Should the post count/Stars be removed


Should the post count and Stars next to members' names be removed?  

285 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the post count and Stars next to members' names be removed?

    • Yes
      95
    • No
      190


Recommended Posts

negative, as stated above, posters that have more stars, USUALLY, have something extremely meaningful to say. what i think we should do, is get rid of all the people that have alot of stars and have nothing meaningful to say at all.

No but maybe some bot would slow down their repetitive post...

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=...luser&mid=26480

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=...luser&mid=36334

585869763[/snapback]

You forgot one. :D

https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=...luser&mid=46589

I voted no, post count combined with join date and a quick search of all posts by the member can tell you wether or not the person replying in your thread is a habitual meaningless post ######, or maybe just had a one off with a "nice one" or "lol :laugh: ".

I like the post count, but I feel there should be more reprecussions for spamming the board with useful "congrats" posts, etc. Then again, I probably just don't notice when punishment is given out for those offenses, so we should just keep the system the way it is.

I'll admit it, I'm very postcountist. You low posties, as I like to call you, aren't even human in my book. Total scum.

585869801[/snapback]

holy crap man u have so many posts but really why do u care about the stars and posts it not that big of a deal man

I honestly don't believe removing the post count would do much to stifle the people that make comments like lol or congratz...or post only smilies all the time. People are gonna do it regardless....but that's just my opinion. And really I don't mind seeing posts like that anywayz, I just move right on to the next post :)

Although I admit I find it humerous when somebody with tons of posts makes a post just saying "lol" or something like that but turns right around and busts on somebody that does the same thing :rofl:

i think the post counts are stupid. i find it incredible that members such as bangbang and others have so many posts and each one is worthwhile, but i think that the annoyance of "lol" and "congrats" and "this is stupid" and "hey you only posted to raise your post count, wait so did i" all severely detract from the quality of these forums (the only ones i frequent). as you can see, i've been here nearly a year and have less than 200 posts, even though i love this place. i only post things that i think contribute to a discussion, and i think that is more important than post count or star number.

also, the bandwidth/speed argument doesn't really pan out. well it would at least be less of a factor if all the stars were single stars repeated multiple times, so only one star image would load per page.

I voted no.....Do not get frid of the post count or the stars. There is a psychological pecking order here on Neowin. I know that everyone has felt it, or at least anyone that has stuck around for a little while. THere are people out there who have a lot of posts and some of them....some of mine included, have absolutely no or very little to add to the thread. Congrats, whether it raises the Post Count or not is still a congrats. People are still going to post LOL and good job. There is no way that can be gotten rid of. Actually if you were to do that, there would probably be more of those pointless posts because there would be no way for anyone to identify how many posts a person had, so the poster would have to post more to make his/her name known. So, there is a status thing, there is the credability thing, then there is the thing that says that Neowin just like it is is what makes the community what it is. This place started out as a discussion for Windows, now look at it. We are able to argue about whether post count should be kept on here or not, and post pretty much uncensorred (as long as the post abides by a few rules). I say leave it like it is.

I voted no.... Yes postcounts can encourage spamming... but, as stated before, they can also show who in our membership is active and contributing. The neowinian milestones subforum could be postcount locked, but dont do away with the counter entirely.

Yes. (Y) Stars serve no purpose and encourage immature and useless posts. Removing them would in no way hurt Neowin, and likely benefit it by helping to restore the credibility it once held. In the end, stars mean nothing. Ranking members get no special benefits. Their only real purpose is separating the 'n00bs' from the '1337s'. Is that what NW is about? or do we care about meaningful discussion and helpful threads?

I voted No but meant yes. That is what you get for not paying attention. The stars don't mean as much to me as Join date. I usually have more tolerance and try harder to help out a member that has been here longer. I also try to help the fellow subscribers more. May not be right but I'm proud to be a supporter of Neowin and think the ones that subscribe are more loyal and deserve more condsideration.

585869755[/snapback]

Agreed, I could add stupid posts to all the threads I read and have a huge penis, I mean post count, as it is, it's tiny- but I use it well.

I think instead of showing post count, it should just have a rank:

0 - 10: Be Nice I'm New

10-100: I Don't Post That Often But That Doesnt Mean I'm Less Worthy Of Help

100-2000: I have a life

2000-5000: The ammount i post is a tad worrying

5000+: Ignore me and hate me for i are leet spammaarrrrr

Edit: Made the ranks a bit fairer after seeing how much the people above me had posted, oh and +1

If they're removed, why would anyone bother posting? :whistle:

585869740[/snapback]

Ermmm, dunno, maybe I am crazy, but... to help and get involve into the community? :rolleyes:

You know, this old and totally crazy saying "quality over quantity" its not that crazy.

Post count is not your e-penis

Perhaps one of the finest specimes on this entire board to find. Read a little more of the other post, it was said-

Bingo.  If the poll was "should the post count/stars be removed", you'd see a landslide in favor of 'no'.

I decided to follow up on that idea, but obvoiously that doesn't matter to you. I can only imagine what you voted for :rolleyes:

I vote 'yes.' I really don't see any reason for them other than ego. On the forum I help admin we have post count only displayed for admins/mods. If someone posts often enough, people will notice... you don't need a post count to tell you that. I also say do away with signature images (avatars are ok because size is relatively restricted) because it is a DISCUSSION board -- i really don't care to read the specs of your PC, what my isp and browser are (i already know, thanks, genius), or what software you endorse.

Yes

If they are removed from posts and left in the profiles and you NEED to see there stars and e-penis/post count then just look in there profile.

585870399[/snapback]

Makes a lot of sense to me. This way those who want to keep track of their posts can still do so. Others who rely on post and star information still have access. And those that don't care about postcount don't have to be bigoted by those who do.

Voted: Yes.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My father still uses a programme written in dbase3. Still manages to work with a little help from dosbox. 
    • Microsoft hides these secret Windows 11 performance boost settings available on every PC by Sayan Sen Windows enthusiasts often look for ways to extract as much performance out of their systems as possible, and it's often the case that they try and do so while trying to minimize the heat and power consumption. This is especially relevant in the case of mobile Windows PCs since laptops and notebooks tend to get hot and management of that heat and power is harder in such a form factor. As such users often turn to techniques like under-volting which can be used to squeeze out the maximum capabilities of a chip while also maintaining lowered power levels. There are official apps from AMD and Intel with the likes of Ryzen Master and XTU (Extreme Tuning Utility). While these are quite handy, most enthusiasts probably prefer to dig into the BIOS and play around with settings there like Curve Optimizer on Ryzen, which lets users set various frequency-voltage scaling values. These are essentially called P-States. If you are not familiar with them, Processor Power Management is done through Advanced Configuration and Power Interface (ACPI) P-states and C-states. While P-states or performance pwoer states handle CPU voltage-frequency scaling, C-states deal with CPU sleep states so that some of the CPU functions, which are not necessary at that moment, can be disabled. The P-states and C-states work together to make the processor run more efficiently. It helps the OS and apps determine which cores can be parked and which should be boosted. Of course not every user is an enthusiast or knows the technicalities and integrities of how things like overclocking or undervolting work. Thankfully for them Windows itself offers something pretty cool, though it is hidden by default on all systems. By default, Windows only has two P-States, "Minimum Processor State" and "Maximum Processor State." However, this can be changed with a Registry trick to expand the options under a secret "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown. This essentially enables the HWP or hardware P-States available on a device, and these are not controlled just by the OS itself as the underlying hardware gets involved too. In total there are five Processor Performance Boost Mode profiles that control how Windows requests and allows CPU turbo/boost behavior under the different power policies. They are: Disabled: In this mode, processor boosting is effectively turned off. The CPU will avoid entering turbo or boost frequencies and instead operate closer to its base frequency ceiling. This can significantly reduce power consumption and heat output, but at the cost of reduced burst performance and responsiveness in short workloads. Enabled: This is the standard behavior where boost functionality is allowed under normal conditions. The processor can opportunistically increase frequency when workload demands it, balancing performance gains with power and thermal constraints as managed by the system. Aggressive: Aggressive mode favors performance more heavily, allowing the CPU to enter higher boost states more readily and sustain them longer. This should in theory improve responsiveness under bursty or heavy workloads but increases power draw and thermal output compared to the default enabled behavior. Efficient Enabled: This mode still allows boosting, but with a stronger bias toward energy efficiency. The system attempts to use boost more selectively, avoiding unnecessary frequency spikes when the performance gain is marginal. Efficient Aggressive: This is a hybrid approach where boost is still performance-responsive, but the system continuously weighs efficiency more heavily than in Aggressive mode. It aims to deliver noticeable performance improvements while reducing wasted power in less demanding scenarios. Here's how to enable the Processor performance boost mode: Open Registry Editor: Press Win+R, type regedit, and click OK. Go to: HKLM\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Control\Power\PowerSettings\54533251-82be-4824-96c1-47b60b740d00\be337238-0d82-4146-a960-4f3749d470c7 (where HKLM stands for HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE_) Modify the value of Attributes from 1 to 2 (you can find modify option by right-clicking) After that, exit Registry, you should now be able to see the new "Processor performance boost mode" dropdown menu: As you can see there are now five new P-States or CPPC states or power profile available that help define the boost mode processor setting on your PC. Wrapping it up here's a quick run-down of the settings as defined by Microsoft itself. Setting Description Disabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is disabled. Collaborative Processor Performance Control (CPPC) behaviour is disabled. Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is enabled. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Efficient Enabled The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Efficient Enabled. Efficient Aggressive The corresponding P-state-based behaviour is Efficient. CPPC behaviour is Aggressive. Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows calculates the desired extra performance above the guaranteed performance level, and asks the processor to deliver that specific performance level. Efficient Aggressive At Guaranteed Windows always asks the processor to deliver the highest possible performance above the guaranteed performance level. In the next part we shall be comparing these settings to explore how much of a benefit or regression they can provide in terms of performance and power efficiency. If you decide to change the values on your system and are experiencing problems like crashes or an overheating PC, make sure to revert the steps back to the original state.
    • I think he means you haven't reviewed previous UFC games. Of course it doesn't matter... Every time you just report on something that involves the President even if just simply what happened you guys usually get accused of being anti-Trump. We live in fun times.
    • So how did you solve the problem? Disabling Secure Boot isn’t a solution.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Leroy Jethro Gibbs earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Conversation Starter
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Month Later
      AndreaB earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      agatameier earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      agatameier earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      518
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      93
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!