + 20% discount + 10% coupon = £460.79 Use NEOWIN coupon code during checkout for 10% discount Over on Amazon US and UK, the F4-425 Pro also gets a 20% launch discount, but here, the above 10% coupon cannot be applied. TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N350) for $639.99 at Amazon US (was $799.99) TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N305) for $559.99 at Amazon US (was $699.99) TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N350) for £583.99 at Amazon UK (was £729.99) TerraMaster F4-425 Pro (N305) for £511.99 at Amazon UK (was £639.99) As an Amazon Associate, when you purchase through links on our site, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • well you can add a GPU for around $500, that's still around the price of Steam Machine but overall significantly better in performance.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      DaviKar went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      112
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      85
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!