What type of internet connection are you using?  

277 members have voted

  1. 1. What type of internet connection are you using?

    • 56k Dialup
      11
    • Cable
      108
    • DSL
      140
    • ISDN
      2
    • Satellite (HST)
      1
    • Other (please specify with post)
      15


Recommended Posts

  asha_b said:
2048kbps/256kbps D/U.

Am I the only one with this connection?

I max out at about 231kbps Down and 30kpbs Up. WOW!!

585643419[/snapback]

Nope I have

--> adsl show rate
Data Path : Fast
  Downstream Bit Rate : 2272 Kbps
  Upstream   Bit Rate : 288 Kbps
-->

:cool:

Maxed out at 340kbs Down and around 38kbps UP.

No Caps either.

I kindof skipped the 1MB and went straight to 2mb. Will be moving to 8MB this summer.

What's the use for a 10Gbit connection when you can't even write data that fast.

10Gbits is about 1Gbyte a second, don't know any disks which write that fast, maybe UCL uses SCSI hard disks.

The best connection which is worth getting is a 1.5Gbit, this speed will allow the data to be written as it is downloaded per second.

  =NickJ= said:
4meg/256kbit here, good ole Telewest :)

UCL's internet connection (University College of London) is 10Gbits/sec  :woot:  :woot:

585648247[/snapback]

yup telewest if by far the best ISP here in uk, well i know defo for midlands lol, i have got 1mb, topped it out at 131k/s, soon to get 2mb in summer hopefully though. :D

4000/384 through comcast high speed (yea, thats a joke) internet. Thats only if my modem works.

I love comcast. Been with them since 1996 (when they were @home) and they still refuse to replace my dying 5 year old modem.

When i move up to william paterson university they have a 4000/1000 connection when it feels like its 100/100. Damn college networks.

I'm on 10mbit university network atm...so in theory I can get up to 1.25MB/s download, but it rarely goes over 1MB/s when downloading large files on fast servers (legally :p )

edit: With a 500MB limit on traffic per day (upload + download)...between the hours of 8am to 8am. Weird times really.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Needs to happen quicker IMO. Pretty dang sick of the same articles reworded five different ways and reposted. I’m sure some people like reading the typical MS tells you why Windows 11 is better article over and over or the minute by minute countdown on the EOL of Windows 10, but I’m not one of them.
    • You must feel left out. I gave you an upvote to feel better.
    • Amarok 3.3 Beta 2 replaces Phonon API with GStreamer by David Uzondu Audio players come and go, but one of the long-standing pack leaders is Amarok, a KDE project that has been around since 2003. This player was an essential application for anyone who ran a KDE 3 system, mostly because its interface was simple and did not get in your way. After spending some time in hibernation following the 2.x series, development has picked up again. Now we have version 3.3 Beta 2, bringing some changes under the hood. The most important of which is a complete overhaul of the audio engine. The developers have ditched the old Phonon multimedia framework on Qt6 and reworked everything to use GStreamer instead. The developers have also partially restored CUE sheet support, which is fantastic news for anyone who keeps albums as single audio files. ReplayGain logic has been improved to apply a default fallback value for tracks without loudness data, helping to even out the volume. Some work was also done to prevent potential database issues that could happen during library scans. This release also finalizes some major changes that were introduced in the first beta, as outlined below: Dropping support for Qt5 and KDE Frameworks 5 entirely. It is Qt6 from here on out. Updating the database character set to allow full UTF-8 values, which is great for international music collections. Fixing a year 2038 bug for dates stored in the database. Removing TagLib extras support, which affects RealMedia and Audible files. Now, before you rush off to install it, there are a couple of things to know. Because the first beta updated the database schema, downgrading from this beta back to an older version is not really possible unless you manually backed up your music library first. Also, if you are a big Last.fm user, its official library has not caught up with the Qt6 world yet. You will need a specific build from a repository like this one to get those features working for now. If you are feeling adventurous and want to try the new beta, you will probably have to build it yourself. For that, you can check out the project on GitLab for the source code and guidance. Some Linux distributions might also package the beta in their testing or unstable repositories, so it is worth a look there, too. You can grab the latest stable version of Amarok on Linux via FlatHub.
    • Yeah, stable and consistent data-harvesting to secure you and your 801 partners bottom line...thanks but no thanks.
    • The ethical thing for MS to do (a foreign concept) would be to continue full support for WIndows-10; until WIndows-11 is stable and mature enough to be considered reliable. Give users the ability to get decent use out of hardware they have bought, that MS decided are no longer able to run WIndows-11.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rising Star
      Phillip0web went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      Epaminombas earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Bert Fershner earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Reacting Well
      ChrisOdinUK earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Year In
      Steviant earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      545
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      205
    3. 3
      +FloatingFatMan
      170
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      150
    5. 5
      Som
      131
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!