Should the post count/Stars be removed


Should the post count and Stars next to members' names be removed?  

285 members have voted

  1. 1. Should the post count and Stars next to members' names be removed?

    • Yes
      95
    • No
      190


Recommended Posts

I will be the first one laughing when one day the database got nuked and all the post counts got deleted

585870423[/snapback]

That's where the weekly back ups on Sundays come into play.

I vote NO to the removal.

My post means alot to me, because I know that I don't spam, and it's therefore a proper post count (give or take a few percent, I'm only human)

no but the milestone forum should be taken down

585869993[/snapback]

agreed (Y)

do you really need to hear a thousand "congrats'"? is your self esteem that low that you rely on meaningless congratulations from some 13 year old boy on the other side of the world?

Oh, is it that low? Sorry.

agreed (Y)

do you really need to hear a thousand "congrats'"? is your self esteem that low that you rely on meaningless congratulations from some 13 year old boy on the other side of the world?

Oh, is it that low? Sorry.

585870581[/snapback]

Yes, but they were totally clogging up general discussion. So milestones as a thread need to be totally banned.

Maybe if people didn't "celebrate" their post count then people wouldn't "congrats" so much, and the whole circle of post whoring would stop.

(I have celebrated in the past, but I wouldn't miss it.)

I guess it's an ego boost to get a load of people all replying in _your_ thread, just for you.

Maybe if the mods deducted 100 posts per 1 stupid post people would get the point

585870296[/snapback]

but what would you class as a stupid post?

personally yes post count is nice but it wouldnt bother me one bit if it was removed, i dont know about other people but i dont look at peoples post count before deciding wether to reply or not, whoever it is i try and help if i can.

im not sure whether removing post count would stop pointless posts though, as if someone says its there birthday for example, course people are going to say 'happy birthday', or if someone posts something funny people are going to say 'lol', whether they have a post count or not.

so basically i wouldnt be bothered if they removed the post count but likewise wouldnt mind if it stayed.

I love the postcounts and I won't have any problems if it was removed. Some members were trying to elevate post counts by spamming...like typing only one word and post it. Yet some of them also posting crap and spending too much free time and got nothing to do...talking about nonsense, etc.

There have been numerous debates about postcounts and as long as I remember that postcounts are here to stay. Postcounts are not to be used for the bad reasons above, its only purpose is to describe how particular members have contribute to the entire Neowin community.

I voted yes, because if they were no longer displayed, it would almost certainly improve the useful : useless posts ratio. Seing people post emoticon-only replies is bad enough; seeing posts that merely say "dunno" is worse still (and I've seen quite a few of those lately). So I guess the number of posts I've made isn't nearly as important to me as the helpfulness of posts I've made.

Edited by scaife
I voted "yes", but I see I am one of a very few...

Post counts tend to promote unproductive repeated one-word posts or all-smiley posts. :no: If they were gone, then people would not be motivated for "more starz!!11!oneone", and be more likely to post only when they had something meaningful to say.

Plus, I judge people by their "warning level", not their "post count". :ninja:

585869832[/snapback]

Yes. (Y) Stars serve no purpose and encourage immature and useless posts. Removing them would in no way hurt Neowin, and likely benefit it by helping to restore the credibility it once held. In the end, stars mean nothing. Ranking members get no special benefits. Their only real purpose is separating the 'n00bs' from the '1337s'. Is that what NW is about? or do we care about meaningful discussion and helpful threads?

585870272[/snapback]

Bang on the money, imho. Down with postcounts! ;) I just think it would result in a better-respected forum.

I don't think post count and starts should be removed, and I absolutely love them because it shows how active I've been involved in this community.

However, some sections seriously need post count locking.

I can come up with at least three members who goes to EVERY SINGLE MILESTONE thread and post "congrats lolz :fun:", and that's what milestone section is becoming, a spamming section.

I like the post count, but I feel there should be more reprecussions for spamming the board with useful "congrats" posts, etc.  Then again, I probably just don't notice when punishment is given out for those offenses, so we should just keep the system the way it is.

585870126[/snapback]

We do hand out warnings/bannings for such behavior. While you may not notice it, the members who post the same crap repeatedly do notice our punishments, first hand.

Why not replace it with something symbolizing post frequency? I don't really know how it would work, but the idea would be something like average posts-per-month, and maybe a neato little mini-icon emoting the rank. Retardedly high averages could be some insane fat Star Wars fan with a goatee. Who knows?

abandon post counts please!!!

instead introduce a rating that tells how active the user is, like, "very active, active, ...". i find these kind of titles more informative than post counts.

you could tie the activity with some rating system, like awarding stars or something like that.

the reason why i dont like the post count is to see all the "my x.000th post" threads all over the place.

and at last neowin would be a pioneer by abondoning the post counts...

EDIT: i second the idea of introducing awards for e.g. being very helpful to other members, or having great knowlegde :D... and the awards should be awarded by the vote of the members .. ( sounds like an awful lot of trouble i know :( )

Edited by omega3112
I wholeheartedly agree that the Milestone threads should be post count locked. It is the best way to reduce spamming.

585871935[/snapback]

Maybe we mods should moderate the Milestone section more thoroughly. I don't mean closing threads or removing posts either.

I mean posting statements like... "You're lucky to make it this far. Good luck reaching your next one" or "Has it only been a year?" or "You're only xx years old? That explains a lot!"

:p

don't take this post seriously

Why the hell would you want to remove our stars & Post count numbers?!?

I personaly try to set a goal (1000 posts in one year or less) and see if I can meet it.

Some of my posts are congrats type posts but many others are voiceing opinions/helping someone.

Granted the post count does not mean much to some but is a personal acheivement to others.

It is a visible notification that represents seniority. It's easier and nicer to look at than the date. You always refer to the date though, because a new member that has a thousand posts most likely has no content and is in a race.

why not make a system where we (the readers) state whether or not a certain post was useful to us or not, the same way imdb.com do it, that way people would make an effort in their posts, rather than posting smileys to enhance their e-penis like many do.

+1

:p

585870214[/snapback]

Indeed. I think both should stay because it would upset too many people for them to go, bangbang023. but then again I want them to go because its annoying people being petty and spamming to get their +1 (like that loser SeMz :woot:)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Samsung messages is still alive and well. They reversed that and decided to our more effort into it.
    • I think every American should have a course in a 'dry sense of humour' at school; and perhaps 'using sarcasm in jest' oh, and also 'the use or irony in humour'.
    • What they really need to do is automatically spell "loses" and "lose" correctly since nobody seems to know how to anymore. Then they blame spellcheck/autocomplete and don't realize autocomplete is just filling in the word for them automatically so it was misspelled in the first place.
    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Twozo Technologies earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      497
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      183
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      85
    5. 5
      neufuse
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!