North Carolina Wins the National Championship


Recommended Posts

it just finished.? it would have been funny if illinois came back and won after this guys post.

oh its true. unc won 75-70

585728056[/snapback]

9 seconds left...5 point lead= Game Time

Both teams had great squads though...I enjoyed the game

YUP the awesome shiet!! My prediction UNC!!

I knew they were gonna win cause of MAY! MAY was unstoppable. ILLINI had trouble with may and no one can stop them, their the greatest! Roy Williams finally won too, haha!! Yeah UNC won!!

Nice game ILLINOIS hard work to, maybe next year :p

Felton, May, Williams, Williams, Noel, and Referee

585728093[/snapback]

ahhh....I guess you didn't see all the moving screens the Ref's didn't call on Illionis...and the commentators even pointed them out constantly.

Enough with the moving screens.? That 'foul' hasn't been called in the last 10 years.? You guys listen to Billy (Do you know who I am??) Packer way too much.

585728117[/snapback]

They call them all season long...They're against the rules too..It was getting ridiculous too.

Actually I didn't listen to Packer. I coach little kids b-ball and I was b*tching about the screens in the first half lol. I don't give any worth to what Packer says, I know he wants to hump the ACC. I say it came down to Illinois finally not hitting the 3s. 12-40=OVER-reliance. And May owned. Even when Augustine was in. And yeah they were touch fouls but they're still fouls.

Edited by bigbluepride35
They call them all season long...They're against the rules too..It was getting ridiculous too.

585728122[/snapback]

Actually, no...It's a foul that basically doesn't exist anymore unless it is blatant....very similar to the 'carry' dribble that everyone does nowadays. It simply isn't called anymore.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Guess it's one of those things best used by devs to thoroughly test stuff.
    • is it all upside down there? traffic lights reverted too?
    • Bluesky COO warns social media regulations could destroy competition from small startups by Paul Hill Fears that increasing government control of social media risks regulatory capture by the biggest social media firms were raised again recently. Bluesky’s chief operating officer said in an interview that social media bans for children and tighter regulations for social media firms risk creating a world where there are only a few social media platforms run by companies with the deepest pockets. Regulations on social media firms have been very lax since they appeared for mainstream users in the 2000’s. This gave Meta, Snapchat, and Google time to build up their user bases and get entrenched, with Meta being the most successful. Now that Meta has succeeded, it has been attempting regulatory capture. By pushing for more regulations of social media, Meta hopes to make it more difficult for rivals to challenge it. For its part, it doesn’t need to worry about the cost of regulation because it has a lot of money to spend, whereas startups do not. Speaking to CNBC, Rose Wang, Bluesky’s chief operating officer, said: “I support the protection and the safety of youth, the question that we have then is at what cost, because essentially what I’m scared of is in the long term, we’re headed to a world where there’s about three to five platforms, and extreme heavy regulation of those platforms, and basically the whole compliance teams of these platforms are 10 times the size of our entire team. So, basically, we’re living in a world where it’s almost impossible for smaller entrants to come in and build healthier spaces. These platforms have led to a place where the bottom line is the thing that drives what they do... so I understand why governments have to step in and regulate, because the platforms have done nothing right.” She said that while she is not against regulation, there needs to be more channels between the small to mid-sized players and regulators to help protect them. She says that big tech players, on the other hand, “who we know are circumventing regulation,” need to be regulated. Essentially, the Bluesky position is one of nuance, rather than absolutes. While Bluesky’s proposal may preserve competition in the social media space, it still doesn’t address the massive privacy implications these age verification measures introduce, such as handing over sensitive identity documents to access age-gated content. Source: CNBC
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      DJC50PLUS earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      493
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      249
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      71
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      70
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!