Recommended Posts

Firstly I'm one of those people who believes that Server is for servers and 2K/XP is for clients. That is my personal belief, but that is not the topic of this thead.

There seems to be more and more threads relating to "Server as a workstation". I would like to see a section where people can post threads about "Server as a workstation" that is not in the same place as serious server threads.

Things like "How do I get Doom3 to run on my server?" have no place along side genuine server related questions.

This post is not about whether people should use Server as a workstaion. Its about keeping related questions together.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/315175-suggestion-for-a-new-section/
Share on other sites

I don't think the demand is very high for this type of section. A lot of people who were using Windows 2003 as workstation are now using Windows XP x64 since it is built on the Windows 2003 core.

But, I am sure some people have Windows 2003 as a server but would still like to play some cool games on them. :)

Ditto, there is a post about this in the Site & Forum Issues forum. Though amusingly, the people who complain all the time about people posting Server as a Workstation questions, were also complaining about the possibility of a seperate forum to deal with the questions so they didn't have to. o__O

I must say that this would be a great idea. Whether or not if it's the same OS system, I think since this is such a hot topic, they're two different concepts. I personally come here to answer tech questions regarding typical server operations. I do not consider running Windows 2003 as a desktop "typical" and I don't think the rest of the IT world does either.

That said, adding a sub form I think would cut down on the flames and aggressiveness since our form isn't being cluttered with stuff that we don't find relevent to topic. And I think I say for everyone that cutting down on that stuff makes Neowin better.

I think what some of us are looking for (me included) is to use this forum for help in using Servers and high end equipement in a business context. I use servers at home for testing and I maintain about 100 of them. I feel that some questions should be in here and should be in the Gamer forum. Because installing a 256 MB video card in a server is rare among otherthings. So yeah another forum for the "I use Windows 2003 server to play games at home" and "I use Windows 2003 server in a business enviroment"

Also can we post the "How to Configure DNS" and the "How to Setup AD" in the top of the page.

That would be great, there are so many questions regarding DNS and most of the time it's because DNS is not setup properly.

My two cents

I personally think you will have more luck if you ask for a "[Definitive] Windows 2003 as a Workstation" thread and have all the newly created 2003 Workstation threads merged into that one.

But yes, this thread should be in S&FI. Ask a green mod (or a super) to move it.

not gonna happen.....i asked for this over a year ago....didnt happen then wont happen now.  Sad but true they would rather have the constant bickering then do something to stop it.

585855910[/snapback]

It's not like walls would be built around the sections, you'd still have the bickering. It would just be in more places with the addition of sub-forums.

Moved here

Firstly thanks for moving the thread.

Its not that we want to build walls, its just that a lot of us are getting tried of seeing posts about server as a workstation in a section that is ment to help people manage server. It is obvious in 99% of the cases that the OS is not purchased, or is 120 day trial used to avoid paying for an OS. But I'm not going to go into the "pirate" debate here.

Genuine server questions are move the thread to Clients!

Can't anything be done about it then? There seems to be a fair amount of support on this one. You know like when people ask for help on bypassing some kind of security or licensing?

585873293[/snapback]

Threads asking for help circumventing Microsoft's security and/or licensing should be closed. Report those threads.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • LibreWolf 152.0-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. LibreWolf 152.0-1 changelog: Upstream release, see the Firefox 152.0 Release Notes Notable changes: The AppImages are now built on Codeberg along with the other releases We have decided to wait a bit longer to enable the settings redesign, due to use being aware of multiple upstream issues Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • hahahahah wow hahahah you sure got me there hahahahahah, you know that bad performance is always due to poor optimization by the developers, right???
    • "I know for a fact I'll never own one of these." This is why choice is better than government regulation. Globaly Android has something like 72% of the smartphone market. Granted the vast majority of that is low end phones. Apple can and should charge whatever they want. The market will decide if it is too much.
    • I dont mind the AI stuff the time its released its going to be super mature. My hope is the AI can optimise or at least work out if things could be and the devs prompted. This would help offset sloppy copy/paste and asset flips resulting is rushed bloated games.
    • its an online game, the better part of it, piracy is not the problem. If that was so, it wouldnt release 1 year after for PCs, the piracy will be there Its probably some contract with the console brands
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Harris Gilbert earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      559
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      72
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      64
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!