OT: Is Linux too hard?


Recommended Posts

raskren, there never was a Red Hat 9.1, but I understand the point. ;)

Winmodems and NTFS are Microsoft-designed items that are not "open". There is no tech data that Open Source programmers can use to write compatible modules. Sad, but true.

NTFS read is a non-issue. NTFS write is not recommended. Use Windows to do that safely (if you aren't concerned about safety with NTFS writes - I am not)

The commandline items are just a feature of Linux at this point, and will likely always be there. If you have an aversion to it, there is Xandros and Linspire.

Skinning KDE, Gnome and any other Window Manager in Linux is 100% supported by Linux. Hell, you can even change the source, if you were so inclined and had programming ability. This is far more ability that Microsoft gives their users. Any other complaint in this department is purely a matter of aesthetics.

Yes, Windows can be easier to do some things. It is good to be the 95% market leader. You get all the hardware manufacturing minions to do your bidding and write their own drivers for your OS. ;) Linux doesn't have this luxury. At this point is is a simple fact, and a mild irritation to Linux users who have hardware that isn't fully compatible.

Try installing Firefox on a Windows PC and see the steps it takes, and compare it to Linux

Uhhh... uh huh. Thanks for making my point. Windows = download Firefox installer, click Next, Next, and Next and you're done. Linux = download the latest .tar, extract, install, and run. If it's included with the distro, make sure that the "package manager of choice" has the latest security updates available (sometimes weeks later, I've noticed). Yeah.

586108920[/snapback]

Can you tell me why you would refuse to use a package manager, unless your intent is to distort the reality that apt-get or synaptic exist? :no:

Knock off the deliberate distortions.

Based on my experience with RedHat 9.1:

I can't use my $20 winmodem without cobbled together, unstable drivers.  I have to buy a $70 modem.

I can't use the latest hardware.  I have to *wait* for *someone* to write a cobbled together, unstable driver.  I've never been able to get any Linux distro to boot from my ICH5R RAID array.  It is cake with Windows.

I can't reliably read and write to my NTFS disks.

I can't understand the multitude of software package formats and command-line switches

I can't understand the (seemingly circular) package dependency problem.

I can't understand no matter how much I skin KDE or GNOME they still appear to be ugly.

I can't understand nerdy Linux programmer naming schemes.  If I know what and how I need to do something, I'll be damned if I can find the software to do it.  "Let's make an audio player comparable to Winamp and call it "J".  Yeah, just the letter J.  Let's make an email client and call it PINE.  Email = PINE trees, genious!"  How about dropping the cryptic ackronym naming schemes.  This disk cleaner is called HONEY.  This IRC cllient is called MELANIE.  This web browser is called MILESTONE.  This makes it incredibly difficult to determine what an application actually does.  In Windows if you want to "play media" you open Windows Media Player.  If you want to explore the internet... 

----

I can add new functionality to Windows without cobbled together hacks (kernel patches) or recompiling the kernel.

I can run a machine without having gigs of source code or a compiler installed.

I can plug in a USB device and it just works.  No going online to search for hacks.  The manufacturer gives me a Windows driver on CD rom.

I can play damn near any PC game I want and at full frame rates.

586108861[/snapback]

A few problems there. Firstly, why are you bitching about RedHat 9.1? There is no 9.1 (the closest was 9.0.93, aka severn. A complete piece of crap)

You can't use a winmodem because it's a... winmodem. The drivers are only available for windows. Anywho, you can't blame lack of driver support on linux. Blame the hardware makers.

The ICH5R chipset is fully supported on the 2.6 servies of kernels. So any modern distro should work.

You can't write to NTFS partitions because microsoft hasn't documented the NTFS filesystem. Blame MS, not linux.

I don't think you can get easier package management than with linux. apt-get, yum, emerge, etc make installing programs a breeze.

As for circular dependencies, I only know of one. And that's when compiling the ada frontend for gcc.

KDE and GNOME have come a long way since the version of redhat you used. Granted, KDE still looks like krap :p but GNOME looks very professional with the default theme.

You find linux confusing, I find windows confusing. To each his own.

raskren, there never was a Red Hat 9.1, but I understand the point.

You're right. These are Red Hat 9.0 discs. I also have Mandrake 9.1 around here somewhere.

Overall, I feel Linux is too hard to use because I can pick up another OS and feel comfortable with it very quickly. Case in point, Mac OS 8, 9, 10. I now manage an OS X server and work on both Windows Xp and OS 10.4.

I don't know for sure but I'd bet there are more Linux installs out there than OS X yet Apple puts out software of higher quality than what I've seen from the Linux community.

That is exactly what most people using Linux fail to see - who said anything about needing a GUI?  Your response is typical and is the reason Linux will stay largely as a "toy" for me.  A GUI is usually faster and more "user friendly".  Plain and simple.

A GUI is only faster if you have absolutely no idea what you are doing. Don't get me wrong, all the basic stuff should be covered under the GUI (and mostly is) but if you want to play around with how your modules are loaded, the interface is the least of your problems. 90% of GUIs are unscriptable making them horrible choices for system configuration.

Go through the hassle and setup an SSL compatible newsreader in Linux and you'll know what I mean -- Thunderbird excluded (at least, it supports SSL in Windows so I'm guessing it does in Linux... just haven't tried yet).  Stunnel was a pain.  Windows = works right out of the box.  Linux = alot of hassle to do something as basic as enable SSL in my newsreader (KNode or Pan).

If Thunderbird can do it in Windows, it can do it in Linux.

Uhhh... uh huh.  Thanks for making my point.  Windows = download Firefox installer, click Next, Next, and Next and you're done.  Linux = download the latest .tar, extract, install, and run.  If it's included with the distro, make sure that the "package manager of choice" has the latest security updates available (sometimes weeks later, I've noticed).  Yeah.

What distro were you using :unsure:

I've never seen a security update go that long, many distros have security lists so they can fix them the day of.

586108920[/snapback]

Can you tell me why you would refuse to use a package manager, unless your intent is to distort the reality that apt-get or synaptic exist? :no:

Knock off the deliberate distortions.

I'm guessing that you've completely misunderstood me... Yes, package managers exist. Yes, they work great (for the most part). Can you use them to install every piece of software available for linux? No. Am I distorting the facts, no. That's a simple fact. In time, packages are added and then it's not a problem but the problem that I'm describing is how you cannot use any package manager that I've ever come across (apt, yum, portage, YaST, etc.) to get the latest software and install it without any hassle.

On that note, one of Linux's strengths (one of many), is that the package managers can keep packages updated -- not just the ones directly released by that distro (ex: Microsoft only updates Microsoft's software).

And on that note, I'm done. It's clear that there are Linux trolls abound on here and people with any rational sense of direction have long since left. Companies like Linspire exist for the very purpose of bridging the gap between "haves" (technical people that can comprehend and handle tweaks necessary to their systems) and "have nots" (ie: my parents and grandparents).

Apart from gaming, name one thing I cannot do in Linux that you can do in Windows?

586107476[/snapback]

Install ATI drivers with ease.

Have a proper design software without the need of emulation and all the compilation and tricks I need to do to run it and not a its full speed.

Modify, change, alter, and whatever synonim you choose without recompiling.

Seamless OS updates.

Should I go on?

And before you call me a troll. I can asure that I have used tons od distros. I know linux.

A few problems there.  Firstly, why are you bitching about RedHat 9.1?  There is no 9.1 (the closest was 9.0.93, aka severn.  A complete piece of crap)

You can't use a winmodem because it's a... winmodem.  The drivers are only available for windows.  Anywho, you can't blame lack of driver support on linux.  Blame the hardware makers.

The ICH5R chipset is fully supported on the 2.6 servies of kernels.  So any modern distro should work.

You can't write to NTFS partitions because microsoft hasn't documented the NTFS filesystem.  Blame MS, not linux.

I don't think you can get easier package management than with linux.  apt-get, yum, emerge, etc make installing programs a breeze.

As for circular dependencies, I only know of one.  And that's when compiling the ada frontend for gcc.

KDE and GNOME have come a long way since the version of redhat you used.  Granted, KDE still looks like krap  :p but GNOME looks very professional with the default theme.

You find linux confusing, I find windows confusing.  To each his own.

586108956[/snapback]

Yes, it was Red Hat 9.0. That was the last distro I used other than Knoppix.

It is supported in 2.6 because the 875P chipset is old now. i've learned that Linux likes old hardware. Hell, at the time my old Radeon 9700 Pro wasn't natively supported. I was on the 2.4 kernel and had to wait to use Linux. This in no way would enhance my opinion of the OS. I had a Windows driver in hand the day the hardware was released.

NTFS: This question in this thread was name one thing you can do in Windows that I can't do in Linux... So, again, I can't reliably read and write to NTFS drives. Period.

Again, you helped prove my point. Package management is not easy because of the myriad of tools and formats. apt-get, yum, emerge, all cryptic names nothing describes what it does and all have different command line switches and formatting. Thanks for that Linux.

I said "seemingly" circular dependencies. Great, now I know it can actually happen!

I don't know for sure but I'd bet there are more Linux installs out there than OS X yet Apple puts out software of higher quality than what I've seen from the Linux community.

586108967[/snapback]

I am not an OSX user, but I like what Apple has done with it.

However, since they dictate that OSX will install on an extremely limited subset of computers, where they specify the components, and Apple also makes their software writers adhere to strict UI requirements, of course it will come out in their one consistent vision.

Linux does not have that luxury. It is made to run on PPC, x86, SPARC, ALPHA and numerous others! The concept of Linux is freedom. The concept of OSX is almost dictatorial control. They have a nice product, but they have a bit of an advantage in their limit of scope.

I'm guessing that you've completely misunderstood me...  Yes, package managers exist.  Yes, they work great (for the most part).  Can you use them to install every piece of software available for linux?  No.  Am I distorting the facts, no.

586109001[/snapback]

My complaint was your untarring of Firefox.

And, yes that is a deliberate distortion. Any attempt to claim otherwise is a bold-faced lie.

but the problem that I'm describing is how you cannot use any package manager that I've ever come across (apt, yum, portage, YaST, etc.) to get the latest software and install it without any hassle.

Not all distros are ment to be bleeding edge. There is a reason GNOME 2.10 isn't in Debian Stable. If you really want to track unstable, there are distributions like Debian Unstable and Ubuntu Unstable.

Install ATI drivers with ease.

Have a proper design software without the need of emulation and all the compilation and tricks I need to do to run it and not a its full speed.

Modify, change, alter, and whatever synonim you choose without recompiling.

Seamless OS updates.

Should I go on?

And before you call me a troll. I can asure that I have used tons od distros. I know linux.

586109018[/snapback]

Oh, there are certainly things that Linux (or Windows, or OSX) cannot do that the others can.

But in this thread, suddenly I have people focusing on crappy details like "Linux can't read/write NTFS". What kind of crap is that? :crazy: So, does the fact that "Windows can't read/write ResierFS" suddenly constitute a good counterpoint?

These are meaningles details (perhaps to a meaningless question?).

However, I find updating a Linux box orders of magnitude better than trying to manage updating a Windows box, so I would remove that item from your list. ;)

Edit: Arrgh... The "]" in your name breaks quotes. Replaced with "|". :p

I think swaret with the slackware-current sites work extremely well. "swaret --upgrade -a" to upgrade everything to the latest or even swaret --install keyword to install something. You don't even need to go to the apps site and download then go through an installer clicking yes yes yes until you find out the app comes with a bunch of spyware... But that's just for me.

Install ATI drivers with ease.

$ sudo apt-get install xorg-fglrx-driver (or just double click on the name in Synaptic).

Have a proper design software without the need of emulation and all the compilation and tricks I need to do to run it and not a its full speed.

http://www.ribbonsoft.com/qcad.html

http://www.tech.oru.se/cad/varkon/

http://www.pythoncad.org/

Those are just the Free Software versions available in APT. I quick google shows many more non-Free packages available.

Modify, change, alter, and whatever synonim you choose without recompiling.

Not sure what you mean here.

$ sudo apt-get install xorg-fglrx-driver (or just double click on the name in Synaptic).

http://www.ribbonsoft.com/qcad.html

http://www.tech.oru.se/cad/varkon/

http://www.pythoncad.org/

Those are just the Free Software versions available in APT. I quick google shows many more non-Free packages available.

Not sure what you mean here.

586109092[/snapback]

So, in your point of view, the entire design industry reolves around autocad? :huh:

The only thing as a Linux user I honestly miss from the Wintel camp is the fast and snappy response time from the OS (for example launching programs) after a fresh install...

I don't miss cracking programs which one would expect to be included in the OS for free (for example a fully functional compression/decompression client) nor do I miss maintaining spyware and virii...

Yes, if you're a Windows user any other OS will seem foreign, including Linux.

My Ubuntu install sees 16,885 packages of software right now. I think I'm covered.

A basic configuration can be done through the GUI tools given by most distros. And, truthfully, if you need a GUI to configure it, you probably shouldn't be editing it.

586108691[/snapback]

can you post your respositories? or pm them to me :)...

Hah, sorry, by design I thought you ment drafting :blush: Were you referring to programs like Adobe Illustrator or Photoshop?

586109156[/snapback]

Yeah! And you could add QuarkXpress to the list ^^

can you post your respositories? or pm them to me :)...

586109147[/snapback]

I just have the Ubuntu repositories (main, restricted, universe, multiverse) and Debian Marillat.

I follow the developers branch a lot of the software I use isn't ment for end users, but if you PM me I can still give you the sources.list.

Well this post is coming from a Windows to Linux back to Windows person.

I didn't abandon Linux because it was too hard or anything, I had to do some googling and some IRCing to learn a lot of things, but I liked it for the most part. However, I found myself booting back into Windows more and more for things I just didn't have the patience to figure out to do in Linux, as I were a little more pressed for time during school. Now that I'm on summer break I think I might dip back into Linux and try it again. Again, it's not that it's harder, it's just unfamiliar and different.

I know I'm not exactly practicing what I preach here, but patience is they key with Linux. And if your distro comes with X-Chat (Like FC3 does), you can use it to your advantage. People in the IRC rooms can be REALLY helpful.

Yeah! And you could add QuarkXpress to the list ^^

586109166[/snapback]

Adobe Illustrator's closest equivalent would be Inkscape.

QuarkXPress (which if my memory serves me is a DTP) resembles Scribus.

The closest thing to Photoshop is, of course, GIMP (though for image editing, GIMP won't be getting CMYK support for another few months).

If you're missing an important feature, or if you're a professional designer, you should probably check out Crossover Office. Its not emulation btw, its an alernative implementation of the Win32 API.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • 10 games join Xbox Free Play Days this weekend by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Another Free Play Days offer has just landed, and this one is a unique one. On top of offering 10 games to jump into for Xbox players, all the titles are from a single publisher: No More Robots. The promotion has games like Little Rocket Lab, Spirittea, Descenders Next, Let's Build a Zoo, and much more. Almost every game in the selection does need an Xbox Game Pass Ultimate, Premium, or Essential subscription, so keep this in mind when browsing. Many of the titles are Xbox Play Anywhere titles though, so both Xbox console and PC players can jump in. Here's how the announcement blog post described some of the available titles: There is one game that's available to all Xbox players without the need for any subscriptions, which is Descenders. Here are the announced games and the platforms they are available to play on: Little Rocket Lab (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Spirittea (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Soccer Story (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Descenders Next (Game Preview) (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Let's Build a Zoo (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Hypnospace Outlaw (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Slayers X: Terminal Aftermath: Vengance of the Slayer (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Nowhere Prophet (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) Family Man (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One) Descenders (Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One, PC) To easily find the titles on Xbox consoles, first head to the Store, then in the sidebar, find the Home section. In there, open the Subscriptions tab. The Free Play Days collection will show up in this area. This week's Free Play Days promotions will end on Sunday, June 7, at 11:59 pm PT.
    • It STILL has horrid theme support. Hard to look at for me. The white is too bright, and the black too dark. I'm using classic outlook for the Dark Grey theme. It's just right for me.
    • inb4 someone leaves the usual "what an unfortunate name" comment
    • Cuktech 10 Ultra charger review: big display, four ports, 110W total power by Taras Buria Cuktech recently announced a couple of Ultra-branded chargers, including a desktop 300W charger, which I reviewed a few weeks ago. For those who do need that much (or who do not want to spend that much on a charger), Cuktech also offers the 10 Ultra, a traditional wall charger with similar features. Four ports, a big display, and up to 110W of power output. After using it for a few weeks, here are my impressions. Disclaimer: Cuktech provided the review unit without any editorial input or pre-approval. Like the 30 Ultra, the 10 Ultra arrived in a box made of nice cardboard with quality print all over it. Inside, besides the charger, you will find a 240W 6A charger, which, this time, is fully braided. While Cuktech always bundles high-power cables with its chargers and power banks, they are usually regular and unassuming. This time, the cable is much nicer, matching the charger's $59.99 price tag. The charger itself measures 67 x 76 x 33 mm or 2.6 x 3.0 x 1.3 inches and weighs about 250 grams. Considering the charger has four ports and a big display, I would say the compact size is quite impressive, albeit a little hefty. The overall design is similar to other chargers from the manufacturer, minus the chrome Cuktech logo next to the four ports. The Cuktech 10 Ultra has retractable prongs for better portability. Its front side is covered with piano black plastic housing two elements: a capacitive button with backlight and a quite large display for various charging stats. Ports are downward-facing, and I have mixed feelings about such a design. It is not the most convenient when you frequently connect and disconnect cables. It makes you bend over to find the right port to connect, and it is a no-go with outlets mounted closer to the floor. On the bright side, design like this eliminates clutter and sagging, especially when using four cables at once. Plus, you get plenty of space for a big display. Ports include two high-speed USB Type-C ports, one Type-C for less demanding devices, and one classic USB Type-A. The first two ports deliver full 100W, while the third is capped at 45W. As for the Type-A port, its maximum output is 18W. In total, the charger delivers 110W of power, but in my testing, I managed to squeeze 117W when charging two power banks and a tablet. Quite impressive. Type-C1 Type-C2 Type-C3 Type-A Single-port 100W 100W 45W 18W Two ports 80W 20W - - Three ports 65W 20W 20W - Four ports 65W 20W 10W 10W The charger can detect handshake protocols and balance power across all four ports according to each device's needs. As such, power is not limited to the values in the table above. You can have two ports charging at 55W, three ports at 45W + 20W, and more. For some reason, Cuktech is not listing the supported protocols, but a quick test showed that it is compatible with PD3.0, PPS, QC5, DCP, and UFCS. When you connect a compatible device, the charger automatically detects its charging standard and displays it on the screen, for example, Apple 6A or Samsung 3A. Speaking of the screen. The main highlight of the 10 Ultra is its 1.57-inch display with a maximum brightness of 700 nits and 160-degree viewing angles. The display takes up most of the front, and it shows various charging-related information, including total output power, current temperature, power distribution across ports with watts, volts, and amps, a screensaver, and more. You can toggle between the different views by tapping the button, and holding it changes the screen orientation (portrait or horizontal, plus flipped) according to your socket position. The screen is very nice. It is sharp, vivid, and the fonts are easy to read. As for settings, you can change the following: Keep the screen on or off Lock the screen orientation (hold the button to change the screen orientation) Keep the USB Type-A port on Toggle power modes The charger has three power modes: AI: standard mode that automatically allocates power to each connected device. Power Priority: prioritizes power for high-demand devices, such as laptops or power banks. Balanced: splits power evenly across connected devices according to their needs I was skeptical at first, but after testing a few devices in different modes, I can see the benefit of these three modes. The most useful is power priority, which gives the first Type-C port more power. When I was charging a 100W power bank (port 1) alongside a 140W power bank (port 2), Power Priority split the total output about 75-30. Balanced mode, as the name suggests, splits the total output between the two ports more or less equally. As for AI mode, the charger uses its brain to detect which device needs more power. In my testing, it figured out that the 140W power needs a bit more juice. As I said, I expected this to be more of a gimmick, but the three built-in modes turned out quite useful. For example, you can prioritize your laptop while giving other ports a little less power, but still enough to charge at acceptable speeds. Unfortunately, unlike the 30 Ultra, this charger cannot display the battery level of the device being charged. This small feature turned out to be very useful when I was testing the 30 Ultra, as it allowed me to see my phone's battery level without picking it up. Like other Cuktech chargers I tested, the 10 Ultra one proved itself reliable and well-made. It uses Gallium nitride semiconductor technology to reduce the charger's size and improve efficiency. It is also better at dissipating heat, but I have to say that when charging two power banks at 117W total, the charger got hotter than what I would call comfortable (hold it for a few seconds, and you start feeling a burning sensation at your fingertips). However, the built-in thermal indicator remained below the temperature threshold, with the screen reassuring that the device operated at "High performance" (I tested it in a 21 °C / 69 °F room). Overall, the Cuktech 10 Ultra is a solid choice. If you need four ports and you like to nerd out on various stats, it is a very easy recommendation. It will take care of your laptop, phone, tablet, and power bank without breaking a sweat, plus the build, material, and cable quality are top-notch. The mode switcher is handy when charging different devices with different power needs, too. I cannot say a display is a must-have in a charger, especially when it makes you more conscious about where to plug it, but it is a neat addition if you have a socket at your table or bed level, so that you can actually use the display and its features. The more important fact is that despite its size and quality, the display does not make the charger that much more expensive than similarly powerful chargers from competitors. Plus, you can save 10% on the 10 Ultra with a promo code on Amazon. Buy Cuktech 10 Ultra charger - $53.99 on Amazon with a promo code As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Last week I was investigating an issue with contacts and tried using the new Outlook. In the real (Classic) Outlook, you can easily go to any Outlook folder and present it in a Table View, then customize the columns to show/sort any field, which was exactly what I needed. But of course, the new Outlook doesn't have this feature at all. I gave up. Oh, and can we possibly stop claiming the new Outlook has PST support? What it really has is the ability to use the real Outlook in the background to pretend to have PST support. There is no PST support without the real Outlook installed.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      247
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!