Recommended Posts

So after reading about the video support I wondered if I added a .mov file would it sync to my iPod. Thinking that if I added some video files, it might rob my ipod of disk space, that I need for music. But when I plugged it in, said it could copy, as it wasn't a supported file.

Next, I added some quicktime trailers to a library on another machine, so see if I could access them across the network. No joy there :(

After messing around with 4.8 for a bit it does feel a lot quicker than 4.7. It's only using 75 mbs of ram now as opposed to the 170 it was using in 4.7 and it is using almost no cpu power.. Thumbs up... still a lot of room for improvement but better.. Anyone know if it burns track titles on to cd's yet?

So basically... theres no point in updating if i dont have a ipod or use the music store?

585897070[/snapback]

It supports movies now although still limited and it loads much faster on my Mac. Why wouldn't you upgrade? It's free and it doesn't make iTunes worse.

It supports movies now although still limited and it loads much faster on my Mac. Why wouldn't you upgrade? It's free and it doesn't make iTunes worse.

585897078[/snapback]

Yeah I suppose so but I'd use .mov files with quicktime anyways... I guess I'll wait till it auto updates.

After messing around with 4.8 for a bit it does feel a lot quicker than 4.7. It's only using 75 mbs of ram now as opposed to the 170 it was using in 4.7 and it is using almost no cpu power.. Thumbs up... still a lot of room for improvement but better.. Anyone know if it burns track titles on to cd's yet?

585897068[/snapback]

170MB?!?! :blink: Man, that's a lot more than I've ever seen!

However, you're right about the speed boosts. Searching is insanely faster now. My guess is because of the Search Kit improvements in 10.4 being backported to the PC version of iTunes. So, I guess there's a little tiny bit of OS X running on your PC when you run iTunes :p

After messing around with 4.8 for a bit it does feel a lot quicker than 4.7. It's only using 75 mbs of ram now as opposed to the 170 it was using in 4.7 and it is using almost no cpu power.. Thumbs up... still a lot of room for improvement but better.. Anyone know if it burns track titles on to cd's yet?

585897068[/snapback]

When I used iTunes 4.7 to burn my audio cd's and it burned track titles, so I'm guessing 4.8 should too.

How's the ram usage with this update?  With 4.7, it was insanely high.

585898395[/snapback]

...

After messing around with 4.8 for a bit it does feel a lot quicker than 4.7. It's only using 75 mbs of ram now as opposed to the 170 it was using in 4.7 and it is using almost no cpu power.. Thumbs up... still a lot of room for improvement but better.. Anyone know if it burns track titles on to cd's yet?

585897068[/snapback]

Mine's at about 48MB atm.

4.7.1.30 ---> 4.8.31

oooo 1 build.?:sleep::

585895830[/snapback]

Umm... yeah, that's the 31st build of 4.8 which is different than what you were thinking (4.7.31). I'm guessing that you are not a developer eh? It means that they released 31 builds of 4.8 to QA before it was released for promotion.

I'm wondering if they released this iTunes by accident with the video feature enabled. It just doesn't seem to do what it is meant to do and there is no mention of the video capability on the Apple site.:huh::

585895916[/snapback]

Look at the first post. They already have at least one album with videos included as extras. So, no it is not a mistake.

First:

It's always nice with a new build - Thanks Apple :D

Second:

Well, they have seemed to fix a few "issues" and added some stuff BUT!

I have a music libary with some 100GB of data... All added into the neat little iTunes... Whenever I close iTunes my CPUload goes BALISTIC! (i mean 98%-100% load constantly for 3-4 minutes). I've been told that this has to do with iTunes writing "stuff" into its files in the libary (and that seems to be right) but Apple... Have you thought this through? This means that I can't use my computer for a few minutes each time I quit iTunes???

They should really let the user take care of the backup instead of forcing it by the application...

Oh...

I'm running AMD x64 (with WinXP x32) and 2GB of DDR2 RAM. Should be efficient (IMO).

Suggestions?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Doesn't DDG mainly use Bing?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!