• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

For those of you on Comcast, they offer McAfee Viruscan 10 free of charge. Just for kicks I just downloaded it tonight to try it out and so far so good (no noticable slowness issues, no errors). I have been hearing good things about their enterprise products for a long time, so I guess it is time to see if that applies for their home products.

At worst it is a learning experience, at best I can recommend this to clients on Comcast who do not want to pay for Antivirus.

  • 0
As suggested, I made the switch to Nod32 from Kaspersky, mainly because of my laptop needing as much resources free as it can get.

I'm liking NOD32 so far, it's uses very little resources that it makes me wonder if its working at all lol.

I downloaded some viruses on purpose and it caught them all.

Another vote for NOD32 ;)

586721359[/snapback]

KAV is not bloated. I don't know where you got that idea, but it only uses 2 resources. I don't know how many NOD32 uses to compare.

For those of you on Comcast, they offer McAfee Viruscan 10 free of charge. Just for kicks I just downloaded it tonight to try it out and so far so good (no noticable slowness issues, no errors). I have been hearing good things about their enterprise products for a long time, so I guess it is time to see if that applies for their home products.

At worst it is a learning experience, at best I can recommend this to clients on Comcast who do not want to pay for Antivirus.

586734665[/snapback]

What a steal! McAfee is excellent in my opinion just they need to cut the processes down a bit. Otherwise they make some good applications.

The latest KAV is excellent...or was; until I found out it slowed down my system with the default settings. I am not sure if this is a bug or what, but previous versions never did this. Norton is bloated as hell and slows down systems; its a known fact. I tried Trend Micro back in the day (2004) and it was ok but there were better alternatives out. In todays modern age I tried the online scanner its fasttttt! I might give Trend Micro PC-Cillin 2006 another whirl to see whats up because it looks promising to me. NOD32 I haven't tried yet and I might soon. AVG I didn't like because it doesn't catch as much viruses as other alternatives do. If I had to use a Anti-Virus right at this moment, my choice would goto KAV. Only has 2 processes running and has updated virus definitions everday. I am just not to 'keen' on the scanning engine though as I said before it slows my system down a bit.

*KAV - Kaspersky Anti-Virus

*Information in this post about KAV is based on version 5.0.388.

  • 0
^^KAV & KIS 2006 will have massive increases in performance.

And it not only updates every day, more like every hour.

www.virustotal.com is great for people who find a suspicious file.

586739295[/snapback]

Well yeah thats what I sort've mean't. When will 2006 be out?

  • 0
KAV is not bloated. I don't know where you got that idea, but it only uses 2 resources. I don't know how many NOD32 uses to compare.

I never said KAV was bloated, I don't know where you read that... :huh:

I like KAV a lot and have it on three machines at home, I just said I like NOD32 because it seems to use less resources. (e.g. my startup time on laptop was nearly cut in half w/NOD32)

Now, for average desktops out there, I'd definitely recommend either KAV or NOD32...but the average laptop out there will not be as fast as desktop so my recommendation is NOD32. :p

  • 0

i used to have all the computers in our house maintained by NAV 2002, because all the more current versions I feel is completly bloatware,

but with all these new viruses varients around i had to wonder if NAV 02 was still protecting as well as any of the more current versions.

when i saw how much better NOD32 was and i was instantly hooked. NOD32 hasn't failed me yet.

  • 0
i used avg free but uinstalled it after i saw the horrible test results, the ntried nod32 but didn't quite understand the hype about it. back to antivirxp for me.

586761174[/snapback]

You should give Kaspersky a whirl. Just look how often it updates ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • In addition to the "sidebar app list" and "Collections" features, Microsoft will also deprecate the "Drop" feature. Before you publish this news and credit another site, here is the original source: https://x.com/i/status/2067838711870439583 .
    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      89
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!