Would you like to be able to delete your own post?  

79 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like to be able to delete your own post?

    • Yes
      48
    • No
      21
    • Don't Care
      10


Recommended Posts

lol why don't they trust us to delete our own posts?

585858132[/snapback]

Because people would abuse the Privilege. No doubt people would be posting stupid comments, flamming eachother, curses, anything against the rules then deleting their posts.

Simply edit your post with <double post> or whatever.

I just see too many problems with this.

Because people would abuse the Privilege. No doubt people would be posting stupid comments, flamming eachother, curses, anything against the rules then deleting their posts.

Simply edit your post with <double post> or whatever.

I just see too many problems with this.

585858286[/snapback]

And people can't do this with being able to edit their posts? Its the exact same thing, just allows the user to delete double posts, there is no downside that editing doesn't already have.

Because people would abuse the Privilege. No doubt people would be posting stupid comments, flamming eachother, curses, anything against the rules then deleting their posts.

Simply edit your post with <double post> or whatever.

I just see too many problems with this.

585858286[/snapback]

I agree. Also Hypoxiaicons point is right. Just get a mod to do it, doesnt take lon:):)

Because people would abuse the Privilege. No doubt people would be posting stupid comments, flamming eachother, curses, anything against the rules then deleting their posts.

Simply edit your post with <double post> or whatever.

I just see too many problems with this.

I don't ever double post and I know this ability would probably never be added anyways, which is fine for me. Does not matter either way.

But I don't see how you think people would abuse the privilegeNeonemesis did say in his topic title and post that it should only be for like 3 minutes. I think there would be no problem or abuse if it were to be say, 1 minute.i> 1 minute would be fine and perfect, if ever considered which Neowin coders have other things to do first anyways.

Lets say it was a minute. Someone who would flame, post a stupid comment, curse, or whatever, and then delete their post within the minute, needs a lot of help in my opinion. Who would actually read that post within the minute, not many, if any at all.

@shockz, not always does that page appear where you can save what you wrote. I know this and have been really ****ed off afterwards if I wrote something long and did not think to save it because I did not think I'd have a problem posting. Not always is it posted either, yes, sometimes, it has been:):)

Oh well though, the ability to do so is not a big deal for me. If Neowin adds it, they do, and it will be useful if it were ever needed. If not, it's still fine, you can just PM a moderator for that forum/global moderator as shockz said.

i'm not sure if guys are getting this, we wan't to have the option to delete our own post, not anyone elses just like we do with "edit" post, as we can only edit ours no one elses. So i don't see how this can be classed as abuse since it would only be our own posts that we are deleteing.

I still think it would be cool none the less.

Not in firefox... I think.

This sounds like a good idea, although the only people who double post are people who are too lazy to wait for the server to load...

585858670[/snapback]

Actually, that's not really true. Some people experience unreliable connections to Neowin, especially me, but all other sites appear fine. It is because the neowin server is so busy, they have to handle thousands of connections at once. They struggle to keep providing content to thousands of computers and thus that would bring it down, forcing some of us to wait a bit longer or face the "Server is busy" messages. The pages does load, but we instead get "Sorry, the server is too busy...blah...blah.." message.

This would be a good feature for those with unreliable connections (especially dialup connections), but as mods already said, they will handle it for you.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      rolfus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      78
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!