Recommended Posts

Never had that problem here its always detected my 1680x1050 capable monitor (DVI) strange problem that.

586293485[/snapback]

Yes, the first monitor works but my second does not work. And Nvidia drivers have no control over whats primary and secondary monitor. The start menu etc. shows up on secondary monitor, and windows/dialogs start up on primary. The secondary monitor is primary and opposite. :wacko: With ATI none of these problems occur :(

Edit: These drivers doesn't even support 1680x1050 at all, on any monitors. That's too bad cause the Vista window effects (fading etc) looks really nice :woot:

for those of you needing 1680x1050 resolution like me, here you go. I just replaced all of the 1600x1200 entries in nv_LH.inf to 1680x1050 and it works.

www.probotic.net/files/1680.rar

586295073[/snapback]

Thanks i'll try that out :woot:

Was just thinking of it myself... It's just numbers, so it should be easy to fix :p

Btw, wouldn't it be easier to just upload the .ini file ;)

Edited by GeeZuZz
Man, it still amazes me that some people think this is a real OS that they can use for day to day things. (ie: Screenshot above)

586296759[/snapback]

Dude, how are people supposed to find bugs / beta test the OS, if they dont treat it like so ?

Man, it still amazes me that some people think this is a real OS that they can use for day to day things. (ie: Screenshot above)

586296759[/snapback]

people like you are really annoying you are in every vista thread when anyone shows there bugs "ITS NOT A REAL OS!!!!" We know its not complete and we are doing our own unofficial compatibility list for what is compatible and what is not compatible so why don't you go to a photoshop thread and stick Mr T on more peoples faces.

people like you are really annoying you are in every vista thread when anyone shows there bugs "ITS NOT A REAL OS!!!!" We know its not complete and we are doing our own unofficial compatibility list for what is compatible and what is not compatible so why don't you go to a photoshop thread and stick Mr T on more peoples faces.

586296780[/snapback]

Listen ****, I have no problem with official beta testers doing their thing. It ****s me when I see these people who have clearly joined this forum because they have downloaded it illegally and wanting help trying to run BF2 on a BETA OS. :sleep:

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Are they on crack at M$? Surely living on an alternative reality? A good dump of mine would run faster down the toilet if I did not flush it. But still looks better than this pile of slop. By the way, did they also comment on what's the next "functionality added"? Maybe you can improve it if you add even more stuff to this vomitware.
    • I don't find them "bitchy" or "whiny". I think the term you should use it, uhm, "passionate."
    • Ahh, I didn't know that. It makes sense. I was thinking I would be fine with 50 hours, but 100 is close enough that I wouldn't feel like I am paying for more than I am using. I might check it out sometime.
    • Google's next-gen Tensor AI chips might be produced by Samsung, report says by Hamid Ganji Image via Google Google’s Tensor Processing Unit (TPU) is produced in collaboration with companies such as Broadcom and TSMC, but a recent report suggests that the search giant is in talks with Samsung to hand over part of the production to the Korean tech company. According to a report by The Information, citing people familiar with the matter, Google has begun talks with Samsung about using its chip manufacturing capacity for the next generation of Tensor AI chips. Google’s upcoming TPUs are reportedly codenamed “Icefish” and will be produced using Samsung's 2-nanometer process technology. Meanwhile, Samsung is expected to produce only a portion of the next-generation Tensor chips, with most of the production remaining at TSMC. The Information says the new Tensor chips are currently in the design stage and are scheduled to enter mass production in 2028. TSMC is generally considered one of the most reliable chip manufacturing partners and is trusted by tech giants such as Apple and Google. However, the growing demand for TSMC’s AI chips, combined with the company’s focus on meeting demand from AI data centers, has reportedly prompted Google to seek additional manufacturing partners for its next-generation TPUs. Besides Samsung and TSMC, Intel could also be assigned part of the production. The Information reported this week is that Google has begun talks with Intel to produce up to three million TPUs in 2028. However, this is not the first time Google has partnered with Samsung on chip production, as Samsung has previously manufactured Tensor chips for Pixel smartphones. Google’s Tensor Processing Unit is used in cloud data centers and competes with NVIDIA’s chips, which currently dominate the market. By relying on in-house chips, Google can not only reduce its dependence on third-party providers but also create new revenue opportunities. The company has already supplied its TPUs to the AI firm Anthropic.
    • Reminder that the Premium and Ultimate plans already come with a 100 hour per month limit, which you then have to pay more to increase in 15 hour blocks.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      FBSPL earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      Jim Dugan earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Tommi118 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      488
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      196
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      155
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      ATLien_0
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!