Recommended Posts

plasmas suck....unless you want a cheap, short term solution.

586209652[/snapback]

That's not always the case. Plasmas (the ones from reputable companies) can last just as long as an LCD (both have a life span of a rated 60,000 hours). I do prefer LCD, especially the Samsung LNR line, but plasmas aren't as bad as everyone makes them out to be. That is, of course, as long as you get a good one and not something cheap-o.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/343719-lcd-vs-plasma/#findComment-586209659
Share on other sites

If you live in a high altitude region, plasmas will not function very well.  Also, plasmas suffer from the "burn-in" effect.  So if you plan to hookup a game console like PS2 the static images can possibly burn in after a long time.

I'd go for the LCD.

586209708[/snapback]

Yes, they can get burn in, but newer sets are much less prone to it than any plasmas in the past. There are also units available from companies, such as LG, that have a "white wash" feature to essentially correct any burn in.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/343719-lcd-vs-plasma/#findComment-586209828
Share on other sites

Yes, they can get burn in, but newer sets are much less prone to it than any plasmas in the past. There are also units available from companies, such as LG, that have a "white wash" feature to essentially correct any burn in.

586209828[/snapback]

You can correct burn in that has already taken place? Or did you mean "white wash" is a way to prevent it.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/343719-lcd-vs-plasma/#findComment-586209841
Share on other sites

You can correct burn in that has already taken place?  Or did you mean "white wash" is a way to prevent it.

586209841[/snapback]

It can remove the burn in after it's occured. Read this about the LG's burn in protection system:

Four image-sticking prevention options reduce the ?screen burn-in? issues inherent in plasma displays. Two of the technologies are preventive in nature: one works by slightly moving the image every ten minutes, and the other creates intermittent variations in brightness. Because these methods are so subtle that they go unnoticed by viewers, they can be employed while the display is being used. Two other LG-developed techniques for eliminating burn-in are inversion and whitewash, which can be employed when the unit is not being used for viewing. The ?inversion? option neutralizes the burned-in image by mapping a reverse image to the affected area, thereby restoring the original configuration, while the ?whitewash? option flushes the entire screen with a white screen for a period of time, theoretically ?washing away? any evidence of burn-in.
Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/343719-lcd-vs-plasma/#findComment-586209852
Share on other sites

Ok, Im confused...

Im looking for a new TV (42" +), and i don't know weather LCD or plasma?

I'm looking for something that will look nice with PS2, PC input, SD/HD TV, and anything else i might want...

Any ideas, or definitions of plasma and lcd differences, and then you get Sony with the whole "3 LCD" thing... ?

586206351[/snapback]

Any rp lcd tv is 3lcd, sony just decided to start marketing it to make it seem new and exciting to potential customers. Who would want a dlp if they can have a 3lcd tv (or atleast that's what sony wants people to think).

42+ tvs that are regular lcd and not rp lcd will be very very expensive, and don't offer anywhere near the picture quality of a good plasma.

Both lcd and plasma tvs reach their half brightness point at 60,000 hours. Both suffer from degraded color as they lose brightness. In a plasma and any other phosphor based tv the blue phosphors wear the fastest, and in lcd and any other tv based on ccfls or lamps the colors degrade as the lamp or backlight ages.

An lcd tv will allow you to avoid possible burn-in, but you will have to live with inferior black-levels, imperfect colors, color-temperatures, and grey-scale, and limited viewing angles.

Newer plasmas claim to offer crt lvl burn-in resistance, and there are numerous accounts of people who use there plasmas for gaming and never even have a hint of image retention (the precursor to permanent burn-in). However, with a plasma you can get near perfect greyscale, color-temperatures, blacks, and pretty much crt lvl viewing angles. As long as you properly break-in a plasma and follow a few simple safety measures, you really shouldn't have any trouble keeping a plasma burn free.

For the cost of an lcd tv over 42"es you can buy a very nice 50" plasma. Lcds are getting better, and with led backlights in the future the technology will vastly improve as time goes on, but as of right now an lcd tv simply has inferior image quality to that of a good plasma.

Oh, and pioneer and panasonic have the best plasmas, while sharp makes the best lcds. If you can stand the samung's dnie then you could look at those, but dnie for the most part degrades image quality more than it helps. Also, samungs usually have a green push, whereas the sharps have a red push. Though neither are good, the red push is better for skin tones.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/343719-lcd-vs-plasma/#findComment-586223951
Share on other sites

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Louis Rossmann suing Samsung over "990 Pro SSD warranty scam" by Sayan Sen Back in 2023, if you recall, Neowin reviewer Robbie Khan had a dispute with Samsung over his 990 Pro SSD, which was rapidly losing its health. After significant back and forth, the tech giant had finally released firmware to "stop" the issue. Interestingly, its previous flagship at the time, the 980 Pro was also facing problems leading to two consecutive sets of firmware fixes. Three years later, it looks like a similar conflict has now broken out between tech repair entrepreneur YouTuber Louis Rossmann and Samsung, as it has escalated into a threatened lawsuit after the company allegedly refused to appropriately replace a failing 990 Pro SSD that remained under warranty. According to Rossmann, a 4TB Samsung 990 Pro NVMe SSD purchased for approximately $330 less than two years ago, began experiencing major hiccups and issues, even though he claims it had been operated under ideal cooling conditions. It was installed in a RAID 1 array and cooled by a heatsink and dual high-speed fans. However the drive reportedly started dropping out of the array, exhibiting controller-level failures that eventually became not useable in any meaningful way. Rossmann said Samsung’s support process was marked by delays and confusion from the very start. After initially contacting the wrong regional support channel, he was redirected to Samsung’s memory support division where he submitted detailed diagnostics, logs, and proof of purchase. Rossmann runs a repair company and owns an ACE Lab PC-3000 machine, which is a professional-grade data recovery equipment. As such, he had been confident in his diagnostics. Samsung even seemingly acknowledged that later. Regardless, Rossmann claims that his initial support ticket was automatically closed before a full 24-hour response window had elapsed, forcing him to reopen the case and resubmit documentation. The controversy however intensified further from here after Samsung accepted the drive for warranty evaluation but later returned it with a repair report stating that the drive had passed its testing and that the SSD had been verified as functional. Rossmann strongly disputed those claims citing that his own independent testing on PC-3000 showed write speeds reducing to as low as 40–60 MB/s before the drive failed entirely. Samsung subsequently informed him that the SSD had been reset and reflashed, passing internal stress tests. However, the company also stated that replacement units were unavailable due to an industry-wide memory shortage and suggested that a refund process could be initiated if further testing confirmed the fault. Thus, to settle, the company offered a refund of $330, the amount that was initially paid by him to make the purchase. Here, Rossmann pointed out the seeming hypocrisy of the tech giant as in how no Samsung drive was apparently allocated for warranty replacements, but they were abundantly available for retail sales especially when using business accounts. As you can see, Rossmann is indeed right, there are Samsung 990 Pro 4TB SSDs on Amazon currently for $950 (shipped and sold by first-party Amazon US itself), and they are also available on Samsung's own store too, albeit for an even higher price of $1100. Thus Rossmann argues that Samsung’s inability or unwillingness to provide a replacement while the same model remains available for purchase at significantly higher market prices reflects a failure to honor its warranty obligations. He has issued a formal 60-day notice and says he intends to file suit in Texas small claims court, asserting that companies should face greater costs for denying legitimate warranty claims than for fulfilling them. You can check out the full video titled "Samsung's 990 Pro SSD warranty policy is a scam; I'm taking them to court," at the link below. Source and image: Louis Rossmann (YouTube) As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases
    • Was it too much to ask to show the icon in this article?
    • Frankly, I blame whoever is writing such articles. "A big improvement/update and/or new feature is now available to everyone! Also, use this unofficial tweak tool to enable it because it actually isn't available to you yet officially and might not in fact even be entirely ready or whatever, hence why it is perhaps not enabled for you*. But it's great and you should enable it!" I mean there's nothing wrong with sharing info about some feature you might need to enable via unofficial means, of course. It's just that these articles tend to essentially end up being two news pieces in one, and one of them tends to be a bit misleading. (*Yes, yes, the "it's a controlled rollout!" thing. Not a fan of that one either. The argument, not the actual rollout.)
    • Thank you. Will do. I read in the release notes that editor config might be at play here.
    • Actually, I think even Microsoft doesn't know how to control it
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      davidbazooked earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Jamswaz earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      Marzoid went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Community Regular
      coch went up a rank
      Community Regular
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      508
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      185
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      83
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      75
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!