• 0

[C++] Test if two files are the same?


Question

I'm not looking to test if two files are duplicates, I know you can do that by doing a byte by byte comparison, or hashing both files.

What I'm looking for is a way to test if both files are literally the same file. For example:

c:\documents and settings\bla.txt

c:\docume~1\bla.txt

When comparing the strings, those might be seen as two different files, when really they're the same file. I could convert both strings to short file names, but I'm not sure if Windows has other ways of linking files to eachother.

In brief, I need a foolproof way to test if two files are the same file or different.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/349791-c-test-if-two-files-are-the-same/
Share on other sites

21 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

Well i can just give you puesudo code:

Read both files and store the text inside, into two seperate strings

--> If string 1 == string 2

Do what you want to happen

You will have to check yourself, or let someone else find out how to read the files, since i haven't learned about reading files yet.

  • 0

So your question is how are you supposed to see if two files are identical without comparing contents of them!?

Btw, love your avatar - reminds me of when I was creating demos in DOS and I made effect that looked exactly as your avatar... heh..

  • 0

so let me see if i'm getting the question.

u have 1 file but have 2 different strings for the paths:

as in

Path 1 is C:\Docs\abc.txt

Path 2 is D:\Prog\Desktop\abc.txt

put the two paths in 2 string arrays. parse the arrays backwards till u reach the '\', from that point on again go forward till the end of the array and store this in 2 new arrays.

now compare these 2 arrays to chk if they are the same.

  • 0
  df_dukkar said:
so let me see if i'm getting the question.

u have 1 file but have 2 different strings for the paths:

as  in

Path 1 is C:\Docs\abc.txt

Path 2 is D:\Prog\Desktop\abc.txt

put the two paths in 2 string arrays. parse the arrays backwards till u reach the '\', from that point on again go forward till the end of the array and store this in 2 new arrays.

now compare these 2 arrays to chk if they are the same.

586278450[/snapback]

He wants to see if the files are the same, i.e. they contain the same stuff, but for some reason he doesn't want to open the file or uses hashes like an MD5sum.

  • 0

Sorry, let me reexplain :pinch:

c:\documents and settings\file.txt

c:\docume~1\file.txt

Technically, both are the same file, but doing a string comparison would say differently.

I have a function which has two parameters, inputfile and outputfile. If the outputfile is different than the inputfile, it will truncate the outputfile. But if the inputfile and outputfile are the same file, then it'll overwrite the current file.

I already mentioned that I could convert both strings to a short filename, but I'm unsure if there are other things to consider. For example, %systemroot%.

So I need a "foolproof" way of testing if the two strings both literally represent the same file. If converting to a short filename would be adequate, could someone give me a function that can do this? I was unable to find anything on Google or MSDN :blush:

And sorry for not being clearer in my first post :(

Btw, love your avatar - reminds me of when I was creating demos in DOS and I made effect that looked exactly as your avatar... heh..

My avatar is a XOR effect, (X ^ Y) ;)

Edit: Just to be absolutely sure I don't confuse anyone again...

I'm NOT looking to compare the contents of files.

I'm only looking to see if two file paths are the same.

eg. c:\docume~1\file.txt IS c:\documents and settings\file.txt. Only difference is one is the short file name and the other is the long file name.

Edited by xinok
  • 0

I dont really get why you would like to do that since they are always the same. That means instead of writing

cd "c:\documents and settings"

you can always use

cd c:\docume~1\

But if you really want to do that then it's only matter of stripping strings.

Reason that it stands docume~1 is that DOS cannot handle filenames larger than 8 characters, so "documents and settings" became "docume~1".

My recomendation is that you have some kind of translation table that translates docume~1 to its full name or use full path as input and strip it down to 6 characters and add "~1" to it.

  • 0
  xinok said:
but I'm not sure if Windows has other ways of linking files to eachother.

586278291[/snapback]

unfortunately windows does not have symlinks like in unix - this is how i understand link of similar (the same) files.

maybe i did not understand your post correctly, but if you want it not as part of some school assignment, what's the problem using 'comp' command?

i have it in the sendTo menu..

  • 0

NTFS supports both hard and soft links like ext2; these features are largely underused though.

There is an api function called GetShortPathName that will deal with 8.3 vs long format. The best way to detect all links/short/long would be to check which directory entry the directories ultimately point to. I think this approach would work only on a per-file-system basis (e.g., you need diff code for FAT32 and NTFS).

  • 0

Jayzee: I know what short file names are.

Andareed: Thanks for the GetShortPathName function

robotnic: I found this: CreateHardLink. It doesn't seem to exist in VC++ 6 though. I was hoping to create a hard link file, see what I can find out about them.

Taken from here:

A hard link to a file is indistinguishable from the original name for the file; there's no particular link that is more the "real name" for the file than any other.

I guess there isn't much I can do about hard link files.

Off Topic

Something thats just sort of bugging me, whats with all the typedef's and #define's in the C++ headers?

typedef LPCSTR LPCTSTR; typedef CONST CHAR *LPCSTR, *PCSTR; #define CONST const, typedef char CHAR; etc.

I really don't see the point. It just makes C++ harder to learn trying to memorize all these "types", and overall makes code harder to read if you don't know what a certain typedef or define is.

  • 0

I've actually written 2 apps for creating soft and hard links. If anyone wants, I can post them.

If you use CreateHardLink, you'll probably need to install the platform sdk and change the vc++ includes/libs directories. Interestingly, there is a new CreateSymbolicLink on msdn that only works with longhorn.

@xinok: these namings are generally acronyms. LPCTSTR means Long Pointer Const null-Terminating STRing. Another one is TCHAR, which is CHAR on ANSI and WCHAR on UNICODE. CHAR is char because win32 uses all caps for structures and primitives.

  • 0
  Andareed said:
I've actually written 2 apps for creating soft and hard links. If anyone wants, I can post them.

586280364[/snapback]

I'd appreciate it if I can get those apps :yes: And thanks ahead of time.
  • 0

Alright, I was able to solve this little riddle. First, creating a hard link file can be done from a command in windows:

fsutil hardlink create c:\output.txt c:\input.txt

Now testing for duplicates (I already tried this, it also locks hard link files):

We have the inputfile and outputfile

First, open the inputfile, but deny access to all other processes (lock the file)

Now try opening the outputfile. If it succeeds, the files are different. If it fails, continue...

Unlock the inputfile, and try opening the outputfile again. If it succeeds this time, then the files are the same. If it fails again, something else is wrong so return an error. :)

  • 0

Couldn't find softlink app but I based it on the code from here: http://www.codeproject.com/w2k/junctionpoints.asp

The hardlink app just uses CreateHardLink. There is also a sysinternals tool with source called junction: http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/Junction.html

  • 0
  df_dukkar said:
could u tell me how to lock down a file ??

586282181[/snapback]

I used the OpenFile function.

#include <windows.h>

char* file = "file.dat";

OFSTRUCT fileinfo;

long handle = OpenFile(file, &fileinfo, OF_SHARE_EXCLUSIVE);

  • 0
  Quote
PIDL's are only used in the shell.

That doesn't mean that you can still use them, if theu turn out to be usefull for your purpose.

You're right about hard and soft links tho. Maybe it's possible to use one of those Nt* API's to determine the file-block they 'link' too.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • "Linux, I gotta tell you, is the worst. I have never even heard about it, but everyone is talking about how it is the worst. Trump Office is a big, beautiful application, that will do, frankly, all the things very strongly."
    • WebSite-Watcher 2025 (25.4) by Razvan Serea WebSite-Watcher is a powerful yet simple website-monitoring tool, perfectly suited to the beginner and advanced user alike. If you can work with an email client, you can even work with WebSite-Watcher! The software places you in complete control over what gets checked, when it gets checked, and even how you are notified. WebSite-Watcher main features: Monitor web pages Monitor password protected pages Monitor forums for new postings and replies Monitor PDF/Word/Excel documents Monitor binary files Monitor local files Monitor RSS feeds, Newsgroups and local files Highlight changes in a page Powerful filter system to ignore unwanted content Many more features to stay up-to-date. Lots of other features: Additional actions when updates are detected - For example to play an alternative sound, send emails or open the changed page with another program. You configure the software to work the way you want. Powerful Plugin system - Bookmark checks can be enhanced with the integrated Plugin system. For example to monitor a page for a specific price and alert an update only if the price is less than USD 100. Plugins must be written in the programming language Basic. WebSite-Watcher contains an integrated development system, no other tools are required. Work with checked pages (Searches, Reports, etc.) - All monitored pages are saved to your hard drive. This allows you to quickly and simply open and view the monitored pages, search text in downloaded files and make reports... all without even having to be online. Archive pages permanently - Keep the information you need by archiving pages with our tool Local Website Archive. This can be done automatically via the bookmark properties or manually on demand. Synchronize bookmark files - Synchronize bookmarks between computers with the synchronize functionality. Backup and Restore - The integrated Backup/Restore feature allows you to backup and restore your settings, bookmarks and downloaded files into/from a zip archive. WebSite-Watcher 2025 (25.4) changelog: Workaround for a Windows bug that displays short flashing windows when checking bookmarks with the Chromium or Edge technology (this bug was introduced with one of the latest Windows updates and affects many software tools, including WebSite-Watcher). Highlight changes: Improvements for more exact highlights within paragraphs If a page uses CloudFront and cannot be monitored with the internal check technology, WebSite-Watcher will automatically use the Chromium technology Download Manager: files could not be downloaded after certain circumstances Download Manager: Improved file type detection based on the file content Dialup/Hangup re-implemented for better compatibility. This function is now based on rasdial.exe which is part of Windows. Plugins: the functions "Chr" and "Ord" work now with Unicode character codes The AutoBackup window is no longer displayed when WebSite-Watcher is minimized or in the tray bar Smaller fixes and improvements Download: WebSite-Watcher 2025 (25.4) | 148.0 MB (Shareware) View: WebSite-Watcher Website | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • If they don't subtitle it "the search for more money" I'll be a little miffed.  I mean, that was a play on "the search for Spock" which no one freaking knows anymore, but still, they literally named the sequel in the first movie, so ...   (regardless, with everyone still alive on board, I'm super happy)
    • It never was. I hear that year after year. It never becomes that.
    • I use it every day also and have never had an issue with any part of it not working OOTB. Maybe not year of the Linux, but I'm willing to bet there will be a fair amount of people making the switch in the next few months. I know I've helped switch a couple dozen people myself.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      NeoToad777 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      JoeV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      VAT Services in UAE earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      LsDmT earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      evershinefacilityservice earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      573
    2. 2
      ATLien_0
      246
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      162
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      144
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      113
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!