Moving to AMD 64 bit, what motherboard do I chose?


Recommended Posts

I currently have an Asus A7N8X Deluxe (nForce 2) motherboard, AMD Athlon XP 2700+ processor and 1024 MB PC2700 DDR-RAM (DDR333).

I picked the motherboard because it was the best motherboard at the time and was an excellent performer. It also had very good on-board sound according to the reviews. I picked the processor because it ran at 333 MHz bus like the RAM and I didn't want to buy PC3200 because the extra speed would have been wasted.

I am now going to upgrade and realise that getting a 64 bit system would be the next move but I don't know how to go about it. What motherboard would you suggest? What processor? I am considering speeds of around 3200/3400 but I don't know the difference between socket 754 and 939. Also, I am putting the current RAM elsewhere, so what RAM should I put in there? I am buying another 1 GB, but I don't know what of (speed, type etc.).

Cheers for your time, I appreciate it.

Edited by King Mustard

s754 is a cpu that does not do dual channel ram and has a lower HTT. s939 has dual channel enabled and a higher HTT and more future compatiblity.

And you do know that a 3000+ isnt 3.0ghz but 1.8ghz?

I would get a 3200+, DFI Lanparty UT Ultra-d and 2x512mb of OCZ Platinum Rev2

David

I'm also in the process of putting together a 64bit system. I chose the MSI K8N Neo4/SLI for its great performance and reasonable price. Here are some links to some of my threads that may help.

Athlon 939 Core Differences?

New AMD64 System, PCIe or AGP?

myNewMachine

New System, Please Critique

Note the stuff about the power supply; the 12V amperage is very important.

s754 is a cpu that does not do dual channel ram and has a lower HTT. s939 has dual channel enabled and a higher HTT and more future compatiblity.

And you do know that a 3000+ isnt 3.0ghz but 1.8ghz?

I would get a 3200+, DFI Lanparty UT Ultra-d and 2x512mb of OCZ Platinum? Rev2

David

586177614[/snapback]

But it doesn't run at the 1.8 GHz speed though, does it?

I'm also in the process of putting together a 64bit system. I chose the MSI K8N Neo4/SLI for its great performance and reasonable price. Here are some links to some of my threads that may help.

Athlon 939 Core Differences?

New AMD64 System, PCIe or AGP?

myNewMachine

New System, Please Critique

Note the stuff about the power supply; the 12V amperage is very important.

586177623[/snapback]

Yeah, forget to mention I would also need a new PSU which I have no idea about.

I dont know why every one recomends OCZ there expensive and you can get the same results from cheaper memory like corsair, giel or kingston. I like giel its inexpensive and comes with a nifty hit spreader:DD

586177651[/snapback]

I will probably stick with Crucial RAM, seems okay?

I dont know why every one recomends OCZ there expensive and you can get the same results from cheaper memory like corsair, giel or kingston. I like giel its inexpensive and comes with a nifty hit spreader :D

586177651[/snapback]

You are refering to the fact it has 2-2-2-5 timings and gets awesome overclocks. And OCZ also has a nifty heat spreader. Also a mate of mine gets OCZ quite cheap.

You are refering to the fact it has 2-2-2-5 timings and gets awesome overclocks. And OCZ also has a nifty heat spreader. Also a mate of mine gets OCZ quite cheap.

586177695[/snapback]

I don't know anything about timings, just want decent RAM for the new system that goes well with the chosen CPU, motherboard and PSU lol

Well, it could vary greatly depending on your budget and whether or not you're planning on a new video card as well. If you're not ready for a new video card, hold out for a bit until you need one/can afford it and go for a PCIe motherboard.

Well, it could vary greatly depending on your budget and whether or not you're planning on a new video card as well.  If you're not ready for a new video card, hold out for a bit until you need one/can afford it and go for a PCIe motherboard.

586177772[/snapback]

Well my parents are having my old hardware so I need the new stuff now. I want to put my 9800 Pro in there but if the motherboard was PCIe too, that would be excellent.

Well my parents are having my old hardware so I need the new stuff now. I want to put my 9800 Pro in there but if the motherboard was PCIe too, that would be excellent.

586177833[/snapback]

Alright, next question - Is SLI something you're going t consider at some point?

Alright, next question - Is SLI something you're going t consider at some point?

586178614[/snapback]

I can't see why not. Can I SLI two of any two cards (as long as they're the same) or only specific cards?

I would check out the ASUS K8N series of motherboards. They have both 754 and 939 as well as SLI support. Currently the 754 Athlon 64 3700 is running $260 or so on newegg. Personally, I don't see any performance difference between single or dual channel, but if you don't care about money go 939 and dual channel ram.

RAM wise, I always use Crucial. I know - not necessarily gaming RAM at CL=3, but middle of the price range, uber stable and fast shipping. I suppose you could get their gaming RAM - the Ballistix, but again, unless you're into overclocking - the timings don't seem to be that important - all PC3200/4000 RAM is fine.

Granted - the Super Hardcore Gamers or overclockers will say I'm wrong, but if you're in that crowd, you wouldn't be asking the question.

I can't see why not. Can I SLI two of any two cards (as long as they're the same) or only specific cards?

586178633[/snapback]

You can only SLI nvidia cards, and only nvidia cards that support SLI (6600 and higher, supposedly a new driver allows SLI without the bridge but why the **** would you SLI 2x6200s?).

s754 is a cpu that does not do dual channel ram and has a lower HTT. s939 has dual channel enabled and a higher HTT and more future compatiblity.

586177614[/snapback]

I don't understand what you mean. Why would a processor enable dual channel RAM and what is HTT and why is a lower good?

This is because on AMD Athlon 64, the memory controller is built into the processor. On s754 AMD Athlon 64s, it only has a single channel memory controller, but runs 200MHz faster than their equivelent s939 counterpart. For example, a s754 3000+ runs at 2.0GHz (10*200) while a s939 3000+ runs at 1.8GHz (9*200).

HTT is the Hypertransport bus thing in AMD Athlon 64, again to do with the integrated memory controller. Basically its the "FSB" of the processor, the higher the better (more bandwidth) but since the memory controller is integrated into the chip its a theoretical speed, because there is no 'actual' FSB in AMD 64 processors.

This is because on AMD Athlon 64, the memory controller is built into the processor. On s754 AMD Athlon 64s, it only has a single channel memory controller, but runs 200MHz faster than their equivelent s939 counterpart. For example, a s754 3000+ runs at 2.0GHz (10*200) while a s939 3000+ runs at 1.8GHz (9*200).

HTT is the Hypertransport bus thing in AMD Athlon 64, again to do with the integrated memory controller. Basically its the "FSB" of the processor, the higher the better (more bandwidth) but since the memory controller is integrated into the chip its a theoretical speed, because there is no 'actual' FSB in AMD 64 processors.

586182618[/snapback]

Do you recommend the 754 if it's faster?

I am so confused with everything lol :$

What motherboard do you suggest? If I want my 9800 Pro in there, does that mean I can't go for an SLI model?

586182774[/snapback]

SLI is an nVidia-only technology.

just stick with your 9800, you've got plenty of time before it's outdated, and by that time a SLI system will be more affordable. IMO, SLI is overkill.

SLI is an nVidia-only technology.

just stick with your 9800, you've got plenty of time before it's outdated, and by that time a SLI system will be more affordable. IMO, SLI is overkill.

586182953[/snapback]

Right, cheers. Well I will be buying 2x512 MB PC3200 chips as I believe it's cheaper than 1x1 GB and it also enables me to use dual channel, yes? Would I need a 939 AXP chip for dual channel? If they're a lot more expensive than equivelent 754 chips, would I be best getting a 754 chip as I heard dual-channel deoesn't really give much more performance.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Opinion. All you did was blame Democrats for everything. You offered nothing but a hit piece to support your pro Trump, anti union right wing ideology.
    • Excuse me for having an opinion, fella'... (Why am I not surprised?...) Congrats on your very informative post however...
    • By the sounds of that wall of Fox News propaganda gibberish attacking the Democratic Party you've already had plenty of "juices" flowing this morning. You've ruined what could have been a productive comment thread.
    • (Topic to get the juices flowing this Sunday morning!...) Actually, the situation has almost nothing to do with "lack of skills", especially since assembly-line skills can be taught to anyone, including Americans, certainly. Rather, the inadequacy-to-impossibility of large-scale tech manufacturing in America today, and the reasons why America finds tech manufacturing completely onerous in the 21st century, has to do with politically driven laws amid a plethora of non-scientific, utterly politicized "science-fact" that is patently false, punitive business taxation at every turn, an array of judicial fines of unimaginable scope and complexity, and, last but not least, American unionization strictures that serve to actually slay job creation and hobble all such manufacturing endeavors in America before they can get off the ground. Globalism emerged, they tell us, as the needed answer to American hubris and an unholy American drive to excel. Unless one is buried under mounds of political propaganda, it's easy to see the absurdity of labeling the employees of SpaceX, for instance, as "unskilled labor"... Etc. ad infinitum. At one time in the recent past, American manufacturing prowess was the envy of the world in a wide variety of technical fields! The current federal and state government roadblocks against America becoming competitive globally in tech manufacturing are considerable, it's true, as anyone with a working brain knows. But remarkably, that is only half the story! The other half of the story is, of course, the corporations themselves... Chinese tech manufacturing is simply unassailable in terms of profits, because the Chinese government wants to see its tech manufacturing second-to-none globally so that no companies/nations can compete in terms of ROI, and China has completely succeeded in that goal. Let's tic-off a few things: *Chinese tariff policies are set according to what is considered best for Chinese business, Chinese employees, and the Chinese people. Huge difference with how things are done with tariffs in the US--as the US government (SCOTUS in this case, Congress in others) plainly feels that tariffs are "unfair" for the limited number of citizens who may pay them, whereas nothing is "unfair" when Congress considers the Personal Income Tax rates to be infinitely hike-able, along with infinitely enlarging annual budget deficits. *The Chinese government boldly subsidizes Chinese companies to artificially amplify their profits. *The Chinese government deliberately refuses to avidly demonize Chinese businesses and does not consider Chinese businesses "the enemy", so very unlike American (D)s these days. *Chinese labor laws and businesses are allowed to set their own labor policies according to what Chinese companies consider is best for companies and their employees... Simply put, American workers in tech manufacturing are not allowed to set their own labor policies! * One additional problem corporations have that I also do not sympathize with is they don't want to pay to train their American employees. They could easily do so, but would rather not have to pay for it. I find that pathetic, actually. It is the height of hypocrisy for Americans to decry working conditions in China while simultaneously ensuring that American products are manufactured in China, not in the US, simply to maximize profits. There is nothing wrong with making a profit, of course, absolutely nothing. But there is plenty wrong with attempts to normalize hypocrisy of this kind! But rank hypocrisy and the (D) party in the US are longtime bedfellows... The current government in Washington is working overtime to see if it can toss out the horribly poor, failed economic policies of the past, while the (D)s still in Washington work very hard to bring back the stupidity whenever possible. With the right policies in place, America can be an infinitely competitive manufacturer.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      198
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!