Recommended Posts

Use this instead of the Creative drivers.  You'll get an error upon the first reboot, but audio won't be garbled anymore.

http://download.kxproject.lugosoft.com/dow...rv3537-full.exe

586298630[/snapback]

Thanks, i'll give it a go. Does it install and reconise the card as an Audigy 2 zs still, or just an audigy like the official drivers. Also does allt he EAX and stuff work?

It's really too bad that we've got to use third party drivers for this. I always thought Creative kind of lagged behind on driver/software development and it really shows here - every other designed-for-XP driver I've used on Vista b1 has worked perfectly. This is honestly the only thing stopping me from running this full time, and it's unfortunate that Creative is so behind the curve.

Here's hoping that Creative will catch up quickly. I understand that http://preview.creative.com is their beta projects page?

edit=nope, that may not be it.

From another thread -- YouP drivers for Audigy http://www.driverheaven.net/showthread.php...&highlight=youp

I have NOT tested these as of yet.

Since I couldnt get my onboard realtek ac'97 drivers to function properly, i broke down and went out and bought a soundblaster audigy 2 value card. to get vista to install, since the install app would not work, said could not detect audigy 2 on system, i DLed the latest drivers, extracted them with winrar and went to the drivers folder and ran the exe, this worked. Now I have beautiful crisp sound in vista.

The original poster's drivers work fine for me. I had the official creative ones installed previously, but after a while sound became garbled. Installed the ones he suggested, and songs playback fine once more. Although I do get the "could not detect your device" message on each boot; I can live with that.

Since I couldnt get my onboard realtek ac'97 drivers to function properly, i broke down and went out and bought a soundblaster audigy 2 value card. to get vista to install, since the install app would not work, said could not detect audigy 2 on system, i DLed the latest drivers, extracted them with winrar and went to the drivers folder and ran the exe, this worked. Now I have beautiful crisp sound in vista.

586299408[/snapback]

Which driver file specifically?

The original poster's drivers work fine for me. I had the official creative ones installed previously, but after a while sound became garbled. Installed the ones he suggested, and songs playback fine once more. Although I do get the "could not detect your device" message on each boot; I can live with that.

586299647[/snapback]

Good to hear :)

well  i get error every boot....no sound !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!  i got sound with creative driveres  but  horrible sound.......... i tryed the direct sound fix  from 5048... totally screwed up  vista///// had to reinstall ////  any one else know a fix

586300519[/snapback]

32 bit AND THIS IS GIVING ME THE ****s//////////////// my mate has a audgity 1 and his WORKS FINE

2 zs r crap//...///./

Just so you all know... installing the drivers will only give ok sound ... Using the PAX drivers off of driverheaven are exactly the same drivers as the creatives... just tweaked.

It appears the "media Technologies" in the Creative suite keep directinput and other "directx" features out... like the "what you hear" feature... If you run the Creative Diagnostics.. you will get 3 errors... One error you get is if you run the diagnostics....is a Framework crash.. Sorry about all the dots...<

the driver version in dxdiag on Vista show as {0.0.0}{HEXADECIMAL VALUE PID HERE} SO.. until we see new drivers.. no use to me.. if you want to change ur EAX feature.. go to the Console.

Just so you all know... installing the drivers will only give ok sound ... Using the PAX drivers off of driverheaven are exactly the same drivers as the creatives... just tweaked.

It appears the "media Technologies" in the Creative suite keep directinput and other "directx" features out... like the "what you hear" feature...  If you run the Creative Diagnostics.. you will get 3 errors... One error you get is if you run the diagnostics....is a Framework crash..  Sorry about all the dots...<

the driver version in dxdiag on Vista show as {0.0.0}{HEXADECIMAL VALUE PID HERE}  SO.. until we see new drivers.. no use to me.. if you want to change ur EAX feature.. go to the Console.

586300912[/snapback]

i just want normal sound.....I DONT CARE BOUT EAX AND ALL THAT C**P !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ,,,,,,

I just got this working and posted it over on the Creative boards. I havent played with EAX yet, but I got this to work w/o any 3rd party drivers, all Creative and I havent had garbled audio for hours.

Ill be quick about this cause I know like most of you I was banging my head as to how to get this to work. This is what I did and its been playinng for hours without any garble. If you deviate from what I have done, post it if theres a quicker way.

I installed the drivers from the disc that I got with the set, you will get alot of errors but it should still install fine. I would also assume you can DL the orginal NOV19 driver and install under compatability mode. (DL to desktop--->right click---->properties----->compatability and change to XP) install and reboot.

Next, I installed the 2nd driver set (april5) and instead of installing under compatibilty mode, I opened the .exe with WINRAR and went to Drivers---->Support----->i386----->ctzapxx.exe and select "driver install" and leave "overwrite existing drivers" unchecked.

Reboot and let me know how it worked.

It's really too bad that we've got to use third party drivers for this. I always thought Creative kind of lagged behind on driver/software development and it really shows here - every other designed-for-XP driver I've used on Vista b1 has worked perfectly. This is honestly the only thing stopping me from running this full time, and it's unfortunate that Creative is so behind the curve.

Here's hoping that Creative will catch up quickly. I understand that http://preview.creative.com is their beta projects page?

edit=nope, that may not be it.

From another thread -- YouP drivers for Audigy http://www.driverheaven.net/showthread.php...&highlight=youp

I have NOT tested these as of yet.

586299050[/snapback]

http://preview.creativelabs.com/default.aspx

I found that once you have any drivers installed, some degree of garbled/glitched sound can be eliminated by disabling hardware acceleration. Its suspected that DirectSound is the culprit of the glitching, as for me the glitching is a progressive problem, one that gets worse and worse as sounds are played.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!