Windows 2003 Server Questions...


Recommended Posts

Hi,

I wanna know if its possible to do the following with Windows 2003 Server :-

1. Add user accounts on the server and then users can login via windows XP Workstations.

2. Possible to have all the clients to have certain drives mapped automatically as they login.

3. Possible to have groups for users, like admins, staff, general users and set them differant permissions.

4. Install programs on the server and allow workstations to load them up without having to install the programs on each comuter.

Yours,

Craig Brass

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/303616-windows-2003-server-questions/
Share on other sites

1) Yes (needs to be XP pro to join the domain)

2) yes - this and much more is possible (login script)

3) yes - kind of the point of a domain ;)

4) hmmm - yes you can run terminal server, and users can run applications on the server using a terminal session.. Keep in mind this a sep lic, and any software - say office that is run this way has to be licensed for ALL users that can access it.. YOu can not just buy 1 copy of office, and let 50 users run it using terminal server.

terminal services info;

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003...es/default.mspx

1) Yes (needs to be XP pro to join the domain)

2) yes - this and much more is possible (login script)

3) yes - kind of the point of a domain ;)

4) hmmm - yes you can run terminal server, and users can run applications on the server using a terminal session..  Keep in mind this a sep lic, and any software - say office that is run this way has to be licensed for ALL users that can access it..  YOu can not just buy 1 copy of office, and let 50 users run it using terminal server.

terminal services info;

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserver2003...es/default.mspx

585708647[/snapback]

Budman did a good job of covering all of your questions, but I have an addition for #4. Depending on the kind of application, you may be able to run these programs right off the server but remember, any big application such as office/photoshop/cad program/whatever need to be installed and have the proper registry entries and dll's on the local windows installation. What you could do is install programs via MSI to automate the installation process at install to suit your exact needs.

Hope that helps...

cultavix - good point about just running the exe off the server.. Yes depending on the program, you could just run it off the share directly.. Might not be a very FAST way to do it (depending on the app).. For some reason I keyed in the word "install" in his question - most (not all) applications that require an install might not function in this fashion..

cultavix - good point about just running the exe off the server..  Yes depending on the program, you could just run it off the share directly..  Might not be a very FAST way to do it (depending on the app)..  For some reason I keyed in the word "install" in his question - most (not all) applications that require an install might not function in this fashion..

585708845[/snapback]

Hmmm, what if some programs I use are not MSI's? I like the way Novell does it with Novell Delivered Applications. As soon as the user clicks an app, it installs it on their machine and in future times it just loads directly from the machine. No way to do that with Windows 2003 as all I can say to Novell is yuck :p

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • About bloody time. I have got PRs with hundred of files and the Web UI just struggling to even load the pages.
    • I wonder if it was applying secure boot certificates/dbx files?
    • I recently tried edge. It seems a lot better. A lot of the junk in it is gone. It seems less bloated and snappy.
    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      499
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      174
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!