[US] Scott Air Force Base avoids 2005 BRAC


Recommended Posts

At 8:15am CDT, Illinois Representative Jerry Costello held a special, and unusual, morning press conference, a couple hours before the offical Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) release to announce the Scott Air Force Base (SAFB) has not been recommended for closure in the 2005 BRAC. The nation will find out later this morning which installations are among the 150 reported to be closed by the BRAC as recommended by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld in an attempt to save a reported $48.8 billion over the next 20 years.

Yahoo News is reporting 33 of those 150 installations will be major U.S. bases, including Ellsworth Air Force Base in South Dakota.

I will try to make updates as more information is available.

-reported by CiQuat

Edit:

Note: Please keep this thread a-political.

Copied from post below:

Official BRAC Recommendations (PDF) (Source: DoD - http://www.defenselink.mil/brac)

Edited by CiQuat

I will try to keep the list of confirmed closures updated in the first post. More info as it becomes available.

And, as I stated above, please try to keep this thread a-political. Whether or not you support the US's military decisions, the BRAC affects hundreds of thousands to millions of people as jobs or lost or gained based on closures and realignments. The majority of the people I associate with would have lost their jobs if SAFB were to close. Now Scott stands to gain more employment capacity as I expect them to pick up many new duties from the closing bases.

It can still takes years for a base to actually close once it's on the projected closure list.

The probability of Scott ever closing is *highly* unlikely.  It's quite a high-profile base.  As a matter of fact, that's the base I enlisted and entered into the AF from.

585913436[/snapback]

That is true. If the list as it stands right now is approved, starting in 2006 the affected installations will be closing or realigning in a process that could take up to 6 years. It's a lot of work to move that much equipment and people while making room for them at the receiving base.

But it's still a disheartening and sometimes crippling blow to the surrounding community that's built itself up around the base. For example, Ellsworth Air Force Base of South Dakota is that state's 2nd largest employer. The entire state will feel that hit when Ellsworth finally locks its gates.

I feel sorry for those individuals, but I'm really looking forward to the additional employment opportunities in my area since SAFB is less than 10 miles from my home and I am a military contractor.

I have a copy of the full BRAC list  ( I'm DOD of course) .. It will close in the re alignment phase thats coming up. BUt alot of other places are being shut down

585913484[/snapback]

Um, I believe you are mistaken. SAFB will gain through realignment, to the tune of almost 800 positions gained.

I noticed some of that info is not accurate according to the e-mail we were just blasted here ..

585913548[/snapback]

Thanks for letting me know. I'll keep my eyes open for a confirmed correct public list and I'll post that when it becomes available (probably from the BRAC official site http://www.defenselink.mil/brac/). Unfortunately, I'm not in a position to confirm or deny the information I'm given right now - just re-reporting what other news organizations have noted or what I have heard personally.

More news in Illinois concerning the BRAC:

Wednesday, May 11, 2005

By Mike Ramsey

Copley News Service

CHICAGO - Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan threatened Tuesday to sue the federal government if Air National Guard units in Springfield or Peoria are on a final list of recommended military shutdowns later this year.

Madigan said her office has determined that federal law obligates the Defense Department to get permission from a governor when closing a National Guard base within that executive's state.

Gov. Rod Blagojevich and members of the Illinois congressional delegation, including U.S. Sen. Dick Durbin, a Springfield Democrat, and U.S. Rep. Ray LaHood, R-Peoria, raised the legal argument earlier this year. Madigan's office was asked to issue an opinion.

"Federal law is clear: no National Guard base closures without the consent of the governor," Madigan said in a news release. "As attorney general, I will seek to uphold this law and protect these bases should it become necessary."

The Pentagon is expected Friday to recommend several bases for closure as part of a national military reorganization. Illinois officials have worried the Defense Department preferences could include shutting down the 183rd Fighter Wing at Springfield's Abraham Lincoln Capital Airport or the 182nd Airlift Wing at Greater Peoria Regional Airport.

If one or both of the central Illinois Guard units are targeted, the attorney general would not immediately file a federal lawsuit, Madigan spokeswoman Melissa Merz said. Instead, Madigan would wait for the Base Closure and Realignment Commission (BRAC) to screen the Pentagon's list and issue a final report, Merz said.

The independent panel is expected to send a report to the president no later than Sept. 8. If Illinois files a lawsuit at that point, it would name the Defense Department and BRAC as defendants, Merz said.

"I hope the Department of Defense will follow clear federal law on this matter, but it's reassuring to know that our Illinois attorney general is ready to act if any unlawful closures are proposed," Durbin said in a written statement.

Pentagon officials have disagreed that the federal government needs state permission to close or move a National Guard unit.

A third Air Guard site in Illinois, at Scott Air Force Base in Belleville, isn't covered under the attorney general's opinion because Scott is considered an active-duty military base, Madigan's office said.

Source: PJStart.com

let me see whats classified information and releasable for public information and I will post up a list of what we have circulating within DOD

585913623[/snapback]

Supposedly the list will be made public shortly (last I heard was around 11am EDT, which has since passed), so don't worry about trying to filter your info for public release. It'd sure be a waste for you to get that done just moments after the DoD official release were to occur. :)

I am DOD .. LOL and what the public gets is not always the full information I can really tell you that after my year of Iraq I just recently made it back from

585913692[/snapback]

I'm sorry. I didn't mean that as a personal knock - I meant I wanted the "official" release by DoD. Yours would technically be a DoD release, but not the official one. And I don't disagree with you about the disconnect between public release and the full info - I have a security clearance that has allowed me to learn things that have made me ill by knowing the truth... Unfortunately in this case, I didn't have the need-to-know to access the list ahead of its public release (and I honestly wish I hadn't had the need to know the other stuff I've learned).

Speaking of official releases, the list has been made available to the public by DoD - which, at a quick glance, looks very much like the MSNBC release:

BRAC Recommendations (PDF) (Source: DoD - http://www.defenselink.mil/brac)

I'm stationed at Wilford Hall Medical Center. We are going from a level 1 trauma center to a "super" clinic. I probably will not be affected much due to my career field...but we will lose a bunch of people. We just got re-verified in August '04 as a level 1 trauma center (one of 3 in San Antonio).

It is the 3rd hospital I've been at when they have made these cuts (Maxwell and Barksdale were the others).

In a way I'm surprised they are going to cut us back...since we are the largest medical center (and only Level 1 Trauma Center) in the Air Force. On the other hand...I'm not surprised since we have a large Army hospital in the same city.

I'm stationed at Wilford Hall Medical Center.  We are going from a level 1 trauma center to a "super" clinic.  I probably will not be affected much due to my career field...but we will lose a bunch of people.  We just got re-verified in August '04 as a level 1 trauma center (one of 3 in San Antonio).

It is the 3rd hospital I've been at when they have made these cuts (Maxwell and Barksdale were the others).

In a way I'm surprised they are going to cut us back...since we are the largest medical center (and only Level 1 Trauma Center) in the Air Force.  On the other hand...I'm not surprised since we have a large Army hospital in the same city.

585915822[/snapback]

Big Willie! I was born there!

Here in GA we are losing three installments - one marine, and two navy I believe, but the big base where I live is safe.

I'll probably get flamed for this...

But it is sad that civilians lose their jobs when bases close, but usually civilians that work with the military make a hell of a lot more money than the soldiers do. When I was at an Army radio school, my instructor was telling me how civilian instructors make like 43k from teaching Soldiers where as Soldier instructors only make what their pay grade is, but I also realize a lot of civilian stores go outta business, but from most of the bases I've been too theres a lot of tattoo parlors, barber shops, and strip clubs right outside of them, and theres also a strong distaste for Soldiers from the locals that live in these towns right outside of military installations, not to say that some Soldiers don't deserve the stereotyping

I'll probably get flamed for this...

But it is sad that civilians lose their jobs when bases close, but usually civilians that work with the military make a hell of a lot more money than the soldiers do.  When I was at an Army radio school, my instructor was telling me how civilian instructors make like 43k from teaching Soldiers where as Soldier instructors only make what their pay grade is, but I also realize a lot of civilian stores go outta business, but from most of the bases  I've been too theres a lot of tattoo parlors, barber shops, and strip clubs right outside of them, and theres also a strong distaste for Soldiers from the locals that live in these towns right outside of military installations, not to say that some Soldiers don't deserve the stereotyping

585916519[/snapback]

Well, possibly my town is the exception to your rule, but we love the base and all the military personnel. True it is very good for civilians to work on the base, it is a kind of career goal for many. Once you get a civil service job you are good for life. basically. But, the soldiers also get a lot of subisidies that contractors don't like housing allowances and medical care (as good as it may be).

I know my town would be devastated if our base closed.

I'll probably get flamed for this...

But it is sad that civilians lose their jobs when bases close, but usually civilians that work with the military make a hell of a lot more money than the soldiers do.  When I was at an Army radio school, my instructor was telling me how civilian instructors make like 43k from teaching Soldiers where as Soldier instructors only make what their pay grade is, but I also realize a lot of civilian stores go outta business, but from most of the bases  I've been too theres a lot of tattoo parlors, barber shops, and strip clubs right outside of them, and theres also a strong distaste for Soldiers from the locals that live in these towns right outside of military installations, not to say that some Soldiers don't deserve the stereotyping

585916519[/snapback]

It may also have to do with which branch of the military the base serves. I used to live near an Army base and the sentiment you related was the same. We didn't care much for the soldiers when they came into town - especially since it seems they just were out to cause trouble.

Here, I live near an Air Force base and the soldiers are very welcomed here. Our town is clean and growing. We don't have large areas of seedy behavior, and next to no such problems near or on the base. Half of the people I go to church with (approx 800) work on the base and half of those are soldiers and their families stationed there. The soldiers don't "come into town" around here, they're part of the community already. I guess that's the biggest difference of all.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Lethal fake phone chargers are still being sold on Amazon and eBay, UK watchdog warns by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels The UK consumer rights organization, Which?, is claiming that “potentially lethal knock-off chargers” are still being sold on online marketplaces seven years after it exposed the danger of these chargers. In its latest investigation, it bought 15 USB phone chargers from several online marketplaces and found they were missing key information, meaning they cannot be legally sold in the UK. Which? bought the 15 chargers from seven online marketplaces. These were Amazon (including Amazon Haul), AliExpress, B&Q Marketplace, Debenhams Marketplace, and eBay. It said that the chargers were so badly made that anyone using them was at risk of electric shock. Over half the chargers also posed fire and explosion risks. Of the chargers purchased, one was a fake Apple USB-C 35W power adaptor charger. To confuse buyers, the box was branded with an Apple logo, but testing found it to be a fake. Further testing picked up arcing sounds after 10 seconds of use, where a current jumps between two parts of the electrical circuit, which can cause fires, explosions, or electric shock. The manufacturers of this particular charger also put modeling clay inside it to make it feel more weighty, robust, and genuine. Not all of the chargers were technically faulty; however, some were missing key packaging, markings, and documentation, meaning they can’t be sold in the UK legally. Which? said that it is now campaigning alongside a coalition of safety groups and businesses for new laws that make online marketplaces responsible for ensuring the safety of products that they choose to list on their websites. It also said the government needs to start using powers under the Product Regulation and Metrology Act, which was adopted last July, to impose safety requirements on online marketplaces via secondary legislation, but so far, there have been delays. No matter what country you are in, be sure to properly research what you are buying and only buy authentic chargers to prevent fires. You can read more about Which?’s research here.
    • Visual Studio finally gets long-awaited feature that developers will love by Usama Jawad Visual Studio Code is Microsoft's popular, lightweight, open-source code editor, it is actually Visual Studio that is the company's flagship integrated development environment (IDE). Although the IDE already offers a boatload of useful features for developers, Microsoft has finally introduced a long-requested capability that will be loved by many. While developers have already been able to create Git pull requests (PRs) directly within Visual Studio for the past couple of years, it had not been possible to review a PR without switching to the browser, until now. Microsoft revealed in December 2025 that it is working on UX that enables developers to do just that, and fast-forward to June 2026, and Visual Studio finally has native capabilities to open and inspect a PR, discuss feedback, and wrap up the review, all without switching to the browser. This integration works for both GitHub and Azure DevOps (including on-prem). Developers have access to multiple surfaces to open a PR, including Git Repository, Git Changes, and the Git menu in Visual Studio. Once you open a PR, all the important details will be immediately visible to you, from where you can navigate to various levels of granularity and branch states, depending on the reviews that you are engaged in. As you would expect, you also get a diff view that enables you to see code changes inline or side-by-side in a separate panel. You can also review commit-by-commit. Additionally, this UX fosters collaboration as you can leave comments, reply to threads, and resolve conversations easily. Naturally, you can also leverage Copilot to apply a code suggestion to fix a potential issue. When you are done, you have the ability to approve, complete, and merge the PR. This is a pretty major feature as it has been requested heavily for the past few years. You can try it out in Visual Studio 2026 version 18.7, made available here recently. Microsoft plans to enhance this experience further in future releases with comment filtering, a timeline of PR activity, and more.
    • This AdGuard Family lifetime deal is still only $15.97 by Steven Parker Today's highlighted Neowin Deal comes via our Apps + Software section, where you can get a lifetime subscription and save 90% on a lifetime AdGuard Family Plan. AdGuard is a unique program that has all the necessary features for what they claim to be "the best web experience." The software combines the an advanced ad blocker, a privacy protection module, and a parental control tool—all working in one app. This software deals with annoying ads, hides your data from a multitude of trackers, protects you from malware attacks, and even lets you restrict your kids from accessing inappropriate content. Install AdGuard and see the internet as it was supposed to be: clean and safe. Get rid of annoying banners, pop-ups & video ads once and for all Hide your data from the multitude of trackers & activity analyzers that swarm the web Avoid fraudulent and phishing website and malware attacks Protect your kids online by restricting them from accessing inappropriate & adult content Good to know Family Plan Length of access: lifetime This plan is only available to new users Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Max number of devices: 9 Access options: desktop & mobile Software version: AdGuard Family Updates included A lifetime subscription of AdGuard Family Plan normally costs $169.99, but this deal can be yours for just $15.97, that's a saving of $157.02. For full terms, specifications, and license info please click the link below. Get this AdGuard Family lifetime deal for just $15.97 (was $169.99) Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. As an online publication, Neowin too relies on ads for operating costs and, if you use an ad blocker, we'd appreciate being whitelisted. In addition, we have an ad-free subscription for $28 a year, which is another way to show support! Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • the MCT currently downloads 26200.8653, so not completely up to date.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Timaximus earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Timaximus earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      FBSPL went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      507
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      179
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      160
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!