Recommended Posts

The battery used in the iRiver is more effeicent, ie doesnt die after a short time. How many times have we herd of corrupt folders etc on the iPod? so many times, we hardly hear this about the iRiver, this is due to the type of hdd used :)

Read the last line in the paragraph. I believe it says " Which consistently ranked last? Apple's iPod Photo." Sound quality in iPod is worse.

586195850[/snapback]

thats nothing more then personal opionion, and you can find allot of those on every site and magazine, some say ipod is better in sound, some day iriver, some say sony, etc

The battery used in the iRiver is more effeicent, ie doesnt die after a short time. How many times have we herd of corrupt folders etc on the iPod? so many times, we hardly hear this about the iRiver, this is due to the type of hdd used :)

586195870[/snapback]

about the battery, problem with ipod battery is not the battery is the users, any rechargable battery if its charged to much it will fail at the rate. plus the hdd, i managed to copput the hdd on the first day because i was messing with IPODS OS (file structure) by deleting 30mb itunes file, ipod got corrupted, which again is nothing more then user error, hdd doesn't just corrupt files by it self

another way to corrupt it by unplugging it at the wrong time, and thats true with every player, if you use it correctly there will be no problem

thats nothing more then personal opionion, and you can find allot of those on every site and magazine, some say ipod is better in sound, some day iriver, some say sony, etc

about the battery, problem with ipod battery is not the battery is the users, any rechargable battery if its charged to much it will fail at the rate. plus the hdd, i managed to copput the hdd on the first day because i was messing with IPODS OS (file structure) by deleting 30mb itunes file, ipod got corrupted, which again is nothing more then user error, hdd doesn't just corrupt files by it self

another way to corrupt it by unplugging it at the wrong time, and thats true with every player, if you use it correctly there will be no problem

586196057[/snapback]

Firstly, its a good opionion, from people who actually know more about this stuff then most people, and this is coming from an iPod loving site. But the quality of the battery used in the iRiver is different, and is proven to stand stronger throughout time, under test conditions. Well i havnt managed to corrupt my iRiver, and my iPod did without me doing anything, same with my mates iPod mini, and about 5 other friends. All shipped back to Apple for repair, and they are all n00bs, who dont mess about with the OS and do everything to the manual, and still there iPod is corrupt. But hey, its an iPod, its expected to happen.

yes noobs, that either didn't press eject ipod from their itunes, or didn't click on Safely Remove Hardware. i got friends that own Ipods too, and one of them corrupt anything.

and your statement saying cnet is ipod loving site, what is that their new moto? "we love ipod"

how can a site love something, since when is a site alive, and if you haven't noticed at a site like cnet there is more then one person working there, and all of them have a right to their own opinion, meaning not all love or hate the same thing, so back to what i said, its all opinions.

note: last reply

Edited by nekrosoft13

Im saying that they are fond of iPods, but they have even said that the sound quality is the worst. iPods are designed for everyone, even n00bs, actually, mainly n00bs, due to its easy interface, but i have never seen an mp3 player break down the most other than an iPod. Even on neowin, we always have threads about, oh my folder is corrupt, when i had my iPod, the exact same thing happened, and i consider myself to have a great knowledge about iPods, as i have followed them for about 3 years. Dont get me wrong, i think they a great a somethings, they are the best at navigation, but for quality, no, and this is due to the number of errors people keep having. and yes, its all down to opinion.

i just had to reply

why do you hear about ipod problems?

well

1) stupid noobs

2) when you have a market share of what 60-80% of the mp3 market, you gonna hear about problems about the product more, then from some copany that has a share of 5-10%

BECAUSE THERE IS MORE OF THEM!!

flame war... only j/k..

in my opinion irivers have better sound quality any of the ipod range. there are ALOTof issues with curruption of data on the ipods. even mini's. say if u were to drop and iriver and ipod- most likely the ipod will end up currupted and the iriver will leave off where u left it (i mean it will be fine).

flame war... only j/k..

in my opinion irivers have better sound quality any of the ipod range.  there are ALOTof issues with curruption of data on the ipods. even mini's.  say if u were to drop and iriver and ipod- most likely the ipod will end up currupted and the iriver will leave off where u left it (i mean it will be fine).

586197023[/snapback]

Thank you

Thank you, you have confirmed that the iPod has flaws :) and let me add, many flaws

586197018[/snapback]

only think i had confirmed that every product has flaws, nothing is perfect

and whith a market share of 60-80%, you gonna hear more about it then with some product that has 2-10%

only think i had confirmed that every product has flaws, nothing is perfect

and whith a market share of 60-80%, you gonna hear more about it then with some product that has 2-10%

586197176[/snapback]

thats true, but if you are ignorant, and dont bother looking up on mp3 players before you debate about them, then you rely on things like majority, but if you are like me who keeps looking into different brand of mp3 players, you will see for yourself the truth, and for me, that iPods have alot more problems than other major brands like iRiver, Cowan, Creative, although Sony is just as bad, The best way to find this stuff out is at places like misticriver, ipodlounge, and see from the owners. I keep getting my mates calling me to fix their iPods, and guess what the problem is 90% of the time? corrupt data.

Anyway, enough :p it will go on forever

Edited by saxondale.

absolute last post here

before making my purchase i compared h10, f20 (toshiba) various zen, i have over 10 friends with ipods, and about 10 with other various players, none of the ipod owners i know, had any problems, maybe my friends are smarter then yours.

I just bought an HP10 20GB North American version, and wanted to add a few words re: sorting and playlist functionality on the iRiver.

In short, a real disappointment.

1. You can only tranfer playlists using Windows Media Player, which doesn't always work; only automatic sync seems to do it, not manual, which is useless for me as my music collection is larger than 20GB - AND WMP sometimes screws up my playlists and is not that easy to use.

2. Limited playlists-on-the-fly functionality. You can play one album/artist/genre at a time normally, or you can queue up individual songs to the Quicklist. But you can't queue up entire albums, so it take a long time to queue up few hours of music. You can't remove files from the quicklist individually, however; you can only clear the entire list. My buddy has a Dell Jukebox he got last year that is far superior to the iRiver in this regard, and another friend has a Zen from years back that can even do it.

3. When playing by artist, it sorts by track name, not by album. Sometimes even when I play one album, it sorts by track name, not track number! Has big problems with Various Artists albums as well.

After a bit of legwork, I managed to get 1 and 3 working using a nice piece of freeware that a frustrated H10 user developed called easy h10 - see http://sourceforge.net/projects/easyh10/

however, if you are using a north american h10, you have to switch the player over to "UMS" mode (making it look like a hard drive when connected) first. To enable UMS mode:

- plug the USB cable into the unit. keep it plugged in throughout the entire process

- hit the reset button (you will need a pin or toothpick to do this)

- hold down the select button (O), and while holding it down, turn on the unit. When you see "Emergency connection" come on the screen, release the (O) button.

- copy all your music over, including all your playlists

- run easyH10, which will reformat your playlists to work on the iriver, and repair naming issues with albums. Doesn't fix various artists completely though.

These, and the poor picture display quality, and the inability to delete recordings, are my main gripes with the iRiver. incidentally, the Ipod has many of the same issues, and is in that sense worse because it only lets you use Itunes (you can't drag and drop copy).... so between the two i would go with iRiver still. But a firmware upgrade correcting these issues is -desperately- needed.

my 2c

Edited by rootless

My H10 20GB iRiver arrived just yesterday, and I have a problem that I'm wondering if anyone else has run into. The "carrying case" (silicone one) that it came with isn't just really snug, it actually doesn't fit. It seems like they sent me the carrying case for a smaller model (perhaps the 5 or 6 GB iRiver H10 series).

Packaging error or did other people encounter the same problem?

My H10 20GB iRiver arrived just yesterday, and I have a problem that I'm wondering if anyone else has run into.  The "carrying case" (silicone one) that it came with isn't just really snug, it actually doesn't fit.  It seems like they sent me the carrying case for a smaller model (perhaps the 5 or 6 GB iRiver H10 series).

Packaging error or did other people encounter the same problem?

586248755[/snapback]

best you ring iriver up and ask them.

in my honest opinion, i think the H10 is a backwards step from iRiver's kickass iRiver H3x0. no video, smaller sized screen, no USB OTG, it's buggy, it need for playlists to play songs from different, it has an ugly GUI, and it seems they don't offer driverless support anymore. evidently, the H320 contrasts the H10 in all these respects.

it seems iRiver has made a serious blunder by not improving their players and decreasing their features - one thing they excelled at during the H3x0 timeframe. worst thing is - they discontinued the H3x0 series and are trying to bury the fact they made a 'backwards step' in their new series by overmarketing the H10 series more than they did with the H3x0.

I am on my third iPod and I love it. I have never had any problems such as file corruption or anything. I have had many friends go and get iPod clones such as the Dell Jukebox, etc. They have had countless problems and spent hours and hours trying to get their simple little mp3 players to work. The iPod is king in my book because they work, look awesome, and I've never had a problem. Especially now that they have batteries that reach 18 hours of life they are hard to beat.

I am on my third iPod and I love it. I have never had any problems such as file corruption or anything. I have had many friends go and get iPod clones such as the Dell Jukebox, etc. They have had countless problems and spent hours and hours trying to get their simple little mp3 players to work. The iPod is king in my book because they work, look awesome, and I've never had a problem. Especially now that they have batteries that reach 18 hours of life they are hard to beat.

586252655[/snapback]

ipods cost too much in comparison to the little features they have.

Im standing between the iPod Photo 20Gb and the H10 2Gb. In Sweden the H10 hasn't arrived yet and while waiting I've looked after reviews all over the internet. in swe the iPod cost about 340$ which is a pretty good price for an mp3 with Photo BUT without voice-rec and radio. The iriver will cost about 440$ which i think is a little bit to much for getting a radio and a voice-rec.

I know that the iriver has better(18mW, iPod has about 12-14mW) sound but who cares, the difference is barely knownable(bad english). It's the headphones or earbuds that will make most difference. Non of the original earbuds are good but if you are very strict about the sound you would had a good pair of headphones before you even had bought the player. I think its pretty even about that. If you want absolute quality sound its the headphones you should changes.

I got some friends that have the iPod and they hasn't have any problems without that one of them's got stolen. The battery time is not as good as the irivers but who listens to music for 10-15 hours a day anyway. Dont you sleep out there

!?!

About the H10. I been reading alot about the 5 and 20gb model and i keep seeing that many has a problem with delay between the tracks that can be up to 10sec. And i don't know if i could take that + that it is a lot more expensive, at least in Sweden.

The iPod looks better than the iriver even if the iriver is really nice too so in my case i think it will be the iPod because of the price and the trackdelay on the iriver.

I know that the iriver is a bit better in the most parts but i dont think its worth it.

//Paralyzed, the swede

  • 2 weeks later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Can you give an example of when you would want to use Rufus over the other or vice versa? Just wondering which is the "best".
    • Oh no...the wallet is already screaming. So many games and so little time. Being old and responsible is awful!
    • LibreWolf 152.0.2-1 by Razvan Serea LibreWolf is an independent “fork” of Firefox, with the primary goals of privacy security and user freedom. It is the community run successor to LibreFox. LibreWolf is designed to increase protection against tracking and fingerprinting techniques, while also including a few security improvements. This is achieved through our privacy and security oriented settings and patches. LibreWolf also aims to remove all the telemetry, data collection and annoyances, as well as disabling anti-freedom features like DRM. LibreWolf features: Latest Firefox — LibreWolf is compiled directly from the latest build of Firefox Stable. You will have the the latest features, and security updates. Independent Build — LibreWolf uses a build independent of Firefox and has its own settings, profile folder and installation path. As a result, it can be installed alongside Firefox or any other browser. No phoning home — Embedded server links and other calling home functions are removed. In other words, minimal background connections by default. User settings updates Extensions firewall: limit internet access for extensions. Multi-platform (Windows/Linux/Mac/and soon Android) Community-Driven Dark theme (classic and advanced) LibreWolf privacy features: Delete cookies and website data on close. Include only privacy respecting search engines like DuckDuckGo and Searx. Include uBlockOrigin with custom default filter lists, and Tracking Protection in strict mode, to block trackers and ads. Strip tracking elements from URLs, both natively and through uBO. Enable dFPI, also known as Total Cookie Protection. Enable RFP which is part of the Tor Uplift project. RFP is considered the best in class anti-fingerprinting solution, and its goal is to make users look the same and cover as many metrics as possible, in an effort to block fingerprinting techniques. Always display user language as en-US to websites, in order to protect the language used in the browser and in the OS. Disable WebGL, as it is a strong fingerprinting vector. Prevent access to the location services of the OS, and use Mozilla's location API instead of Google's API. Limit ICE candidates generation to a single interface when sharing video or audio during a videoconference. Force DNS and WebRTC inside the proxy, when one is being used. Trim cross-origin referrers, so that they don't include the full URI. Disable link prefetching and speculative connections. Disable disk cache and clear temporary files on close. Disable form autofill. Disable search and form history...and more. Download: LibreWolf 64-bit | Portable 64-bit | ~100.0 MB (Open Source) Download: ARM64 | Portable ARM64 Links: LibreWolf Home Page | Addons | Screenshot | Reddit Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Hands on with iFlyTek AINote 2 E-Ink tablet: insanely thin and smart by Taras Buria During Amazon Prime Day 2026, iFlyTek is offering its E-Ink tablets with big discounts. The AINOTE 2 is now available at 20% off, allowing you to save quite a lot on one of the thinnest E-Ink tablets out there. I was offered a chance to look at the device, so here are my impressions. The AINOTE 2 is a large 10.65-inch E-Ink tablet that strikes you the moment you take it out of the box. It is extremely thin. At just 4.2 mm, this tablet is at the edge of what is possible for a device with a USB Type-C port. It is also very light, which makes it comfortable and enjoyable during long reading sessions. The tablet has a gold metal chassis with the front and back made of plastic. The back also features four rubber feet that prevent it from sliding around your desk when writing. Besides a USB Type-C port and an LED indicator, there are two buttons mounted on the top edge: a power button with a built-in fingerprint scanner and a dedicated AI button. I would say the fingerprint scanner is quite mid. Given that iFlyTek positions the device as a digital notebook, it makes sense to have a biometric scanner to protect sensitive information. However, it is not the fastest fingerprint reader, and sometimes it fails to recognize my finger. I assume that is due to the tablet's insane thinness. A dedicated AI button is an interesting choice, especially in the middle of the top edge. I can see this button being useful for those who heavily rely on AI and use it frequently, but I cannot help but think its placement is impractical. Having it on one of the longer sides would make so much more sense. The AINOTE 2 is a very pretty device. Gold finish with thin chassis and nearly symmetrical front bezels create a fantastic combination, and iFlyTek cleverly hides the front chin with a section that looks like an extension of the screen, housing two touch-capacitive buttons: one for AI and one for quick notes. This section can also scroll pages when you swipe from the middle to the left or right. It is a cool idea, and very handy when you need to scroll tens of pages at once. AINOTE 2's elegant look extends from its exterior to its software. The user interface is very clean and not cluttered with an abundance of buttons. The tablet prioritizes the note-taking experience, and when you unlock it, it defaults to the list of all notes and folders. Additionally, there is a separate "Schedule" section with your calendar, tasks, memos, and other productivity features. You can connect your Outlook or Google account or use a local calendar. The tablet has quite a lot of AI features powered by OpenAI's GPT-5 and Google's Gemini 3. Besides a standard app with all your chats, you can invoke AI by pressing its dedicated button and dictating your request. It is not limited to just chats. It works with the built-in calendar, and you can tell it to create events, tasks, notes, and more. Additionally, AI features are integrated into the built-in notepad, allowing you to summarize notes, ask questions about your notes, and more. The tablet can OCR handwritten text in different languages (about 120 languages, which is very impressive), and it surprised me with very good accuracy. Voice note transcription is also available, including a "multiplayer" mode where the tablet detects each speaker. Unfortunately, the AINOTE 2 has no built-in speakers (even though it somehow makes a tapping noise when you flip pages using the Quick Bar), so the only way to listen to something is to connect a Bluetooth speaker or headphones. However, there are four front-facing mics for dictation, voice notes, AI chats, and more. Unfortunately, certain features require a Pro subscription that costs $5.99/mo or $59.99/year. Those include offline voice transcription, access to better AI models, the ability to edit notes on a PC or mobile app, and extended service coverage similar to Apple Care. It is a bummer to see yet another app, especially in a device that costs $649, but at least they give a free 90-day trial so that you can see if the benefits justify the price. As for the reader, it supports PDF, EPUB, TXT, MOBI, AZW3, DOC(X), XLS(X), PPT(X), JPEG, JPG, and PNG. The app is quite customizable, with features like text contrast/boldness/size adjustments, margins and spacing customization, and the ability to load custom fonts. Plus, you can annotate books with the stylus, add text notes, and use AI to work with them. Just keep in mind that most AI features require an active internet connection. Like with other E-Ink tablets with Android inside, you can load any other reader you want from the Google Play Store or a third-party source. Despite its hefty price tag of $629 or $519 by the time of publishing this article during Prime Day 2026, the AINOTE 2 has quite modest hardware inside. There is only 4 GB of RAM and about 42GB of storage. It is powered by the RockChip RK3576 processor with 8 cores at 2.2 GHz. Given that the tablet runs Android 14 and has Google Play, you can install Android apps, but do not expect much from this thing performance-wise. As for the battery, there is a 4,000 Li-Ion battery, which, on full charge, lasted me for about one week of active daily use of reading and note-taking. The screen has a resolution of 1920x2560 pixels, which equals 300 PPI, a perfect spot for a sharp, nice-to-read display. It supports EMR styluses that do not require charging, and I have to say that the note-taking experience on this tablet is fantastic. Stylus lag is nearly imperceivable, creating a very natural, paper-like feel. The stylus comes in the box (including two extra nibs), and it features an extra button for various actions and an eraser on top. It magnetically attaches to the tablet and stays safely secured. The stylus has a very nice coarse texture, and thanks to using Wacom tech, you can swap it for any other EMR pen if you wish. The AINOTE 2 has no front light, and because of that, the display sits very close to the screen surface, reducing the distance between the stylus tip/your finger and the display to a minimum. No front light is certainly an inconvenience in certain scenarios, but the screen makes up for that with a seriously impressive paper-like feel and writing experience. In dark conditions, you will have to find a lamp, but the good thing is that the screen has a solid anti-glare surface that diffuses light. The display has two modes: Crisp and Fast. Crisp ensures the image stays, well, crisp and sharp, while Fast speeds up refresh rate and response by toning down display resolution and making everything a bit more jagged. In my testing, I only used Fast mode when browsing the web for a much faster render time. The iFlyTek AINOTE is an impressive device, but it's not flawless. A few things disappointed me during a week of using it. Software localization has a bunch of not necessarily broken, but certainly awkward, machine-translated English. System navigation is not good, as there is no universal "Home" gesture. To go to the main page, you have to swipe up and then press the Home button from the multi-tasking window. There are many gestures for various actions, such as display cleanup, screenshot, undo/redo, but no back/forward or Home gestures. I really hate that the tablet won't let me update its software without creating an iFlyTek account first. Finally, privacy could be a concern for some, as most tablets' features require an active internet connection, an iFlyTek account, and sharing data when using AI. If you can overlook its quirks, some of which could be addressed with software updates (I received two with massive changelogs over a single week), and accept a $519 price tag (with a discount), you will be happy with the AINOTE 2. However, if you do not need that many AI features in an E-Ink reader or you want something a bit more affordable, you'd better look at cheaper competitors from BOOX or Amazon, such as the BOOX Go 10.3 Gen 2 or the Kindle Scribe, which is currently 24% off during Prime Day sales. Buy iFlyTek AINOTE 2 on Amazon - $519 | 20% off with Prime What I liked What I disliked Very impressive hardware Beautiful design Fantastic display with an EMR stylus Supports offline voice transcription Easy-to-use software Clever, useful, and well-made AI features A fingerprint scanner Very expensive Some features require a subscription Poor system navigation Mandates a user account No speakers Privacy could be a concern Note: iFlyTek provided the review unit without any editorial input or review guidance. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Look up "greed". If you are willing to buy that it's only inflation, I've got a bridge to sell you.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      416
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      168
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      132
    4. 4
      Xenon
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!