• 0

[C#] Return a value from a Form


Question

Ive got a form (we'll call it Form1), which has a button that opens up another little input form (Form2). Form2 contains 4 inputs, i want to return those from Form2 back to Form1.

How do i do that? Ive tried creating an overloaded ShowDialog() method with a return value, but that caused a System.StackOverflowException in mscorlib - always nice.

Am i complicating something simple? Because it feels like i am...

So, how do i return a value from the form?

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/347559-c-return-a-value-from-a-form/
Share on other sites

19 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

An easy solution is to just create accessors for your input values in form 2. I believe the default implementation of ShowDialog() waits until the form that was opened is hidden or closed to return, so you could do something like this:

Form2 a = new Form2();

a.ShowDialog(whatever parameters there may be);

string value1 = a.value1;

I haven't dealt with this stuff for a while, so i could be completely off, but i think that will work.

  • 0

Say you have an integer called number in Form2. Do this to get it back to Form1:

in Form2 write:

public int GetNumber()
{
return number;
}

in Form 1 write:

Form2 form2 = new Form2()
int myNumber = form2.GetNumber();

Now the myNumber integer which is in Form1 will have the value of number which is in Form2. Hope that's what you need.

  • 0

Make the textboxes public - then you can do the following:

myform f1 = new myform();

DialogResult dr = f1.ShowDialog();

// the user then happily enters data

if(dr == DialogResult.OK) //or whatever it is

{

String mystring1 = f1.TextBox1.Text;

// etc etc...

}

  • 0

No, the form is not destroy after the ShowDialog() exits.

You can very simply add some properties to form2, like this:

public string Input1Value
{
  get
   { return txtInput1.Text;}
}
...

And call them from Form1 after the ShowDialog line.

It's not recommended to make the textboxes public.

  • 0

Ah ok... yep got it working, thanks for the help everyone.

I create the form by doing Form2.showDialog() and there is a close button on Form2 that onClick executes this.Close(). I assumed this meant the form was destroyed once the showDialog() line has passed. But even after close() and showDialog() the form's properties are still accesible.

Since the form is not destroyed when i thought it would be, when does it get destroyed??? When the application closes???

  • 0

If you want to do things a bit more deterministically, and close the form, you can do a couple of things.

1. you can overload your Form2 constructor to take a delegate to call when you have pressed OK on Form2 that passes state info back into Form1.

2. you can create an event in Form2 that Form1 can listen for to retrieve state info.

Realistically, you shouldn't try to access form2's properties after it has closed. You could effectively bring a disposed object back to life(zombie code!) and generate a memory leak.

Either of these options allows you to not worry about whether or not the form was cancelled, and let's you not worry about if properties on Form2 are null or disposed.

From MSDN:

  Quote
When a form is closed, all resources created within the object are closed and the form is disposed.

  • 0
  weenur said:
If you want to do things a bit more deterministically, and close the form, you can do a couple of things.

1. you can overload your Form2 constructor to take a delegate to call when you have pressed OK on Form2 that passes state info back into Form1.

2. you can create an event in Form2 that Form1 can listen for to retrieve state info.

Realistically, you shouldn't try to access form2's properties after it has closed. You could effectively bring a disposed object back to life(zombie code!) and generate a memory leak.

Either of these options allows you to not worry about whether or not the form was cancelled, and let's you not worry about if properties on Form2 are null or disposed.

From MSDN:

586257021[/snapback]

Why not hide the form, grab result properties, and then dispose it?

int result;
frm.Hide();
result = frm.uiresult;
frm.Dispose();

  • 0

You're creating a binding between form 1 and form 2 that's not needed.

// beware: pseudo-code

class Form2
{
 protected:
    Integer val1; // or some other wrapper-type that can be passed as a reference
    Integer val2;
    Integer val3;
    Integer val4;

public:

   // c`tor
   Form2(Integer value1, Integer value2, Integer value3, Integer value4)
   {
         assert(value1 != null);
         assert(value2 != null); 
         // ...

         val1 = value1;
         val2 = value2;
         // ....

       textBox1.SetText( val1.ToString() );
       textBox2.SetText( valu2.ToString() );
       // ...
   }

   void OnClose(...)
   {
      val1.setValue ( textBox1.GetText().ParseInt() );
      val2.setValue ( textBox2.GetText().ParseInt() ); 
      // etc...
   }
}


class Form1
{
public:
    void invokeForm2()
    {
        Integer val1 = new Integer(defaultValue1);
        Integer val2 = new Integer(defaultValue2);
        // etc...

       Form2 form2 = new Form2(val1, val2, val3, val4);
       form2.ShowModal();
       
       // values are assigned now
       MessageBox(NULL, val1.ToString(), NULL, NULL);
    }
}

Weenur's solution is elegant, especially if you want to react immediately when a value is updated.

  Quote
i recommand not calling this.Close()

try this code instead:

this.DialogResult = DialogResult.OK // or .Cancel

this.Opacity = 0

This is just plain stupid. Let's blow up the desktopheap with layered windows that have an opacity of 0!

  Quote
Why not hide the form, grab result properties, and then dispose it?

a) You're creating unneeded bindings between two forms.

b) you can't hide form2 if form1 is in a modal dialog loop.

c) You don't know for sure if the form is destroyed if the call to Show() returns. What if I press ALT+F4, which will close/destroy the window and its childs?

  • 0

actually, Ave, Close()'ing a form doesn't actually dispose it. you can wait for the ShowDialog() to finish and use the results. i find this approach more modular.

using(Form2 form=new Form2())
{
     if(form.ShowDialog()==DialogResult.OK)
    {
        // access own created properties on (form) Form2
    }
}

that's pretty nice. it'll open Form2, show it, when it's done, get the variables and Dispose() it when the "using" block is done.

  • 0

One issue is that you don't know when Dispose is being called or when Form2's finalizer is called. Yes, the "Hide(), access properties, close" solution would work. It does create tight coupling between your forms. That is a property you want to try to avoid. It stifles reuse. Yeah, I know that it maybe a canned solution, so reuse isn't an issue. It is still something to strive for, and the less coupling you have, the better.

  • 0
  weenur said:
From MSDN:

When a form is closed, all resources created within the object are closed and the form is disposed.

586257021[/snapback]

So attempting to access the form's properties after its .close() has been called is very dodgy then!

Ok lots of ideas here... ill try it one of those ways... thanks.

  • 0
  On 24/07/2005 at 19:45, AndreasV said:

You're creating a binding between form 1 and form 2 that's not needed.

// beware: pseudo-code

class Form2
{
 protected:
    Integer val1; // or some other wrapper-type that can be passed as a reference
    Integer val2;
    Integer val3;
    Integer val4;

public:

   // c`tor
   Form2(Integer value1, Integer value2, Integer value3, Integer value4)
   {
         assert(value1 != null);
         assert(value2 != null); 
         // ...

         val1 = value1;
         val2 = value2;
         // ....

       textBox1.SetText( val1.ToString() );
       textBox2.SetText( valu2.ToString() );
       // ...
   }

   void OnClose(...)
   {
      val1.setValue ( textBox1.GetText().ParseInt() );
      val2.setValue ( textBox2.GetText().ParseInt() ); 
      // etc...
   }
}


class Form1
{
public:
    void invokeForm2()
    {
        Integer val1 = new Integer(defaultValue1);
        Integer val2 = new Integer(defaultValue2);
        // etc...

       Form2 form2 = new Form2(val1, val2, val3, val4);
       form2.ShowModal();

       // values are assigned now
       MessageBox(NULL, val1.ToString(), NULL, NULL);
    }
}

Weenur's solution is elegant, especially if you want to react immediately when a value is updated.

This is just plain stupid. Let's blow up the desktopheap with layered windows that have an opacity of 0!

a) You're creating unneeded bindings between two forms.

b) you can't hide form2 if form1 is in a modal dialog loop.

c) You don't know for sure if the form is destroyed if the call to Show() returns. What if I press ALT+F4, which will close/destroy the window and its childs?

Hi, the pseudo-code is exactly what I'm looking for.

Only difference it's I'm with strings instead of int, but that shouldn't matter I believe.

I tried to implement it, but the value of the form1 is unchanged when I return after form2 is closed.

Do you see what I'm doing wrong? Thank you.

    public partial class ChoicesEnumForm : Form
    {
        String choiceSelected;
        Int32 val1;

        public ChoicesEnumForm(string[] choicesText, string choicesFormTitle, String choiceSelected, Int32 value1)
        {
            InitializeComponent();

            choiceSelected = this.choiceSelected;
            val1 = value1;
...
           //Create buttons and link the click event.
         }

        private void choiceButtonClick(Object sender, EventArgs ea)
        {                       
            choiceSelected = ((RibbonStyle.RibbonMenuButton2)sender).Text;
            val1 = 8;
            this.Close();
        }
}

public class MainForm : System.Windows.Forms.Form
    {
        void invokeForm1()
        {
            string[] textos = { "111", "222", "333", "444"};
            char[] choiceCharArr = new char[128];
            Int32 value1 = new Int32();

            String choice = new String(choiceCharArr);
            ChoicesEnumForm form = new ChoicesEnumForm(textos, "text", choice, value1);

            form.ShowDialog(this);

            // Values should be selection on 'form' (choice and value1)
            // But when I put breakpoint here, the value has not changed.

        }
    }

  • 0

I was able to make it work by creating a custom string class.

    public class CustomString
    {
        string X;

        public CustomString(string X)
        {
            this.X = X;
        }

        public void SetValue(string value)
        {
            X = value;
        }

        public string GetValue()
        {
            return X;
        }
    }

    public partial class ChoicesEnumForm : Form
    {
        CustomString choiceClicked = new CustomString("");

        public ChoicesEnumForm(string[] choicesText, string choicesFormTitle, ref CustomString choiceSelected)
        {
            InitializeComponent();

            this.Text = choicesFormTitle;

            choiceSelected = choiceClicked;
            ...
            //create buttons and link event to it
            button[x].Click += new EventHandler(choiceButtonClick);
         }

        private void choiceButtonClick(Object sender, EventArgs ea)
        {                       
            string valueSelected = ((Button)sender).Text;
            choiceClicked.SetValue(valueSelected);
            this.Close();
        }


//Parent form
        public void invokeForm()
        {    
            CustomString revSelected = new CustomString("");
            ChoicesEnumForm form = new ChoicesEnumForm(revisionChoices, "Choose revision of product " + GetProductNameSelected(), ref revSelected);

            form.ShowDialog(this);

            string revSelectedString = revSelected.GetValue();
        }

  • 0

Glad you solved it, but just so you know, the reason it worked once you made a custom class is because a string is a struct, not a class. Strings (structs) are passed by value instead of by reference. You could have passed the strings with the ref keyword instead of making a custom class.

  • 0

Here's another simple idea. Try adding a setForm1(Form1 form1) method into Form2. After creating (but before calling showDialog()) Form2, you could pass in a reference to form1. When the value has been set in Form2 (I'm not sure what way you're validating your data in the second form but I'm not sure there's an action listener), set a value in form1 (which you've now stored a reference to locally in Form2), e.g. form1.value = this.value; That way, the value gets passed to where you need it while Form2 is still open. This might not be the best way to preserve the OOP coding of the forms but it should work perfectly fine.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Wikipedia suffers backlash from human editors over AI summaries, prompting feature pause by David Uzondu Wikipedia editors have pushed back against plans from the Wikimedia Foundation to test AI-generated article summaries, powered by Aya, the open-weight AI model from Cohere. The non-profit has now paused the project. The decision came after a swift and overwhelmingly negative reaction from its community. As first reported by 404Media, the plan involved a two-week, opt-in trial on the mobile version of Wikipedia. But the volunteer editors who build the encyclopedia met the idea with immediate and fierce opposition. The project's discussion page became a torrent of rejection. It included simple comments like "Yuck" and blunt declarations like "strongest possible oppose" and "Absolutely not." One editor argued that a test would cause "immediate and irreversible harm to our readers and to our reputation as a decently trustworthy and serious source." They noted that Wikipedia has built its name on being sober and reliable, not flashy. Another feared it would destroy the site's collaborative model. They argued that while the "collective mass" of human editors "evens out into a beautiful corpus," the AI would install "one singular editor with known reliability and NPOV [neutral point-of-view] issues" at the very top of an article. That same editor also noted the following: For context, this is what AI-generated summaries on the platform was supposed to look like: Image: 404Media It is not hard to see why they are so protective. The editors' fears are grounded in recent and very public failures of AI features from tech giants. For example, Google's AI overviews recently hit 1.5 billion monthly users. The feature became a laughingstock for telling people to put glue on their pizza and that a dog had played in the NBA. This is the kind of humiliating error Wikipedia's community is desperate to avoid, as it would undermine two-plus decades of careful work. We also saw the potential for reputational damage back in January. That was when Apple's AI feature falsely generated a notification claiming that Luigi Mangione had died by suicide. The man was actually alive and in custody. On the site's technical discussion page earlier today, Marshall Miller (MMiller), a Senior Director at the Wikimedia Foundation, posted an update acknowledging the feedback. He admitted, "It's clear we could have done a better job introducing this idea," and confirmed the experiment was paused. The Foundation says the goal was to explore accessibility for different readers. While this specific test is off the table, the organization still wants to use new technologies. Miller ended with a promise: "We do not have any plans for bringing a summary feature to the wikis without editor involvement." A WMF spokesperson also told 404Media that though the feature has been paused, the foundation is still interested in AI-generated summaries. The spokesperson insisted the goal was to eventually build moderation systems where "humans remain central" and called this kind of backlash feedback part of what makes Wikipedia a "truly collaborative platform."
    • I see, yeah that makes sense. I have been in situations where I barely did not crush badly on the road due to other driver starting to change lanes into another car - freaked out last second and avoided it by crashing into the side of the bridge instead. i got away because I quickly changed lanes 2 times in a couple of second and unlike that idiot I did not lose control big part of this was my car was good 😊 (audi a7) vs the old van the crashed driver was driving would AI be able to react and quickly change lanes twice both time barely avoiding collision … I don’t know my car systems pumped the breaks and tried to warn me with a beep and vibration but if I slammed the breaks the car behind me would hit me then again I have BMW driver training and a good car - so I have no idea how robot taxi would react i am not sure extreme fast lane changes would be programmed in - it is dangerous as hell unless you are FULLY aware, and have done it before but it is a general risk to do it especially in the conditions with bad weather and when you are not driving a sports car with 4 wheel drive and very good control
    • PDF Arranger 1.12.1 by Razvan Serea PDF Arranger merges or splits PDF documents and rotates, crops and rearranges their pages using an interactive and intuitive graphical interface. It is a front end for pikepdf. It's available for Linux and Windows. PDF Arranger features: Merge double-sided scanned document Delete pages from a PDF file Rotate pages in a PDF file Merge multiple PDF documents Zoom in / out Export selected pages from a PDF Undo/redo support Duplicate PDF pages Crop white borders Supports importing encrypted PDF files Create a booklet from multiple pages Allow to edit Keywords, Subjects and dates in document info ...and more PDF Arranger 1.12.1 changelog: Fix incompatibility with Python 3.13.4 on Linux #1238 Update Dutch and Italian translation Download: PDF Arranger 1.12.1 | 42.6 MB (Open Source) Download: PDF Arranger Portable | PortableApps.com View: PDF Arranger Website | Other operating systems | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • If you can't sleep, work, or make out with your lady in the back of the car, then it isn't actually "full self driving"...and shouldn't be marketed lied about that way. It's actually just "driver assisted".
    • I’m happy to admit that I truly hate musk from the bottom of my heart. He provided me with PLENTY reasons.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      CHUNWEI earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Apprentice
      Cole Multipass went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Posting Machine
      David Uzondu earned a badge
      Posting Machine
    • One Month Later
      Stokenking earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      Kevin Jones earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      536
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      263
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      193
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      178
    5. 5
      snowy owl
      135
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!