OT: Is Linux too hard?


Recommended Posts

Apart from gaming, name one thing I cannot do in Linux that you can do in Windows?

586107476[/snapback]

Encode many different forms of streaming media properly and efficiently.

Even the most basic (i.e. Real) has to be done from command line. That and getting some of the newer codecs on Linux is impossible.

Windows = Good for everything, excellent in some areas. Often insecure, ofen unstable.

The End.

:ninja:

586107497[/snapback]

Only insecure if you don't know what you are doing. Goes for any system.

There are lots of things in Linux that can't be done easily, where on other operating systems (such as Windows and Mac OS X), can be done much easier.

If you're used to doing them on Windows and Mac OS X, then those operating systems will seem easier. If you're used to doing them on linux/bsd/whatever, then those will seem easier. Linux isn't inherently harder than Mac OS X or Windows, but it is inherently different. To someone who comes from a Unix background and tries to use Windows or OS X, they seem awkward and difficult to use just as much as a Windows user trying to do things in linux.

For example, there is no really good music playing software on Linux.  XMMS is nowhere near good enough.  There is no satisfactory equivalent to foobar2000.

586108394[/snapback]

amaroK, rhythmbox, and mpd with ncmpc come to mind immediately as possible foobar alternatives.

False.

586108491[/snapback]

Really?

I'd like to see that. There are some crappy front end's for the Real encoder, but I said efficient.

A pointless post... false. Great well done.

Get WMVHD (9.1 + 7.1 Professional Audio Codec) to play on Linux let alone create it.

I'm not a newbie when it comes to Linux and definately not when it comes to streaming media.

Edited by Septimus
Yeah it's really hard. Oh wait, it's usually 3 commands or less.  :rolleyes:

Perhaps if people weren't so inept with computers things wouldn't seem so hard?

586107580[/snapback]

I didnt say its hard, i said it would take extra time. For a new user they will need to search for those commands you talk off. Some just want things that work out of the box.

Sorry to say, but everything I have used from the distros I have selected have been configured right out of the box...........  :yes:

Seems like lots of comments are by people who have little or no experience or insight into how these distros work....

Barney

586107907[/snapback]

But this is not about our configurations. I never had major issues, i was refering to cyberfrem post

Here are the things preventing me from considering Linux "ready for the desktop" (ie: for the non-techie masses)

1. Linux needs to come up with a better and more unified method of installing software.

Having so many different package managers makes it tough to find software that is easily installable in your distro of choice. Yes, you can compile the software but when was the last time you'd had to compile software to install it in Windows? I'm having flashbacks of DLL hell. Package managers are a big help but they're not there yet. Until 100% of the available Linux software is easily installable on any distro, it's a problem.

2. Configuration. I know that tools are being developed all of the time to help with this but having to dig around for various .conf files or even read through them and edit them to make your app work is a huge hassle. I seriously like GUI apps (I can deal with utilities being command-line driven but c'mon... it's a new century, guys). Keeping a .conf file handy for advanced tweaking is a cool concept but it shouldn't be the only way to edit a file. Disclaimer: Obviously, this does not apply to every app and the problem seems to lessen with each new update of a distro.

Realmedia player 10 is available for Linux.  :)

screenshot9kj.th.png

586108577[/snapback]

Yeah I know, sorry, didn't mean playback.

Real has been the only company who officially supports their codec on Linux. Though their encoders are still rubbish, command line only, no real time previews, nadda. A front end or 2 do exist, but they are unofficial and unstable at the best of times. That and the firewire support through it is pretty bad to.

Flash streaming video works on playback, but again, creating it on Linux is frustrating at the very best of times.

Really?

I'd like to see that.  There are some crappy front end's for the Real encoder, but I said efficient.

A pointless post... false.  Great well done.

Get WMVHD (9.1 + 7.1 Professional Audio Codec) to play on Linux let alone create it.

I'm not a newbie when it comes to Linux and definately not when it comes to streaming media.

586108510[/snapback]

MPlayer's Supported Codecs

With Ogg Theora, and the HIDEF Ogg Dirac coming soon (most computers are too slow to run it in realtime) we can hold our own.

Septimus: If you are looking for a streaming solution, check out http://www.fluendo.com/

MPlayer's Supported Codecs

With Ogg Theora, and the HIDEF Ogg Dirac coming soon (most computers are too slow to run it in realtime) we can hold our own.

Septimus: If you are looking for a streaming solution, check out http://www.fluendo.com/

586108638[/snapback]

Thanks for the link, pretty interesting, but delivery isn't a problem. We have ?40,000 servers running Linux for delivery and Windows 2003 AS.

For media creation and viewing though Linux can't cut it currently. We would never advise our customers to use it in a multimedia deployment.

1. Linux needs to come up with a better and more unified method of installing software.

Having so many different package managers makes it tough to find software that is easily installable in your distro of choice.  Yes, you can compile the software but when was the last time you'd had to compile software to install it in Windows?  I'm having flashbacks of DLL hell.  Package managers are a big help but they're not there yet.  Until 100% of the available Linux software is easily installable on any distro, it's a problem.

586108624[/snapback]

Does it really matter that Debian uses apt-get or synaptic, and that Fedora uses yum, or Gentoo users use emerge as their command? They all do the same thing and make finding, installing, and updating apps much easier than in Windows.

Try installing Firefox on a Windows PC and see the steps it takes, and compare it to Linux (even assume that it isn't already included), Keeping updated? Nearly automatic in Linux (or truly automatic if you want to set it up as a cron task!).

I don't buy into your premise there at all. :no:

2. Configuration.  I know that tools are being developed all of the time to help with this but having to dig around for various .conf files or even read through them and edit them to make your app work is a huge hassle.  I seriously like GUI apps (I can deal with utilities being command-line driven but c'mon... it's a new century, guys).  Keeping a .conf file handy for advanced tweaking is a cool concept but it shouldn't be the only way to edit a file.  Disclaimer: Obviously, this does not apply to every app and the problem seems to lessen with each new update of a distro.

586108624[/snapback]

There are some GUI apps, and most of them make modifications to wonderful text files. Slapping a GUI on top of a Windows Registry doesn't make registry changes any less obscure to the "common user". Try explaining what "901E040c-6000-11D3-8CFE-0150048383C9" is. :wacko:

GUIs do not make everything better.

For media creation and viewing though Linux can't cut it currently.  We would never advise our customers to use it in a multimedia deployment.

586108684[/snapback]

No one said that Linux was the best for every app. I would wager that OSX would be a good choice for a lot of media work. ;)
Here are the things preventing me from considering Linux "ready for the desktop" (ie: for the non-techie masses)

1. Linux needs to come up with a better and more unified method of installing software.

Having so many different package managers makes it tough to find software that is easily installable in your distro of choice.  Yes, you can compile the software but when was the last time you'd had to compile software to install it in Windows?  I'm having flashbacks of DLL hell.  Package managers are a big help but they're not there yet.  Until 100% of the available Linux software is easily installable on any distro, it's a problem.

My Ubuntu install sees 16,885 packages of software right now. I think I'm covered.

2. Configuration.  I know that tools are being developed all of the time to help with this but having to dig around for various .conf files or even read through them and edit them to make your app work is a huge hassle.  I seriously like GUI apps (I can deal with utilities being command-line driven but c'mon... it's a new century, guys).  Keeping a .conf file handy for advanced tweaking is a cool concept but it shouldn't be the only way to edit a file.  Disclaimer: Obviously, this does not apply to every app and the problem seems to lessen with each new update of a distro.

586108624[/snapback]

A basic configuration can be done through the GUI tools given by most distros. And, truthfully, if you need a GUI to configure it, you probably shouldn't be editing it.

Thanks for the link, pretty interesting, but delivery isn't a problem.  We have ?40,000 servers running Linux for delivery and Windows 2003 AS.

For media creation and viewing though Linux can't cut it currently.  We would never advise our customers to use it in a multimedia deployment.

586108684[/snapback]

I agree with you right now. Hopefully, Dirac will change that.

No one said that Linux was the best for every app.  I would wager that OSX would be a good choice for a lot of media work. ;)

586108686[/snapback]

Hah, yeah OSX is great for editing and most encoding... it's my main platform at work. But you wouldn't believe the amount of time you just have to go to Windows in this field just because it supports just that 'little bit' but essential more.

*yawns* More crap about Linux being hard to configure, hard to install, hard to update

The more I use Linux (gentoo) and the more I learn, the more tired I become with people saying it is too hard. Sit down, learn it, shut up.

I am past caring who likes it and who doesn't. It runs everything I need it to, It can do everything I want it to. If it doesn't for you, stick to bloody windows. *yawns*

If a dam 13 year old could figure it out almost anyone can. I am now 14 but I started with linux in february

586108781[/snapback]

haha so true ppl just got to try, and got to put in a lot of work and not just expect it to happen

by the way wat distro have you installed

only distro i installed has been ubuntu but i have used gento, red hat, knoppix, mandrake, suse, that one that starts with X for got what is called somefin like xog i dunO

I teseted all of them at school :D

i luv my school

Based on my experience with RedHat 9.1:

I can't use my $20 winmodem without cobbled together, unstable drivers. I have to buy a $70 modem.

I can't use the latest hardware. I have to *wait* for *someone* to write a cobbled together, unstable driver. I've never been able to get any Linux distro to boot from my ICH5R RAID array. It is cake with Windows.

I can't reliably read and write to my NTFS disks.

I can't understand the multitude of software package formats and command-line switches

I can't understand the (seemingly circular) package dependency problem.

I can't understand no matter how much I skin KDE or GNOME they still appear to be ugly.

I can't understand nerdy Linux programmer naming schemes. If I know what and how I need to do something, I'll be damned if I can find the software to do it. "Let's make an audio player comparable to Winamp and call it "J". Yeah, just the letter J. Let's make an email client and call it PINE. Email = PINE trees, genious!" How about dropping the cryptic ackronym naming schemes. This disk cleaner is called HONEY. This IRC cllient is called MELANIE. This web browser is called MILESTONE. This makes it incredibly difficult to determine what an application actually does. In Windows if you want to "play media" you open Windows Media Player. If you want to explore the internet...

----

I can add new functionality to Windows without cobbled together hacks (kernel patches) or recompiling the kernel.

I can run a machine without having gigs of source code or a compiler installed.

I can plug in a USB device and it just works. No going online to search for hacks. The manufacturer gives me a Windows driver on CD rom.

I can play damn near any PC game I want and at full frame rates.

Edited by raskren
1. I cannot interface with my Motorola v500 mobile phone.

2. I keep personal files encrypted on a USB stick so that I can access them at work or at home (I've only access to Windows at work).

3. I cannot watch "TV Gold" (an Internet TV channel available thru' WinAmp)

4. I cannot figure out what services are running so that I can stop those I don't want.

5. I cannot interface fully with my Creative Zen Xtra Jukebox. I know that gnomad exists and I've tried it but it's not as fully featured as Creative MediaSource (in particular I cannot edit tags once the files are on the Jukebox).

6. I cannot figure out what packages I really need and which can be removed.

7. I don't know if I can interface with my Pocket PC?

8. and others I can't recall at the moment...

586107525[/snapback]

1. -------

2. mount /pathtousbdrive/usbdrive /mnt/usbdrive -t usbfs

3. Amarok, Totem...

4. top, ps -aux

5. KZenExplorer :)

6. Google, apt-get, Synaptic, pkgtool...

7. -------

You can do these things, you just don't know how.

Im not bad mouthing linux here because im more of a fence sitter when it comes to either, i can see the positives and negatives of each side, but i believe a fair few people use linux simply because they dont like microsoft, wont pay the price for the OS, or because they are over worried about security! If you personally dont think any of them then good on you.

If you dont think any of thoes things then i think linux just takes too much effort to get going and choose the right distro, i see it as a Play OS, something that people who enjoy playing around and using new stuff can use.

You'll probably disagree but i see alot of applications and things for linux that basically try to make it like windows and i'd like to see linux produce its own league instead of competing with windows.

My Ubuntu install sees 16,885 packages of software right now. I think I'm covered.

A basic configuration can be done through the GUI tools given by most distros. And, truthfully, if you need a GUI to configure it, you probably shouldn't be editing it.

586108691[/snapback]

That is exactly what most people using Linux fail to see - who said anything about needing a GUI? Your response is typical and is the reason Linux will stay largely as a "toy" for me. A GUI is usually faster and more "user friendly". Plain and simple.

Anyone who disagrees is fine. I'm not at all saying Windows is better (heck, just ask my friends and family). I'm just saying that Linux has a ways to go before it can claim to accomodate the needs of 90% of the computer-using population.

My Ubuntu install sees 16,885 packages of software right now. I think I'm covered.

Yup, I've used Ubuntu and, I'm sorry to say, it might have you covered but numbers aren't crap. Go through the hassle and setup an SSL compatible newsreader in Linux and you'll know what I mean -- Thunderbird excluded (at least, it supports SSL in Windows so I'm guessing it does in Linux... just haven't tried yet). Stunnel was a pain. Windows = works right out of the box. Linux = alot of hassle to do something as basic as enable SSL in my newsreader (KNode or Pan).

Try installing Firefox on a Windows PC and see the steps it takes, and compare it to Linux

Uhhh... uh huh. Thanks for making my point. Windows = download Firefox installer, click Next, Next, and Next and you're done. Linux = download the latest .tar, extract, install, and run. If it's included with the distro, make sure that the "package manager of choice" has the latest security updates available (sometimes weeks later, I've noticed). Yeah.

I'm not trying to troll. I was simply pointing out what people tell me when I try to convince them that Linux is the way to go (the continued delays in Longhorn only cements my point). Get over it guys. Linux works for some but I'm still right - it's nowhere close to being "there" for the Windows market.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 10 games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Another Free Play Days offer has just landed, and this one is a unique one. On top of offering 10 games to jump into for Xbox players, all the titles are from a single publisher: No More Robots. The promotion has games like Little Rocket Lab, Spirittea, Descenders Next, Let's Build a Zoo, and much more. Almost every game in the selection does need an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, or Essential subscription, so keep this in mind when browsing. Many of the titles are Xbox Play Anywhere titles though, so both Xbox console and PC players can jump in. Here's how the announcement blog post described some of the available titles: There is one game that's available to all Xbox players without the need for any subscriptions, which is Descenders. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Little Rocket Lab (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Spirittea (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Soccer Story (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Descenders Next (Game Preview) (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Let's Build a Zoo (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Hypnospace Outlaw (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Slayers X: Terminal Aftermath: Vengance of the Slayer (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Nowhere Prophet (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Family Man (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Descenders (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 7, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!