• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0
which one uses the least resources and doesn't annoy you unless you actually have a virus?

586693479[/snapback]

You can configure NOD32 to automatically delete any virus it finds on your computer and then disable the GUI. That way it won't annoy you even if you did have a virus... it does its job in the background completely silently. :)

  • 0
Though I do believe you can turn it off now.  KAV2006 seems to be vastly faster in any case.  I can barely tell the difference between having only NOD32 or KAV2006 on, and both on (with certain modules disabled mind you, or it's going to be conflict city).

586689563[/snapback]

I know I can't wait for 2006. If you want to help, beta test for em here:

http://forum.kaspersky.com/

  • 0

I've voted for Avast! because it's the best free antivirus solution out there. It's a small, light, fast and effective solution.

If I had to choose a paid one I would go for Kaspersky (probably the best A/V) or McAfee.

But besides the antivirus, precautions must start within us. People must know what kind of stuff they do with their computers, what kind of things they download, install and from where. :)

P.S. - Sorry for my poor english. :s

  • 0
Kaspersky is the best :yes:. Avast, Nod32 are quite good too. ;-)

Please stay away from Avg, Norton.

586695410[/snapback]

As a matter of fact, I voted for AVG Free. In my opinion, it is the best antivirus. Previously I had tried Avast!, and found it to be quite annoying.

Smctainsh

  • 0

I have this message in another thread https://www.neowin.net/forum/index.php?act=...#entry586714405. So, I thought that I just copy down here:

Hmm..people needs to know that comparing Norton Antivirus and Symantec Antivirus Corporate is like comparing apple and orange. Both are fruit for sure but they taste so differently.

I have experience of a virus that crippled my AV (at that time it was NOD32). So, everytime I do Local Scanning, NOD32 will tell me that it has CRC check error. Thus, NOD32 is crippled.

So far, I have SAV 10 (again...it's not NORTON ANTIVIRUS) in my comp. the 10 version is advertised to have a feature called "Tamper Protection". Thus if a virus wants to write itself to any antivirus program that it's programmed to acknowledge, then SAV can protect itself from any modifications.

  • 0

As suggested, I made the switch to Nod32 from Kaspersky, mainly because of my laptop needing as much resources free as it can get.

I'm liking NOD32 so far, it's uses very little resources that it makes me wonder if its working at all lol.

I downloaded some viruses on purpose and it caught them all.

Another vote for NOD32 ;)

  • 0
As suggested, I made the switch to Nod32 from Kaspersky, mainly because of my laptop needing as much resources free as it can get.

I'm liking NOD32 so far, it's uses very little resources that it makes me wonder if its working at all lol.

I downloaded some viruses on purpose and it caught them all.

Another vote for NOD32 ;)

586721359[/snapback]

can u tell me a site that lets u download virii to check if you AV works?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Too soon, I'm still not over this death!
    • Normally, I admit when a title is clickbait (unfortunately, it's become somewhat necessary in AI-dominated news sections today), but in this case, all supported versions is implied and doesn't need to be spelled out in the title. Of course, I'm covering a Patch Tuesday update but that is only available to supported Windows SKUs. All our coverage relates to supported Windows software and SKUs only unless we expressly state that it's "unsupported", "unofficial", or "third-party". I'm sorry, but supported/official SKUs don't need to be spelled out as such in every Neowin headline.
    • ALL versions or ALL SUPPORTED versions? Neowin does it again.
    • But the reality is it will work for people's needs, and they don't care about the technology that makes it. Clearly not everyone's needs, but that low end space where personal laptops were only used to type emails, watch content and browse websites, but they didn't want to do that on a small screen device. Heck, writing that out I can now see the connection and reason it'll do so well. Apple is about experience. If the experience is bad, they don't release it. Low end Windows laptop manufacturers up until this point have not taken that into consideration ever before, so slow laggy usage with brittle slimey plastic shells were common. I hope that the low end space at least creates better physical products that last a bit longer, and if Microsoft get their act together, they could also have a solid OS on such low end hardware that would actually make the experience work for what the hardware was intended for. The fact that the CPU is a "cellphone", sorry mobile phone processor is irrelevant. It's about the experience, and so far, that sounds quite solid.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Jordan Smith earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      590
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!