[MLB] Kenny Rogers suspended for 20 games


Recommended Posts

Please look at the movie link I posted and tell me how he shoved him. It's utterly obvious he only shoved the camera... any movement on Mr. Gonzalez's part is in an effort to catch the camera, not because he was shoved. And it's not for you or I to determine if it was assault... that's a police matter.

But, I can tell you that Canadian law isn't American law.

Please look at the movie link I posted and tell me how he shoved him. It's utterly obvious he only shoved the camera... any movement on Mr. Gonzalez's part is in an effort to catch the camera, not because he was shoved. And it's not for you or I to determine if it was assault... that's a police matter.

But, I can tell you that Canadian law isn't American law.

586159177[/snapback]

Whether or not the police and the camera operator press charges, it is a low violent uncivilized act that has brought shame to baseball. 4 starts and 50 grand (considering his salary) was a soft punishment.

as i said before if if someone pushes your backpack into your back and u stumble and fall i dont expect you to raise a hand or sue because the guy has a problem with your backpack and you just happen to have it strapped to your back.

he assaulted him period maybe not to the point of bleeding but apparently that doesnt matter. people that get whiplash because they got rear-ended shouldnt be allowed to sue either because they arent bleeding oh and besides that the driver behind them had a problem with the car in front of him. you have got to be friggen kidding me. as i said im done you obviously have a fans point of view of the whole thing and dont want your ace to be lost for 4 starts.

Considering his salary? What do you expect he makes? $50,000 out of $3 million is quite a portion.

Next...

assault, in law, an attempt or threat, going beyond mere words, to use violence, with the intent and the apparent ability to do harm to another. If violent contact actually occurs, the offense of battery has been committed; modern criminal statutes often combine assault and battery. An assault may be both a crime and a tort, for which the party assaulted may sue for damages; the victim's freedom, as to move or remain at peace, must have been impinged on. Modern criminal statutes recognize certain degrees of assault (e.g., with intent to kill, to do great bodily harm, to rape) as aggravated assaults and felonies, though simple assault remains, as at common law, a misdemeanor. Either malevolence or recklessness (as in driving a car in reckless disregard of human life) may constitute the intent necessary to assault in most jurisdictions.

Can you tell me where he intended to harm the cameraman? I see an intent to damage property, which is not assault.

as i said before if if someone pushes your backpack into your back and u stumble and fall i dont expect you to raise a hand or sue because the guy has a problem with your backpack and you just happen to have it strapped to your back.

he assaulted him period maybe not to the point of bleeding but apparently that doesnt matter.  people that get whiplash because they got rear-ended shouldnt be allowed to sue either because they arent bleeding oh and besides that the driver behind them had a problem with the car in front of him.  you have got to be friggen kidding me.  as i said im done you obviously have a fans point of view of the whole thing and dont want your ace to be lost for 4 starts.

586159198[/snapback]

Um, hardly. I am not a Texas Rangers fan, nor am I the one who pays for the season tickets. Can you tell me where I've ever posted that I'm a fan of the Rangers? Because I am not. St. Louis Cardinals are my team, buddy. I don't like AL teams. Because I am defending him does not mean I am a fan of him or the team. I like a few players on the Rangers (Michael Young being the only one I really like), but not Rogers.

Considering his salary? What do you expect he makes? $50,000 out of $3 million is quite a portion.

Next...

Can you tell me where he intended to harm the cameraman? I see an intent to damage property, which is not assault.

586159202[/snapback]

Less than 1.7% of his salary? Cry me a river.

I see a violent attack on a person and his property with little regard for safety.

Less than 1.7% of his salary?  Cry me a river.

I see a violent attack on a person and his property with little regard for safety.

586159210[/snapback]

OK, whatever you want to think, but Rogers isn't paid what most pitchers are paid is the point I was making.

So is it assault or not? That's what you said it was earlier... is it? I've been saying it wasn't, and that's all I've been saying.

Considering his salary? What do you expect he makes? $50,000 out of $3 million is quite a portion.

Next...

Can you tell me where he intended to harm the cameraman? I see an intent to damage property, which is not assault.

Um, hardly. I am not a Texas Rangers fan, nor am I the one who pays for the season tickets. Can you tell me where I've ever posted that I'm a fan of the Rangers? Because I am not. St. Louis Cardinals are my team, buddy. I don't like AL teams. Because I am defending him does not mean I am a fan of him or the team. I like a few players on the Rangers (Michael Young being the only one I really like), but not Rogers.

586159202[/snapback]

oh ok im sorry your not a rangers fan you just have season tickets for the rangers. :rolleyes: oh and he got a 50k bonus for making the all-star roster so i guess that takes care of the fine.

with the intent and the apparent ability to do harm to another.
do you know what rogers intended to do? are you basing the his intent on what was said by rogers or what you see in the video? would u think he had the ability to do harm to that guy? i mean a camera is not lightweight so is there ABILITY to do harm? what is your response to the scenario i presented my post just prior? you seem to address everything said in my post except the situation i presented.
So is it assault or not? That's what you said it was earlier... is it? I've been saying it wasn't, and that's all I've been saying.

586159221[/snapback]

I think it is assault. Ultimately it will require the camera operator to press charges and the police/D.A. to agree with him. Then it will take a judge/jury to agree with them.

What is even more likely, however, is that the camera operator will take a cash settlement from Roger's lawyers and we'll never hear about it.

In Canada, however, the police are free to file charges even without the camera operator's cooperation (we don't require the victim to press charges). It is a nice way to prevent private cash settlements that amount to hush money.

oh ok im sorry your not a rangers fan you just have season tickets for the rangers.  :rolleyes: 

do you know what rogers intended to do? are you basing the his intent on what was said by rogers or what you see in the video? would u think he had the ablitity to do harm to that guy? i mean a camera is not lightweight so is there ABILITY to do harm? what is your response to the scenario i presented my post just prior? you seem to address everything said in my post except the situation i presented.

586159226[/snapback]

Please don't try to pretend to know me if you don't. I have Rangers tickets because my dad's company provides them. Normally he takes customers, but sometimes we go instead. Other time we'll just give them away because we don't go to a ton of games except during the summer. He had Mavericks tickets before. The Mavericks I actually was fan of.

I think it's obvious that he didn't intend to cause harm to Mr. Gonzalez, but that's my point of view. I think it's obvious that he isn't trying to hurt him, only remove the camera from his posession. Perhaps you think differently, but personally, I think that thinking anything to the contrary is simply grabbing at straws.

And, yes, he has the ability to harm him. But BOTH the ability AND the intent must be present, not only the ability. I have the ABILITY to harm some people, but do I intend to? Nope. So if I were to stand next to a guy who is smaller than me would I be comitting assault? No, I wouldn't.

What scenario are you referring to? This one?

"as i said before if if someone pushes your backpack into your back and u stumble and fall i dont expect you to raise a hand or sue because the guy has a problem with your backpack and you just happen to have it strapped to your back."

If someone pushes my backpack into me and I stumble and fall is a completely different situation than this. Kenny Rogers pushed the camera off of the man, and the man only tried to grab it as reaction -- he didn't stumble for any other reason. And you're completely changing the situation. To me, it was obvious that Kenny Rogers was going after the camera, not the cameraman. In your scenario it seems to me like the opposite is true, so I won't even dignify it with a response as it is nothing similar to this case.

oh ok im sorry your not a rangers fan you just have season tickets for the rangers.  :rolleyes: 

586159226[/snapback]

He siad he didn't pay for them. If someone offered me free season tickets to Knicks' games I'd probably go to a bunch of games even though I'm not a Knicks fan. And basically this is going to come down to what everyone's interpretation of assault is. And no matter what I think it was dumb for Rogers to lose his cool like that. No matter what his intentions were or what happened previously you can't just come flying out of the dugout and go after someone like that. You open yourself up to exactly this. Thoughts and speculation on what the motvie was and what the intent was and even if he did issue a statement after the fact we know it would be drafted up by a lawyer so that wouldn't reveal much of what really went on anyway. I agree that paparazzi (spelling?) and other media outlets can be invasive at times but you can't retaliate like that. It just makes you look awful no matter what.

Please don't try to pretend to know me if you don't. I have Rangers tickets because my dad's company provides them. Normally he takes customers, but sometimes we go instead. Other time we'll just give them away because we don't go to a ton of games except during the summer. He had Mavericks tickets before. The Mavericks I actually was fan of.

I think it's obvious that he didn't intend to cause harm to Mr. Gonzalez, but that's my point of view. I think it's obvious that he isn't trying to hurt him, only remove the camera from his posession. Perhaps you think differently, but personally, I think that thinking anything to the contrary is simply grabbing at straws.

And, yes, he has the ability to harm him. But BOTH the ability AND the intent must be present, not only the ability. I have the ABILITY to harm some people, but do I intend to? Nope. So if I were to stand next to a guy who is smaller than me would I be comitting assault? No, I wouldn't.

What scenario are you referring to? This one?

"as i said before if if someone pushes your backpack into your back and u stumble and fall i dont expect you to raise a hand or sue because the guy has a problem with your backpack and you just happen to have it strapped to your back."

If someone pushes my backpack into me and I stumble and fall is a completely different situation than this. Kenny Rogers pushed the camera off of the man, and the man only tried to grab it as reaction -- he didn't stumble for any other reason. And you're completely changing the situation. To me, it was obvious that Kenny Rogers was going after the camera, not the cameraman. In your scenario it seems to me like the opposite is true, so I won't even dignify it with a response as it is nothing similar to this case.

586159252[/snapback]

i dont know you and i dont assume to know you. no he didn't stumble but my point to you is that if you find that rogers taking it upon himself to remove the camera from the cameraman OK then you would find someone doing what they can to take your backpack from you acceptable as well. no the guy didnt stumble but its obvious that he was being physically inconvienced in some way. you cant get to the camera without getting to the man. thats why they are called cameramen and not just camera. i'm not changing the situation but i'm not saying rogers wasn't wrong in what he did. but i see your not able to see that point of view so i digress.

He siad he didn't pay for them. If someone offered me free season tickets to Knicks' games I'd probably go to a bunch of games even though I'm not a Knicks fan. And basically this is going to come down to what everyone's interpretation of assault is. And no matter what I think it was dumb for Rogers to lose his cool like that. No matter what his intentions were or what happened previously you can't just come flying out of the dugout and go after someone like that. You open yourself up to exactly this. Thoughts and speculation on what the motvie was and what the intent was and even if he did issue a statement after the fact we know it would be drafted up by a lawyer so that wouldn't reveal much of what really went on anyway. I agree that paparazzi (spelling?) and other media outlets can be invasive at times but you can't retaliate like that. It just makes you look awful no matter what.

586159259[/snapback]

at the time i stated that, he said he had season tickets. he didnt make clear they are not his and he doesn't pay for them. i got no problem with him going, but a person that says "i have season tickets" is paying good money for them and usually roots the team.

Oh, and I can post pictures all day if you want to play that game...

a_rogers_275.jpg

The camera being pulled down, nowhere near injuring the cameraman's eyes.

586159159[/snapback]

Oh yes, outside of shadowing Kenny Rogers and knowing what he tells cameramen while he is deep in the clubhouse and you in section 110 row 2, seat 3, you also know how it feels to have a camera pushed into your eye...

3728538_36_1.jpg

The camera being thrown over the head of the camerman, nowhere near injuring his eyes. Look at the picture -- see any blood around his eyes? And sagging? Maybe a black eye? I don't.

586159159[/snapback]

....and hold that heavy camera as it is pushed behind you and having your arm at an awkward angle. Yeah, you know it didn't hurt. Those season tickets daddy gets are pretty good since you can tell all that.

So..him pushing the camera away is perfectly ok? Even though the cameraman was in no way invading his personal space? (see: Rogers coming right out of the dugout right towards the cameraman)

I give up, trying to get you to think logically about all this is utterly hopeless. :wacko:

Trying to get me to think logically? That's a good one coming from you, BOOG, the man who sees Barry Sanders as more of a team deserter than Ricky Williams.

I like how you've completely changed your opinion, too, as the topic has gone on... first the camerman was brutally beaten and raped by Rogers, and he also suffered 2nd degree burns as well as a gunshot wound, and now he just pushed the camera, right? What happened to all the crap you said before?

Oh, and it's nice of you to just completely ignore the video footage I posted, too. Guess you could tell that it didn't harm his eye or wouldn't have hurt him at all so you just chose to leave that out as it'd damage your argument (well, I call it that, but you've done nothing to argue your point unlike the other people here).

But, go ahead, keep flinging the insults and cockiness as you have no clue what you're talking about. Keep pretending to know the story when all you've seen is the coverage on Sports Center. Go ahead, keep making fun of me for merely just being there and having the information the local media gives me when all you've done is looked at a freaking picture and watched a 5 second clip on ESPN. You are 1337, and I bow down before you. :rolleyes: Please, you may be a moderator, but you have some of the weakest arguments I've ever seen here.

christracy: I never said what he did was right. I never said he doesn't deserve a suspension for it... I said I thought the suspension was far too harsh, considering no one was hurt (like I said, the cameraman was released in less than an hour after being taken to the hospital). I also said that I wouldn't consider it assault, yet I have no problem admitting what he did was wrong. It was. But I think saying he needs more time suspension is just plain silly.

I'd just like to clarify, for the record, I never said Rogers didn't deserve a suspension. I said he does from the very beginning, and I also said "[he] blew a gasket" at the very beginning. I don't condone anything he did, nor will I ever condone it. I merely said that I thought the suspension was too harsh and scoffed when people said he should be brought up on charges of assault.

As a Ranger fan, I expected him to be suspsended, and cannot really argue the length, if looked at by itself. But when you compare it to other things, such as drug use, it does seem a little excessive.

Its unfortunate, as Rogers is the #1 pitcher on that staff. This is a huge lose for Texas and puts them in serious trouble as far as the AL West in concerned.

rogers has some frustration problems.

Rogers is a competitor. Plan and simple. He's playing for a team that is in a slump. 2 weeks ago they were in first place, now they are 6.5 out. Yeah, thats frustrating. But still, that doesn't give one the right to go postal on a cameraman.

I like how you've completely changed your opinion, too, as the topic has gone on... first the camerman was brutally beaten and raped by Rogers, and he also suffered 2nd degree burns as well as a gunshot wound, and now he just pushed the camera, right? What happened to all the crap you said before?

586159776[/snapback]

I dunno, 'cause I never said any of that. I simply stated Rogers attacked the cameraman. Dunno where you got all that.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • ...but you're Johnny, from Australia?    
    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      270
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      75
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!