Serving a website


Recommended Posts

Digital Nightmares

Please test this link. I have so far found that Mac users will see the site, but Windows users get a blank page (regardless of browser). Just trying to confirm this. Thanks a lot. If anyone can help me to figure out why this would happen, I would appreciate it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/302937-serving-a-website/
Share on other sites

Blank page...did view source and i got..

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN">

<html>

<head>

<title>Digital Nightmares</title>

</head>

<body>

<frameset cols="145, *" frameborder="0" noresize scrolling="no">

<frame src="sidebar.html" noresize scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0">

<frameset rows="123, *" frameborder="0" noresize>

<frame src="banner.html" noresize scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0">

<frame src="news.html" name="main" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="20">

</frameset>

</frameset>

</frameset>

</body>

</html>

Try this...

&lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN"&gt;
&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Digital Nightmares&lt;/title&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;frameset cols="145, *" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no"&gt;
 &lt;frame src="sidebar.html" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" /&gt;
 &lt;frameset rows="123, *" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize"&gt;
  &lt;frame src="banner.html" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" /&gt;
  &lt;frame src="news.html" name="main" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="20" /&gt;
 &lt;/frameset&gt;
&lt;/frameset&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

frames do not require a body tag.  Delete the <body> and </body> tags and it should work.

585699563[/snapback]

I have been coding for 8 years and I have not used a body tag for frames and they work in IE, NS, FF, ect.

585699606[/snapback]

I have ALWAYS used the <body> tag; as i learned it (circa 1996-97) you beeded one. Is this a convention M$ destroyed at some point?

AAAHHH frames!!!  omfg *puke*

Do us ALL a favor, and yourself a HUGE one, and stop using frames.  Frames are an easy way to mess up a website.  Just google it...  you'll have all the top 10 reasons quickly.

585699618[/snapback]

Bite me. I don't care to learn CSS or Flash, and this allows me to maintain a menu along the side of the screen while content will scroll. BTW, your post was neither informative NOR useful to solving my problem.

yes, it's ur frames that are messed up.

585699623[/snapback]

Try this...

&lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN"&gt;
&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Digital Nightmares&lt;/title&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;frameset cols="145, *" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no"&gt;
 &lt;frame src="sidebar.html" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" /&gt;
 &lt;frameset rows="123, *" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize"&gt;
 ?&lt;frame src="banner.html" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" /&gt;
 ?&lt;frame src="news.html" name="main" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="20" /&gt;
 &lt;/frameset&gt;
&lt;/frameset&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

585699635[/snapback]

Thank you so much for your help and to all the others that pointed out the <Body> tag for me; suppose I need to buy a newer HTML book since all my HTML is memorized from, like i said, eight years ago...i THINK it was HTML 4....

frames do not require a body tag.? Delete the <body> and </body> tags and it should work.

585699563[/snapback]

I have been coding for 8 years and I have not used a body tag for frames and they work in IE, NS, FF, ect.

585699606[/snapback]

I have ALWAYS used the <body> tag; as i learned it (circa 1996-97) you needed one. Is this a convention M$ destroyed at some point?

AAAHHH frames!!!? omfg *puke*

Do us ALL a favor, and yourself a HUGE one, and stop using frames.? Frames are an easy way to mess up a website.? Just google it...? you'll have all the top 10 reasons quickly.

585699618[/snapback]

Bite me. I don't care to learn CSS or Flash, and this allows me to maintain a menu along the side of the screen while content will scroll. BTW, your post was neither informative NOR useful to solving my problem.

yes, it's ur frames that are messed up.

585699623[/snapback]

Try this...

&lt;!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 TRANSITIONAL//EN"&gt;
&lt;html&gt;
&lt;head&gt;
 &lt;title&gt;Digital Nightmares&lt;/title&gt;
&lt;/head&gt;
&lt;frameset cols="145, *" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no"&gt;
 &lt;frame src="sidebar.html" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" /&gt;
 &lt;frameset rows="123, *" frameborder="0" noresize="noresize"&gt;
 ?&lt;frame src="banner.html" noresize="noresize" scrolling="no" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="0" /&gt;
 ?&lt;frame src="news.html" name="main" MARGINHEIGHT="0" MARGINWIDTH="20" /&gt;
 &lt;/frameset&gt;
&lt;/frameset&gt;
&lt;/html&gt;

585699635[/snapback]

Thank you so much for your help and to all the others that pointed out the <Body> tag for me; suppose I need to buy a newer HTML book since all my HTML is memorized from, like i said, eight years ago...i THINK it was HTML 3:ninja::ninja:

Edited by mrelusive978
Bite me. I don't care to learn CSS or Flash, and this allows me to maintain a menu along the side of the screen while content will scroll. BTW, your post was neither informative NOR useful to solving my problem.

While the previous poster was rude at pointing out, frames are a very easy way of messing up your site.

You may not like learning CSS or any of that which is a valid argument however tables do a great job as well. Plus you would have never had the issue to begin with as with tables you do use a body tag.

There are alternatives to frames and (un)fortunately those alternatives are pretty much better then then say other topics...(amd vs intel, pc vs mac, etc. etc.)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I bought one of these last year. I really hope I won't have to deal with this crap. My drive is in good condition at the moment.
    • Umm, read my answer again! If you have something to add or contribute, feel free. Otherwise my point was that you apparently dont want faster updates... so you want slower updates by process of elimination. If you have something to contribute, meaningful answers are better.
    • These features described above are good, but far from what developers will like the most. The main feature that developers will care and love the most it's called "Bring Your Own Models". It gives us the ability to connect to LOCAL AI models running on Ollama. The feature it's located on GitHub Copilot tab -> On the model picker where you can select "manage models" instead of paid models and then it will show you the "Bring your own models" window where you can now select Ollama and the endpoint of your local server. So if you have a beefy spec machine you can now use your own model 100% local inside Visual Studio 2026 18.7.0
    • Microsoft Teams is getting a controversial location tracking feature that users may hate by Usama Jawad Image generated with Microsoft Copilot Earlier this year, Microsoft planned to roll out a controversial location tracking feature in Teams, but following customer feedback, it decided to delay its release. The bad news is that the company has decided to launch it later this year, but it's based on roughly the same design that was shared earlier, which means that many users still have good reason to worry. Basically, Microsoft Places and Teams have received workplace check-ins via Wi-Fi. The idea is that if an employee arrives at the office and connects to their enterprise network, their profile status indicator will show them as being present in the office. For example, if you arrive at work, open Teams on your PC, and connect to the "Studio B" company Wi-Fi network, your Teams profile will indicate that you are present in "Studio B", as shown below: Microsoft says that this feature is basically a replacement for physical workplace check-in peripherals, it reduces the need to manually update your status, and it also enables co-workers to know that you're at work so that they can coordinate in-person meetings with you. IT admins can enable this workplace check-in capability at a tenant level, and users have the ability to control whether they want to enable it or not. Of course, all of that sounds great on paper, but naturally, many Teams customers may still have concerns, as they did before. This is because it enables your reporting manager and other members of the organization to track if you are at the office, when you arrive at the office, and where you are right now. This could be problematic for people who work in what they consider to be flexible work environments or hybrid setups, and this kind of location tracking could be considered an invasion of privacy. Microsoft has tried to alleviate some of these concerns by letting users know that they can manually set their location easily, which essentially overrides workplace check-in if they feel uncomfortable with it. However, that doesn't really solve the problem because your organization could enforce a workplace policy that mandates that this feature remains enabled. The Redmond tech giant has also assured users that this capability does not store historical data and is only a real-time indicator of location. Finally, it only generates a signal when you connect to a corporate network, which means that if you are working from home and connect your PC to your personal Wi-Fi, it won't broadcast your location to your employer; you will simply be shown as "Remote". Microsoft has encouraged IT admins to prepare for this change and begin informing users so they know what to expect once it begins rolling out later this year.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Very Popular
      AndrewSteel earned a badge
      Very Popular
    • Veteran
      Taliseian went up a rank
      Veteran
    • One Month Later
      Clizby earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      516
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      82
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      81
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!