• 0

Your favourite Antivirus?


  

2295 members have voted

  1. 1. Your favourite Antivirus?

    • Avast!
      193
    • AVG
      306
    • BitDefender
      42
    • Kaspersky
      261
    • McAfee
      154
    • NOD32
      633
    • Norton/Symantec
      435
    • Panda
      29
    • Trend Micro
      81
    • Other
      161


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I wish the Registration was easier with Avast (for anyone that knows that the hell they are doing it is, i'm must talking about the average user) I haven't seen the new version of Avast expire yet, what does it do? Does it bring up a wizard that helps you renew it?

  • 0

Norton is the best even using a lot of memory :yes:

The best??? ... how is detecting a virus but then saying fails to remove it, but you can manually locate and find the virus and remove it yourself, how is that the best?

  • 0

The best??? ... how is detecting a virus but then saying fails to remove it, but you can manually locate and find the virus and remove it yourself, how is that the best?

Norton blows. It takes up so much memory. Slows the system down heaps and doesn't even catch everything that is thrown at it. If I recall correctly when installing Norton it also asks you to install a whole bunch of ****e that you don't even need. Call me old-fashioned but I don't want a swiss-army Anti-Virus soluction.

NOD32 seems to work the best for me ( aside from AVG which gets kudos because it has a free version and that free version is pretty good ). NOD32 has a small footprint and catches everything that is thrown at it.

  • 0

i ahve a question my friend needs a free anti-virus andi was wondering which was the best of the free ones besides AVG since ive used that one before and dont real care for it. but anyways which one has lower resources and better detection rate etc... Avast! or AntiVir? or is there another good free one anyone can reccomend?

AntiVir Personal Edition Classic offers a smaller footprint and better detection rates than Avast!. I switched from AVG to AntiVir's beta 7 Classic a few months ago and couldn't be happier. I'm definitely not saying Avast! isn't a good choice, I just think you'll see more and more users switching to AntiVir when version 7 is officially released. Personally, even the beta has been rock solid for me. :)

Seriously, free AV has pretty much been a two name race for a while now (AVG and Avast!), but for those of you still recommending Avast!, you should really check out AntiVir, I think you'll be surprised. No matter where I've looked, their detection rates are at worst equal, but usually much better, and its footprint is roughly equivalent to NOD32 which is way less than Avast!

Edited by MuddyMuDmaN
  • 0

I've tried many of the following:

Norton (yuk!, slows down any PC), good AV engine though, crap at removal.

McAfee, not bad

NOD32, quite good.

KasperSky, very good.

AVG, not bad at all

BitDefender, stunning

I settled for BitDefender for more than 1 reason, apart from being a very good AV detector & remover, it's footprint was very small, plus it's bundled with an excellent Firewall, Spam and Spyware system - one small program which takes care of everything.

Anyone looking for one simple single package to take care of secuirty, I would seriously suggest to try it out.

It's a cutting-edge package, that is to say whilst it's ahead of many others it can be buggy - one bug is the firewall stops some 3rd party software (such as Partition Magic, Diskeeper etc) from running as the software really does stop just about anything from messing with your machine, they're working on a fix but tend to be slow on bug fixes.

  • 0

AntiVir Personal Edition Classic offers a smaller footprint and better detection rates than Avast!. I switched from AVG to AntiVir's beta 7 Classic a few months ago and couldn't be happier. I'm definitely not saying Avast! isn't a good choice, I just think you'll see more and more users switching to AntiVir when version 7 is officially released. Personally, even the beta has been rock solid for me. :)

Seriously, free AV has pretty much been a two name race for a while now (AVG and Avast!), but for those of you still recommending Avast!, you should really check out AntiVir, I think you'll be surprised. No matter where I've looked, their detection rates are at worst equal, but usually much better, and its footprint is roughly equivalent to NOD32 which is way less than Avast!

just looking at Antivir's website and it says the premiem edition has pop3 scanning, so the free one doesn't?

  • 0

I wish the Registration was easier with Avast (for anyone that knows that the hell they are doing it is, i'm must talking about the average user) I haven't seen the new version of Avast expire yet, what does it do? Does it bring up a wizard that helps you renew it?

you get a popup, just like the when you have newer definitions or a virus is found and you get a link to the site.

I believe it was via a popup, either that or you get a prompt when you attempt to get new definitions. Was pretty painless

  • 0

you get a popup, just like the when you have newer definitions or a virus is found and you get a link to the site.

I believe it was via a popup, either that or you get a prompt when you attempt to get new definitions. Was pretty painless

ya but that popup saying a new version is available can be poping up on some peoples machines, for ever and they will never click on it. had that a few days ago, went to someones house and connected to the net and it poped up, checked there version number and they were still at 4.1, so you know its been popping up for a while.

  • 0

i switched to NOD32 after seeing the response here.....WOW! what a difference. This AV software is like a breath of fresh air. I would recommend it to anyone.

what did you have prevous?

if you had norton, does your computer feel alittle less ass raped?

  • 0

Using NOD32 from along time ,and never had any issues with it, but just done a new format and had the chance to try Kaspersky , so i did , and really feeling the same secure feeling of NOD32 and it doesnt take alot much ram ..

so my fav list will be :

1) NOD32

2) Kaspersky

but wanna know , does anyone have any bad experince with Kaspersky??

  • 0

Kaspersky is my favorite.

Its tech is No.1, but not too successful in market place. :cry:

Kaspersky AV Personal Pro needs proper configuration in earlier version like 4.x. But now I think there are no compatibility issues and it is easy to use.

Edited by Starcraft
  • 0

Well, I've used Norton AV, Kaspersky, NOD32, AVG, and finally Symantec AV, and I would have to say my favorite out of all is Symantec. I'm talking about the Corporate edition... It's so nice on resources and so very out of the way... Me likes it very much :D

  • 0

AVG and Kaspersky

My goal with security, small memory foot print programs, as few processes running as possible, and common sense so I don't need too much crap running lol That should go with anyone no matter how powerful a machine you have, thats my opinion though, rant on...

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!