Recommended Posts

Hey guys ive got the latest build which was the one from winhec and ive been up all night watching lh install it got upto the bit where it says it may take a hour to complete which i where im questioning, how long did it take for you to get past the 'May take up to a hour to complete' section so far its taken me 5 hours and i think ill just goto bed soon

PS. whats the setup actually doing at this point?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/313157-time-to-install-winhec-build-of-lh/
Share on other sites

OK, just 2 things I want to say:

1) The only legit way to have this build is to have received it at WinHec.

2) The sort of people attending WinHec are there because they are supposed to understand the technologies and to get a head's-up on the new technologies.

It took me about 45 minutes from that point - installed fine first time, but I have to say I really don't like this beta. Things like internet explorer are just too chunky, and I appreciate its in beta, and probably aimed at 1600x1200 resolution, but just my opinion!

I was deliberately not rude.  Just curious as to why the original pster needs our help whn a WinHec attendee should have all the resources available to deal with issues like this.

585831069[/snapback]

It's quite clear he was not at WinHEC. Don't be so naive.

thnx tiddle, btw who says i didnt attended the WinHec you have no evidence that i didnt so dont go playing the blame game and stop being a troll

585831301[/snapback]

Oh come on now... I don't really care whether you were there or not. I was only trying to help you in my post above.

For me it took maybe 45 minutes or so... Felt like a long time anyway. :)

Why don't you do like it says? Check if it's crashed or something with the task manager. I think it should be easy enough to see on the CPU load if it's still working.

For me it took maybe 45 minutes or so... Felt like a long time anyway. :)

Why don't you do like it says? Check if it's crashed or something with the task manager. I think it should be easy enough to see on the CPU load if it's still working.

585831395[/snapback]

yeh i did that but its goes on 0% but some hdd activity and its stupid how the progress bar keeps going across for certain items and not the whole thing so i wouldnt know ifs its on 99% complete or not

most people in this forum are going to have this lh build soon now its leaked.  just accept it

585831136[/snapback]

thank you. everyone keeps saying "only way you can have a legit copy is..."

stop complaining, and start helping :) the more you guys help, the more people have the same problem, and fix it. the less threads there will be, and the less you need to read about it.

BTW: im downloading longhorn too!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!