GNU/Linux April Desktops

[MrStaticVoid]

I unmasked pre0 the day it came out and haven't had any problems yet.

BTW it looks nice Knight'. I'm a big fan of default-looking GNOME desktops.

[Knight']

,Apr 29 2005, 12:51]Did you unmask 2.10_pre0? If yes, experienced any problems?

585846605[/snapback]

No serious problems, you might want to check this out:

http://bugs.gentoo.org/showdependencytree.cgi?id=84701

@MrStaticVoid

;)

[.calibre]

Another change.

[skybl4ck]

very nice .calibre :) what font is that in your term?

[.calibre]

:)

It's Silkscreen Extended, you can grab it here: http://www.kottke.org/plus/type/silkscreen

[thechitowncubs]

ubuntu on my desktop... im 100% linux now =D

[tukten_tdo]

Cent 0S 4.0 on a Dell Inspiron 8000

[kyro]

funtastic desktops here :D

[thechitowncubs]

made a few changes hehe :cool:

[markwolfe Veteran]

ubuntu on my desktop... im 100% linux now =D

585849571[/snapback]

Congrats on the 100% (Y)

[Kreuger]

It is now May people lol

[markwolfe Veteran]

It's just started April 30th here, so hold your horses... :p

[Knight']

Bah, who needs may... :p

[kyro]

maaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

:p cudnt resist

[Prosidius]

Ubuntu 5.04

[BiGMaN]

I like look at all these desktops, but what's with everyone posting ULTRA-tiny little thumbnails and no link to the big pictures. Sometimes I can delete the .th or whatever in the addess to see the actual image, but the other half the time I simply cannot find a way to look at the full sized screenshot.

I hereby request that people post links to the big pictures as well as the tiny little thumbnail images.

-BiGMaN

[Rob2687]

I don't see anybody just posting thumbnails...

[BiGMaN]

I don't see anybody just posting thumbnails...

585852814[/snapback]

Well, I may have exaggerated a bit when I said everyone.

Pleny have though. Just check back a few pages.

Either that, or I'm crazy.

UGH! I just went back though the pages to try and prove to myself that I'm not crazy. Everything I clicked on worked! UGH! I swear, sometimes (and I use a lot of different computers, so that's not it) half the images I click on bring me to thumbnail images.

Oh well... Perhaps I am crazy.

Edited April 30, 2005 by BiGMaN

[markwolfe Veteran]

I like look at all these desktops, but what's with everyone posting ULTRA-tiny little thumbnails and no link to the big pictures.  Sometimes I can delete the .th or whatever in the addess to see the actual image, but the other half the time I simply cannot find a way to look at  the full sized screenshot.

I hereby request that people post links to the big pictures as well as the tiny little thumbnail images.

-BiGMaN

585852806[/snapback]

Actually, it is the full-size image postings that are starting to bother me more and more. And when images look too big at 1600x1200, they are too big. :yes:

But, I agree that thumbs should be properly linked to a full-size image (and I haven't noticed one that wasn't).

[msg43]

Ubuntu 5.04

585852455[/snapback]

nice desk do you think you can tell me were I can get that wall

btw what metacity and gtk2 theme?

[skybl4ck]

:)

It's Silkscreen Extended, you can grab it here: http://www.kottke.org/plus/type/silkscreen

585849467[/snapback]

thanks :yes:

[markwolfe Veteran]

April is over.

See May

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=315163

* thread closed *