Recommended Posts

Sorry but true metalhead = AC/DC.

Im sorry but you can count me out on that one.

I guess im not a true metalhead?

To this day no one has EVER said to me AC/DC is metal. Rock N Roll if anything

Please I hardly even wanted to reply to this but I thought that statement was completely False.

While im not as misguided as our little friend over there to think that they "SUCK"

Their music is clearly not needed in a "true METALHEAD's" Library.... Trust me... Many do fine without.

"I don't think so pal and not trying to fight here but AC/DC pretty much owns on albums sold and fans."

Metal has never been about owning on how many albums you sell and how many fans you have. (Not the respectable bands anyways)

With that being said I respect them as a band considering if they have fun on stage Ill have fun as a fan, and thats what it should be about.

I totally rambled on but im sleepy and Im not trying to fight either but a bold statement like "Sorry but true metalhead = AC/DC." is really hard to swallow.

Really i thought it was a good album and i loved that song A Tout Le Monde (Set Me Free) i find it to be a better version then the original.
The music seemed to have no direction and was off beat. The time changes were weird and everything. Sometimes that's okay but they can't pull it off in my opinion. On the vocals side half the time Dave didn't even sing he was just merely talking/ranting his political views over music. Such a waste if you ask me. The band has talent (obviously) but this is definitely no show case.

On the topic of ACDC, I've always considered them Classic Rock.

it's funny how what people thought was "heavy" or "hard" years ago is nothing compared to what's out now :happy:

in my case, back when Slipknot's ST was out.... i thought that was the tell-all, end-all hardest stuff on the planet... little did i know... :whistle:

it's funny how what people thought was "heavy" or "hard" years ago is nothing compared to what's out now :happy:

in my case, back when Slipknot's ST was out.... i thought that was the tell-all, end-all hardest stuff on the planet... little did i know... :whistle:

I still talk to with old time rockers who to this day don't like anything out there. I once tried to get this old rocker who works with me into death metal but failed lol :p well slipknot isn't metal :x but can see how a young persold think that (not saying you but to the other young 14 year old kids who think korn, linkin park, slipknot is the best and metal... no metal there.

I think i should of put [Joke] when i said ac/dc = true metalhead as i was meaning a joke :woot:

I know many don't like ac/dc and funny enough mostly the younger generation that don't like them due to them being a older band....IMO :p

it's funny how what people thought was "heavy" or "hard" years ago is nothing compared to what's out now :happy:

in my case, back when Slipknot's ST was out.... i thought that was the tell-all, end-all hardest stuff on the planet... little did i know... :whistle:

Yeah, it was interesting to watch the transition. Metallica really led the way to the popular heavy sounding stuff and underground bands like Slayer, Death, and their ilk really pushed the whole thing over the edge by being completely hardcore. I am one of those old timers that actually likes a lot of newer stuff. I still prefer people that actually sing over those that growl, but I do appreciate the technique involved in growling and do like some growlers. I do love heavy riffs and will for eternity. :punk:

i enjoy the combination of screaming/growling with singing... 'All That Remains' does this pretty well. i really like their music. i dont really like a metal song with 100% singing though... there's a certain art form to screaming as long as it's not monotone.

i enjoy the combination of screaming/growling with singing... 'All That Remains' does this pretty well. i really like their music. i dont really like a metal song with 100% singing though... there's a certain art form to screaming as long as it's not monotone.

I love Opeth. Probably the best combo I've liked so far when it comes to singing and growling. Screaming/growling does take excellent technique in order to not damage your vocal cords. I give props to those guys big time.

Finally, I remembered my password. Anyways, when I first got into metal all I listened to was Metallica and Megadeth, and didn't understand why people would scream for their vocals. But as time progressed I started expanding my horizons away from the 80s thrash scene and getting into newer acts like Children Of Bodom and Lamb Of God. Yet, while I do appreciate my roots in metal, I prefer to this day a band that screams predominantly over singing. But I do love bands that sing and scream like All that Remains, KSE, and Opeth. When I look back I think it's funny to see that all I liked were two of the biggest names in metal, than getting into North American revival of Metal, then black metal, than melodic death metal, and inevitably death metal (which I hated so much for a long time).

Aside from my story of how I got into metal, I'm gonna try and go see As Blood Runs Black with Beneath The Massacre, The Faceless, and Animosity tomorrow. Then on Friday, hopefully, Dimmu Borgir and Unearth in Phoenix.

Finally, I remembered my password. Anyways, when I first got into metal all I listened to was Metallica and Megadeth, and didn't understand why people would scream for their vocals. But as time progressed I started expanding my horizons away from the 80s thrash scene and getting into newer acts like Children Of Bodom and Lamb Of God. Yet, while I do appreciate my roots in metal, I prefer to this day a band that screams predominantly over singing. But I do love bands that sing and scream like All that Remains, KSE, and Opeth. When I look back I think it's funny to see that all I liked were two of the biggest names in metal, than getting into North American revival of Metal, then black metal, than melodic death metal, and inevitably death metal (which I hated so much for a long time).

Aside from my story of how I got into metal, I'm gonna try and go see As Blood Runs Black with Beneath The Massacre, The Faceless, and Animosity tomorrow. Then on Friday, hopefully, Dimmu Borgir and Unearth in Phoenix.

You in Tucson?

Well, since I was born in the mid-70s I grewup with a lot of the music of the late-70s and all the '80s, so my preference in music is skewed more towards that time period.

Yes, I like some artists that came out in the '90s and now, right now the metal bands I listen to -- besides the obvious ones -- are:

Falconer (http://www.falconermusic.com/); site seems to be down at the moment, don't think they have any music videos...as I've never found any.

DragonForce (http://www.dragonforce.com/); They have two music videos on their site.

Nightwish (http://www.nightwish.com/en/news/); They have links to videos on their site, but you can find a lot of their videos on YouTube.

Power Quest (http://www.power-quest.co.uk/); Never really checked if they have any videos.

i enjoy the combination of screaming/growling with singing... 'All That Remains' does this pretty well. i really like their music. i dont really like a metal song with 100% singing though... there's a certain art form to screaming as long as it's not monotone.
I don't like screaming per se but the death growl if done right (like if it's still decipherable) then I like it. I absolutely hate black metal for the vocals.
I don't like screaming per se but the death growl if done right (like if it's still decipherable) then I like it. I absolutely hate black metal for the vocals.

do you ever listen to Chimaira? his vocals are the best combination of heavy screaming with clarity. It's real heavy but you can still make out the words.

do you ever listen to Chimaira? his vocals are the best combination of heavy screaming with clarity. It's real heavy but you can still make out the words.

I wouldn't call Chimaira a screamo band, just kick ass metalcore but in the heavy way :D Kick ass riffs/solos. I would call the vocals more aggressive then screaming. The new album even has the odd death metal growl which is great :woot:

  • 3 weeks later...
Finally, I remembered my password. Anyways, when I first got into metal all I listened to was Metallica and Megadeth, and didn't understand why people would scream for their vocals. But as time progressed I started expanding my horizons away from the 80s thrash scene and getting into newer acts like Children Of Bodom and Lamb Of God. Yet, while I do appreciate my roots in metal, I prefer to this day a band that screams predominantly over singing. But I do love bands that sing and scream like All that Remains, KSE, and Opeth. When I look back I think it's funny to see that all I liked were two of the biggest names in metal, than getting into North American revival of Metal, then black metal, than melodic death metal, and inevitably death metal (which I hated so much for a long time).

Aside from my story of how I got into metal, I'm gonna try and go see As Blood Runs Black with Beneath The Massacre, The Faceless, and Animosity tomorrow. Then on Friday, hopefully, Dimmu Borgir and Unearth in Phoenix.

Man I just recently got into Dimmi Borgir. They're amazing. I love the theatrics and "grand" sound they add to their style of death metal. Definitely enjoy the show!

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
    • If you don’t get lucky with Valve’s Steam Machine reservation system, you can make your own Steam Machine instead. Valve says that “starting with the SteamOS 3.8 release, you can put together your own Steam Machine using whatever PC parts you want.” SteamOS 3.8.10 launched last week with a slew of updates, including “improved compatibility with recent Intel and AMD platforms.” Alongside that improved compatibility, Valve is giving gamers the green light to install SteamOS on their own desktops. In an interview with The Verge, Valve’s Pierre-Loup Griffais said Valve has been “rolling out improvements to [SteamOS] so it’s more compatible with desktop hardware,” including eventual support for Nvidia graphics. Griffais says Valve has “a growing team” working on Nvidia driver support for SteamOS, adding, “We’re collaborating with Nvidia very closely.” While he mentioned that Nvidia support might not come this year, Griffais emphasized that “it’s certainly something that we’re working on in the background.”     Subscription not needed: https://archive.fo/Tssfc Subscription needed: https://www.theverge.com/games/953411/valve-steamos-desktop-nvidia
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      454
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      162
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!