New VIRUS.GR virus report! Best on the net!


Recommended Posts

Norton does have good detection rates, probably due to the vastness of their signature database.

But at the cost of greater detection through the large database, it has the tag of being a resource hog.

NOD32 is unique as said before from its heuristics detection, which ideally means the database can be lesser and it has a greater chance of identifying new viruses.

For some reason, I don't really trust that site. Virus bulletin is what I've always checked.

http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/archives/products.xml?eset.xml

585822327[/snapback]

sure...virus bulletin is trust worthy, but it never publishes numbers like virus.gr does...for comparing products that is. All you have to go by is Pass/Fail on certain tests...tests you dont know the specifics of.

Virus Bulletin vs Virus.gr is like with college classes. You can choose pass/fail, or number graded.

Pass/Fail says like anything above a certain point is PASS, and everything below that point is FAIL. Never knowing how the students compare since people who pass are all on the same level.

meh.. this is why internet is so bad.. and loser programmers have nothing better to do. let's create viruses and spread them, and go to jail for releasing something that crashes computers, deletes files :)

is CREATING a programmar that executes onto your PC, destroys other peoples property worth a lawsuit and possible jail time?

meh.. this is why internet is so bad.. and loser programmers have nothing better to do.  let's create viruses and spread them, and go to jail for releasing something that crashes computers, deletes files :)

is CREATING a programmar that executes onto your PC, destroys other peoples property worth a lawsuit and possible jail time?

585823234[/snapback]

apparently, theres a virus out there that deletes MP3's :(...

bull**** tests, norton can't be that high, corp prob. can but v2005 is so bloated and horrible and doing it's job i find that site garbage

585823366[/snapback]

What a stupid comment. These tests aren't judging based on performance or interface, they're judging on detection rate. And since symantec corp and 2005 use roughly the same definition files, they should be roughly equal in any such test.

I hope you guys realize that the site used to say:

Malware = Adware, DoS, Constructors, Exploit, Flooders, Hoax, Jokes, Nukers, Sniffers, Spoofers, Virus Construction Tools, Virus Tools, Corrupted, Droppers, Intended, PolyEngines.

Hoaxes? Jokes? Corrupted? Are you kidding me?

That's what it used to say, and I can vouch for that until the guy on the site changed it to what it is now. He better have an explanation for this. This test is simply not trustworthy.

28. AVG version 7.0.308 - 54.07%

horrible. what a blow to avg lovers.

anyhow. symantec corp is going strong, that is all a care for.

interesting to see AVK version 15.0.5 - which uses both kasperski and microsoft bought engine - score lower then kasperski alone.

also few other issues ake me doubt the trustworthiness of the tests.

What a stupid comment.  These tests aren't judging based on performance or interface, they're judging on detection rate.  And since symantec corp and 2005 use roughly the same definition files, they should be roughly equal in any such test.

585823404[/snapback]

not necessarily true, an av can be destroyed by a virus if the virus disables it, no matter the definition files, detection is one thing but actually sucessfully removing the virus is another, i've seen norton find viruses often and fail to do anything good not to mention the amount of viruses it has missed catching, symantec corp and nav do not use the definition files in the same way, based on what i've seen

meh.. this is why internet is so bad.. and loser programmers have nothing better to do.  let's create viruses and spread them, and go to jail for releasing something that crashes computers, deletes files :)

585823234[/snapback]

Writing viruses is a learning experience. (unless the virus contains ten lines of code that executes something else..., I'm talking about non-nooby virus codin). One that has evil intentions but a learning one nevertheless.

This is why some of the wicked "hax0rs" get great jobs because they know how to bypass holes that they discovered and such.

They deserve to go to jail if they intentionally wanted to disrupt production servers that affect thousands of ppl.

Yeah I may be off topic on this..... whatever, my 2 cents. :ninja:

The test sucks.

Nod 32 doesn't have the best detection in the world compared to Kaspersky and others, but at the same time this site paints an unrealistic picture of it and other AV's true performance.

For example Nod32 no longer detects most MS-Dos Viruses, spyware detection by most AV vendors is fairly limited, joke files aren't even viruses, corrupted viruses should never be on the list considering they don't work, etc the test is lame.

I really don't think Nod 32 is all that, but at the same time you're well off with it, well unless you live in the US and need tech support, but that's a different subject all together.

there are some serious NOD32 fanboys here. I'm not putting you guys down and I'm not saying this test is 100% reputable, but you're being offered real proof that NOD32 doesn't hold up well to some of its competitors. What do you say to that? "Oh, NOD32 is still better than Norton even though the results showed the exact opposite." I don't understand that.

there are some serious NOD32 fanboys here. I'm not putting you guys down and I'm not saying this test is 100% reputable, but you're being offered real proof that NOD32 doesn't hold up well to some of its competitors. What do you say to that? "Oh, NOD32 is still better than Norton even though the results showed the exact opposite." I don't understand that.

585825635[/snapback]

Read my comment -- I never said that.

How are you going to answer the question I posed about the "malware" category?

a few comments based on other users comments:

i think this test is very trustworthy. one of the guys in that wildersecurity forum said that the guy who does the test is not trustworthy since he is a virus collector. i think that being a virus collector makes him more trustworthy. He has 91000+ viruses in their original form. The guy is dedicated to virus collecting...

i have to agree with that guy who commented on the NOD32 faithful. Pretty strong evidence provided against NOD32's performance. Quite interesting how the faithful are staying put...

the guy who ran the test said he runs no real time protection. He runs occasional virus scans of his hard drives using three different virus scanning products.

Personally I couldnt care less about which product between NOD32 and Norton is better. All I care about is that the Kaspersky engine is much better than both products combined.

I asked the maker, he said that Kaspersky Personal is not listed because it is the same exact engine as Kaspersky Personal Pro.

He has already fixed the numbering problems that people on the wildersecurity forum made note of. The file has been since updated...as well as the PDF and XLS files within.

As far as the differences between products using the same engines, the guy said that the numbers dont lie...he just does the tests.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!