How to get your warning level down?


Recommended Posts

Well, I would just like to know since noone will reply to my PMs. How do you get it down, because I have one from december that is keeping me from changing my name  :rolleyes:.....Admins?

585823292[/snapback]

starting that thread about how long you have been at neowin won't help :rofl:

Dont feel bad, im at 100% warning level mate. I dont care tho. I dont want a name Change

585823352[/snapback]

100%? doesn't that mean you are suppost to be banned?

im at 80%.. and already recieved a 3 day suspension :( and then another 7 day suspension for making another account. lucky my warning level didn't go all the way up :(

ive smartened up, and watch what i say... so should everybody else. and since everyone was so kind to report me... i now report everyone :rofl:

Quite simply, posting topics like this keeps your warning level up. Trust me, I know.

Keep your head down, stick to the rules and don't bother anyone. At all. That way, having a low-profile enables you to continue on as is - without any fear of having an increased warning level.

Put it this way mate, learning is part of life. You just have to try, try and try again. Alas, you need to get good - and get good quick. Otherwise your arse (just like mine) will be out of here.

I liked it there, is it possible for certain members, say Subscribers to have a setting to enable or disable it for their own viewing or something?

585824349[/snapback]

yea, good idea.

But really, who complained about that? And I do not see how there could have been that many people complain about it.

If you listened to that small number and act on their wishes, why not listen to the large number of users that has asked to start a new Opera sub-forum?

your stuck with your warnings, just as in life, you cannot erase your mistakes, no matter how much you have actually changed. Its a shame isn't it people actually have to pay for their crimes (i know, but its the best word that i could come up with)

You dont... people complained it cluttered the interface. :rolleyes:

So its gone now.

585824341[/snapback]

Yeah a few crybabies bitched till it was taken away, they didn't have enough sense to realize only they could see there warning level. I liked it myself.

Cody

The warning level used be viewable under your name and avatar in each post you made. People who had warnings complained that they didn't want to be reminded about it every time they posted, so it was removed from there, and you could then only see it when you viewed your profile.

However, I believe after Neowin upgraded to IPB 2.0, it was temporarily placed back under your name and avatar, until the decision was made to ultimately not allow members to view their own warning level.

From that day forward, and it continues this way even today, you must PM a Mod to find out your warning level. I believe you will also find out when you receive a warning. Otherwise, if you have never received a warning, then it should be at 0%.

As any Mod will currently tell you, there is no way at this time for your warning level to go down. The only time a warning is removed is when it was given in error, or if two Mods happen to be giving the same member a warning for the same offense and not realizing it until they hit submit. Your warning level is your report card or permanent record on Neowin.

Finally, your warning level being at 0% doesn't mean you are free to screw up a few times before you get a ban, and being at 100% doesn't equal an auto-ban. A ban can be placed on your account at any time, regardless of warning level, depending on the severity of your offense.

The simple solution to never having to worry about this is to just follow the rules. Neowin's rules are by no means strict, and no, the Mods do not have any personal vendetta against any particular member. They are doing their job and are fair and impartial to all the members as a whole, for the better of the site itself.

By the way, a lot of what I posted is actually common sense, but for some people, unless you type in black and white, and put it up for them to read, they won't get it. I'm not making this up either. This is all coming from what the Admins and Mods have all said in the past.

Yeah a few crybabies bitched till it was taken away, they didn't have enough sense to realize only they could see there warning level. I liked it myself.

Cody

585824374[/snapback]

Same here, I actually think it would be a good additon to the Subscriber thing, having a option button or PM a Mod/Admid to enable or disable it on request.

Of course, im not sure if it is possible for certain accouts to be have this and others not or it might just be global on/off settings - I dont know.

Maybe a mod could forward this suggestion?

seeing as they aren't always warented and are more of abuse of powers.

585824412[/snapback]

Yeah since we love to abuse our powers all the time. :rolleyes:

Why do people think that??? ****ed they got warned for breaking the rules?

I've searched a lot of warns and never once did I think it was an abuse of power.

Yeah since we love to abuse our powers all the time. :rolleyes:

Why do people think that??? ****ed they got warned for breaking the rules?

I've searched a lot of warns and never once did I think it was an abuse of power.

585824441[/snapback]

I don't think the mods abuse the warning feature, and the level meter doesn't really matter one way or the other, I liked it and I always felt if I got a warning then everytime I started to post a hateful or bad comment that little reminder over there might make me think twice, could possibly save me from getting banned. Just my thoughts about it.

Cody

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!