Should the post count/Stars be removed


Should the post count and Stars next to members' names be removed?  

285 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the post count and Stars next to members' names be removed?

    • Yes
      95
    • No
      190


Recommended Posts

I voted No but meant yes. That is what you get for not paying attention. The stars don't mean as much to me as Join date. I usually have more tolerance and try harder to help out a member that has been here longer. I also try to help the fellow subscribers more. May not be right but I'm proud to be a supporter of Neowin and think the ones that subscribe are more loyal and deserve more condsideration.

Cody

If they're removed, why would anyone bother posting? :whistle:

No, they shouldn't be removed. Why would you/anyone want them removed in the first place?

585869740[/snapback]

As stated in the other thread, many members rely on "post counts" for credibility, or for some an "e-penis". I think removing this barricade would help newer members integrate into the community better, rather than allowing all the "Post ###### and 1337 people with 10,000 posts plus" to either spam threads with extremely repetitive replies such as "thanks for the info!", or to degrade others simply because their post count isn't up to their standards. :no:

EDIT:

First give everyone a reason why they should be reset.

I do not mean "reset" I mean ELIMINATED COMPLETELY.

As for join dates, those are not covered in this thread- this is simply about post counts and stars.

i feel they should, not only do those stars encourage useless one word posts but they are totally useless graphics that only clutter up the page and eat bandwidth from the server and 56k users.

585869776[/snapback]

Yet another good reason. I have yet to hear a convincing argument from the other point of view. Anyone care to give a good reason as to why post counts should stay? (Because it grows my e-penis isnt one tards :no: )

I voted "yes", but I see I am one of a very few...

Post counts tend to promote unproductive repeated one-word posts or all-smiley posts. :no: If they were gone, then people would not be motivated for "more starz!!11!oneone", and be more likely to post only when they had something meaningful to say.

Plus, I judge people by their "warning level", not their "post count". :ninja:

I like the post count. While some members spam away to high numbers, members like myself and Steven and John and etc. work hard at making every post count. I feel my post count is indicative of how much time I put into this community and I would hate to have it suddenly removed. If anything, it makes for great fun when a warned member uses my post count to proclaim how I think I'm high and mighty and on some power trip.

Without going into the pyschology of it all, the post count whilst on some level is meaningless, at other times it gives you an indication of the member as such, I mean if youve been here for a month and have a post count of like 2000 or something, and your trying to help me out with a post such as 'teh sucks' that indicates to me in future to ignore you. thats just one experience, but theres other instances were it is helpful as such.

In any case, the stars can go, but it doesnt hurt anyone by having the post count there, and truth be known I dont think not having it there would reduce the useless posts by a great percentage anyway.

But if the posts ever went id want the member no. highlighted or something, as id make that the new 'stat' to be as such :D

I'm not much of postwhore. I think anyone who's ever going to remember my posts, will remember them for my long, insightful, logical comments. I hope so, anyway.

I'm cutting back as of right now. Why you ask? Because I want to have 1000 posts by August 14th (My birthday) lol. Make it a 2-in-1 post in the Milestone subforum.

I'm not much of postwhore. I think anyone who's ever going to remember my posts, will remember them for my long, insightful, logical comments. I hope so, anyway.

I'm cutting back as of right now. Why you ask? Because I want to have 1000 posts by August 14th (My birthday) lol. Make it a 2-in-1 post in the Milestone subforum.

585869871[/snapback]

I managed to do that a while back. Going to try 2000 on my anniversary but I doubt if it's this year. Maybe next, after all it took nearly 4 years to get to 1000. Maybe 1337 by Annv. this year.

Cody

Edited by cyoung1616
I voted "yes", but I see I am one of a very few...

Post counts tend to promote unproductive repeated one-word posts or all-smiley posts. :no: If they were gone, then people would not be motivated for "more starz!!11!oneone", and be more likely to post only when they had something meaningful to say.

Plus, I judge people by their "warning level", not their "post count". :ninja:

585869832[/snapback]

Yeah, as far as I can see the benefits would outweigh the costs.

As for Bangbang023, you and John have the Super Mod tag already- wouldn't that be just as effective means to prove the amount of work and time you have put into Neowin, as well as the trust the community has in you?

Lastly, I think most dedicated, good quality members (Such as yourself and many other moderators) are represented well by the content in their posts. :happy:

I managed to do that a while back. Going to try 2000 on my anniversary but I doubt if it's this year. Maybe next, after all it took nearly 4 years to get to 1000. Maybe 1337 by Annv. this year.

Cody

585869889[/snapback]

(Y) Go for it man.

You can l337 it.. defo

btw, I think I got the idea from you. :shifty:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I grew up a Star Trek fan and never watched Star Wars movies. To this days I've not watched most Star Wras movies. As a result I rarely get these references, I have no idea what this post means. Given the popular reactions these get I have to accept I missed out.  
    • Spotify really have turned in to a butthole of a company. Assuming this isn't a bug then this is a low act for Premium users. Honestly, YT Premium which includes YT Music is a genuine alternative. In any event, the internet enshitification continues unabated...next up, the banning of VPN's.
    • This is why science is the only path to truth. It isn't rigid in its beliefs, rather it changes its views based on scientific discoveries.
    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      92
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!