• 0

[VB.NET]Copy File with progress bar


Question

I'm attempting to make a program that will copy files reclusively in VB.NET.

basically I have a function that calculates the total size of every file in the directory and sub directories then goes through all of them and calls the CopyFile function.

this works alright in that my progress bar actually updates while the file is being copied instead of using filenames like I had been. It just seams to be going a lot slower. Five seconds for a 156k file as opposed to bellow three.

Is there a better way?

Clint

        Private Function CopyFile(ByVal OldFile As String, ByVal NewFile As String)
            Me.FileProgressbar.Value = 0
            Dim FS As New FileStream(OldFile, FileMode.Open)
            Dim FW As New FileStream(NewFile, FileMode.CreateNew)
            Dim Buffer() As Byte
            'Get the bytes from file to a byte array
            ReDim Buffer(FS.Length - 1)
            Me.FileProgressbar.Maximum = FS.Length
            FS.Read(Buffer, 0, Buffer.Length)
            'Do your stuff :-)
            For i As Int32 = 0 To Buffer.Length - 1
                Me.FileProgressbar.Value += 1
                FW.WriteByte(Buffer(i))
                Me.TotalProgressbar.Value += 1
            Next
            FS.Close()
            FW.Close()
        End Function

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/341607-vbnetcopy-file-with-progress-bar/
Share on other sites

11 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

I'm already using basic multi threading.

Per another board I changed it to write and update the progressbars every kb and that helped a lot.

It copied a 75.5 Meg file 1.53125 Seconds faster then File.Copy :)

I will try and get this "Proper Threading" thing figured out in the morning after I've had some rest. :p

Clint

  • 0

Yes I was, now it copies each Kb

My Code with a single progressbar took 42.374 seconds to copy a 483,005 kb file, File.Copy took 46.343 seconds

two progressbars:

My Code: 68.28 Seconds

File.Copy: 37.343 Seconds

No Progressbars:

Mine: 23.796 Seconds

.NET: 41.499 Seconds

that last one surprised me.

figured that at best mine would be just as fast as File.Copy, but apparently not...

Clint

  • 0
  GoodOlClint said:
Yes I was, now it copies each Kb

My Code with a single progressbar took 42.374 seconds to copy a 483,005 kb file, File.Copy took 46.343 seconds

two progressbars:

My Code: 68.28 Seconds

File.Copy: 37.343 Seconds

No Progressbars:

Mine: 23.796 Seconds

.NET: 41.499 Seconds

that last one surprised me.

figured that at best mine would be just as fast as File.Copy, but apparently not...

Clint

586183376[/snapback]

You seems calculating the time taken by using codes WHICH slows the copying process, if so then you should remove this codes and see the difference ;)

  • 0
  Elagizy said:
You seems calculating the time taken by using codes WHICH slows the copying process, if so then you should remove this codes and see the difference  ;)

no I used this to get how long it took:

Sub debug()
        Dim copy As New clsCopyFiles(Me.ProgressBar2, Me.ProgressBar1, Me.Label8, Me.Label7)
        Dim start1 As Date = Now
        copy.CopyFile("C:\largefile.wmv", "C:\video1.wmv")
        Dim finish1 As Date = Now
        Dim start2 As Date = Now
        File.Copy("C:\largefile.wmv:\video2.wmv")
        Dim finish2 As Date = Now
        MsgBox(finish1.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds - start1.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds & vbNewLine & finish2.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds - start2.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds)
    End Sub

so I wasn't calculating untill after the copying was done.

Clint

  • 0
  GoodOlClint said:
no I used this to get how long it took:

Sub debug()
        Dim copy As New clsCopyFiles(Me.ProgressBar2, Me.ProgressBar1, Me.Label8, Me.Label7)
        Dim start1 As Date = Now
        copy.CopyFile("C:\largefile.wmv", "C:\video1.wmv")
        Dim finish1 As Date = Now
        Dim start2 As Date = Now
        File.Copy("C:\largefile.wmv:\video2.wmv")
        Dim finish2 As Date = Now
        MsgBox(finish1.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds - start1.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds & vbNewLine & finish2.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds - start2.TimeOfDay.TotalSeconds)
    End Sub

so I wasn't calculating untill after the copying was done.

Clint

586183620[/snapback]

The problem with your method, though, is that you can only transfer files that can fit in memory. Unless you are now implementing a buffer that outputs every megabyte or so.

  • 0

It's strange that you're like trying to reinvent the wheel, i mean yeah the base class library offers a static file copy method for you to use, why try to do it all over again, and furthermore, i'm sure their implementation of file copy is much more efficient.

  • 0
  Winston said:
It's strange that you're like trying to reinvent the wheel, i mean yeah the base class library offers a static file copy method for you to use, why try to do it all over again, and furthermore, i'm sure their implementation of file copy is much more efficient.

586185592[/snapback]

hehe I'm one of those people who can't stand knowing things work. I have to know why it works.

I learn best by reinventing the wheel. :-p

Besides, I'm in highschool, I can do anything right :shifty: ?

Clint

  • 0
  GoodOlClint said:
hehe I'm one of those people who can't stand knowing things work. I have to know why it works.

I learn best by reinventing the wheel. :-p

Besides, I'm in highschool, I can do anything right :shifty: ?

Clint

586185657[/snapback]

Yeah i guess it's good to understand how things work. But i think that's how you'd do it in general, however, i think the file.copy in which the framework provides, invokes a Win32 API, and i'm pretty sure MS does the file copy a little different, peraps more efficient, since they made the OS after all.

  • 0
  Winston said:
Yeah i guess it's good to understand how things work. But i think that's how you'd do it in general, however, i think the file.copy in which the framework provides, invokes a Win32 API, and i'm pretty sure MS does the file copy a little different, peraps more efficient, since they made the OS after all.

586186072[/snapback]

Oh I have no doubt that it is extremly more efficient. after all, they are a mega corp with billions to spend and I'm a 17 year old with $5 in my pocket...

Clint

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • My best decision: SHIFT+DELETE WINDOWS Then Installed Fedora Linux. Now I am a Happy Person
    • I value a game as a whole including graphics. But going backwards in terms of graphics with a game I'm not already invested in (as in something I played and loved in the past and still do) is off-putting. Its a very poor demo trailer if they didn't crank the settings to max that would be ridiculous. Different strokes for different folks i guess, i'm not into slop the trailer and likely game could have been far better, it doesn't it instead looks like it was made on a shoe string budget or with lack of experience. But that could also be down to trying to get it running on low budget/outdated hardware and sacrificing the top end.
    • > Our goal is to ensure that the App Store remains an outstanding opportunity for developers and a safe, trusted experience for our users. There are so many scam apps on the platform that it is hard to believe they are truly interested in having a safe, trusted experience for their users.
    • Google announces upgraded Gemini 2.5 Pro model with enhanced capabilities by Pradeep Viswanathan Google today announced an updated Gemini 2.5 model with several improvements that can be observed in popular AI benchmarks. Google particularly highlighted that the new Gemini 2.5 Preview 06-05 "Thinking" model performs better in coding, math, science, and reasoning. Last month, during Google I/O, Google released an updated version of the Gemini 2.5 Pro model with significant improvements. Today's update builds on the release of the previous month with further enhancements. In addition to benchmark improvements, based on user feedback, this updated Gemini 2.5 Pro model also comes with improved style and structure, which will result in creative and better-formatted responses for end users. You can find the benchmark comparison with other leading AI models below. As you can notice in the above table, this updated Gemini 2.5 Pro preview model is now SOTA (State-of-the-Art) in coding benchmarks like Aider Polyglot. It also scored SOTA performance on GPQA and Humanity’s Last Exam (HLE) benchmarks, which test math, science, knowledge, and reasoning capabilities. In real-world testing, this latest 2.5 Pro model scored 24 points better on LMArena, maintaining its lead, and a 35-point jump on WebDevArena at 1443. Developers can access this latest Gemini 2.5 Pro preview model through the Gemini API via Google AI Studio and Vertex AI. General consumers will be able to access this model via the Gemini app. Google also confirmed that the Gemini 2.5 Pro model will be generally available in a couple of weeks, allowing developers to start using it in production-ready enterprise-scale applications.
    • The Bromance is definitely over! 🤣🤣🤣
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      jbatch earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      Yianis earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      GTRoberts went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      James courage Tabla earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      419
    2. 2
      +FloatingFatMan
      182
    3. 3
      snowy owl
      181
    4. 4
      ATLien_0
      176
    5. 5
      Xenon
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!