Recommended Posts

Sorry but true metalhead = AC/DC.

Im sorry but you can count me out on that one.

I guess im not a true metalhead?

To this day no one has EVER said to me AC/DC is metal. Rock N Roll if anything

Please I hardly even wanted to reply to this but I thought that statement was completely False.

While im not as misguided as our little friend over there to think that they "SUCK"

Their music is clearly not needed in a "true METALHEAD's" Library.... Trust me... Many do fine without.

"I don't think so pal and not trying to fight here but AC/DC pretty much owns on albums sold and fans."

Metal has never been about owning on how many albums you sell and how many fans you have. (Not the respectable bands anyways)

With that being said I respect them as a band considering if they have fun on stage Ill have fun as a fan, and thats what it should be about.

I totally rambled on but im sleepy and Im not trying to fight either but a bold statement like "Sorry but true metalhead = AC/DC." is really hard to swallow.

Really i thought it was a good album and i loved that song A Tout Le Monde (Set Me Free) i find it to be a better version then the original.
The music seemed to have no direction and was off beat. The time changes were weird and everything. Sometimes that's okay but they can't pull it off in my opinion. On the vocals side half the time Dave didn't even sing he was just merely talking/ranting his political views over music. Such a waste if you ask me. The band has talent (obviously) but this is definitely no show case.

On the topic of ACDC, I've always considered them Classic Rock.

it's funny how what people thought was "heavy" or "hard" years ago is nothing compared to what's out now :happy:

in my case, back when Slipknot's ST was out.... i thought that was the tell-all, end-all hardest stuff on the planet... little did i know... :whistle:

it's funny how what people thought was "heavy" or "hard" years ago is nothing compared to what's out now :happy:

in my case, back when Slipknot's ST was out.... i thought that was the tell-all, end-all hardest stuff on the planet... little did i know... :whistle:

I still talk to with old time rockers who to this day don't like anything out there. I once tried to get this old rocker who works with me into death metal but failed lol :p well slipknot isn't metal :x but can see how a young persold think that (not saying you but to the other young 14 year old kids who think korn, linkin park, slipknot is the best and metal... no metal there.

I think i should of put [Joke] when i said ac/dc = true metalhead as i was meaning a joke :woot:

I know many don't like ac/dc and funny enough mostly the younger generation that don't like them due to them being a older band....IMO :p

it's funny how what people thought was "heavy" or "hard" years ago is nothing compared to what's out now :happy:

in my case, back when Slipknot's ST was out.... i thought that was the tell-all, end-all hardest stuff on the planet... little did i know... :whistle:

Yeah, it was interesting to watch the transition. Metallica really led the way to the popular heavy sounding stuff and underground bands like Slayer, Death, and their ilk really pushed the whole thing over the edge by being completely hardcore. I am one of those old timers that actually likes a lot of newer stuff. I still prefer people that actually sing over those that growl, but I do appreciate the technique involved in growling and do like some growlers. I do love heavy riffs and will for eternity. :punk:

i enjoy the combination of screaming/growling with singing... 'All That Remains' does this pretty well. i really like their music. i dont really like a metal song with 100% singing though... there's a certain art form to screaming as long as it's not monotone.

i enjoy the combination of screaming/growling with singing... 'All That Remains' does this pretty well. i really like their music. i dont really like a metal song with 100% singing though... there's a certain art form to screaming as long as it's not monotone.

I love Opeth. Probably the best combo I've liked so far when it comes to singing and growling. Screaming/growling does take excellent technique in order to not damage your vocal cords. I give props to those guys big time.

Finally, I remembered my password. Anyways, when I first got into metal all I listened to was Metallica and Megadeth, and didn't understand why people would scream for their vocals. But as time progressed I started expanding my horizons away from the 80s thrash scene and getting into newer acts like Children Of Bodom and Lamb Of God. Yet, while I do appreciate my roots in metal, I prefer to this day a band that screams predominantly over singing. But I do love bands that sing and scream like All that Remains, KSE, and Opeth. When I look back I think it's funny to see that all I liked were two of the biggest names in metal, than getting into North American revival of Metal, then black metal, than melodic death metal, and inevitably death metal (which I hated so much for a long time).

Aside from my story of how I got into metal, I'm gonna try and go see As Blood Runs Black with Beneath The Massacre, The Faceless, and Animosity tomorrow. Then on Friday, hopefully, Dimmu Borgir and Unearth in Phoenix.

Finally, I remembered my password. Anyways, when I first got into metal all I listened to was Metallica and Megadeth, and didn't understand why people would scream for their vocals. But as time progressed I started expanding my horizons away from the 80s thrash scene and getting into newer acts like Children Of Bodom and Lamb Of God. Yet, while I do appreciate my roots in metal, I prefer to this day a band that screams predominantly over singing. But I do love bands that sing and scream like All that Remains, KSE, and Opeth. When I look back I think it's funny to see that all I liked were two of the biggest names in metal, than getting into North American revival of Metal, then black metal, than melodic death metal, and inevitably death metal (which I hated so much for a long time).

Aside from my story of how I got into metal, I'm gonna try and go see As Blood Runs Black with Beneath The Massacre, The Faceless, and Animosity tomorrow. Then on Friday, hopefully, Dimmu Borgir and Unearth in Phoenix.

You in Tucson?

Well, since I was born in the mid-70s I grewup with a lot of the music of the late-70s and all the '80s, so my preference in music is skewed more towards that time period.

Yes, I like some artists that came out in the '90s and now, right now the metal bands I listen to -- besides the obvious ones -- are:

Falconer (http://www.falconermusic.com/); site seems to be down at the moment, don't think they have any music videos...as I've never found any.

DragonForce (http://www.dragonforce.com/); They have two music videos on their site.

Nightwish (http://www.nightwish.com/en/news/); They have links to videos on their site, but you can find a lot of their videos on YouTube.

Power Quest (http://www.power-quest.co.uk/); Never really checked if they have any videos.

i enjoy the combination of screaming/growling with singing... 'All That Remains' does this pretty well. i really like their music. i dont really like a metal song with 100% singing though... there's a certain art form to screaming as long as it's not monotone.
I don't like screaming per se but the death growl if done right (like if it's still decipherable) then I like it. I absolutely hate black metal for the vocals.
I don't like screaming per se but the death growl if done right (like if it's still decipherable) then I like it. I absolutely hate black metal for the vocals.

do you ever listen to Chimaira? his vocals are the best combination of heavy screaming with clarity. It's real heavy but you can still make out the words.

do you ever listen to Chimaira? his vocals are the best combination of heavy screaming with clarity. It's real heavy but you can still make out the words.

I wouldn't call Chimaira a screamo band, just kick ass metalcore but in the heavy way :D Kick ass riffs/solos. I would call the vocals more aggressive then screaming. The new album even has the odd death metal growl which is great :woot:

  • 3 weeks later...
Finally, I remembered my password. Anyways, when I first got into metal all I listened to was Metallica and Megadeth, and didn't understand why people would scream for their vocals. But as time progressed I started expanding my horizons away from the 80s thrash scene and getting into newer acts like Children Of Bodom and Lamb Of God. Yet, while I do appreciate my roots in metal, I prefer to this day a band that screams predominantly over singing. But I do love bands that sing and scream like All that Remains, KSE, and Opeth. When I look back I think it's funny to see that all I liked were two of the biggest names in metal, than getting into North American revival of Metal, then black metal, than melodic death metal, and inevitably death metal (which I hated so much for a long time).

Aside from my story of how I got into metal, I'm gonna try and go see As Blood Runs Black with Beneath The Massacre, The Faceless, and Animosity tomorrow. Then on Friday, hopefully, Dimmu Borgir and Unearth in Phoenix.

Man I just recently got into Dimmi Borgir. They're amazing. I love the theatrics and "grand" sound they add to their style of death metal. Definitely enjoy the show!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Dude, im talking about simply disable it from settings app. Because of the eu regulation, you could disable it here for years.
    • One big question about Mars was answered thanks to Einstein's 100 year old theory by Sayan Sen Image via DepositPhotos Scientists at the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) have calculated how time passes on Mars compared with Earth, adding detail to how timekeeping would need to work beyond Earth’s orbit. The study, published in The Astronomical Journal, found that clocks on Mars run an average of 477 microseconds, or millionths of a second, faster per day than clocks on Earth. A microsecond is one millionth of a second, a very small unit used in precise scientific timing systems such as atomic clocks, which measure time using consistent atomic behavior. This difference is not constant. Because Mars moves around the Sun in a non-circular path (an eccentric orbit, meaning its distance from the Sun changes over time instead of staying fixed) and is affected by gravity from other bodies, the daily difference can vary by as much as 226 microseconds over a Martian year. The study also identifies smaller repeating changes of about 40 microseconds per day linked to synodic cycles (repeating periods that describe how planets line up with each other as they orbit the Sun from different positions). These longer patterns affect how time differences slowly rise and fall. To make these estimates, researchers compared Mars with Earth and the Moon. The work looks at relativistic proper time (the time actually measured by a clock depending on its speed and the strength of gravity where it is located, as described in Einstein’s relativity). This shows that each world has its own slightly different “rate” of time. This becomes more important as space missions expand into cislunar space (the region between Earth and the Moon) and toward Mars. On Earth, time systems rely on atomic clocks and satellites, which stay closely synchronized for navigation and communication. The study is based on Albert Einstein’s theory of relativity, which shows that time is affected by gravity and motion. Stronger gravity makes clocks run slower, while weaker gravity makes them run faster. “The time is just right for the Moon and Mars,” said NIST physicist Bijunath Patla. “This is the closest we have been to realizing the science fiction vision of expanding across the solar system.” A day on Mars is about 40 minutes longer than on Earth, and a Martian year lasts 687 Earth days. But the main question is not just about days and years, but how fast time itself passes. An atomic clock placed on Mars would function normally, but compared with one on Earth, the two would slowly drift apart due to differences in gravity and motion. This requires careful calculation of what is similar to a time-zone difference across planets. Researchers modeled Mars using a reference surface and included gravitational effects from the Sun, Earth, the Moon, and other planets. This includes a multi-body gravitational system (often described as a three-body or four-body problem, where predicting motion becomes difficult because multiple large objects all pull on each other at the same time through gravity). Mars also follows a Keplerian orbit (an idealized elliptical orbit based on simple gravitational laws that assume smooth motion, before adding real-world disturbances from other bodies). In addition, the researchers accounted for solar tides (small changes in gravitational force caused by the Sun that slightly distort planetary motion and timing, especially in systems involving Earth and the Moon). These combined effects are described as relativistic proper-time offsets (small but measurable differences in elapsed time between locations caused by gravity and motion), which must be included when comparing clocks across planets. “But for Mars, that’s not the case. Its distance from the Sun and its eccentric orbit make the variations in time larger. A three-body problem is extremely complicated. Now we’re dealing with four: the Sun, Earth, the Moon and Mars,” Patla explained. “The heavy lifting was more challenging than I initially thought.” Although the differences are extremely small, they matter for navigation and communication systems that depend on precise timing. Even modern networks on Earth, such as mobile systems, rely on timing accuracy at very small fractions of a second. Communication between Earth and Mars currently takes about four to 24 minutes or more depending on planetary positions, meaning signals are not real-time. A shared and accurate time system could help future missions reduce confusion in navigation and data exchange. “If you get synchronization, it will be almost like real-time communication without any loss of information. You don’t have to wait to see what happens,” Patla said. Researchers note that fully developed interplanetary communication networks are still far in the future. However, understanding how time behaves across planets helps prepare for those systems. “It may be decades before the surface of Mars is covered by the tracks of wandering rovers, but it is useful now to study the issues involved in establishing navigation systems on other planets and moons,” said Neil Ashby. “Like current global navigation systems like GPS, these systems will depend on accurate clocks, and the effects on clock rates can be analyzed with the help of Einstein’s general theory of relativity.” Patla added that the results also help improve understanding of time itself under relativity. “It's good to know for the first time what is happening on Mars timewise. Nobody knew that before. It improves our knowledge of the theory itself, the theory of how clocks tick and relativity,” he said. Source: NIST, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 by Razvan Serea TeraCopy is a compact program designed to copy and move files at the maximum possible speed, also providing you with a lot of features. Copy files faster. TeraCopy uses dynamically adjusted buffers to reduce seek times. Asynchronous copy speeds up file transfer between two physical hard drives. Pause and resume transfers. Pause copy process at any time to free up system resources and continue with a single click. Error recovery. In case of copy error, TeraCopy will try several times and in the worse case just skips the file, not terminating the entire transfer. Interactive file list. TeraCopy shows failed file transfers and lets you fix the problem and recopy only problem files. Shell integration. TeraCopy can completely replace Explorer copy and move functions, allowing you work with files as usual. TeraCopy is free for non-commercial use only. For commercial use you need to buy a license. The paid version of the program includes the following features: Copy/move to your favorite folders. Save reports as HTML and CSV files. Select files with the same extension/folder. Remove the selected files from the copy queue. TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 changelog: Added support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. Improved exception handling and automated bug report upload. Fixed several minor bugs and small memory leaks. Build 26 (June 24) Fixed a rare exception when a transfer completed. Features added since version 3.17: Enhanced speed graph. New multi-threaded copy engine. Support for copying to multiple targets. Queue system for managing multiple copy operations. Support for receiving files via the LocalSend protocol. TeraCopy entry in the modern Windows Explorer context menu. Integrated toolbar in the title bar. Why receive LocalSend transfers with TeraCopy? Handle file conflicts: Skip, overwrite, or rename files when a file with the same name already exists. LocalSend always creates another copy, which can waste time and disk space, especially when resuming an interrupted transfer. Filter unwanted files: Apply ignore lists or remove files manually before accepting a transfer, so unnecessary files are not downloaded. Better performance on fast networks: In tests over a 10 Gbps connection, TeraCopy received files several times faster than the standard LocalSend app on Windows. Download: TeraCopy 4.0 Build 26 | 14.5 MB (Freeware, paid upgrade available) View: TeraCopy Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Briefly used Turbo Pascal (and Turbo C++) in 97 and soon after that I bought PC magazine that included a full version of Delphi 2. I still use Delphi today, some 29 years later.
    • Age of Empires Mobile comes to PC, here's how to carry over progress from your phone by Ivan Jenic Image: YouTube/Microsoft Microsoft just released Age of Empires Mobile for PC. The game, officially called Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, is available for free on Steam and Microsoft Store, almost two years after its initial release for handheld devices. Age of Empires is one of those franchises that entire generations grew up with. The original came out in 1997, and immediately got people hooked to building civilizations and crushing their enemies on the battlefield. However, the franchise today is a far cry from its roots, as Age of Empires Mobile is, well, a game optimized for handheld devices, and not a classic RTS title we’ve all loved for years. And, of course, it includes in-game purchases. The PC version is still a mobile game at its core, but it’s been optimized for desktop play. There’s mouse control, full keyboard compatibility, and a refined UI. Microsoft also refreshed the visuals with some 4k textures, so the game should look better on larger screens. The game supports Crossplay, so you can switch between your phone, tablet, and PC without losing anything. But linked progress doesn’t come out of the box, as you have to enable it first. Here’s how to link your progress: On your mobile device, open Age of Empires Mobile. Go to Settings (Gear icon) > Account. Select Bind Account and choose a sign-in option. Once you enable account binding, sign in on PC using the same method, and your progress will be accessible across all your devices. Xbox Game Pass subscribers also get a bonus reward pack on PC, which includes: 1 Monthly Pass Token 1 Custom Resource Chest 10 Universal 60-Minute Speed-Ups 1,000 Empire Coins Exclusive Player Portrait Frame You can find more info about Age of Empires Mobile: PC Edition, as well as download links, on the Age of Empires official website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      Tom Schmidt earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      D0nn13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Rookie
      +ChiefOfNeo went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      458
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      177
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      124
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      79
    5. 5
      Xenon
      76
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!