Recommended Posts

France to host nuclear fusion project

Tue Jun 28, 2005 04:30 AM ET

By Guy Faulconbridge

MOSCOW (Reuters) - France is to host the world's first nuclear fusion reactor, the project's multinational partners agreed on Tuesday, bringing closer a technology backers say could one day provide the world with endless cheap energy.

France beat off a rival bid from Japan to host the 10-billion-euro ($12.18 billion) experimental reactor at Cadarache in the south of the country, according to an agreement signed by the partners after a meeting in Moscow.

The ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) project is backed by China, the EU, Japan, Russia, South Korea and the United States. It seeks to mimic the way the sun produces energy, potentially providing an inexhaustible source of low-cost energy using seawater as fuel.

Unlike fission reactors used in existing nuclear power stations, which release energy by splitting atoms apart, ITER would generate energy by combining them.

"After long discussions and a great deal of joint work, the participants chose the site of Cadarache in France," Russia's atomic energy chief Alexander Rumyantsev told reporters.

"Today we are making history in terms of international scientific cooperation," the EU's Science and Research Commissioner Janez Potocnik said in a statement.

"Now that we have reached consensus on the site for ITER, we will make all efforts to finalize the agreement on the project, so that construction can begin as soon as possible," Potocnik said.

Japan and France have wrangled for months over where the reactor should be built while other partners have clashed over funding, causing repeated delays in the project.

ITER began in 1985. Decades of research, however, have yet to produce a commercially viable fusion reactor.

The EU supported the French bid to have the reactor built in Cadarache. Tokyo had sought to have it built in the northern Japanese village of Rokkasho. The other partners have also been at odds over which of the two should host the reactor.

"It is a big success for France, for Europe and for all the partners of ITER," said a statement issued by the office of French President Jacques Chirac.

France has been a big producer of nuclear energy since the oil shocks of the 1970s and has 58 nuclear reactors, the most in the world after the United States. (Additional reporting by Brussels newsroom)

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?t...storyID=8911598

Nice. Somday, Fusion will replace fission. And after that, Anit-Matter reactors!

From what i understand, fusion produces much less waste than fission does.

586131533[/snapback]

Anti-Matter reactors...damn now we can build a life-sized working replica of the enterprise!!! Now where did i put those spare warp drives... :shifty:

Ontopic, I think Fusion could be an answer to greater energy demand in the future, including fuels!

you are correct. fusion produces far less waste than fission.

The large flux of high-energy neutrons in a reactor will make the structural materials radioactive. The radioactive inventory at shut-down may be comparable to that of a fission reactor, but there are important differences. The half-life of the radioisotopes produced by fusion tend to be less than those from fission, so that the inventory decreases more rapidly. Furthermore, there are fewer different species, and they tend to be non-volatile and biologically less active. As opposed to nuclear fission, where there is hardly any possibility to influence the spectrum of fission products, the problems can be further reduced by careful choice of the materials used. "Low activation" materials like vanadium, for example, would become much less radioactive than stainless steel. Such materials would have half-lives of tens of years, rather than the thousands of years for radioactive waste produced from fission. This involves the design of new alloys with unusual chemical compositions; a complex process as the chemical composition also affects the materials' mechanical properties.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power#...onmental_issues

Nice... got beaten to this one... here's another source:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/4629239.stm

this is wonderful news... hopefully one day fusion will replace all current nuclear (fission) and fossil fuel (carbon, petroleoum, gas) power plants and will become the source for nearly all the power we need at a low (relative) cost and with minor enviromental impact

Isnt this still highly dangerous and potentially another chernobyl?

586131551[/snapback]

I'd be more worried about the reactor turning one of the scientists into an 8 legged super villian.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fusion_power#...onmental_issues

The likelihood of a catastrophic accident in a fusion reactor in which injury or loss of life occurs is much smaller than that of a fission reactor. The primary reason is that the fuel contained in the reaction chamber is only enough to sustain the reaction for about a minute, whereas a fission reactor contains about a year's supply of fuel.
Isnt this still highly dangerous and potentially another chernobyl?

586131551[/snapback]

not at all ^_^

a fusion reaction is contained and sustained by powerfull magnetic fields, should there be any containment breach; ie; magnetic field collapse, the reaction itself would cease.

the only damage would be to the imidiate area, such as the reactor room, which would be constructed of heavy thermal shielding.

The ITER will not produce any actual electrical energy or anything. This is just a test reactor that will be activated for about half a second at a time.

We are some time away (probably still decades) before we have cheap, clean, nuclear fusion.

Canada pulled out of the ITER partnership because the prospects seemed dim (to make a bit of a pun about electrical power generation).

I'd be worried too if they were pulling off an experiment like that near my home. ;)

Hope there's no accidents. make sure the French are drinking wine while building it. :blink:

here's a lil Q & A on the BBC news website..should answer a few basic questions: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/4627237.stm

if anyone wants further, more detailed info, a quick google search will produce more info than you can handle ^_^

Isn't the power output by fusion also much greater per amount of fuel?

Edit: ^Fission rips electrons off of atoms by slamming them together, fusion combines atoms. Fission= taking apart, fusion= putting together. Stars use fusion. They start with hydrogen and produce other elements.

Can someone tell me the difference between nuclear fission and Nuclear fusion?

I know stars burn nuclear fuel, by way of E=MC2, or something like that.

586133590[/snapback]

Fission is splitting of a complex element into two simpler ones.

Fusion is combining two simple elements into a more complicated one.

The ultimate goal with Fusion is to combine Hydrogen and Oxygen so that the "waste" product is water. The trick is to do this at reasonable temperatures.

But doesn't fission toss neutrons at an atom since you cant slam a positively charged atom at another positively atom. Neutrons have no charge hence they can stick to an atom and produce an amount of energy?

But i think thats where the atom bomb comes in, nevermind :pinch:

Can someone tell me the difference between nuclear fission and Nuclear fusion?

I know stars burn nuclear fuel, by way of E=MC2, or something like that.

586133590[/snapback]

star's 'energy' is pretty much a hydrogen fusion reaction.

fission is gathering power emited by the splitting an. fusion is the energy gathered when two atoms or entities are 'fused'. the problem is that they dont stay fused too long to put it in a nutshell.

But doesn't fission  toss neutrons at an atom since you cant slam a positively charged atom at another positively atom. Neutrons have no charge hence they can stick to an atom and produce an amount of energy?

But i think thats where the atom bomb comes in, nevermind :pinch:

586133640[/snapback]

The reaction is started by launching a neutron at super high speed into the matter to be diffused, but then the electrons are what destroy everything and continue the reaction.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • NASA: This asteroid may not kill us but it probably won't be far off either by Sayan Sen Image by Zelch Csaba via Pexels New observations by NASA's James Webb Space Telescope have eliminated the last remaining impact threat posed by asteroid 2024 YR4, ruling out the possibility that the near-Earth object could strike the Moon in December 2032. NASA said observations collected by Webb on February 18 and 26, 2026, enabled scientists to refine the asteroid's orbit enough to "rule out a chance of lunar impact on Dec. 22, 2032." Instead, asteroid 2024 YR4 is now expected to pass the Moon at a distance of about 13,200 miles (21,200 km). The agency stressed that the update "reflects improved precision in our understanding of where the asteroid is expected to be in 2032 rather than a shift in its orbital path." The announcement closes a remarkable chapter in planetary defence that began in late 2024, when the approximately 60-metre-wide asteroid briefly became the most closely watched near-Earth object in the world. Discovered on December 27, 2024, by the ATLAS telescope in Chile, 2024 YR4 initially appeared to have a small chance of colliding with Earth on December 22, 2032. As astronomers gathered more observations, the impact probability briefly climbed to around 3%—the highest ever recorded for an asteroid of its size—before steadily falling as its orbit became better understood. By early 2025, international observations had ruled out any significant risk to Earth. However, astronomers were left with another possibility: a roughly 4% chance that the asteroid could instead strike the Moon. "The probability that asteroid 2024 YR4 will strike the Moon on 22 December 2032 is now approximately 4%," the European Space Agency (ESA) had said last year, noting that "there is a 96% chance that the asteroid will not impact the Moon." ESA said such an impact, while unlikely, would have presented an extraordinary scientific opportunity. "It is a very rare event for an asteroid this large to impact the Moon – and it is rarer still that we know about it in advance. The impact would likely be visible from Earth, and so scientists will be very excited by the prospect of observing and analysing it," said Richard Moissl, Head of ESA's Planetary Defence Office. "It would certainly leave a new crater on the surface. However, we wouldn't be able to accurately predict in advance how much material would be thrown into space, or whether any would reach Earth," he added. The asteroid also exposed an important blind spot in planetary defence. Because 2024 YR4 approached Earth from the direction of the Sun, it remained hidden from ground-based telescopes until after its closest approach. "We looked into how Neomir would have performed in this situation, and the simulations surprised even us," Moissl said. "Neomir would have detected asteroid 2024 YR4 about a month earlier than ground-based telescopes did. This would have given astronomers more time to study the asteroid's trajectory and allowed them to much sooner rule out any chance of Earth impact in 2032." He added, "As an infrared telescope, like Webb, Neomir would have also immediately given us a much better estimate for the asteroid's size, which is very important for assessing the significance of the hazard." The latest NASA observations underscore the value of space-based infrared telescopes in tracking faint asteroids. According to NASA, Webb made "among the faintest ever observations of an asteroid," extending the object's observational record by nearly eight months at a time when it had become too faint for other telescopes. That additional data allowed scientists to eliminate the remaining uncertainty surrounding its 2032 flyby. Although asteroid 2024 YR4 is now confirmed to pose no threat to either Earth or the Moon, scientists say its discovery remains one of the most significant real-world tests of the international planetary defence system, demonstrating how continued observations can rapidly transform an object once considered hazardous into one whose future path is known with high confidence. Source: NASA, ESA This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Yup. Google is just scraping the entire internet for their own ad profits without sharing revenue with the sources. It's obviously stealing, but since these sites depend upon Google's search scraps to survive... As for me, I just stopped using Google for anything except Reddit searches. If Reddit's own search wasn't complete crapola, I'd never use Google search again.
    • I had a feeling this was coming. Picked up my first Mac ever last Saturday. Glad I did.
    • In a major surprise there is actually some good deals for the first time in years. At least for me.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
    • Apprentice
      daryld went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Contributor
      Carltonbar went up a rank
      Contributor
    • One Month Later
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      130
    4. 4
      Xenon
      69
    5. 5
      neufuse
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!