Recommended Posts

Actually, the chances would be higher for Firefox to be included, if it provided an easy way to install silently. Right now, the only way to do this is to repack the whole thing. And repacking means we go from ~4MB to ~14MB...

I am a Firefox user myself, so it's not that we are Firefox haters or something.

Actually, the chances would be higher for Firefox to be included, if it provided an easy way to install silently. Right now, the only way to do this is to repack the whole thing. And repacking means we go from ~4MB to ~14MB...

I am a Firefox user myself, so it's not that we are Firefox haters or something.

585898587[/snapback]

What will happen if Microsoft will come with IE 7? Are we gonna use it or not? If we will use IE7 (don't know what size it is) is it going to depend on the size too? Just like Firefox?

What about netscape version 8? The same rules as above?

:ninja: Pascal B :ninja:

IE7 will probably be included, as a vital component of Windows, just like .NET Framework and Windows Media Player.

585898760[/snapback]

Hmmm........are we offering only Microsoft "media and browser" products? Vital or not? Is that want you want to tell?

:ninja: Pascal B :ninja:

No there are plenty of things in AutoPatcher which are not by Microsoft. We target Windows, Microsoft's operating system, which means updated components of it should be included in AutoPatcher. When it comes to non-Microsoft software, we try to keep it tidy. It's really hard to draw a line there. If I include a non-Microsoft media player (which has nothing to do with Windows), people would scream. Let's say we included Winamp. People would say "Hey, why Winamp? Why not iTunes? Or QuickTime? Or RealPlayer? Or BSPlayer?". Same goes with browsers. "Why Firefox? Why not Opera? Or Maxthlon? Or.....". That's something we just can't do. If we start including non-Microsoft software, we would have to include the bigger part of the competition aswell. AutoPatcher 5.x is modular, which means we don't need to include all those. Every one of the programs mentioned can become stand-alone modules.

As I said, my intention is not to kill Microsoft's competition. I'm all for it. But I can't include all media players and all browsers.

As I said, my intention is not to kill Microsoft's competition. I'm all for it. But I can't include all media players and all browsers.

585899080[/snapback]

I'll agree with that one! If we would do it all....we soon need a DVD to burn all that stuff.....hehehehe :D

:ninja: Pascal B :ninja:

why o why?

Getting sick :x

In the Autopatcher Module Editor I made the module for installing Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Hotfix (KB886903) with the result below:

"Module:\NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe" /Xp:%L%%temp%

Why does that not work in Autopatcher?

:crazy:

Making a batchfile installing Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 Hotfix (KB886903) for use within Autopatcher Module Editor with the result below

cmd "Module:\NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.cmd"

Made a batch-file that works fine.....Autopatcher won't eat a batch-file. Stocks at 95%....... :alien:

The commands I used in the batch are:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe /Xp:%L%%TEMP

msiexec /update %L%%TEMP\M886903.msp /q /norestart

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Damn, that works good!

Who has the clue? :rofl:

Don't see it any more at this moment :wacko:

:ninja: Pascal B :ninja:

Edited by DaFlapDrol

Pascal, Raptor and i had the same problem. The trick were was decompressing the NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe and use the .msp created (and renamed to KB886903.msp) in the AutoPatcher, not the original file. The installation commands are very simple this way:

[Install With Backups]
"Module:\kb886903.msp" /q /norestart

I know you like to use the original files, but in this case, i don't know how...

I hope this helps. ;)

Actually, the chances would be higher for Firefox to be included, if it provided an easy way to install silently. Right now, the only way to do this is to repack the whole thing. And repacking means we go from ~4MB to ~14MB...

I am a Firefox user myself, so it's not that we are Firefox haters or something.

585898587[/snapback]

And when 1.1 is released, I'll make another module for it like I did with 1.0 (as there will be .msi files), but as it stands, the repackaging thing is totally useless.

Pascal, Raptor and i had the same problem. The trick were was decompressing the NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe and use the .msp created (and renamed to KB886903.msp) in the AutoPatcher, not the original file. The installation commands are very simple this way:

[Install With Backups]
"Module:\kb886903.msp" /q /norestart

I know you like to use the original files, but in this case, i don't know how...

I hope this helps. ;)

585899833[/snapback]

Hey my man Gandolas,

well it has to be fixed in AutoPatcher!!! Again, on the command-line all works great. Just a simple batch-file makes it possible to install ALL hotfixes and patches. I have used the example:

[Install With Backups]
"Module:\kb886903.msp" /q /norestart

I don't know why, it doesn't seem to work here with the Dutch version, as far as I discovered.

Be honest, did you tried my example? With the batch file? If it works on the command-line I think that it must be possible to make it work in AutoPatcher too??.

The repacked version of the Framework stuff in Release April is no solution, it?s a workaround.

[Install With Backups]
"Module:\kb886903.msp" /q /norestart

I don't know why, it doesn't seem to work here with the Dutch version, as far as I discovered.

Be honest, did you tried my example? With the batch file? If it works on the command-line I think that it must be possible to make it work in AutoPatcher too??.

The repacked version of the Framework stuff in Release April is no solution, it?s a workaround.

585902985[/snapback]

Strange.. it works with the English, Portuguese from Portugal and with the Portuguese from Brazil...

No, i din't try it but i'm going to try it now.

It's a workaround and it saves some s;)ce. ;) I know, it's not perfect...

The commands I used in the batch are:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe /Xp:%L%%TEMP

msiexec /update %L%TEMP\M886903.msp /q /norestart

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Damn, that works good!

Who has the clue?  :rofl:

Don't see it any more at this moment :wacko:

585899422[/snapback]

The problem is that you didn't make a TEMP folder:

Add as a first line:

mkdir Temp

and

rmdir temp

as a last line, in order to delete the temp folder after the instalation.

Hope it helps. :)

Edited by gandolas
The problem is that you didn't make a TEMP folder:

585904610[/snapback]

Gandolas,

The commands I used in the batch are:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe /Xp:%L%%TEMP%

msiexec /update %L%TEMP\M886903.msp /q /norestart

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In this case it means the TEMP folder exist. The user logged on, has a TEMP folder in the LOCAL SETTINGS folder. That TEMP folder is being used by the extraction command as above. Nothing new here.

As shown above I don?t need to make a TEMP folder first.

I?m very curious how Autopatcher handles this all, I didn?t make the program. Perhaps it isn?t possible within AutoPatcher??

Edited by DaFlapDrol

Okay, here's exactly how AutoPatcher handles it:

It creates a batch file in the user's temp folder and outputs the installation commands, replacing Module: with the module's path. Then it just executes the batch file. Theoretically, this means that any batch file which works on the command prompt will work. Only trouble is, you must make a path-independant batch file (read: one that specifies ALL paths).

Where does "%L%TEMP" point? Maybe you should put the .msp part in quotes? Maybe you meant %TEMP%?

Okay, here's exactly how AutoPatcher handles it:

It creates a batch file in the user's temp folder and outputs the installation commands, replacing Module: with the module's path. Then it just executes the batch file. Theoretically, this means that any batch file which works on the command prompt will work. Only trouble is, you must make a path-independant batch file (read: one that specifies ALL paths).

Where does "%L%TEMP" point? Maybe you should put the .msp part in quotes? Maybe you meant %TEMP%?

585907664[/snapback]

Here it comes:

In a batch-file

NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe /XP:%L%%TEMP%

msiexec /update %L%%TEMP%\M886903.msp /q /norestart

This within a module:

[install With Backups]

"Module:\NDP1.1sp1-KB886903-X86.exe" /XP:%L%%TEMP%

msiexec /update %L%%TEMP%\M886903.msp /q /norestart

The setting %L%%TEMP%\ points to the users Temp folder located in the Local Settings folder. This setting %L% points to the systemsdrive letter.

When I launch this module in Autopatcher is doesn't extract the file. In the batch-file it does. I don't know if AutoPatcher can handle these variables, maybe not.

Edited by DaFlapDrol

AutoPatcher only handles its own variables. Module: and AutoPatcher:. %L% doesn't exist on my system. %TEMP% already contains the systemdrive letter. Type "SET" in a command prompt and see the variables. Also, consider using:

"%temp%\M886903.msp" /q /norestart

AutoPatcher only handles its own variables. Module: and AutoPatcher:. %L% doesn't exist on my system. %TEMP% already contains the systemdrive letter. Type "SET" in a command prompt and see the variables. Also, consider using:

"%temp%\M886903.msp" /q /norestart

585908080[/snapback]

I already know what one problem was. The path depth??

I took a close look at the apmodule.bat created in the TEMP directory. That was what I should have done earli:laugh:laug:laugh:ugh: ?

Here are the eD2K links for the Portuguese May version:

ed2k://|file|AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_Portuguese_Full.exe|150422974|E2154D27E161DB9F2D67983871DD6B5D|/

ed2k://|file|AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_Portuguese_Lite.exe|69316771|3C0C3C047CB53F22C1E328BEB887655A|/

ed2k://|file|AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_Portuguese_Update.exe|54189222|113055E3C0CA31136615C878C42A9272|/

and the links to the Portuguese (Brazil) version:

ed2k://|file|AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_PortugueseBrazil_Full.exe|149472323|4A27C5D27D6796C32691DECABDA845AF|/

ed2k://|file|AutoPatcher_XP_May2005_PortugueseBrazil_Lite.exe|67933929|549B1BFE71E1751EB1E17D2A0D98F05E|/

:angry:  HElp,how can I use this soft with French XP?????????????,,

585914920[/snapback]

General, you can't use the AutoPatcher on your French XP edition. It will give you a known error like

Runtime error '35601'

Modules will only load if the running operating system is supported and the language settings. The language setting on your system can be one of the numbers below:

2060 French (Belgium)

11276 French (Cameroon)

3084 French (Canada)

9228 French (Congo)

12300 French (Cote d'Ivoire)

1036 French (France)

5132 French (Luxembourg)

13324 French (Mali)

6156 French (Monaco)

10252 French (Senegal)

4108 French (Switzerland)

7180 French (West Indies)

The English version has code 1033 and that isn't supported with your systems language setting. That's the first detecting!!

What you can do is edit the modules. Just change the settings concerning the language into one on of the Values as shown above.

At that time it's possible to launch AutoPatcher. BUT, you don't have the French files (update, hotfix, etc). That means that you to download all these files.

To make it short, you have to translate all!!!!!!!!!

If you need assistance "How to".... just knock on the door!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Here is the new Surface Laptop Ultra wallpaper in high resolution by Taras Buria Earlier this week, Microsoft announced the Surface Laptop Ultra, its brand-new high-end laptop powered by NVIDIA's brand-new RTX Spark processor. As usual, Microsoft gives each new device a unique wallpaper, and the Surface Laptop Ultra is no exception. While the device is not publicly available yet, somebody has already extracted its wallpaper, giving everyone a chance to get a piece of the upcoming laptop in its full-resolution glory. The Surface Laptop Ultra has a very dark, abstract wallpaper that resembles the stock wallpapers in Windows Server, albeit with much less color. Having this dark, grim wallpaper highlights the laptop's mini-LED display and its ability to cut off parts of the screen's backlight to achieve OLED-like black levels. However, if you also like light wallpapers, we made a white version by simply inverting its colors. You can download both wallpapers below (click the image, right-click it, and select "Save as"): The Surface Laptop Ultra is expected to launch later this year. Microsoft is not revealing full details yet, including the price. However, Microsoft confirmed up to 1 petaflop of AI performance and RTX 5070-level of GPU performance. The heart of the laptop has up to 20 CPU cores and 6,144 GPU cores. Additionally, Microsoft and NVIDIA boast high CPU efficiency for all-day battery life. As for the display, it is a 15-inch mini-LED display with a pixel density of 262 ppi and a maximum brightness of 2,000 nits. Of course, not everyone needs this amount of power, and certainly not everyone can afford it. For those who need a more affordable device, Microsoft is also preparing the next-generation Surface Pro powered by the Snapdragon X2 Elite processor. Weeks ahead of the announcement, details about this computer were leaked by a retailer. Do you like the Surface Laptop Ultra's stock wallpaper? Share your thoughts in the comments. Image provided by @nextgenos2026 on X
    • From all that I've read on the subject--not that much, really--it looks to me like companies and parents are trying to protect themselves from children using their parents accounts to run up giant bills, sometimes in the thousands of dollars, and the first the parents know about it is when they get sued... Internet companies have been sued for tailoring their ads to children, which is kind of old news. My belief is that policing starts at home with the parents, and the reason that so many laws that can't be enforced are being passed is because parents are eschewing their responsibilities, claiming not enough time, not enough knowledge, etc. Giving kids cell phones sans Internet connectivity is a good place to start--confine Internet activity to PCs in the home that the parents regulate. My kids are all grown and gone, I'm happy to say... They have their own kids to worry about.
    • ChartNet’s 1.7 million synthetic samples let compact open-source models outperform GPT-4o on every chart task   A team from MIT and the MIT-IBM Computing Research Lab has built a training dataset that solves one of the most persistent gaps in enterprise AI: the inability of even the best commercial models to reliably read a chart...... https://www.techtimes.com/articles/317752/20260604/ai-chart-understanding-breakthrough-mit-ibm-dataset-lets-small-models-beat-gpt-4o.htm  
    • BTW DXVK is also available on Windows and offers similar benefits like on Linux when it comes to performance, at least in some titles. The Raceroom racing sim for example even offers DXVK as one of its officially supported options and it can achieve ridiculous improvements in certain situations, like quite literally doubling (or more) the framerates
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      232
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      68
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      58
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!