How to get your warning level down?


Recommended Posts

Perhaps he just gets a kick out of being respectful.

585825323[/snapback]

Yeah a few crybabies bitched till it was taken away, they didn't have enough sense to realize only they could see there warning level. I liked it myself.

Cody

Sorry to disagree, bangbang023...but if THAT is respectful then I should be an Adminstrator by now :rolleyes:

Edited by Chode

Here is some more reading material on this topic:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=228615&st=0 (in which Toxikk calls removing the warning level from each post a "fixed bug")

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=145043

^ That's a 26 page thread in which we first were able to see our warnings, which it seems Redmak enabled at the suggestion of a member who is now banned.

It should be noted that the biggest opponent against the warnings on each post is the man I like to think of as the member most experienced in all things Neowin, a member who was one of the first 350 members of this place, who has been here since around the second month of this forums existence, who has in excess of twenty one thousand posts, and is also the top poster here at Neowin: Steven/xStainDx

Now i'm interested...  :blink: What is my warning level?

585825789[/snapback]

If you've never recieved a PM from a Mod, SMod or Admin, then yours is at 0%. They tell you when you've been warned and why.

Cody

From what I know of-I've gotten 2 PMs about my warning level being increased-What would it be at-If I've gotten 2?

585825808[/snapback]

I think they should tell us not only when we're warned but what % it carries. I wasn't aware that you didn't find out what % point the warning carried.

Cody

That'll learn ya.

But onto the pressing discussion at hand. Warning level's should be viewable to people who want them. The easiest way todo this is to create a topic saying that you can now view your warning level's in the following places yada yada yada if you wish to have this feature activated please PM a moderator/super moderator/admin etc.

Then the people who don't want it don't have it and the people who do, do.

Edit: I was just wandering. So it's against the rules for us to sign up and create a new account if we don't like our nickname but are unable to have it changed.

Edited by ninjakarl

I have been here for quite a few years now, and believe mine is still at 0%, but it makes me think have I or haven't I. I respect this place, and the people who run it, stick to the rules, and you can count on that you will be fine.

JMann

Does a warning level even matter then? From what I gather in this thread, it's just for show lol.

585825854[/snapback]

it really means nothing in my opinion. especially since we can't even see our warning how is it any type of punishment so to speak.

i've been warned a few times, but i know my warning has been lowered atleast once. but that in no way changes how i act or say things on the forums.

regardless of your warning level the mods or admin will ban you whenever they see fit. so i think it's just a waste of time even bothering with them or caring what % you are at.

Edit: I was just wandering. So it's against the rules for us to sign up and create a new account if we don't like our nickname but are unable to have it changed.

585826172[/snapback]

Correct.

No alternate accounts are allowed. Should you be disciplined with a restriction or ban, you are not allowed to open a new account to obtain freedom to post. Restrictions and bans are given for a reason, and usurping that ability by re-registering is not tolerated. If another account is opened, that account will be banned immediately, and the original account will be further penalized. Anyone who has warnings on their account are automatically excluded from changing their user name.
Here is some more reading material on this topic:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=228615&st=0 (in which Toxikk calls removing the warning level from each post a "fixed bug")

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?showtopic=145043

^ That's a 26 page thread in which we first were able to see our warnings, which it seems Redmak enabled at the suggestion of a member who is now banned.

It should be noted that the biggest opponent against the warnings on each post is the man I like to think of as the member most experienced in all things Neowin, a member who was one of the first 350 members of this place, who has been here since around the second month of this forums existence, who has in excess of twenty one thousand posts, and is also the top poster here at Neowin: Steven/xStainDx

585825781[/snapback]

If you read what was posted about the suggestion the warning level will not be in every post, only in the members profile.

Either way I could care less if it was posted or if it was hidden.

Baaaaaaaaaaaaad lyle, didnt know you were like that  :whistle:.

585824635[/snapback]

LOL it was sorta my fault.. i was an idiot and didnt read the rules.. sorta like every forum and web site i signed up to in the passed. now i read the fine print :pinch:

correct me if i am wrong mods.. i dont care if everyones knows what i did LOL

warning 1: flamming a user

warning 2: trying to get people to sign up for my site?

warning 3: flamming a MOD (i think i accidently called him an idiot)

warning 4: flamming a user (which gave me the 3 day)

suspension 2: making another account... lylesback3 ROFL (7 days added) :(

coming soon:

warning 5: bangbang finally having enough of me.. and deleting me all together :laugh: :laugh: kidding :p

I realy wish there was a way to get it lowered, I mean come on we all make mistakes and most of use learn from them and we should be givin another chance to redem ourselves. I so do not want to be stuck with this name forever...Damn it :p.

I realy wish there was a way to get it lowered, I mean come on we all make mistakes and most of use learn from them and we should be givin another chance to redem ourselves. I so do not want to be stuck with this name forever...Damn it :p.

585829318[/snapback]

well... you need to look at it from a mods perspective. me not being a mod.. results may vary LOL

there is a TUN of users.. and a small percentage are trouble makers. example, someone the other day, kept spamming his dumb free money threads. and they ended up banning the first user, and he made a new account, spammed again.

if you were a mod.. i dont think you'd want to warn the same person more then once. it is there job, and i respect there decision... but it's not easy reading threw 4,000,000 posts, and cleaning out the bad...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!